[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Hezbollah WMD Attacks Inside US Cities?
Source: References Noted Within
URL Source: http://www.freedom4um.com
Published: Feb 7, 2006
Author: Patrick B. Briley
Post Date: 2006-02-07 20:21:01 by OKCSubmariner
Keywords: Hezbollah, Attacks, Cities?
Views: 653
Comments: 61

Copyright 2006 by Patrick B. Briley

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad recently pledged in late 2005 to use Iran's weapons capabilities to "wipe Israel off the map" and to "DESTROY AMERICA." Iran's hardliner 'sees the light'. Iran’s pledge to destroy America was not made as a bluff or just because the US has led world nations against Iran’s nuclear weapon program.

AlQaeda and Hezbollah terrorist group leaders aligned with Iran and Syria have also made recent threats against the US. Bin Laden’s last tape warned in January 2006 of attacking, bleeding the US economy and destroying the US if the US does not agree to the terms of Laden’s Islamic truce. The Hezbollah international terror group leader, Hasan Nasrallah, made a speech on Hezbollah’s Al Manar Television immediately after 9/11 warning that America's day of judgment would come.

Bashar Assad, the Syrian leader of Iran’s military ally, also has made threats against the US. Syria Threatens US with Military Retaliation Iran's President Ahmedinejad just attended a terror summit in January 2006 hosted by Syria's leader Assad.

Iran, Syria, Bin Laden and Nasrallah may well soon try to deliver on their threats by attacking US cities with WMDS delivered by AlQaeda and Iranian and Syrian backed Hezbollah terrorists. Syria has been helping Iran arm Hezbollah.

The Islamic terror organizations, AlQaeda and Hezbollah have forged global operational alliances with each other as well as with Iran and Syria. The Egyptian FBI informant Ali Mohammed organized and provided security for the summit meeting in Sudan between Bin Laden and the Hezbollah terror chief Mughniyah, responsible for the killing of 243 Marines killed in the bombing of their Beirut barracks in 1983. Mugniyeh was also responsible with Hezbollah for the bombings of US and French embassies, and Israeli consulates and synagogues in Argentina. Al Qaidah’s links to Iran and Hizbollah

Leaders from Hezbollah met with Hamas, Islamic Jihad and top AlQaeda leaders such as Dr. Ayman Zawahiri at two terror summits in Baghdad in December 2000 and February 2001 to amalgamate and collaborate.

Both AlQaeda and Hezbollah have the capability to conduct surveillance in the US in major US cities. In 2004 the FBI nabbed an Iranian surveillance team while the FBI was watching Israeli consulates in LA, Atlanta and Houston. Close ties have been set up by Iranian officials between Iranian intelligence, AlQaeda and Hezbollah inside Iraq and around the world. Like AlQaeda, Hezbollah surveillance teams have been picked up when operating in Western Europe for Iran. FBI Catches Iranian Surveillance Teams Red-handed

Syria and Iran have their own advanced nuclear and WMD programs. The London-based Jane's Defense Weekly recently reported that Iran and Syria signed a strategic accord meant to protect either country from international pressure regarding their weapons programs. Syria agreed to store Iranian nuclear and WMD materials and weapons if Teheran came under United Nations sanctions. Report: Syria agrees to hide Iran weapons

Syria and Iran have also been the recipients of Pakistan’s (A.Q. KHAN) and Iraq’s WMD research and materials including biological and chemical weapons as well as plutonium that can be used to make dirty radiological bombs. Russia Moved Iraqi WMD

Iran and Syria have been harboring, plotting with, and training Hezbollah and AlQaeda terrorists in the use of missiles, sabotage and likely WMDS in the Bekka Valley of Lebanon. See Iran Continues to train, arm Hezbollah and Bush Again Accuses Iran and Syria of Harboring Terrorists

Hezbollah and AlQaeda are believed to have access to Iranian and Syrian developed WMDS as well as Iraqi WMD materials stored in Iran and in Lebanon’s Bekka valley. AlQaeda and Hebollah are also believed to be sharing their acquisitions and training expertise in the use of WMDS Hezbollah preparing chemical weapons?

