See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: FBI releases video of shooting death of Oregon protester
Source:
.
URL Source: https://www.rt.com/usa/330526-fbi-video-oregon-protester-shooting/
Published: Jan 28, 2016
Author: .
Post Date: 2016-01-28 22:23:07 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 1902
Comments: 63
go to minute 6 for the bottom line. this is F'd up. , murder by an amped up cop. LaVoy Finicum was not charging anybody. Here is the 25 minute version
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 54.
#9. To: Artisan (#0)
The edited version is 8 minutes 3 seconds. The tape ran for 36:49 according to the FBI time stamp. I did not see Finicum go for a weapon. As I understand it, he was shot several times after falling down onto the snow. No word in the article saying how many times he was shot.
that's interesting if it was 36:49 and yet even the 'unedited' version here is 25 minutes, no? at any rate, whether he had a weapon on him or not, I believe by all accounts that LaVoy Finicum was a very good and decent, God-fearing man with the best of intentions. He was passionate in his beliefs. However, whether you have a donut, a pocket full of daiseys or an AK47 under your jacket, if you reach in to your jacket during a confrontation with amped up Israeli-trained cops guess what? you're dead as dirt within seconds. Only a suicidal maniac or a looney tunes would a act like that in such a situation, sorry. That's my opinion and i'm sticking to it, and guess what? Ive had MANY contentious interactions with evil pig cops, and I'm still alive. and it is going to stay that way. I get tired of these libertarian types always bashing the cops even when they clearly don't deserve it. their judgment and completely irrational bias is screwed in the head. In retrospect all the other occupiers are actually lucky that the state police didn't open fire on the vehicle as it approached speeding towards the roadblock. They all could have been killed. I'm not saying that would be justified, but it could have VERY easily occurred.
True, by all accounts that I've seen, heard, or read.
True, by all accounts that I've seen, heard, or read. I will third that. While I have criticisms of the occupation that are strategically & logistically based and have voiced the same here, when people nobly stand up for what they believe in and suffer for it, they still deserve full & complete respect. Especially from anyone who has, instead of lifting a finger for the cause, continues to be subjugated. It's possible Finicum preferred to be shot & killed instead of arrested. Didn't he voice as much? If so, then his actions of getting out of the car and reaching in his jacket -- if that's what he did -- might have been intentional with the desired result achieved.
It did appear that he was reaching into his jacket, and if he was, he had to know that that was likely to answered with quick and extreme violence. When you are armed (or believed to be so), a gov helicopter is overhead, and a dozen police cars are chasing and blocking you thus making escape impossible, the only two choices are to surrender or risk being killed. His surrender wasn't quite peaceful and compliant enough for gov, so they killed him. That said, they might killed him anyway, even if he hadn't reached into his jacket.
Exactly! Only a completely irrational maniac does this. I think it's unspeakably foolish for people to characterize these actions as somehow noble or heroic. Just bizarre.
Standing up for what you believe in, and suffering for same, absolutely is noble. I stand by that statement.
I agree that standing on principle is noble, even to death as my tagline says. But suicide by cop isn't noble, it is sinful and crazy.
If he chose to die rather than go to prison, how is it anything BUT principled?
Personally I don't believe in Suicide , it's considered an affront to God. Throwing away the life God gave you. Just as BLM tyranny is evil, an affront to the dignity of the person and theft of their property, Suicide is even more immoral than that. Since suffering or fear of it is not reason to destroy your body, the temple of God. 2281 Suicide contradicts the natural inclination of the human being to preserve and perpetuate his life. It is gravely contrary to the just love of self. It likewise offends love of neighbor because it unjustly breaks the ties of solidarity with family, nation, and other human societies to which we continue to have obligations. Suicide is contrary to love for the living God.http://www.vatican.va/archive/c cc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a5.h tm
But you also said this: Under what principled conditions would/could one allow his death to occur unnaturally that would not qualify as suicide? And why wouldn't Finicum's death qualify (assuming he purposely chose to be shot rather than be arrested?)
For example the martyrs who died rather than deny their faith, or in defense of self or others fighting to protect them, or your property. As a last resort when there is no further recourse. I appreciate your very good questions even if I don't answer them to your satisfaction. These are not my personal ideas, it is from the Catholic catechism, a theology that goes back thousands of years. For example a just war doctrine, if it meets the criterion a soldier can go and risk death out of duty but that is not careless disregard for his sacred life. Or if you jump into a river to save a drowning person, that would be an example of a noble act.
I appreciate your answers as well. Thank you. I subscribe to a different belief system which holds to a different standard. Under it, mercy killing, i.e. a terminally ill end of life situation, is not a spiritual crime, though suicide as a form of running away from a difficult life situation is not acceptable. Finicum's act, however, if indeed it was purposed to cause his own death which we don't know for a fact was the case, would have room for virtue that rises above suicide. One aspect of that choice, again if that is what it was, is that people like us are discussing it in that context. A example of "give me liberty or give me death" being demonstrated fully. His death would not have been in vain if it inspires others to appreciate freedom as a higher virtue.
