See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Dangerous Faggot: “Let’s Beat Feminism Together.”
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blo ... t-lets-beat-feminism-together/
Published: Feb 29, 2016
Author: Karen De Coste
Post Date: 2016-02-29 08:06:00 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 1720
Comments: 94
I like how Milo Yiannopoulos has been disrupting college campuses one trigger at a time, as he likes to say. He is openly queer, articulate, funny, and blunt- honest outrageous. And he’s a conservative. Accordingly, he may be a Coulter-like statist on some issues, but on the topic of feminism he has been a leading anti- SJW activist. And he calls his speaking-debate tour the “Dangerous Faggot Tour.” This month he was at the very radical, left-wing (surprise, I know) University of Michigan debating a feminist. In all of his usual candor, his closing arguments noted that it is male imaginativeness that explored the oceans, got us to the stars, built what was best about the world, and generally, he exalts the role of men in society. He says that in America today men are ridiculed and free speech is curtailed by feminism in a world where women have a stranglehold on academia and politics. His shtick – as a Brit – is to help expose a poisonous, hateful, sexist system that is finally being exposed to the public. He calls feminists a tiny, angry minority that is shrinking by the day. And he does this all very poignantly. In this video he debates the Trump campaign with Kate Andrews from the Adam Smith Institute, who is somewhat of a Republitarian. Kate is not always bad on issues, but here she comes off as a defender of perpetually offended women and minority persons. What is important to understand about Social Justice Warrior-ism is that its greatest defenders do not have a clue that most women do not side with these shrill, 20-something Social Justice Warriors and their crazed hatred of all things male and/or traditional. We are not perpetually offended at every turn in the road, every word uttered, and every action taken. And we are not underpaid and under-promoted in corporate America due to glass ceilings and misogyny and patriarchy. We are not offended by Donald Trump, we do not need safe spaces, we are not triggered by something we don’t agree with, and we do not genuflect at the alter of female talk TV and left-wing female academics. These people who pretend to argue for our cause and speak for us have absolutely nothing in common with most of us women.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-7) not displayed.
.
.
.
#8. To: Ada (#7)
Where are Greenwald's? Am familiar with Raimondo's antiwar.com of course. A site ironically so full of the bad news I force on others that I can't take it very often meself. ------------------------------------------
Greenwald's site is The Intercept Not as many articles. Notice a negative piece about Trump and his appeal White Nationalists in today's site.
Thanks for the tip. Trump admitted to NYT that his rhetoric on illegals is an act, a lie. Thats what ive posted here for months. This harry reid donors record on "pathway to citizenship" advocation speaks for itself. This clown is playing gullible, desperate America like a fiddle. https://theintercept.com/2016/0 3/01/the-new-york-times- strange-behavior-in-the- controversy-over-trumps-off- the-record-comments/ "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Wow, I'd been missing the Intercept. If what you mean is that Trump is a total phony, Martisan, I fear you're absolutely right. It's ALL theater now, he's just been given a different role (members of a cast often double or triple up). The wall is a dumb idea - - only a return to pre-1965 immigration policies will work. ANYTHING ELSE IS A TRICK.
"Lie" is such a nasty word. No doubt Trump considers it a negotiating stance from which he will, of course, compromise.
Then to BLOODY HELL with him. With yawl's help I'm enjoying hating him today, but you may persuade me the other way tomorrow if you wish :-)
Trump is first and foremost a negotiator. And with negotiation you adjust your position in order to reach a deal. When I want to persuade you, I'll just blow in your ear :-)
Well, he's first and foremost a yankee who expresses himself like a little runny- nosed 6th-grader. Some of you folks forget the ironclad NN Theorems of Political Typology: (1) There are NO arch-conservative politicians from the northeastern USA. (2) There are NO very wealthy arch-conservatives. (3) Murphy's Law has redoubled its control over politics. It will never change until amerikans start naming and indicting the Jue en masse. Anybody offended by my language, I'm actually sorry -- but facts are facts. I feel I've got grounds after spending a third of a century 30 minutes from the Big Bagel. There are arch-conservative New Yorkers, yes -- but they're not allowed into politics. And there's a crucial difference between northerners and yankees, but that's a subject for another diatribe.
