See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Dangerous Faggot: “Let’s Beat Feminism Together.”
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blo ... t-lets-beat-feminism-together/
Published: Feb 29, 2016
Author: Karen De Coste
Post Date: 2016-02-29 08:06:00 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 2356
Comments: 94
I like how Milo Yiannopoulos has been disrupting college campuses one trigger at a time, as he likes to say. He is openly queer, articulate, funny, and blunt- honest outrageous. And he’s a conservative. Accordingly, he may be a Coulter-like statist on some issues, but on the topic of feminism he has been a leading anti- SJW activist. And he calls his speaking-debate tour the “Dangerous Faggot Tour.” This month he was at the very radical, left-wing (surprise, I know) University of Michigan debating a feminist. In all of his usual candor, his closing arguments noted that it is male imaginativeness that explored the oceans, got us to the stars, built what was best about the world, and generally, he exalts the role of men in society. He says that in America today men are ridiculed and free speech is curtailed by feminism in a world where women have a stranglehold on academia and politics. His shtick – as a Brit – is to help expose a poisonous, hateful, sexist system that is finally being exposed to the public. He calls feminists a tiny, angry minority that is shrinking by the day. And he does this all very poignantly. In this video he debates the Trump campaign with Kate Andrews from the Adam Smith Institute, who is somewhat of a Republitarian. Kate is not always bad on issues, but here she comes off as a defender of perpetually offended women and minority persons. What is important to understand about Social Justice Warrior-ism is that its greatest defenders do not have a clue that most women do not side with these shrill, 20-something Social Justice Warriors and their crazed hatred of all things male and/or traditional. We are not perpetually offended at every turn in the road, every word uttered, and every action taken. And we are not underpaid and under-promoted in corporate America due to glass ceilings and misogyny and patriarchy. We are not offended by Donald Trump, we do not need safe spaces, we are not triggered by something we don’t agree with, and we do not genuflect at the alter of female talk TV and left-wing female academics. These people who pretend to argue for our cause and speak for us have absolutely nothing in common with most of us women.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-44) not displayed.
.
.
.
#45. To: Ada (#42)
I bozo the obvious ones.
Is it fags you disapprove of or their behavior? I belong to a ski club where one of the males is obviously homosexual but very well regarded by the other men in the club. When my son was in his teens, I would have had no reservation about sending him off alone on an overnight ski trip with this fellow. I cannot say the same about some of the club straights if he had been a girl. His behavior has always been exemplary. Raimondo and Greenwald do not represent themselves as being conservative. They are libertarian and Greenwald might even be left-libertarian. So what? Both of them contribute a great deal to the cause of freedom. I might add more so than most conservatives do. (I used to be conservative but have given up on them.)
Don't you think you're getting a little carried away on this, Art? Everybody knows you're straight as an arrow, but I think if you save this thread and look at it in another 10 years you may agree you've rather gone off the deep end -- the "too much" factor in terms of quantity merely for the intrinsic weight of the subject. So many posts, such white-hot passion about getting people to stop posting stuff by fag authors regardless of its merits -- what gives? Or is it people referring to them as conservative that's got you het up? Discuss it calmly would be my suggestion. My point is obviously that what you're promoting might be a bit impractical. Apparently you weren't here when somebody posted -- purely for our enjoyment -- a performance by phenomenal pianist Van Cliburn the other day. He prolly didn't know Cliburn was fag and it's irrelevant whether he did, I mention it merely to show how shot through our culture is with useful work done by fags, most of them giving no clue of it through history. Yes, the militancy of some of them today is ripping amerika to shreds and I hate and deplore it. But so far I'm not aware Raimondo, Greenwald or Cliburn have been involved in all that -- suspect it would be all over the net if so -- and it's pretty hard to imagine them approving the persecution of Christians who exercise their God-given option not to bake fag cakes. I see Raimondo at least disapproves fag marriage (youtube). Voilà, I've spelt out my position and you're still in a rage. What more can I do except suggest this isn't getting us anywhere. You see no incongruity regularly receiving communion from Catholic priests -- I see no huge blight in people freely linking any valid material. And as Mrs. Robert Clarkson used to say in all guilelessness, neither is the twain gonna mix :-)
Never seen any articles be either of those two where they have "promoted" faggotry. As far as I'm concerned, a person can be homosexual and still be conservative in other ways. During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
