[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The True COST of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION explained - Edward Dowd

People are just starting to understand the economic impact of illegal migration on an economy.

Freight Fraud, Cargo Theft, Deadly Collisions - Ghost Carriers Are Growing National Security Threat

Hamas To Release American-Israeli Hostage As Goodwill Gesture To Trump

Targeted by the mind control programs of the evil ones (Pedos)

Ex-CIA agent gives his take on some of America's biggest historical events...

Asheville N.C. hit again. May 9th 2025

"No One is Prepared for What’s Happening in EUROPE

"This loss is permanent"

Daniela Cambone: The Great Taking Author Interview

Polar ice rebounds confound alarmist predictions: New studies highlight climates unpredictable dance

NBC: The United States, Europe and Ukraine have made a list of 22 conditions for ending the conflict

President Trumps Proposal to Eliminate Income Taxes: Can It Be Done?

Trump Still Does Not Understand What Russia Wants and Demands

Borrell: Half of bombs dropped on Gaza supplied by Europe

Surprise, Surprise: Bibi Discovers "Secret Iranian Nuclear Weapons Facility" in Iran

Report: Trump Delinks Saudi Nuclear Deal from Israeli Normalization

Lebanon's war-wounded and pregnant women face deepening healthcare crisis

Hordes of NATO military and elite PMCs suddenly went to the Kursk region

The Ukrainian Armed Forces will receive missiles for attacks on the rear, headquarters, airports of Russia

Minister o Defense Thousands of corpses on the border - a French breeding ground near Kiev was destroyed

Ivermectin Reverses Alzheimer's Disease

80% Of 'Liberal' Americans Want Elon Musk Thrown In Prison

Why Silver is Lagging Gold

Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver verbally and physically assaulted federal agents in New Jersey

Diana Ross & The Supremes - Reflections [Spain TV] [1967]

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Introduces Bill to REPEAL the USA PATRIOT Act Declares War on Surveillance State

Car Followed Home. Quick Thinking Driver Saved Himself

Woody Harrelson Couldn't Hold Back

Burkina Faso leaders visit to Moscow for Victory Day carries HUGE strategic significance: heres why


Business/Finance
See other Business/Finance Articles

Title: Obama orchestrated a massive transfer of wealth to the 1 percent
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://nypost.com/2016/01/17/occupy ... er-of-wealth-to-the-1-percent/
Published: Jan 17, 2016
Author: Michael Gray
Post Date: 2016-01-17 09:44:44 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 218
Comments: 10

When people use the term Great Recession, they are playing into the charade laid out by Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department.

The years 2008 through 2015 should be known as the Great Fleecing.

During that time, the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world occurred. Some $4.5 trillion was given to Wall Street banks through its Quantitative Easing program, with the American people picking up the IOU.

“If liberals are angry about inequality, they should look no further than President Obama.”

This is the primary reason the US economy has not been able to recovery from the bank implosion of 2008.

Surely if you inject $4.5 trillion into the economy, you will get economic growth. You will get a 4% to 5% increase in Gross Domestic Product for at least a year or two.

Yet the Obama administration is the first two-term presidency that has not posted a 3% GDP growth on an annualized basis for 8 years. Even Franklin Delano Roosevelt posted 3% growth year during the Great Depression.

That’s because the $4.5 trillion was not given to any infrastructure program — it was given to banks, under the misguided notion that they needed the money to remain solvent. The banks promptly invested this money, which kept the stock market humming, but did nothing for jobs, wages or the GDP.

This was by design. The Fed could not allow the bank’s largesse to be circulated into the public for fear of rapid inflation.

The banks also funded company mergers, company debt offerings and stock buybacks. This activity kept the money sequestered and allowed a greater return for the banks. After all, they were getting free money to invest — there was no way to lose.

Who did this help? The 1%, and pretty much only the 1%.

These actions are the reasons the American middle class has been decimated and no longer makes up the majority of the population.

If liberals are angry about inequality, they should look no further than President Obama. He has done more to contribute to the gap between rich and poor than anyone.

Modal Trigger A trader reacts on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange October 15, 2008 in New York City at the closing bell.Photo: AFP/Getty Images Obama bragged about the economy in the State of the Union, pointing to the low unemployment rate. But under this White House’s job-recovery program, the US added roughly 1.5 million bartenders and wait staff, while losing an equal number of manufacturing jobs, according to Job Creators Network figures.

The middle class has seen the wholesale export of good-paying jobs, while on the hook for crushing mortgages and higher taxes to pay down the growing US debt to fund the banks.

Is it any wonder that in all of the 3,007 US counties, parishes and territories just over 50% of the population in each county is on government assistance of some sort?

Now comes the punch line. After the Fed finally decided to stop the QE program, asset bubbles are growing weak and some say about to pop. The stock market is in correction mode — off more than 10% from its highs last year. After seven years of getting no interest on your savings, after little opportunity for job advancement and raises, now your 401(k) will take a hit anyway.

The US has “the strongest, most durable economy in the world,” Obama boasted Tuesday. But only for the few.

