[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Business/Finance See other Business/Finance Articles Title: The FBI pushes Congress to alter Silicon Valley’s “business model” When the FBI killed capitalism, quips the civil liberties blogger Marcy Wheeler on Twitter. Here we go again: The feds say Silicon Valley needs to rethink its business model. We return today to the topic of end-to-end encryption -- the security technology Apple has built into the current version of iOS and Google has built into the current version of Android. It means that only the sender and the recipient of a message can unlock it, explains Andrea Peterson at The Washington Post -- so, basically, only each end of the conversation holds the keys. That also means its impossible for the feds to read intercepted messages. The feds dont like that, and theyve been squawking about it for well over a year. The squawking has grown since the attacks in Paris -- never mind that the killers used unencrypted text messages to communicate. The feds want Silicon Valley to build a back door into their products so the feds can get access. The problem is that a back door would also let in hackers, foreign governments and so on. You cant have a back door in the software because you cant have a back door thats only for the good guys, Apple CEO Tim Cook once explained. Other tech experts have said the feds are expecting a unicorn. But FBI chief James Comey wont give up: Yesterday, he told credulous senators that its not a technical issue
Its a business model question. The question we have to ask is: Should they change their business model? Oy. Virtually all of the senators fawned all over his remarks and pledged to go even farther than the FBI director wanted, writes a discouraged Trevor Timm from the Freedom of the Press Foundation. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, ranking member on the powerful Intelligence committee, said she was working on a bill to outlaw such encryption tools
Even Comey admitted this type of law wouldnt stop terrorists from using encryption. After all, theyve been using encryption for decades, and even now, the top five encrypted applications ISIS supposedly recommends to their followers are either open-source (meaning the code is already all over the Internet), made by companies in other countries or both
So basically what the FBI director is proposing, concludes Mr. Timm, is that we lower everyones security for the applications that are popular with hundreds of millions of people -- even if terrorists will still be able to use encryption unimpeded. Sounds like a hell of a business model to us
Poster Comment: Back doors are not just for the good guys. As we used to say on the CB when we were driving the big truck, "Bend over and back up." LOL Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
They have a very simple agenda in politics -- ruin goodthings and make bad ones worse. The moral hubris they show with every move is shocking.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|