this issue arose in post #26 when I referred to the intercept article, which referred to greenwald as "a conservative." I disagreed and replied "also, what a stupid line at the beginning of this article that claims greenwald "is a conservative." regarding your question "Is it fags you disapprove of or their behavior?", most of them seem to have their identity as being openly homosexual - in their mannerisms, behavior, etc. They believe that there is nothing wrong with it, or else they wouldn't act so proud of it. As I stated above to NN, that's sad if someone has these leanings and it would be a cross to bear for them. But I do not agree with them embracing that lifestyle. For them to do so is a grave mistake and a serious sin. Heterosexuals oftentimes embrace and flaunt their sexual sinfulness also, and that is also a terrible mistake. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Voilà, I've spelt out my position and you're still in a rage... i'm not in a rage, I was simply arguing my point and responding to your posts. my replies are one reply to each persons post. Nothing at 4um would warrant getting in to a rage, imo. 4um is just an amusing diversion to discuss stuff. I didn't care when it was shut down. life would go on the same for me. I have many other outlets to discuss stuff If I want to., as I'm sure everyone probably does. I never said for you or anyone else not to post anything or censor content based on the authors sexual habits. I simply stated that I would not post it. 80% of the stuff posted here I don't read anyway and if I do read it I just skim it. regarding your line going to communion has nothing whatsoever with homos. you cannot assume or imply that all Catholic priests are perverts, homos or pederasts. That would be crazy. Although they (the catholic hierarchy who were complicit in these type crimes)have certainly brought on this bias themselves and caused the disdain which many people have for them. Statistically though, the percentage of catholic priests who are molesters or perverts is no more than that of jewish rabbis or protestant ministers. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
I remember in the 90s there was a dyke woman who was the head of the ultra radical feminist, abortionist group NOW (national organization of women)) in Los Angeles, and she later had some magical transformation and became an alleged "conservative,". Her name was tammy bruce, and she even was praised by the supposedly conservative dr laura schlessinger, the jewish radio psychologist. The two woman praised each other in public and wrote forwards to each others books, etc. Bruce adopted aggressive neoconservatism, thus claiming to be a conservative convert. At the same time she claimed homseoxuality as normal, healthy, promoted it as normal, and just a life choice. while she sometimes critiqued what she called 'militant gays.' Tammy bruce by the way had a tabloid fling with bill Bixby's (the incredible hulk's) dyke ex wife. To me this is all very sick and I don't think anyone who would promote such a disordered, personally destructive, and sinful life as "moral" and "normal" could ever be considered as a legitimate conservative. To me a conservative is one who adheres to and submits to God's basic laws (COMMANDS). Their opinions, and very being, flow from that basic foundation. Of course they are still flawed sinners, as we all are, but we would never flaunt our sin and be proud of it and encourage it, right?? I certainly hope not. In someone who regards homosexuality as "normal," (when in reality it is one of the most serious sins, "one which cries out to heaven for vengeance", that person is inherently disordered and to me would not be considered a conservative. Because blatant and flagrant rejection of God's basic laws is very scary for the person, it doesn't bode well for their eternal future, and is literally like the devil (pride.) Full Question What are sins that cry to heaven for vengeance and sins against the Holy Spirit? Answer Most Catholics are familiar with the term mortal sin. Mortal sins deprive the soul of grace. They are serious transgressions of God's law, done freely and deliberately with a clear understanding of what they are. Their result is to deny a soul entrance to heaven. There are particular mortal sins that are so evil that they are said to be sins that cry to heaven for vengeance: murder (Gn 4:10), sodomy (Gn 17:20-21), oppression of the poor (Ex 2:23), and defrauding workers of their just wages (Jas 5:4). Sins against the Holy Spirit are mortal sins that harden a soul by its rejection of the Holy Spirit. Six sins are in this category. They are despair, presumption, envy, obstinacy in sin, final impenitence, and deliberate resistance to the known truth." "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Wasn't Greenwald but a fellow called Milo Yiannopoulos who was described by Karen Coulter as a conservative fag in the first sentence of the article. I like how Milo Yiannopoulos has been disrupting college campuses one trigger at a time, as he likes to say. He is openly queer, articulate, funny, and blunt- honest outrageous. And he’s a conservative. Accordingly, he may be a Coulter-like statist on some issues, but on the topic of feminism he has been a leading anti- SJW activist. And he calls his speaking-debate tour the “Dangerous Faggot Tour. A public figure if he is queer is almost required to come out lest his enemies try to blackmail him. Raimondo, for instance, didn't come out until his site had been up for years. Just something he had to do, I would think, and he hasn't mentioned it since. I'm sure you have heard the rumors about Chief Justice Roberts being a closet queer (if you haven't I'll post a link from tex marre) whose prime qualification for the job was that he could call Bush43 by his first name. May not be true, of course, but the suspicion resurfaced when he changed his Obamacare vote at the very last minute causing some critics to believe he had been blackmailed. Better to be openly homosexual than be blackmailed into hurting the country.
