[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Israel/Zionism See other Israel/Zionism Articles Title: The Jewish Lie - Anatomy of a False Dichotomy Anatomy of a False Dichotomy “Like the Indian idol Vishnu they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion.” – Protocols of Zion The purpose of a false dichotomy is to pretend to cover the entire spectrum of opinion of a given topic, so that people pick their position from within the confines rather than outside of it. It is crucial to understand that the Jewish lie never tries to convince people to choose one position or the other within the false dichotomy; all it tries to do is keep the debate as a whole inside the false dichotomy. One easy way to construct a false dichotomy is by verbal obfuscation. This consists of constructing a dichotomy out of two apparent poles so as to lead people to assume all possible positions lie somewhere between these poles, thereby discouraging them from considering the options outside. EXAMPLE 1 “Gun control” vs “Gun liberty” Michael Wiener Savage (Jew), professional liar This has produced a wrongheaded debate between firearm-loving conservatives who believe that firearm ownership is a fundamental liberty, and firearm-hating liberals who believe that all civilian firearm ownership should be banned. This leads either to conservatives being better-armed than liberals, or police and criminals being better-armed than civilians, neither of which threatens Jewish power. It, however, hides the truth that truly threatens Jewish power: that the people who hate firearms most are the ones who most deserve to be armed, because firearm ownership is not a liberty but a duty. EXAMPLE 2 “Debt currency” vs “Gold currency” David de Rothschild (Jew), professional liar This has produced a wrongheaded debate between creditbugs who support creating money as debt, and goldbugs who support backing money by gold (or other precious metals). This hides the position that truly threatens Jewish power: that money should be backed by the labour of a citizen of the country inside which alone the money has purchasing power. “One has to grant that extraordinarily clever tactics are being used, and that it takes some intelligence or sound instincts to see behind the Jewish facade. … They are virtuosos at the art of transformation. They can appear in a thousand forms, yet are always the same. If one has caught them, they claim injured innocence and send their guard of pity on ahead to beg for mercy. But if one extends them even a finger of pity, they chop the whole hand off.” – Joseph Goebbels Another easy way to construct a false dichotomy is by verbal misassociation. This consists of putting two irrelevant or even contradictory terms together as though they are two facets of the same idea, and then presenting this fake idea as one pole of the dichotomy. Whether the gullible agrees or disagrees with this pole, he has been deceived. The only way to not be deceived is to destroy the pole by pulling the terms back apart. EXAMPLE 3 “Science & Reason” vs “Religion” Sam Harris (Jew), professional liar This has produced a wrongheaded debate between anti-religionists who believe that religion is intrinsically unscientific and unreasonable, and religionists who try to prove that religion supports the findings of empirical science in order to prove that religion is reasonable. This leads to empiricism – hence materialism – becoming the standard by which the value of various religions are measured, thereby hiding the truth that threatens Jewish power: that Aryan religion was originally designed as a way to transcend the material. EXAMPLE 4 “Freedom & Democracy” vs “Tyranny” Tzipi Livni (Jew), professional liar This has produced a wrongheaded debate between proto-libertarians who believe they have to defend democracy in order to support freedom, and proto-fascists who believe they have to disparage the concept of freedom in order to destroy democracy. This hides the position that truly threatens Jewish power: that democracy is a form of tyranny (of majority opinion over minority opinion), and thus the quest for freedom begins by rising against democracy along with all other forms of tyranny. EXAMPLE 5 “Racism & Anti-Semitism” vs “Anti-Racism” Abraham Foxman (Jew), professional liar This has produced a wrongheaded debate between racists who believe that opposition to Jewish domination is merely part of their glorified allergy towards anything and everything not of one’s own ethnotribe, and well-meaning anti-racists who correctly condemn racism but who incorrectly insist on using Jews as the primary example of victims of racism. This hides the position that truly threatens Jewish power: that Jews should be opposed precisely because they themselves are among the most committed racists in the world, and that the anti-Zionist movement must therefore associate itself not with racism but with honest anti-racism. (If ever accused of racism against Jews during your anti-Zionist activism, never forget to point out that it was not we but Jews themselves who introduced the racial identity