[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson

Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest

Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music

Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok

Trump wants concealed carry in DC.

Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River

COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS.

Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker

Test post re: IRS

How Managers Are Using AI To Hire And Fire People

Israel's Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS

14 Million Illegals Entered US in 2023: The Cost to Our Nation

American Taxpayers to Cover $3.5 Billion Pentagon Bill for U.S. Munitions Used Defending Israel

The Great Jonny Quest Documentary


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: We Stopped Mass Murder
Source: AmmoLand.com
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/12/no_author/stopped-mass-murders/
Published: Dec 14, 2015
Author: Rob Morse
Post Date: 2015-12-14 12:04:32 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 132
Comments: 10

Louisiana - Islam declared war on unarmed civilians. It is the muslim way, after all. We’ve watched our politician dither. What should ordinary citizens like us do? Despite their heartfelt desire, Police and Sheriff’s Deputies cannot be everywhere to protect us. Law enforcement does their best, but we need to protect ourselves until help arrives. We have. Armed citizens stopped mass murder. Ordinary people like you and me saved lives time after time.

Sure, President Obama wants us disarmed. He is wrong. Ordinary citizens like us are the secret weapon in the defense against terrorism and mass violence. The average man or woman in the United States can be armed and effective. We have been.

That isn’t speculation on my part. We have proof. Here are a few of the many examples.

Armed civilians stopped mass murders in ordinary settings.

-John Hendricks was driving his car for Uber in Chicago, Illinois. Mister Hendricks had just dropped off a passenger when he saw a man yell, draw a gun, and start shooting at the crowd standing nearby. One of the attacker’s bullets actually hit Hendricks’ car. Mister Hendricks shot the armed attacker and called 911. Hendricks walked up to police with his arms raised and his concealed carry license in hand. The attacker lived. Mister Hendricks saved many lives.

-A man was turned away from a Portland, Oregon nightclub. The man came back wearing a mask and carrying a gun. He shot one of the club’s bouncers and two other people in the club. Jonathan Baer was also working as a bouncer at the club. Baer had a concealed carry license and was carrying that night. He shot and killed the attacker. We will never know how many people in the club or outside might have also been shot in the minutes it took for the police to arrive.

-Aaron Guyton saw a man pull a shotgun from his car and walk towards the nearby church. Gayton is a concealed carry holder and was working in another church building not far away. He quickly slipped into the main church building and locked the doors.. even though a church service was in session. He called police and sounded the alarm. Parishioners stood ready as the attacker kicked in the church’s side door. Aaron Gayton held the attacker at gunpoint as other parishioners grabbed his shotgun. They held the attacker until Spartanburg, South Carolina sheriff’s deputies arrived. The deputies confirmed that the shotgun was loaded.

-Two men started arguing in a crowded Philadelphia barber shop. The barber asked them to calm down since they were disturbing other customers. Instead, one of the two men pulled a gun from his clothing and started shooting at customers and the barbers. An armed citizen happened to be walking down the street at that time. He heard the gunshots, stepped into the shop, and shot the gunman once. He saved at least a half-dozen lives including four adults and children. Quoting Philadelphia Police Captain Frank Llewellyn. “The person who responded was a legal gun permit carrier.”

“He responded and I guess he saved a lot of people in there.”

-Dr. Lee Silverman is a Pennsylvania psychiatrist. He was treating a mental patient at a hospital when the patient became violent. The mental patient pulled a gun from his bag. The patient then shot and killed his case worker before he turned the gun on his doctor. The doctor moved and the bullet grazed the doctor’s head. The doctor then retrieved his own firearm from his desk and shot the attacker. The patient lived. The patient had 39 more cartridges in his bag when he was stopped. The doctor saved perhaps dozens of victims, including both hospital staff and patients. 10 percent of all workplace violence occurs in medical facilities. These facilities are often called gun-free zones.

-Sean Barner went to a birthday party in Atlanta, Georgia. He wondered why the 9 other people at the party were sitting on the floor so quietly as he walked in. That was when two robbers put a gun against Mister Barner’s back. The robbers took their valuables before separating the men and women. Barner heard the armed robbers mention raping the women, and heard them say they had enough bullets to finish everyone at the party. When he had a chance, Barner retrieved his own firearm rather than escape. The first criminal ran. The second robber was shot. The attacker died on the front lawn. All 10 of the victims lived. The first attacker was arrested and convicted of felony murder.

An ordinary citizen stopped mass murder at a birthday party.

-There was a long standing feud between two families in Winnemucca, Nevada. A member of one family walked up and fatally shot two members of the other family. Two other people were injured. A bystander saw the murder take place and shot the attacker. The bystander was briefly detained by police before being released. This happened at the Players Bar and Grill filled with about 300 people.