Don't forget this! "He (Artisan) is OK, he's just got a lot of energy. He's on our side. He's very committed! He's a Trump guy!" Sorry I didn't take the soma/ :-) "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Ok right, Milo Yiannopoulos. Thanks for the correction. yes, john Roberts has always been very shady even before he was nominated because he had proudly boasted that roe v wade "was the settled law of the land." That is not something that a conservative pro lifer would ever say, because number one roe v wade is not a law, and according to actual pro lifers themselves, it has never been considered 'settled' (accepted.) To those who like abortion rights, yes it is considered long settled. in my opinion, only an idiot would have ever considered Roberts conservative if they had actually viewed his record. I wrote this back at LP at the time, that he was not trustworthy. Plus, anyone nominated by a bush by definition should be known to be untrustworthy and not conservative. It wouldn't surprise me if that pervert arch-criminal John Roberts is a homo. That makes perfect sense. who knows what he was doing in that third world country when he illegally adopted those poor foreign kids. which reminds me, Donald trump is close friends with jewish pedophile jeff Epstein, has ridden in his plane and been to his home. no one likes to mention that pesky fact. I guess its only bad if bill Clinton and alan dersowitz do it., I guess is the logic. trump's lawyer even threatened to sue the media outlet for reporting it. they said the fact that Donald rode in Epstein's plane and went to his home in no way proved the insinuations attached. lol. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
I recall him posting on FReakrepublic under his real name. Not sure if he got banned or moved on. He was occasionally flamed for his sexual preference. Not that any of this matters to anyone except Artisan. I wrote to Greenwald after reading an article about him rescuing and raising dogs shortly after I lost mine to old age. He gave me a kind reply.
I heartily disagree. It matters to God. Sodomy is "a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance." Anyone who believes that Holy Scripture is the actual word of God will acknowledge this. Promotion and attempted "normalization" of homosexuality is from the devil himself. People who do this will be very sorry when they die and are judged and are sent to hell for all eternity. it is a very sick and sad situation. I reject the popular culture that creepily promotes this, always have. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Just so you love the sinner as a fellow human being then I'm good with that. Hating, condemning and all that won't eliminate homosexuality from the face of the earth. Although I understand Iran doesn't have any of them.
Oh, no. No way. Wherever did I get that idea..... ROTF + + + !!
You forgot to ad the part that "that would be crazy." I see that you never post about the pedophile jewish rabbis, you only obsess on and try to deride the catholics - just like the masons, hagee fundies, satanists, and zionist jews do. very interesting company you are aligned with there. :-) "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
I know for sure I've zinged all those parties here and pointed out that it's by no means only the RC ones. But you see, Mart, it's the RCs you brought up here, that's why we're on that subject again. You see no irony in quoting Catholic palimpsests in shooting down homosexuality, I do. It's a free country for 15 more minutes -- deal? :-) Thanks for the ping -- I love pings! Why March 3, 2016 should have suddenly proved a ping extravaganza is a great mystery. :-?
I was suggesting that Roberts was conservative in the sense of not being openly homosexual if, indeed, that's what he is. A Supreme Court Justice should not be blackmailable and his last minute opinion change on Obamacare suggested to some people that was what happened. Years ago a homosexual could not work for the State Department because homosexual conduct was illegal and, therefore, they could be blackmailed. But of course there were homos in State and they were blackmailed. Therefore, the rules were changed to permit homos to serve. The State Department is still a problem and employees are still blackmailed (ever hear of the Israeli "honey pots") but not for homosexuality. IMO if a homosexual wishes to stay in the closet, that's fine but if someone thinks to blackmail him, he should give the old Duke of Wellington's, "publish and be damned". I hope The Donald has cut his acquaintence with Epstein. Jeff is one bad dude.
