[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)

France reacted to the words of a US senator on sanctions against allies

Trump nominates former Soros executive for Treasury chief

SCOTUS asked to review if Illinois can keep counting mail-in ballots 2 weeks after election day

The Real Reason Government Workers Are Panicking About ElonÂ’s New Tracking System

THEY DON'T CARE ANYMORE!

Young Americans Are Turning Off The TV

Taxpayer Funded Censorship: How Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars To Silence Your Voice

"Terminator" Robot Dog Now Equipped With Amphibious Capabilities

Trump Plans To Use Impoundment To Cut Spending - What Is It?

Mass job losses as major factory owner moves business overseas

Israel kills IDF soldiers in Lebanon to prevent their kidnap

46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days

In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law

MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!!

Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits

Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon

FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate...

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt.

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Top Cardinal Blasts 'Da Vinci Code' as 'Cheap Lies'
Source: Netscape News
URL Source: http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/ns/news ... 2&dt=20050315130200&w=RTR&covi
Published: Mar 15, 2005
Author: Reuters
Post Date: 2005-03-15 17:59:13 by Mr Nuke Buzzcut
Keywords: Cardinal, Blasts, Cheap
Views: 8659
Comments: 568

Top Cardinal Blasts 'Da Vinci Code' as 'Cheap Lies'

ROME (Reuters) - A top Catholic cardinal has blasted "The Da Vinci Code" as a "gross and absurd" distortion of history and said Catholic bookstores should take the bestseller off their shelves because it is full of "cheap lies."

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, in an interview with the Milan newspaper Il Giornale, became the highest ranking Italian Churchman to speak out against the book, an international blockbuster that has sold millions of copies.

"(It) aims to discredit the Church and its history through gross and absurd manipulations," Bertone, the archbishop of the northern Italian city of Genoa and a close friend of Pope John Paul told the paper in its Monday edition.

"This seems like a throwback to the old anti-clerical pamphlets of the 1800s," he said.

The central claim of the book, written by American Dan Brown, is that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had children. The Bible says Jesus never married, was crucified and rose from the dead.

Bertone's comments were significant because until the Pope named him archbishop of Genoa in 2003 he was for years the number two man at the Vatican's most powerful department - the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

"You can find that book everywhere and the risk is that many people who read it believe that those fairy tales are real," he said. "I think I have the responsibility to clear things up to unmask the cheap lies contained in books like that."

HOLY GRAIL

A central storyline of the book is that the Holy Grail is not the cup which Christ is said to have used at the Last Supper but really the bloodline descended from Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Bertone calls this idea "a perversion."

Bertone is so incensed about the novel that he will be the key speaker at a roundtable in Genoa Wednesday night attempting to dismantle the book, which also accuses the Church of covering up the female role in Christianity.

"I will try to clear things up and help form consciences," the cardinal said.

"I think that when faced with affirmations that are so shameful and unfounded, readers who have even a minimum of basic (Christian) formation should react," he said.

He said it was "sad" that even Catholic bookstores were selling The Da Vinci Code "for purely economic reasons."

One bookstore selling "The Da Vinci Code" is the one in the Gemelli Hospital, a Catholic institution where the Pope spent a total of 28 days in two stints in February and March.

In the interview, Bertone firmly rejected the book's claim that the feminine role in Christianity had been suppressed.

"This is one of the most vulgar of inventions. The feminine element is present in all the Gospels," Bertone said.

Bertone also strongly defended Opus Dei, the conservative Church organization that the book depicts as a ruthless, Machiavellian group that resorts even to murder in its attempt to keep the Church's secrets hidden.

The novel is going to reach an even wider audience next year with the release of a film based on the book staring Tom Hanks.

© Copyright Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of Reuters Ltd.

03/15/2005 13:02 RTR

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-335) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#336. To: Don (#335)

How? With a single word: Sarcasm..

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-03-16   21:32:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#337. To: Jhoffa_ (#336)

Sarcasm is a wonderful art to develop.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   21:34:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#338. To: noone222 (#138)

My sister had a near death experience, which she detailed for me. I don't say this is proof of anything ... but it's a little shred of evidence !

You may find it compelling, but it does not rise to the level of "evidence."

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   21:51:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#339. To: Continental Op (#141)

You stated that the Bible was a "work of fiction."

And it is. Those of us who read books realize that writers often wrap their fiction around actual historical events. That doesn't magically turn their stories into truth.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   21:52:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#340. To: Continental Op (#142)

why? they died out, under persocution. The Bible didn't. The Bible has endured. how do you account for that?