-Two gunmen armed with recently stolen handguns robbed the Shoney’s restaurant in Anniston, Alabama. At least they tried. The robbers herded the 20 customers and staff into the walk-in freezer. They held the store manager at gunpoint and continued to rob the cash register. One customer had escaped the robbery. This customer tried to sneak out the restaurant’s back door, but the back door was chained shut. One of the robbers saw the customer and pointed his gun at him. This lone customer, Thomas Glenn Terry, was also carrying a licensed pistol. Mister Terry pulled his firearm and shot the robber 5 times striking him in the chest and abdomen. The second thief shot at Mister Terry. Mister Terry shot the thief several times and caused critical injuries. Thomas Glenn Terry then released the hostages from the freezer and called police.

We usually think of “mass public murders” happening in crowded malls, schools or churches. They do. I also reported that concealed carriers also stop mass murder in those crowded settings. The eight examples above are far more frequent and generally involve fewer people at risk. They are important as well. Each example demonstrated the threat of lethal force by the attacker. In addition, there were at least 4 people who could have been killed if the citizen gun owner had not intervened. Would every one of these events turned into a mass public shootings? We will never know because a legally armed citizen stopped them.

You seldom see examples of civilian self-defense covered in the news. The reasons are easy to understand. Most self-defense incidents end without gunshots. In the rare instance when the gun is fired, the number of people injured is usually confined to the attacker. That isn’t sensational news. In short, it is easy to report when many lives are lost. It is hard to report when many lives are saved. I report on citizen self-defense every week. Armed citizens defend themselves every day. They save lives in private.. and when they are out in public. You always suspected that was true. Now you know.

It is easy to report when many lives are lost. It is hard to report when many lives are saved.

President Obama never noticed. You did. You set firearms sales records on Black Friday. Thank you.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

This is exactly why we should have Constitutional Carry.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-12-14   12:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Lod (#1)

This is exactly why we should have Constitutional Carry.

All federal gun control laws are unconstitutional.

Ada  posted on  2015-12-14   13:22:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#2)

Indeed they are, and that's what Constitutional Carry is all about. If you own it, you can carry it openly or concealed; your choice, anywhere and any time.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-12-14   13:31:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod, Ada (#1)

This is exactly why we should have Constitutional Carry.

We do.

The laws which infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms are unconstitutional.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall’s crystal-clear wording is below.

Here is the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Marbury v Madison:

The powers of the Legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the Constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may at any time be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed

Between these alternatives (limited and unlimited government) there is no middle ground. The Constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.

If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law; if the latter part be true, then written Constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.

Certainly all those who have framed written Constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be that an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void.

… So, if a law be in opposition to the Constitution, if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular case, … those, then, who controvert the principle that the Constitution is to be considered in court as a paramount law are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution, and see only the law.

This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written Constitutions. It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that, if the Legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It would be giving to the Legislature a practical and real omnipotence with the same breath which professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure.

That it thus reduces to nothing what we have deemed the greatest improvement on political institutions — a written Constitution, would of itself be sufficient, in America where written Constitutions have been viewed with so much reverence, for rejecting the construction. But the peculiar expressions of the Constitution of the United States furnish additional arguments in favour of its rejection.

… Why otherwise does it direct … an oath to support it? This oath certainly applies in an especial manner to their conduct in their official character. How immoral to impose it on them if they were to be used as the instruments, and the knowing instruments, for violating what they swear to support!

The oath of office, too, imposed by the Legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words:

I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.

Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the Constitution of the United States if that Constitution forms no rule for his government?

… If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe or to take this oath becomes equally a crime.

It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument (the US Constitution).

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2015-12-14   13:55:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Southern Style (#4)

Until this correct concept is much, much, more widely embraced by local LEOs, I'll not be strapping on a hawg and strolling around.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-12-14   14:02:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Lod (#5)

I'll not be strapping on a hawg and strolling around.

Not quite ready to push the issue, eh?

Well, I understand. Save whatever good fights you may have in you for the mother of all battles.

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2015-12-14   14:20:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Southern Style (#6)

My first battle will likely be my last.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-12-14   14:23:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Lod (#7)

My first battle will likely be my last.

I suspect you sell yourself short.

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2015-12-14   14:28:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Lod (#7)

Your first battle will likely be vs roving bands of starving chimps. I like your odds of surviving that.

Obnoxicated  posted on  2015-12-14   16:11:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Obnoxicated (#9)

You're right, the primates are the least of my worries right now.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-12-14   16:27:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]