I agree that we can't say for sure that finicum did suicide by cop or chose to die by his purposeful actions. And even if he did, it's not my place to judge his intent or motivations. I agree with you that in his mind he probably didn't think he was doing wrong. As an interesting sidenote, the traditional Catholic teaching was obviously opposed to the French revolution, which put freemasonic concepts of "liberty" above God's laws, as Jefferson urged to "break the chains of monkish superstitions ". This was also covered in the papal encyclical on "americanism". As one great priest put it recently, the reason Americans are losing their liberties is not surprising since you can't get good fruit from a rotten tree. I don't revere the CONstitution as many do. There are higher standards above and beyond it. My main point is that is never suggest to a friend or loved one or stranger that they confront armed amped up Israeli trained cops in a wild manner. I have a question for you also. What's the big distinction between suicide as running away from problem as you said was condemned in your belief system vs Mercy killing?
Who's that "great priest", and where can we catch up with his work? Does he oppose the ironclad Catholic dogma of open borders for white countries -- one of the main tools of the rottenness you mention? Americanism as I understand it is the anti-interventionist philosophy of the early Revisionists, the Lindberghs et al -- the last generation that had a fighting chance of staving off the amerikan empire as we know it. Fr. Coughlin was friendly with them but he embraced a lot of (what do you know!) stuff that's gliberal boilerplate now. ----------------------- UNRELATED
I'll post the homily later, it's from my fave site audiosancto.org. that particular sermon was on freemasonry. The priests don't list their name, the explanation is on the site. Basically it's because their homilies are not to focus attention on them personally or for fame, but for the doctrine. Although I have a wild story of how after years of listening to sermons from that site, my wife and I actually, by complete chance while having no clue even what state the priests originated from, actually ended up at that church for Mass one Sunday in 2012. As far as open borders, I've posted before, the actual Catholic catechism affirms the right and duty of a nation to secure it's borders, not the opposite. Although As I acknowledged to you before, their rhetoric today never mentions that.
Now how did I just know we weren't going to learn his name? How do you know he's a great priest if you don't know who he is. ---------------- NN sequitur
Read my reply again, & pay better attention this time. The answer to your questions is there.
You mean this question -- "Does he oppose the ironclad Catholic dogma of open borders for white countries -- one of the main tools of the rottenness you mention"? Where is it? I've read your replies but don't see it. --------------------- NN Sequitur
#55. To: NeoconsNailed (#54)
Oh, i was replying to where you said you figured I wouldnt give his name & how do I know he's a great priest if I don't know who he is. The site explains why they don't give their names. It's not about personal noterity or fame for them. They are humble & don't seek public attention, They have many parishoners & duties to attend to. Their sermons are a throwback that my grandparents probably heard. I've never heard them discuss immigration. They arent modernists or libs at all. And, to clarify, I do know who they are. I've met with them & atended Mass at the parish many times since we came upon it, anyway after I began listening to their very beautiful & instructional material. You can check out the site if you're interested.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#10. To: Horse, all (#9)
#17. To: Artisan (#10)
I believe by all accounts that LaVoy Finicum was a very good and decent, God-fearing man with the best of intentions. He was passionate in his beliefs.
#18. To: Lod (#17)
I believe by all accounts that LaVoy Finicum was a very good and decent, God-fearing man with the best of intentions. He was passionate in his beliefs.
#21. To: Pinguinite (#18)
If so, then his actions of getting out of the car and reaching in his jacket -- if that's what he did -- might have been intentional with the desired result achieved.
#22. To: StraitGate (#21)
When you are armed (or believed to be so), a gov helicopter is overhead, and a dozen police cars are chasing and blocking you thus making escape impossible, the only two choices are to surrender or risk being killed.
#24. To: Artisan (#22)
Exactly! Only a completely irrational maniac does this. I think it's unspeakably foolish for people to characterize these actions as somehow noble or heroic.
#29. To: Pinguinite (#24)
#33. To: Artisan (#29)
I agree that standing on principle is noble, even to death as my tagline says. But suicide by cop isn't noble, it is sinful and crazy.
#37. To: Pinguinite (#33)
#39. To: Artisan (#37)
I agree that standing on principle is noble, even to death
#41. To: Pinguinite (#39)
#43. To: Artisan (#41)
#45. To: Pinguinite (#43)
#47. To: Artisan (#45)
#49. To: NeoconsNailed (#47)
#52. To: Artisan (#49)
(Edited)
#53. To: NeoconsNailed (#52)
#54. To: Artisan (#53)
Replies to Comment # 54.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 54.