CIA Director George Tenet testified before Congress February 24, 2004 that Hezbollah has an extensive network of operatives on American soil and an “ongoing capability to launch terrorist attacks within the US.” This capability would include delivery and use of WMDS in major US cities. According to former Florida Senator Bob Graham of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Hezbollah has 300-400 well-trained and KNOWN terror agents inside the US. Former Deputy Secretary of State Dick Armitage has described Hezbollah as the “A-team” of terrorists, with AlQaeda being on the “B team”. Terrorists at the Gates

Yet in his most recent appearance before Congress, National Intelligence Director, John Negroponte, significantly left out mention of Hezbollah and instead emphasized that the AlQaeda terror network remains the “top concern” of the U.S. intelligence community. He did mention the nuclear activities of Iran and North Korea but said that Iran probably does not yet have nuclear weapons, nor the fissile material needed for producing them. Negroponte calls al-Qaeda, Iraq and North Korea top U.S. concerns

Negroponte may have left out mention of Hezbollah because of the political influence of a close Bush family friend and large contributor strongly loyal and representing Hezbollah, namely Lebanese billionaire Issam Fares. Hezbollah has friend close to White House

Fares has very close financial and personal ties to the Bush administration and used his influence to push for the dropping of Hezbollah from the US terrorist list Nov. 10, 2001. Colin Powell and his close benefactor friend, Issam Fares, have called Islamic terrorists like Hamas and Hezbollah freedom fighters against Israel. He has paid 4 and 5 figure speaking fees and made very large political donations to HW Bush, former Secretaries of State James Baker and Colin Powell, and other members of the GW Bush administration.

But Fares, the deputy prime minister of Lebanon, is also a close associate of Maj. General Ghazi Kanaan. Kanaan is the head of Syrian intelligence in Lebanon and he controls narcotics production and trafficking in the Bekka Valley where Hezbollah and Syria maintain WMDS from Iraq, Syria and Iran.

Negroponte also avoided publicly presenting the fact that Hezbollah and Iran have had significant access to plutonium (for over two years) and detailed, sophisticated nuclear bomb plans as described by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). See Iran's Plutonium use dates back to 2003 and U.S. fears North Korea-Iran plutonium deal as well as Iran Said to Have Nuclear Warhead plans

Negroponte’s estimate about Iran’s nuclear bomb capabilities may also have been very wrong because Negroponte did not want to reveal that the Bush administration and EU blundered in negotiations with Iran over enriching uranium. See Iranians Retain Plutonium Plan In Nuclear Deal and EU to Iran: Plutonium's OK for Now

The US and EU intentionally and foolishly allowed Iran to continue pursuing its plutonium production and processing capabilities. Along with the bomb plans that Iran is now known to possess, plutonium can be used to build a more powerful lighter, nuclear bomb with less enriched uranium. This means that Iran may now have a nuclear bomb or is much closer to making a nuclear bomb than what Negroponte is publicly saying. Furthermore, a smaller, lighter nuclear warhead made with plutonium would further extend the range of Iran’s ballistic missiles to be able to hit targets in Europe and Israel.

But what is of even more immediate alarm is that Negroponte did not discuss the likelihood that Iran could have given Iranian plutonium to Hezbollah and AlQaeda terrorists to build very effective, small and well shielded, dirty radiological and toxic bombs to be delivered and detonated in major US cities by well established and long standing KNOWN Hezbollah cells.

If well designed dirty radiological and toxic bombs made with plutonium were detonated (even if dispersed over relatively small areas –a few square blocks, etc) in major US financial, agricultural, energy, water, transportation (ports, roads) or industrial centers or facilities, it would be a crippling blow to the US economy because these centers would not just have to be evacuated, they would have to be abandoned for years until and unless very costly and time consuming cleanup efforts were made.

The bomb grade plutonium 239 and 240 radioisotopes have half-lives of over 24,000 years and 6,500 years respectively. Ingested or inhaled in small quantities (micrograms) plutonium can cause long term and serious organ cancers. In larger quantities (grams) plutonium can not only cause radiation sickness and death, but it is also very chemically toxic. Other radioisotopes of Cesium known to be in the hands of Iran, Syria, AlQaeda and Hezbollah can also be used with plutonium to make deadly and hard to clean up dirty bombs. The fact that plutonium is so hard to clean up and is harmful in such small quantities means that numerous small dirty bombs can be built, shielded, transported and detonated in US cities before detection.

AlQaeda and Hezbollah may also be collaborating to transport and detonate two plutonium-fueled suitcase nukes obtained by AlQaeda and possibly brought into the US. These suitcase nukes can be detonated by a triggering mechanism activated by a clock or by a call from a cell phone.