Michael Gray is the Sunday Business Editor of The Post. His blog where a version of this article appeared is Gray’s Economy on WordPress.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

The years 2008 through 2015 should be known as the Great Fleecing.

Gray is quite right but the explanation, below, is much more complete.

The Financial Con Of The Decade Explained So Simply Even A Congressman Will Get It

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/10/2010 22:13 -0400

Sometimes, when chasing the bouncing ball of fraud and corruption on a daily basis, it is easy to lose sight of the forest for the millions of trees (all of which have a 150% LTV fourth-lien on them, underwritten by Goldman Sachs, which is short the shrubbery tranche). Luckily, Charles Hugh Smith, of oftwominds.com has taken the time to put it all into such simple and compelling terms, even corrupt North Carolina congressmen will not have the chance to plead stupidity after reading this.

Of course, to those familiar with the work of Austrian economists, none of this will come as a surprise.

1. Enable trillions of dollars in mortgages guaranteed to default by packaging unlimited quantities of them into mortgage-backed securities (MBS), creating umlimited demand for fraudulently originated loans.

2. Sell these MBS as "safe" to credulous investors, institutions, town councils in Norway, etc., i.e. "the bezzle" on a global scale.

3. Make huge "side bets" against these doomed mortgages so when they default then the short-side bets generate billions in profits.

4. Leverage each $1 of actual capital into $100 of high-risk bets.

5. Hide the utterly fraudulent bets offshore and/or off-balance sheet (not that the regulators you had muzzled would have noticed anyway).

6. When the longside bets go bad, transfer hundreds of billions of dollars in Federal guarantees, bailouts and backstops into the private hands which made the risky bets, either via direct payments or via proxies like AIG. Enable these private Power Elites to borrow hundreds of billions more from the Treasury/Fed at zero interest.

7. Deposit these funds at the Federal Reserve, where they earn 3-4%. Reap billions in guaranteed income by borrowing Federal money for free and getting paid interest by the Fed.

8. As profits pile up, start buying boatloads of short-term U.S. Treasuries. Now the taxpayers who absorbed the trillions in private losses and who transferred trillions in subsidies, backstops, guarantees, bailouts and loans to private banks and corporations, are now paying interest on the Treasuries their own money purchased for the banks/corporations.

9. Slowly acquire trillions of dollars in Treasuries--not difficult to do as the Federal government is borrowing $1.5 trillion a year.

10. Stop buying Treasuries and dump a boatload onto the market, forcing interest rates to rise as supply of new T-Bills exceeds demand (at least temporarily). Repeat as necessary to double and then triple interest rates paid on Treasuries.

11. Buy hundreds of billions in long-term Treasuries at high rates of interest. As interest rates rise, interest payments dwarf all other Federal spending, forcing extreme cuts in all other government spending.

12. Enjoy the hundreds of billions of dollars in interest payments being paid by taxpayers on Treasuries that were purchased with their money but which are safely in private hands.

Charles' conclusion does not need further commentary as it is absolutely spot on:

Since the Federal government could potentially inflate away these trillions in Treasuries, buy enough elected officials to force austerity so inflation remains tame. In essence, these private banks and corporations now own the revenue stream of the Federal government and its taxpayers. Neat con, and the marks will never understand how "saving our financial system" led to their servitude to the very interests they bailed out.

The circle is now complete: in "saving our financial system," the public borrowed trillions and transferred the money to private Power Elites, who then buy the public debt with the money swindled out of the taxpayer. Then the taxpayers transfer more wealth every year to the Power Elites/Plutocracy in the form of interest on the Treasury debt. The Power Elites will own the debt that was taken on to bail them out of bad private bets: this is the culmination of privatized gains, socialized risk.

In effect, it's a Third World/colonial scam on a gigantic scale: plunder the public treasury, then buy the debt which was borrowed and transferred to your pockets. You are buying the country with money you borrowed from its taxpayers. No despot could do better.

As for part two of this epic con we are all living through, Charles explains as follows:

The Con of the Decade (Part II) meshes neatly with the first Con of the Decade. Yesterday I described how the financial Plutocracy can transfer ownership of the Federal government's income stream via using the taxpayer's money to buy the debt that the taxpayers borrowed to bail out the Plutocracy.

In order for the con to work, however, the Power Elites and their politico toadies in Congress, the Treasury and the Fed must convince the peasantry that low tax rates on unearned income are not just "free market capitalism at its best" but that they are also "what the country needs to get moving again."

The first step of the con was successfully fobbed off on the peasantry in 2001: lower the taxes paid by the most productive peasants marginally while massively lowering the effective taxes paid by the financial Plutocracy.

One Year Later, No Sign of Improvement in America's Income Inequality Problem:

Income inequality has grown massively since 2000. According to Harvard Magazine, 66% of 2001-2007's income growth went to the top 1% of Americans, while the other 99% of the population got a measly 6% increase. How is this possible? One thing to consider is that in 2001, George W. Bush cut $1.3 trillion in taxes, and 32.6% of the cut went to the top 1%. Another factor is Bush's decision to increase the national debt from $5 trillion to $11 trillion. The combination of increased government spending and lower taxes helped the top 1% considerably.