I'm unfamiliar with that passage. Surely it was not used to refer to the David and Jonathan relationship.
Raimondo's real first name was Dennis. Anyone who rescues and raises dogs can't be all bad :-). I read the same article and noted that those dogs were mighty large and therefore might prove useful should the bad guys come prowling around.
Wow, I hadn't noticed the Epstein factor -- but of course it's the most natural connection in the world. The media should theoretically be yelling about it, but of course they favor Epstein's crimes and accomplices like the British royals. I'm warning yawl, Trump is NOT conservative if that's what you're looking for. He'll be another Bush at best, and that is deplorable if not fatal for our hopes of a future for amerika. You don't get to be a plutocrat without being evil -- and if in NYC, FORGET about it! Predict that after the election he and the Clintoons will be best pals again. Slick and other top power players have their own lockers in the posh Trump Tower gym. Do you think a former prexy of amerika would suffer having his engaged nameplate removed from a place like that?
Wait a minute -- Roberts a fag? The Google eight-ball seems to say yes Yeah, some of these indicators are flimsy by themselves, but others would seem to be smoke enuff to prove a blazing fire behind the scenes. It wouldn't be a problem except these Busheviks are toxic in every possible way and that means Roberts would be prime blackmail material even in a communistically pro- gay situation like today's amerika. Bushite neocons are evil personified and no good will ever voluntarily come from their direction. (Pure coincidence -- I swear on a stack of Bibles :-)
Much suspected by me, Nothing proved can be, Quoth Elizabeth prisoner. Written with a diamond on her window at Woodstock (1555) Even the fever swamps of the right have offered no proof, but there has been plenty of suspicion since his name was first proposed.
We're heavily dependent on sources we've never met and can't vet as there are only 24 hours in a day, but I feel we can develop a nose for authenticity. If that pile of assertions is even 3/4 true, Roberts has to be a member of the lavender hill mob -- just as surely as Jonathan and David :-}
Circumstantial evidence is strong that he is a closeted queer. But nothing concrete. Unlike Bush 43 where his boyfriends have been named.
Nobody's coming after me on David and Jonathan this time? This stuff IS going mainstream :-[
Are people still doing Bitcoin? (I never understood it, so I didn't do it.)
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
There are frequent articles on it linked at www.freedomsphoenix.com -- a "must" site for all true freedom lovers -- many of them asserting it's got a great future ahead despite past volatility. Some are saying alternatives like "Litecoin" are going to leave it in the dust. I'm no expert but predict if the dollar really really drops, Bitcoin will be riding high once again.
lol - I'll stick with gold, silver, and lead. Even an EMF blast won't destroy them.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
That's circumstantial evidence too :-) If anything had been amiss, God surely would have come down on them.
That's just silly! "We need more H-1B visas, because source code is rotting in the fields." - Countenance Blog
..........the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul. And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle. “..........I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.” All I want is the truth. And the truth so far that is neither I nor any guy I've asked about this has ever said anything like that to or about another guy. There's no parallel for it in the rest of the Bible, amerikan history or world history -- except when one or both the parties were queer. My father, brother, my guy friends and compatriots, none of them report having had a friendship in (or about) which such things were said. No covenant declared or (heh heh) stripping off of robes makes the file! David was the renowned king of Israel. Where is there any case of a modern head of state saying some guy's love was better than his wife's -- or wives'? There are such, but on inspection they come off shockingly fag rather than rescuing J and D from this implication. I really don't want to be any trouble, but am just dying to know what's going on here if it's not what "queer theology” says -- same-sex love framing the adult lives of these heroes. We're supposed to take the good Book at its word but what it says clashes with the Billy Graham interpretation sometimes. The rest of what we know of David's sex life wasn't very Presbyterian. If he'd been married to one woman (1 Tim 3:2) as long as they both should live we could call Jonathan a passing adolescent thing, but the King has smashed our chances -- the 2nd quote at top is his lament at J's death, not a jotting in his soldier diary. Help me, somebody! Vindicate them! Since yawl have brought it up again 0:-)
Even with his sodomy, his murder to have Bathsheba, David was the one that the Lord loved. Many times, I don't get the messages of the Bible. Prolly need to read and study more of the NT, than the Olde. “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
wikid: "its atompunk retrofuturistic setting and artwork are influenced by the post-war culture of 1950s America", so I suppose it's at least partly ironic. Thanks for reading it, Dak -- makes life worth living! Mine, that is.....