So... Are you saying that if one religion can wipe out another and destroy all of the writings of the other, that automatically makes the murderous one the truth?

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   21:54:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#341. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#340)

So... Are you saying that if one religion can wipe out another and destroy all of the writings of the other, that automatically makes the murderous one the truth?

Worked for the US during the Civil War. Damned old Confederacy.

Samuel Gray  posted on  2005-03-16   21:56:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#342. To: Don (#150)

Counselor, this isn't a court of law. It's your decision to believe or not.

My comments have no relevance to the shenanigans that go on in a court of law. I was speaking to reason, reality and logic. But, if you wish to set reason, reality and logic aside, that indeed is your choice.

In the meantime, we have the First Amendment in this country. Freedom of Religion and all that? I can start a religion worshipping my right, big toe and I don't have to prove a thing.
I've in no way indicated that you should be prevented from worshiping as you please - provided you violate the rights of no person in the process. Have at it. Believe what you will.

Christianity and belief in Christ is much more established than my pretend church. Prove something? Yeah, right. In your dreams. Christianity is here and it will stay here. Sorry 'bout that. No, I'm not.
Lots of religions are here. Some are more populous than christianity. But, popularity is not proof. And, if the cardinal wishes to make accusations against the written works of other, he best look in the mirror first, else he stands to be laughed at for the fool that he makes himself.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:01:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#343. To: Jhoffa_ (#321)

These same people think Saddam had nukes..

No, I don't think they actually thought Saddam had nukes. I think they knew that he did not. They just relished the thought of seeing the opposing religion suffer a few million killed.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:03:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#344. To: rowdee (#334)

Catholics don't believe in divorce.

Did you know that the Bible says "Call no man father but your heavenly Father ?

Right off the bat the Catholic Church commits a misdemeanor violation by making kids call the priests "Father" ... and they are habitual in this effort, having violated this ordinance repeatedly for thousands of years. They have shown no remorse and continue this practice in violation of the Bible.

The Catholic Church also makes rules as it goes, like no meat on Friday, and no Communion with the Lord unless you come to the table "WORTHY". Jesus said do this in remembrance of me, and he also said none are worthy, all men's righteousness is as filthy rags.

Jesus was no bullshit artist and he didn't come here to hang out with the self- righteous hypocrits at the church. He even said a physician comes to heal the sick, not the healthy. That's us, and we don't start getting well until we remember Him, and forget us.

However, the Catholic Church wrongly interprets scripture to keep their followers from "remembering Him".

noone222  posted on  2005-03-16   22:03:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#345. To: noone222, Jhoffa_ (#344)

Jesus was no bullshit artist

Jesus Was A Terrorist

Dakmar  posted on  2005-03-16   22:07:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#346. To: rowdee (#229)

You most certainly have the right to believe you evolved from monkeys.

When you learn what evolution ACTUALLY is and what it says, we'll talk, until then, you are just a superstitious ignorant savage as far as I am concerned.

Learn a little science, your mind may actually expand, and you might, just might, learn to think for yourself.

Aric2000  posted on  2005-03-16   22:17:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#347. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#338)

My sister had a near death experience, which she detailed for me. I don't say this is proof of anything ... but it's a little shred of evidence !

You may find it compelling, but it does not rise to the level of "evidence."

It's the best I could do on such short notice. What do you have for opposing evidence ? Make it "compelling" !

noone222  posted on  2005-03-16   22:21:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#348. To: Jhoffa_ (#275)

Poor Jhoffa, where else are you going to get fighters for a revolution? The high and mighty muckety mucks of the Roman Empire?

Get a grip on reality......

If you know your history, and I assume that you at least know a itsy bitsy bit, the romans controlled the middle east in those days, and Israel did NOT exist.

The "Messiah" was the Jewish Priest/warrior/king who would rightfully be the King of Israel, and throw the Romans out of Israel.

Jesus was that man, he was rightful heir to the throne of David, but he FAILED, and failed miserably, therefore, the Jews do not and cannot accept him as the Messiah.

Learn a little history, PLEASE......

BTW, when many of the Scriptures are looked at in that light, a lot of the weird ones become MOST evident of what Jesus was actually trying to do, and why, when the Romans came after his little butt, he faked his death and fled the country.