The second part of the con is to mask much of the Power Elites' income streams behind tax shelters and other gaming-of-the-system so the advertised rate appears high to the peasantry but the effective rate paid on total income is much much lower.

The tax shelters are so numerous and so effective that it takes thousands of pages of tax codes and armies of toadies to pursue them all: family trusts, oil depletion allowances, tax-free bonds and of course special one-off tax breaks arranged by "captured" elected officials.

Step three is to convince the peasantry that $600 in unearned income (capital gains) should be taxed in the same way as $600 million. The entire key to the U.S. tax code is to tax earned income heavily but tax unearned income (the majority of the Plutocracy's income is of course unearned) not at all or very lightly.

In a system which rewarded productive work and provided disincentives to rampant speculation and fraud, the opposite would hold: unearned income would be taxed at much higher rates than earned income, which would be taxed lightly, especially at household incomes below $100,000.

If the goal were to encourage "investing" while reining in the sort of speculations which "earn" hedge fund managers $600 million each (no typo, that was the average of the top 10 hedgies' personal take of their funds gains), then all unearned income (interest, dividends, capital gains, rents from property, oil wells, etc.) up to $6,000 a year would be free--no tax. Unearned income between $6,000 and $60,000 would be taxed at 20%, roughly half the top rate for earned income. This would leave 95% of U.S. households properly encouraged to invest via low tax rates.

Above $60,000, then unearned income would be taxed the same as earned income, and above $1 million (the top 1/10 of 1% of households) then it would be taxed at 50%. Above $10 million, it would be taxed at 60%. Such a system would offer disincentives to the speculative hauls made by the top 1/10 of 1% while encouraging investing in the lower 99%.

Could such a system actually be passed into law and enforced by a captured, toady bureaucracy and Congress? Of course not. But it is still a worthy exercise to take apart the rationalizations being offered to justify rampant speculative looting, collusion, corruption and fraud.

The last step of the con is to raise taxes on the productive peasantry to provide the revenues needed to pay the Plutocracy its interest on Treasuries. If the "Bush tax cuts" are repealed, the actual effective rates paid on unearned income will remain half (20%) of the rates on earned income (wages, salaries, profits earned from small business, etc.) which are roughly 40% at higher income levels.

The financial Plutocracy will champion the need to rein in Federal debt, now that they have raised the debt via plundering the public coffers and extended ownership over that debt.

Now the con boils down to insuring the peasantry pay enough taxes to pay the interest on the Federal debt--interest which is sure to rise considerably. The 1% T-Bill rates were just part of the con to convince the peasantry that trillions of dollars could be borrowed "with no consequences." Those rates will steadily rise once the financial Power Elites own enough of the Treasury debt. Then the game plan will be to lock in handsome returns on long-term Treasuries, and command the toady politicos to support "austerity."

The austerity will not extend to the financial Elites, of course. That's the whole purpose of the con. "Some are more equal than others," indeed.

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2016-01-17   11:47:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Southern Style (#1)

The austerity will not extend to the financial Elites, of course. That's the whole purpose of the con. "Some are more equal than others," indeed.

I suspect the system will collapse sooner than expected.

Ada  posted on  2016-01-17   11:59:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#2)

sooner than expected

They might drag it out a bit longer, talk of QE4 is encouraging in this regard. I would say that when the price of PMs starts to rise, the fleecing will be over and the goring begins. This rise in PMs will be the signal that the bankers have gotten all they can reasonably hope to get out of the public, at least, without a fight.

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2016-01-17   13:57:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Southern Style (#3)

They might drag it out a bit longer, talk of QE4 is encouraging in this regard.

None of the QEs worked so why try another? What the fed wants is a 3% inflation rate; instead we have deflation.

Ada  posted on  2016-01-17   15:46:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Ada (#4)

How their minds work:

"None of the QEs worked so why not try another?"

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-01-17   18:37:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: NeoconsNailed (#5)

How their minds work:

Its the only trick they have in their bag other than shoveling cash out of helicopters.

Ada  posted on  2016-01-17   18:39:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Ada (#4)

None of the QEs worked so why try another?

To the contrary, QE has worked miraculously well...for the bankers. They are given/loaned billions of dollars each month at Zero Percent Interest. They then deposit/park these same billions with the Federal Reserve and collect interest payments for doing so.

It's the taxpayers who get screwed.

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2016-01-17   18:47:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Southern Style (#7)

To the contrary, QE has worked miraculously well...for the bankers.

But not for the economy.

Ada  posted on  2016-01-17   18:54:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Ada (#8)

the economy.

The bankers don't care about the economy, their only concern is extracting all the wealth of the nation from us, to themselves.

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2016-01-17   20:10:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Southern Style (#9) (Edited)

The bankers don't care about the economy, their only concern is extracting all the wealth of the nation from us, to themselves.

Federal Reserve Notes are evidence of debt. The banksters have already looted the treasury and there is nothing left. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-01-17   20:32:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]