So you agree with the iconoclasts. Thanks for weighing in. Next!
Exactly which iconoclasts are you referring to? there's only hundreds of them out there.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
The ones who call David a fag, of course. You used the word sodomy? What made me think you were an atheist? Must be another 4umizer.
Same sex, but chaste, love? I know it sounds unlikely, especially what we know about their neighbors. But the kings of Israel did know the law.
David found favor with the Lord in all that he did except in the matter of Uriah the Hittite. That means that David's relationship with Jonathan was okay.
If you mean platonic, have it your way -- wouldn't really change anything.
Not Platonic but obedient to the law. The question being just what the law. Was all sodomy prohibited or just temple prostitution and homosexual rape?
Comments (85 - 94) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning
#46. To: Artisan (#43)
proud homos, by their very nature can not be conservative
#47. To: Artisan (#37)
(Edited)
#48. To: Artisan (#32)
Someone who promotes faggotry such as Glenn and Justin are disordered...
#49. To: Ada (#46)
Raimondo and Greenwald do not represent themselves as being conservative.
#50. To: NeoconsNailed (#47)
So many posts, such white-hot passion...
"You see no incongruity regularly receiving communion from Catholic priests -- "
#51. To: Bill D Berger (#48)
As far as I'm concerned, a person can be homosexual and still be conservative in other ways.
http://www.catholic.com/quickquestions/what-are-sins-that-cry-to-heaven-for- vengeance-and-sins-against-the-holy-spirit
#52. To: Artisan (#49)
also, what a stupid line at the beginning of this article that claims greenwald "is a conservative."
#53. To: NeoconsNailed (#47)
So many posts, such white-hot passion
- Donald J. Trump, future president of the United States.
#54. To: Ada (#52)
#55. To: Ada (#52)
Raimondo, for instance, didn't come out until his site had been up for years. Just something he had to do, I would think, and he hasn't mentioned it since.
#56. To: Fred Mertz, ada, aka stone (#55)
Not that any of this matters to anyone except Artisan.
#57. To: Artisan (#56)
#58. To: Artisan (#50)
going to communion has nothing whatsoever with homos. you cannot assume or imply that all Catholic priests are perverts, homos or pederasts.
#59. To: NeoconsNailed (#58)
Oh, no. No way. Wherever did I get that idea..... ROTF + + + !!
#60. To: Artisan (#59)
(Edited)
#61. To: Artisan (#54)
#62. To: Artisan (#56)
Sodomy is "a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance.
#63. To: Fred Mertz (#55)
#64. To: Artisan, all (#54)
#65. To: Ada (#61)
#66. To: NeoconsNailed (#65)
#67. To: Ada (#66)
#68. To: NeoconsNailed (#67)
If that pile of assertions is even 3/4 true, Roberts has to be a member of the lavender hill mob -
#69. To: Ada (#68)
#70. To: NeoconsNailed (#69)
#71. To: Lod (#70)
#72. To: NeoconsNailed (#71)
#73. To: NeoconsNailed (#69)
Nobody's coming after me on David and Jonathan this time?
#74. To: NeoconsNailed (#71)
#75. To: Ada (#73)
(Edited)
#76. To: NeoconsNailed (#75)
#77. To: Dakmar (#74)
#78. To: Lod (#76)
#79. To: NeoconsNailed (#78)
#80. To: Lod (#79)
#81. To: NeoconsNailed (#75)
same-sex love framing the adult lives of these heroes
#82. To: Lod (#76)
Even with his sodomy, his murder to have Bathsheba, David was the one that the Lord loved. Many times, I don't get the messages of the Bible.
#83. To: Ada (#81)
#84. To: NeoconsNailed (#83)
.
.
.