of ”Jewishness” into the discussion to begin with. In other words, it was never we who intended to keep us separate from them, but they who ever insist on keeping themselves separate from us. Therefore it is not we but they who are the racists. In all cases, the racist side is the side which drew the line of ethnic apartheid in the first place. Jewish use of the term “anti-Semite” rather than ”anti-Jewish” is an attempt to camouflage this. Our best way to intercept is by enthusiasm on our part to accept non-Jewish Semitic-speaking peoples into our folk.) EXAMPLE 6 “Judeo-Christianity” vs “Islam” Geert Wilders (Jew), professional liar This has produced a wrongheaded debate between four(!) sides: i) ZC Judeo-Christians who believe Muslims are the enemy and that Jews are on their side ii) BS Muslims who believe that both Jews and Christians are enemies iii) BS Judeo-Christians who believe that both Jews and Muslims are enemies iv) well-meaning nonreligious anti-Zionists who believe that Christianity and Mohammedanism must first be completely abandoned in order to effectively oppose Jewish domination thereby hiding the true position that threatens Jewish power: that Jesus and Mohammed – both of whom were murdered for fighting against Jewry - would have been best friends and perfect teammates had they lived in the same era, and that a genuinely united Christian-Mohammedan force today (hopefully under the prophesized joint leadership of the Second Christ and the Mahdi) could defeat Zionism with ease. “In the long run they all swallow the same hash, even though it be dished up with different spices. In both cases the cook is one and the same – the Jew.” – Adolf Hitler However, the deeper false dichotomies rely not on the relatively crude technique of verbal misassociation, but on a more advanced technique of verbal misdirection. This consists of choosing terms which together encourage movement within the topic inside the wrong dimension altogether. EXAMPLE 7 “Individual Rights vs Collective Rights” Alisa Rosenbaum Ayn Rand (Jew), professional liar By setting individual rights and collective rights in apparent opposition, we are led to forget that the very notion of ”rights” is a manifestation of indulgence, and hence to fail to see that it is upon indulgence that Zionism thrives. An individual who desires survival or power or glory or any other indulgence for himself is structurally no different than an entire civilization that desires the same for itself, and a society composed of individually non-indulgent people can be indulgent as a whole – and be similarly manipulated. Only those persons or civilizations whose mindset is based on serving a non-self-referential purpose (ie. Aryan individuals and Aryan folkdom) are able to leave the Goy Wheel. In presenting us a choice between two types of indulgence, our enemies hope that we may forget the idea of service altogether, and thus stay on the Goy Wheel forever. This is the Zionist pre-emptive defence against critical thinking, which is solely capable of scrutinizing the validity or invalidity of what has already been presented. (Critical thinkers thus become the most effective useful idiots, as they make the discussion sound intelligent while actually keeping it where the Zionists want it.) This technique is only overcome by lateral thinking that is willing to consider what has not been brought up. But don’t worry about the words used to formulate those assumptions, arguments and conclusions. Otherwise you might see the Jewish lie, and we don’t want that to happen, do we? For instance, consider a Zionist agent saying: “X is better than Y because of Reasons 1, 2 and 3.” (They do this all the time with various Xs and Ys, such as “black” people and “white” people, “homosexuals” and “heterosexuals”, big government and small government, etc.) There are three possible types of response. The uncritical thinker’s response is to accept that X is better than Y. Thus he is being herded, as it is perfectly possible for Jews to anticipate and prepare for this outcome. The critical thinker’s response is to examine the validity of Reasons 1, 2 and 3. If he finds that Reasons 1, 2 and 3 are invalid, he will reject that X is better than Y, and may even start believing that Y is actually better than X. Thus he is still being herded, albeit by reverse-bluff, because it is also perfectly possible for Jews to anticipate and prepare for this outcome. The lateral thinker’s response, on the other hand, is to ask: “Why are we even comparing X and Y? Why don’t we compare _____ and _____ instead?” The lateral thinker rejects the entire X-Y paradigm, and it is impossible for Jews to anticipate (let alone prepare for) what _____ and _____ might be. Thus only lateral thinking is anti-Zionist thinking. Poster Comment: This is extracted from a longer piece at the source. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Horse (#0)
Ya gotta be shittin me ! "Honest, April 15th is the real April Fool's Day". "The almighty Dollar ain't worth a buck". Doug Scheidt
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||