Aric2000  posted on  2005-03-16   22:22:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#349. To: Aric2000 (#348)

John 6: 14

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-03-16   22:30:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#350. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#342)

"I was speaking to reason, reality and logic. But, if you wish to set reason, reality and logic aside, that indeed is your choice."

Reason, reality, and logic. Ok, those things will do for a start. How do you prove the existence of God? A better question would be how do you disprove the existence of God when you can look up and see the stars and other bodies there or look here on earth and see the things that have been created here?

Is it reasonable, real, or logical to think all of these things just popped into existence one morning. Where did they come from? There has to be a beginning to physical things. There has to be as Plato might put it the real or original from which all other similar things are copies.

If there is a God, would He abandon his creation or get bored with it? Lets consider the case of a father and a son for a moment. Would most human fathers abandon his son. A son is a copy of the father. We are told that God made man in His image in the Bible. You don't believe in the Bible? Use your own human experience. Would you abandon a child made in your image? Most men wouldn't.

Oh, I forgot. You don't believe in the Bible so how do we know that man is made in God's image? Well, something was made in God's image. You don't create something out of a vacuum. Lets consider just the animals are made in God's image. Or just the earth itself is made from God's image. Well, God created all of those things. If most men would not abandon their creation, why would God? It isn't reasonable, real, or logical to think that everything was just created without a supreme maker or that the supreme maker would just abandon His creation.

What about Christ? We still don't believe in the Holy Bible so lets toss it out for the moment. The Jewish historian Flavius Josephus has some comments in his history that might be of interest to you.

The Holy Bible, of course, is still the main source of information about Christ and Christianity. Paul never met Christ, but he knew Peter and other disciples who did know Christ. Paul got his information from the people who personally knew Christ and were with him from the beginning of his ministry to the end of his time on earth. If there are books that were left out of the Holy Bible, still Paul knew those people who knew Christ. So, his version of what happened must be true.

Wait a minute. You say that Paul's writings were filtered and even changed to make the man Jesus into Christ, the son of God? The true story is that Jesus died as a man and never rose on that third day. And, that the Jews are right in still awaiting their king. There comes that dividing line between faith and disbelief, right? The smart people are on the side of disbelief. The other side...well...they should know better to put it charitably.

Ok, is the Bible correct in simple facts like the existence of long dead cities? Archeologists are constantly coming up with their findings. So, if the Bible is right in one thing maybe other things are also true. Biblical prophecy is an interesting area. It even talks about the rebirth of Israel some 2,000 years later. Gee, it was just a lucky guess, I suppose.

"provided you violate the rights of no person in the process. Have at it. Believe what you will. "

Thank you for your courtesy. I appreciate you allowing me to do that. I would also appreciate it if you don't violate any rights that Christians might have such as being allowed to obey what they think is the will of God in certain matters such as preaching the gospel.

"if the cardinal wishes to make accusations against the written works of other, he best look in the mirror first, else he stands to be laughed at for the fool that he makes himself. "

You can send the Pope a letter and advise him of that if you wish. He might even take the time to read it. I am not a Catholic so I don't take great exception to you calling him a fool, but I am sure that many Roman Catholics would take exception with you on that statement.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:34:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#351. To: Aric2000 (#348)

PS:

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-03-16   22:36:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#352. To: Don (#350)

How do you prove the existence of God?

It would be a simple exercise - if he in fact existed. But, since he does not, you are forced to play word games and delve into logical fallacy in order to obfuscate an appearance of proof.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:39:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#353. To: Jhoffa_ (#351)

it's the thread that never ends!
it just goes on and on my friends!
Somebody started posting it
not knowing what it was!
Now we'll continue posting it
Foreverjust because......

Sing along everyone! Second Verse - Same as the First!!!

CAPPSMADNESS  posted on  2005-03-16   22:41:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#354. To: Don (#350)

Thank you for your courtesy. I appreciate you allowing me to do that. I would also appreciate it if you don't violate any rights that Christians might have such as being allowed to obey what they think is the will of God in certain matters such as preaching the gospel.

You are welcome to preach - on your own property. Just don't expect me to be swayed by the silliness.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:41:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#355. To: Aric2000, rowdee (#346)

When you learn what evolution ACTUALLY is and what it says, we'll talk, until then, you are just a superstitious ignorant savage as far as I am concerned.

When you get a little time, could you see your way clear to educating us "superstitious ignorant savages." We could use your help.