Trump doesn't pretend to be a conservative, much less an arch-conservative. He's perceived as being a populist, maybe because of the 6th grade level of his discourse. Yes, the wealthy tend to be liberal Democrats and not conservatives. Maybe because they prosper under the Democrats. Andrew Bacevich hits it with: Trump has cultivated a mass following that appears impervious to his missteps, miscues, and misstatements. What Trump actually believes—whether he believes in anything apart from big, splashy self-display—is largely unknown and probably beside the point. Trumpism is not a program or an ideology. It is an attitude or pose that feeds off, and then reinforces, widespread anger and alienation. - It is this attitute that appeals to my "anger and alienation".
We're back to square one -- enjoy the ecstasy high while it lasts, but have some pot handy to soften the crash in January. ---------------------------------------
Grasping at straws is more like it. But that in itself is a treat.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Just posted the rather long Bacevich piece where he concludes that if Trump is elected we will find that we have traded the rule of law for a version of caudillismo. Trump’s Washington could come to resemble Buenos Aires in the days of Juan Perón, with Melania a suitably glamorous stand-in for Evita, and plebiscites suitably glamorous stand-ins for elections.
The rule of law is in tatters, but it could indeed fall yet further with a horrible crash. Caudillismo -- that sounds like the Strump all right. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caudillo
As long as we stay home, that wouldn't bother me. Our global bullshit cannot be sustained.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Sounds like a deal :-)
Whom are you referring to when you say "we" and "our"?
We and Our = US in this context.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
My female naber says they're both dynamic but "Greenwald's got the animal magnetism" :-) I'm shocked that anyone's neighbor on this forum would ever even know who greenwald or raimando is. also, what a stupid line at the beginning of this article that claims greenwald "is a conservative." That's such a twisted, absurd claim that some homo, whose perverse acts are those of "grave depravity" and whose "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered" is somehow a ''conservative''. WTF wrote that and what exactly in their mind does ''conservative'' MEAN? coming from an 'old right' perspective, even though when I was a kid the tv shows, sitcom, and jew-run hollyweird started trying to normalize and mainline this God-hating perversion, even as a kid I knew it was wrong and twisted. So I would never characterize some pervert as 'conservative'. That is completely, indescribably bizarre, a la 1984. I reject it completely. pretty soon they will say abortionists are pro life and reconquistas are pro sovereignty. Chastity and homosexuality 2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition. 2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Congratulations, they've just condemned half their own clergy and half their favorite politicians to the eternal flames of hell! BURN, BABIES, BURN. Don't link any more Greenwald or Raimondo, gang -- even if they're doing the dirty work 90% of conservativity refuses to. And no more piano playing by Van Cliburn, UNDERSTAND??? :-) -------------------------------------
I sort of knew the Catholic link would throw you off,. sorry. lets start again. Do you believe homo perverts (people who believe that wrong is right and right is wrong, and celebrate depravity,) are ''conservative''?????! if so, what exactly does 'conservative' mean? I always understood it basically to mean adhering to , & wanting to preserve traditional values. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
"A Kind of Gay Hogwarts With Palm Trees" gawker.com/5825254/the-catholic-churchs-secret-gay-cabal ----------------------------------
So, now you can't justify your twisted thesis that homo pervs are "conservative", so you're gonna divert the topic & obsess on pervert priests all day? (Who by the way never claim to be conservative) I'll recap. Homo pervs like raimando and Greenwald are not conservative. They are an abomination, just like those pervert satanic false priests you link to. At least I'd never defend them and claim that they're somehow "conservative"! Eegads. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Recap all you want, but it's you who are blithely diverting on the perverting and just reverting. YOU invoked the RCC, I didn't. More stuff for you to ignore: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/us/archdiocese-in-boston-plans-to-close-65- catholic-parishes-by-the-end-of-the-year.html?_r=0 I'm confused here. The Swiss Guards are calling the Vatican a homo mafia, or are they one -- or both? http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/24/vatican-s-pope-protecting-swiss- guards-accused-of-secret-gay-lobby.html https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/retired-swiss-guard-commander-confirms-existence- of-vaticans-gay-lobby I'm just sayin'..... taking up your implication that all homos should be shunned, cast into outer darkness or mebbe burned at the stake, how about we start with the religious since they're supposed to be humanity's moral compass? I know. You're not listening, but others are reading. I'm playing to the jury and having a jolly good time :-) ----------------------------------------------------
That's just the point. You point out all sorts of pervert homos, but at the same time you claim They're capable of being some sort of "conservatives". They are not. They're the exact opposite. I would not find one of those priests named in your links and then post and promote their weekly political column or blog as some sort of invaluable political principled wisdom, as you seem to be suggesting with justin and glenn, LoL. Someone who promotes faggotry such as Glenn and Justin are disordered, until they repent they don't know right from wrong. It is akin to satanic posession. I would likewise suggest that any priest who is a homo or pederast is also most likely possessed by satan.
