[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: 'Third Prominent Eyewitness' to the San Bernardino Shooting? Not So Fast. There's plenty of documented evidence that the San Bernardino shooting is not what we're being told. Multiple eyewitness reported three shooters, along with several TV and print newscasts referring to the hunt for three shooters. There were also active shooter drills going on that the same time. Heck, even neocon government boot-lickers Pamela Geller and Rush Limbaugh, of all people, are asking questions about the third shooter. This is all great. However, this latest claim that is circulating on conspiracy sites about a 'third prominent eyewitness' who was called and told to change his story does not pass the smell test. Blacklisted News, along with many other alternative and conspiracy websites, ran the same story, 'Third Eyewitness To San Bernardino Shooting Says It Wasn't 'Terror Couple' Who Carried Out Attack' [Note that they misspelled his first name as Chirs instead of Chris.] Christopher Nwadike, a co-worker of Sayd Farook, was interviewed by the L.A. Times, Wall Street Journal, and many others where he admitted that he was in the bathroom when the shooting started and hid on the floor until rescue crews arrived to the bathroom. He never saw ANY shooter, much less his co-worker and his Muslim wife, or three tall white military men, or anyone else. Also, it's the very L.A. Times video of Nwadike that is circulating on conspiracy sites, as 'proof' of a false flag. Nowhere does either Nwadike or the L.A. Times claim that Nwadike saw the shooters, and they certainly never claim that Nwadike was called by some "secretive ominous guy" telling him to change his story. There's plenty of legit evidence here, let's not poison the well. Below is the L.A. Times video they are referring to. First of all, he's jibbering in broken English, you can hardly understand what he's saying. And most importantly, he admitted numerous times, it's probably published in hundreds or thousands of newspapers, that he was in the bathroom when the shooting started and hid on the floor until rescue crews arrived to the bathroom. He never saw ANY shooter, be it his co-worker Sayd Farook and his Muslim wife, or the three tall white military men, or anyone else. Of course the government does false flags but there is plenty of evidence, we don't need to make up witnesses or stretch the truth into something it's not. That will just serve to 'poison the well' and discredit those who want to teach the general public about false flags and black-ops. [Article continues here.] Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil rights advocate. His work has been featured in the Los Angeles Daily News, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, The Orange County Register, KNBC4 TV Los Angeles, The Press Enterprise, LewRockwell.com, WhatReallyHappened.com, Infowars.com, PrisonPlanet.com, Economic Policy Journal, TargetLiberty.com, FreedomsPhoenix, Haaretz, TMZ, and many others. Archives can be found at LibertyFight.com and DontWakeMeUp.Org. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: Artisan (#0)
Another trolling Nigerian?
He never said what the conspiracy sites claim. Its a very stupid story that will make it very easy for statists to dismiss false flags entirely. The black guy in the 60 second vid never claims any of what they claim. He told the la times the truth, which is that he was in the bathroom with coworkers on the floor. Some people will do anything for click bait.
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||