For example, is it true that evolution teaches that man evolved from the apes? A yes or no answer here would be of interest to us all.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:42:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#356. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#354)

The property is the world. That is how it goes. You just aren't safe anywhere.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:42:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#357. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#352)

How do you prove the existence of God? It would be a simple exercise -

Then please do so sir, I (among others) would like to see said proof.

CAPPSMADNESS  posted on  2005-03-16   22:42:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#358. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#357)

Then please do so sir, I (among others) would like to see said proof.

I am not the one asserting his existence, so I am not the one in a position to be challenged to prove his existence. You should have posted that challenge to Don.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#359. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#352)

A much better example of a fallacy of logic is to deny what is in front of your face. You qualify for that award much better than I.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:44:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#360. To: Don (#356)

The property is the world. That is how it goes. You just aren't safe anywhere.

You don't own the world. Your free speech rights end at the borders of your property. If you wish to preach at me on my property, then you are a trespasser and will be treated as such.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:45:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#361. To: Don (#355)

superstitious ignorant savages

I suppose he can tell us "savages" by our "Bible Thumping"?

THUMPTHUMPTHUMPTHUMPTHUMP!

;0)

Or can he tell us by our cannibalism?

CAPPSMADNESS  posted on  2005-03-16   22:45:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#362. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#358)

so I am not the one in a position to be challenged to prove his existence

You are much more challenged in denying it.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:45:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#363. To: Don (#359)

A much better example of a fallacy of logic is to deny what is in front of your face. You qualify for that award much better than I.

In front of my face? No, there's no god there. Just a computer. Do you worship bits-n-bytes?

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:46:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#364. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#358)

But you were the one who said it would be a simple exercise, right?

CAPPSMADNESS  posted on  2005-03-16   22:46:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#365. To: Don (#362)

You are much more challenged in denying it.

If you understood even a shred of logic, you would know how comical your position is.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:47:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#366. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#364)

But you were the one who said it would be a simple exercise, right?

Indeed it would be simple -- IF SUCH A THING AS A god EXISTED. It is a simple matter to prove existence of things that exist. Something as significant as a god would be the easiest of all -- if it existed.

But, it does not. That's why believers have never been able to produce him.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:49:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#367. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#363)

In front of my face? No, there's no god there. Just a computer.

Then, you are very blind indeed.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:50:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#368. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#366)

You want God to prove His existence to you say...in a courtroom? Or, maybe in your living room would be a better place for your immediate comfort? God is all around you and you can't see him because you believe He is there. I point out the heavens and everything here on earth as created things from a source, and you blow right past it. You don't want to face that issue. It might cause you to think, and in time it might even cause you to doubt your doubt. We couldn't have that, could we?

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:52:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#369. To: Don (#367)

Then, you are very blind indeed.

Not at all. I don't see ghosts, angels, supernatural beings, fairies, dragons, easter bunnies or gods. Why? Because they just aren't there. I refuse to subvert my mind and pretend that these fantasies exist. But, if you ever come up with some actual verifiable evidence, let me know.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:53:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#370. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#366)

That's why believers have never been able to produce him.

And science has never been able to discount Him.

this is a round robin argument that is making no head way. Neither side will be swayed. Let's just talk about the thread topic - what ever it was.

minds are not gonna be a changin' I know mine isn't and I am fairly sure your's isn't either.

Truce???

CAPPSMADNESS  posted on  2005-03-16   22:53:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#371. To: All (#368)

Fast typing: because you don't believe He is there

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:53:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#372. To: Aric2000 (#346)

Fredwin on Evolution

your opinion, Aric?

christine  posted on  2005-03-16   22:53:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#373. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#369)

Why? Because they just aren't there.

Not good enough. You are not addressing what I said about created things.

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:54:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#374. To: Don (#368)

You want God to prove His existence to you say...in a courtroom? Or, maybe in your living room would be a better place for your immediate comfort? God is all around you and you can't see him because you believe He is there. I point out the heavens and everything here on earth as created things from a source, and you blow right past it. You don't want to face that issue. It might cause you to think, and in time it might even cause you to doubt your doubt. We couldn't have that, could we?

What is it with this courtroom fetish of yours?

You point to everything EXCEPT your god. If you want to prove the existence of something, then you have to actually present proof of THAT THING! You can't prove that the planet Venus exists by pointing to your Ford Pinto. But hey, if that's all you've got...

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-16   22:55:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#375. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#374)

But hey, if that's all you've got...

You aren't even trying. Who created the universe and earth?

Don  posted on  2005-03-16   22:56:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (376 - 568) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]