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Van Cliburn -- don't forget Van Cliburn! :-)
Never heard of him. Should I have? Is he like Elton john, Barry manilow or Johnny mathis? (I like all their music, by the way, but I wouldnt call them "conservatives" :-)
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Just to be clear, in case you don't understand where I'm coming from. I don't "hate" people who are homos, or think they should be as you put it, burnt at the stake. I simply don't accept their perversion. Just as I don't call them "gay". Which is a term used in the Flintstone cartoon, a term that meant happy. A term hijacked to attempt to normalize sodomy. I think there are certain litmus tests. People who support homos, abortion or gun control should never be promoted or trusted. People who have homosexual tendenies, who are cursed and suffer with that disorder and struggle with it, should be shown compassion. But that is distintly different from those who openly embrace and promote faggotry., and proudly embrace the abomonation as if there is nothing wrong with it. I fear for such people on judgment day, when they meet their maker.
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
"Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much". Oops, I just parafrazed the Bard :-0 en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Sexuality_of_William_Shakespeare --------------------------------------------------------
"Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much". oh I get it. so people who aren't afraid to criticize fags and condemn sodomy and perversion are therefore themselves fags. That's what you're arguing, right? if so, that's interesting, because that's exactly what the fags themselves say. In that case, two can play this game. Have you ever been married? for how long? kids? "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
If you roll in the mud with pigs you just get dirty.
Is that you, A K A Stone? How did you hijack artisan's account?
IMO your question is inappropriate. I would not ask it of anyone.
Most of society is inappropriate. ameriKa is a cesspool of every kind of abomination to the max.
We don't have to encourage it in this forum.
just sinking to the same level that he was. he kept whining when I explained to him why proud homos, by their very nature can not be conservative., and he responded by saying ''methinks he protests too much''. in other words, he was implying I protest too much, insinuating that i am a fag because i disapprove of fags. so I sank down to his level. anyone that matters here has met my beautiful wife in person. Where is his? So, who's more likely to be the fag here? facts are facts. do i really think NN is a fag? No, probably not, i was just applying , throwing back at him, the same twisted logic and insults that he launched. if ya cant take the heat, get out of the kitchen, or, where i come from , if you don't want a fight, don't start one. this always starts with NN - whenever I dare mention anything about Catholicism, he has a mental breakdown. It's all in the archives. he seems to have some rabid hatred the church that Christ established, for some reason. Must be a fundy upbringing, I don't know. and lastly, no, I would never promote and copy and paste articles by unrepentant, proud pervert fags such as raimando and greenwald, who also by the way is a PC Israel shill. I don't believe such people have anything worthwhile to contribute any more than a gang banger, dope dealer or usurious bankster, or mass murderer. these are all known as "sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance." "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
lol! I never said I am a libertarian, at least as it is widely understood today. I am not. 'Anything goes' is very wrong. AKA & I would probably agree on a lot of things. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
I bozo the obvious ones.
Is it fags you disapprove of or their behavior? I belong to a ski club where one of the males is obviously homosexual but very well regarded by the other men in the club. When my son was in his teens, I would have had no reservation about sending him off alone on an overnight ski trip with this fellow. I cannot say the same about some of the club straights if he had been a girl. His behavior has always been exemplary. Raimondo and Greenwald do not represent themselves as being conservative. They are libertarian and Greenwald might even be left-libertarian. So what? Both of them contribute a great deal to the cause of freedom. I might add more so than most conservatives do. (I used to be conservative but have given up on them.)