Intelligence reports based on captured leaders and documents reveal that Al-Qaeda is targeting nine U.S. cities with the highest Jewish populations for attack with suitcase nukes and/or multiple dirty and toxic plutonium type radiological bombs. The FBI has been monitoring radiation levels using CIA developed detection equipment (specifically designed to look for plutonium based nuclear devices) at more than 100 mosques, homes, businesses and other sites in and around at least six of these cities. This is another indication that law enforcement and intelligence agency officials suspect Hezbollah and AlQaeda have brought nuclear or radiological weapons inside the US. Unfortunately, plutonium based dirty radiological bombs can be made transportable and undetectable with shielding and yet powerful enough to be effective especially when multiple ones can be used at the same time. See AMERICAN HIROSHIMA: The search for nukes and How to Listen for the Sound of Plutonium

Every one of the nine US cities mentioned in intelligence reports has a large, strong well-established Hezbollah group sponsored by Iran and Syria, even though not all the cities have an AlQaeda presence.

Hezbollah has had a strong, entrenched organization for over twenty years in most major US and Canadian cities like LA, San Francisco, Chicago, Detroit, New York City, Seattle, Portland, Houston, Dallas, Las Vegas, Miami, Boston, Washington, D.C, Montreal, Quebec, Toronto, Vancouver, etc. Hezbollah has backing and funding from Saudi Wahhabists, Russia and the Communist Chinese. Hezbollah now closely works with Hamas, AlQaeda, and Islamic Jihad terror groups around the world and inside the US.

Saudi radiological bomb expert and terrorist Adnan Shukrijumah and his trainees are still at large and have had the operational support of Hezbollah and AlQaeda cells and Saudi Wahhabbists in these cities as they have moved in and out of the US via Mexico and Canada. Shukrijumah was trained by AlQaeda master bomb maker Abu al-Masri and, like Jose Padilla, was sent into the US by Khalid Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Adnan is also an accomplished pilot and visited the Norman Airman flight school where Khalid Mohammed also sent 9/11 hijackers Mohammed Atta, AlShehhi, AlHazmi, and Moussaoui. It is very likely that Adnan could train Hezbollah and AlQaeda terrorists in how to transport (even by plane), plant and detonate dirty radiological and suitcase nuke bomb inside US cities.

Bin Laden sought and received a fatwah ruling from Muslim clerics in 2005 for Islamic religious permission to detonate nuclear devices inside the US. The Quran requires bin Laden’s offer of a truce before Bin Laden can carry out the fatwah to use nuclear weapons in the US. To maintain support from more moderate Muslims in the streets around the world, Bin Laden would be more likely to hit a sin city (gays and film industry) like San Francisco that also has a large Jewish population. AlQaeda has also gone back after missed targets like the Trans America Building in San Francisco repeatedly until they succeed, especially since it is a financial center that Laden would want to destroy to bleed the US economy as strongly implied in his last warning tape to America.

Iran and Syria has said that if Israel or the US attacks Iranian or Syrian WMD (nuclear, chemical and/or biological) facilities, Iran and Syria will retaliate against the US. Many have thought the Iranian and Syrian retaliation would be limited to US interests in Iraq, the Middle East and perhaps Europe. What has been publicly overlooked is the fact that Iran and Syria could and would use their international proxy terror organization Hezbollah to launch WMD attacks, chemical, biological and nuclear, against US cities. As demonstrated in this article, Hezbollah has a solid capability to attack US cities with WMDS including suitcase nukes and dirty radiological bombs with or without the participation of AlQaeda. Hezbollah does not need Bin Laden’s fatwah and religious ruling to retaliate against US cities for Iran and Syria but Hezbollah may well receive AlQaeda’s help anyway.

The window of opportunity for the US and Israel to attack Iran’s and Syria’s WMD and nuclear facilities becomes more problematic by August 2006 when the Russians will have completed advanced air defense missile batteries to protect the facilities. Putin’s Plan for Conflict with Iran

There are more than ten major Iranian and Syrian WMD and nuclear facilities that are deep underground and hardened to withstand bombardment. Recall that Syria has agreed to store Iranian WMD and nuclear materials and weapons. It may well take US nuclear bunker busting bombs dropped from Stealth bombers at high altitude to destroy the Iranian and Syrian facilities. The use of US nuclear bunker busting bombs would be a further excuse used by Iran and Syria to justify to Muslims the unleashing of Hezbollah and possibly AlQaeda WMD and nuclear attacks in US cities.

Copyright 2006 by Patrick B. Briley

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#13. To: OKCSubmariner (#0)

Juggernaut Gathering Momentum, Headed for Iran

What President George W. Bush, FOX news, and the Washington Times were saying about Iraq three years ago they are now saying about Iran. After Saturday's vote by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to report Iran's suspicious nuclear activities to the UN Security Council, the president wasted no time in warning, "The world will not permit the Iranian regime to gain nuclear weapons."

The next IAEA milestone will be reached on March 6, when its director, Mohamed ElBaradei, makes a formal report to the Security Council regarding what steps Iran needs to take to allay growing suspicions. The Bush administration, however, has already mounted a full-court press to indict and convict the Iranian leaders, and the key question is why.

Iran signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty and insists (correctly) that the treaty assures signatories the right to pursue nuclear programs for peaceful use. And when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice claims, as she did last month, "There is simply no peaceful rationale for the Iranian regime to resume uranium enrichment," she is being, well, disingenuous again.

If Dr. Rice has done her homework, she is aware that in 1975 President Gerald Ford's chief of staff Dick Cheney and his defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld bought Iran's argument that it needed a nuclear program to meet future energy requirements. This is what Iranian officials are saying today, and they are supported by energy experts who point out that oil extraction in Iran is already at or near peak and that the country will need alternatives to oil in coming decades.

Ironically, Cheney and Rumsfeld were among those persuading the reluctant Ford in 1976 to approve offering Iran a deal for nuclear reprocessing facilities that would have brought at least $6.4 billion for US corporations like Westinghouse and General Electric. The project fell through when the Shah was ousted three years later.

It is altogether reasonable to expect that Iran's leaders want to have a nuclear weapons capability as well, and that they plan to use their nuclear program to acquire one. From their perspective, they would be fools not to. Iran is one of three countries earning the "axis-of-evil" sobriquet from President Bush and it has watched what happened to Iraq, which had no nuclear weapons, as well as what did not happen to North Korea, which does have them. And Iran's rival Israel, which has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty but somehow escapes widespread opprobrium, has a formidable nuclear arsenal cum delivery systems.

Israeli threats to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities simply provide additional incentive to Tehran to bury and harden them against the kind of Israeli air attack that destroyed the Iraqi nuclear facility at Osirak in 1981. Although the US (together with every other UN Security Council member) condemned that attack, Dick Cheney and other senior officials do not disguise their view that it was just what the doctor ordered at the time ... and that the same prescription might take care of Iran.

Who Is Threatened by Iranian Nukes?

The same country that felt threatened by putative nuclear weapons in the hands of Iraq. With at least 200 nuclear weapons and various modes of delivery at their disposal, the Israelis have a powerful deterrent. They appear determined to put that deterrent into play early to pre-empt any nuclear weapons capability in Iran, rather than have to deal with one after it has been put in place. Israeli leaders seem allergic to the thought that other countries in the region might be able to break its nuclear monopoly and they react neuralgically to proposals for a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East. Bending over backwards to such sensitivities, the US delegation to the IAEA delayed the proceedings for a day in a futile attempt to delete from Sunday's report language calling for such a zone. The final report called for a "Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction." This is the first time a link has been made, however implicitly, between the Iranian and Israeli nuclear programs.

The argument that the US is also threatened directly by nuclear weapons in Iranian hands is as far-fetched as was the case before the war in Iraq, when co- opted intelligence analysts were strongly encouraged to stretch their imaginations - to include, for example the specter that Iraqi weapons of mass destruction could be delivered by unpiloted aerial vehicles (UAVs) launched from ships off the US coast. No, I'm not kidding. They even included this in the infamous National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) of October 1, 2002.

That canard was held up to ridicule by the US Air Force, which was permitted to take a footnote in the NIE. The scare story nonetheless provided grist for the president's key speech in Cincinnati on October 7, 2002 - three days before Congress voted to authorize war. That was also the speech in which he also warned, "Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof - the smoking gun - that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."

While Congress was voting for war on October 10, more candid observations came in highly unusual remarks from a source with excellent access to high-level thinking at the White House. Philip Zelikow, at the time a member of the prestigious President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and confidant of then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice (and later Executive Director of the 9/11 commission), said this to a crowd at the University of Virginia:

Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I'll tell you what I think the real threat is and actually has been since 1990 - it's the threat against Israel. And this is the threat that dare not speak its name ... the American government doesn't want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell. More recently, in the case of Iran, President Bush has been unabashed in naming Israel as the most probable target of any Iranian nuclear weapons. He has also created a rhetorical lash-up of the US and Israel, referring three times in the past two weeks to Israel as an "ally" of the US, as if to condition Americans to the notion that the US is required to join Israel in any confrontation with Iran. For example, on February 1 the president told the press, "Israel is a solid ally of the United States; we will rise to Israel's defense if need be." Asked if he meant the US would rise to Israel's defense militarily, Bush replied with a startlingly open-ended commitment, "You bet, we'll defend Israel."