Don't you think you're getting a little carried away on this, Art? Everybody knows you're straight as an arrow, but I think if you save this thread and look at it in another 10 years you may agree you've rather gone off the deep end -- the "too much" factor in terms of quantity merely for the intrinsic weight of the subject. So many posts, such white-hot passion about getting people to stop posting stuff by fag authors regardless of its merits -- what gives? Or is it people referring to them as conservative that's got you het up? Discuss it calmly would be my suggestion. My point is obviously that what you're promoting might be a bit impractical. Apparently you weren't here when somebody posted -- purely for our enjoyment -- a performance by phenomenal pianist Van Cliburn the other day. He prolly didn't know Cliburn was fag and it's irrelevant whether he did, I mention it merely to show how shot through our culture is with useful work done by fags, most of them giving no clue of it through history. Yes, the militancy of some of them today is ripping amerika to shreds and I hate and deplore it. But so far I'm not aware Raimondo, Greenwald or Cliburn have been involved in all that -- suspect it would be all over the net if so -- and it's pretty hard to imagine them approving the persecution of Christians who exercise their God-given option not to bake fag cakes. I see Raimondo at least disapproves fag marriage (youtube). Voilà, I've spelt out my position and you're still in a rage. What more can I do except suggest this isn't getting us anywhere. You see no incongruity regularly receiving communion from Catholic priests -- I see no huge blight in people freely linking any valid material. And as Mrs. Robert Clarkson used to say in all guilelessness, neither is the twain gonna mix :-)
Comments (48 - 94) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#9. To: NeoconsNailed (#8)
Where are Greenwald's? Am familiar with Raimondo's http://antiwar.com of course. A site ironically so full of the bad news I force on others that I can't take it very often meself.
#10. To: Ada, neoconsnailed (#9)
#11. To: Artisan, Ada (#10)
#12. To: Artisan, neoconsdailed (#10)
Trump admitted to NYT that his rhetoric on illegals is an act, a lie
#13. To: Ada (#12)
#14. To: NeoconsNailed (#13)
With yawl's help I'm enjoying hating him today, but you may persuade me the other way tomorrow if you wish :-)
#15. To: AdAll (#14)
#16. To: NeoconsNailed (#15)
there's a crucial difference between northerners and yankees
#17. To: Ada (#16)
#18. To: NeoconsNailed (#17)
We're back to square one -- enjoy the ecstasy high while it lasts, but have some pot handy to soften the crash in January.
#19. To: Ada (#18)
Grasping at Inhaling through straws is more like it. But that in itself is a treat.
#20. To: Lod, neoconsnailed (#19)
Grasping at Inhaling through straws is more like it. But that in itself is a treat.
#21. To: Ada (#20)
#22. To: Ada (#20)
#23. To: Lod (#22)
As long as we stay home, that wouldn't bother me. Our global bullshit cannot be sustained.
#24. To: Lod (#22)
As long as we stay home, that wouldn't bother me. Our global bullshit cannot be sustained.
#25. To: StraitGate (#24)
#26. To: NeoconsNailed, ada, turtle (#6)
http ://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm 2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
#27. To: Artisan (#26)
#28. To: NeoconsNailed (#27)
#29. To: Artisan (#28)
#30. To: NeoconsNailed (#29)
#31. To: Artisan (#30)
#32. To: NeoconsNailed (#31)
#33. To: Artisan (#32)
Someone who promotes faggotry such as Glenn and Justin are disordered, until they repent they don't know right from wrong.
#34. To: NeoconsNailed (#33)
#35. To: NeoconsNailed (#33)
#36. To: Artisan (#35)
(Edited)
#37. To: NeoconsNailed (#36)
To: Artisan
#38. To: Artisan (#37)
"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning
#39. To: Artisan (#37)
oh I get it. so people who aren't afraid to criticize fags and condemn sodomy and perversion are therefore themselves fags.
#40. To: Artisan, Rotara (#37)
Have you ever been married? for how long? kids?
#41. To: Ada (#40)
"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning
#42. To: Rotara (#41)
Most of society is inappropriate
#43. To: Ada (#40)
#44. To: Fred Mertz (#39)
Is that you, A K A Stone? How did you hijack artisan's account?
#45. To: Ada (#42)
"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning
#46. To: Artisan (#43)
proud homos, by their very nature can not be conservative
#47. To: Artisan (#37)
(Edited)
.
.
.