In repeatedly labeling Israel our "ally," Bush is following his own corollary to the dictum of Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels that if you repeat something often enough, most people will believe it. In an unusual moment of candor in a discussion of domestic affairs last May, Bush noted:

That's the third time I've said that. I'll probably say it three more times. See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda. Why No Treaty?

The trouble is that, strictly speaking, allies are not picked by presidential whim - or by smart staffers like the top Bush aide who bragged that he and his colleagues are "history's actors ... creating new realities." Bush's speech writers are acting as though the "new realities" they create can include defense treaties. But unless they've changed the Constitution, in our system nations become allies via treaty; and treaties have to be approved by a two- thirds vote of the Senate.

There is no treaty of alliance with Israel.

But why? Earlier, I had had the impression that it must be because of US reluctance - despite widespread sympathy for Israel - to get entangled in the complexities of the Middle East and gratuitously antagonize Arab countries. Comparing notes with Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) colleagues with more experience in the Middle East, however, I learned that the Israelis themselves have shown strong resistance to a US-Israel defense treaty - for reasons quite sound from their perspective, and quite instructive from ours.

The possibility of a bilateral treaty was broached after the 1973 Yom Kippur war as a way to reduce chances of armed conflict between Israel and its Arab neighbors. But before the US could commit to defending Israel, its boundaries would have had to be defined, and the Israelis wanted no part of that. Moreover, the Israelis feared that a defense pact would curb their freedom of action - as would signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty. They were aware that in a crisis situation, the US would almost certainly discourage them from resorting to their familiar policy of massive - often disproportionate - retaliation against the Arabs. It became quite clear that the Israelis did not want the US to have any say over when they would use force, against whom, and what (US or non-US) equipment might be employed.

Aside from all that, the Israelis were, and are, confident that their influence in Washington is such as to ensure US support, no matter what. And, as President Bush's rhetoric demonstrates, they are correct in thinking they can, in effect, have their cake and eat it too - a commitment equivalent to a defense treaty, with no binding undertakings on Israel's part.

That is a very volatile admixture. Congress would do well to wake up to its Constitutional prerogatives and responsibilities in this key area - particularly now that the juggernaut to war has begun to roll.

Preparing the Public

One major task is to convince the public and, as far as possible, our allies that the Iran-nuclear problem is critical. This would be an uphill task, were it not for the success of our domesticated media in suppressing the considered judgment of the US intelligence community that Iran is nowhere near a nuclear weapon.

Washington Post reporter Dafna Linzer, to her credit, drew on several inside sources to report on August 2, 2005, that the latest NIE concludes Iran will not be able to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon until "early to mid-next decade," with general consensus among intelligence analysts that 2015 would actually be the earliest. That important information was ignored in other media and quickly dropped off the radar screen.

In the Washington of today there is no need to bother with unwelcome intelligence that does not support the case you wish to make. Polls show that hyped-up public statements on the threat from Iran are having some effect, and indiscriminately hawkish pronouncements by usual suspects like senators Joseph Lieberman and John McCain are icing on the cake. Ahmed Chalabi-type Iranian "dissidents" have surfaced to tell us of secret tunnels for nuclear weapons research, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld keeps reminding the world that Iran is the "world's leading state sponsor of terrorism." Administration spokespeople keep warning of Iranian interference on the Iraqi side of their long mutual border - themes readily replayed in FOX channel news and the Washington Times. This morning's Chicago Tribune editorial put it this way:

There will likely be an economic confrontation with Iran, or a military confrontation, or both. Though diplomatic efforts have succeeded in convincing most of the world that this matter is grave, diplomatic efforts are highly unlikely to sway Iran. On Saturday, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist insisted that Congress has the political will to use military force against Iran, if necessary, repeating the mantra " We cannot allow Iran to become a nuclear nation." Even Richard Perle has come out of the woodwork to add a convoluted new wrinkle regarding the lessons of the attack on Iraq. Since one cannot depend on good intelligence, says Perle, it is a matter of "take action now or lose the option of taking action." One of the most influential intellectual authors of the war on Iraq, Perle and his "neo-conservative" colleagues see themselves as men of biblical stature. Just before the attack on Iraq, Perle prophesized:

If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war ... our children will sing great songs about us years from now. Those songs have turned out to be funeral dirges for over 2,250 US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

christine  posted on  2006-02-07   21:18:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: christine (#13)

"The world will not permit the Iranian regime to gain nuclear weapons."

China just mind lend them a couple to take the USA out in Iraq.

RickyJ  posted on  2006-02-07   21:20:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

        There are no replies to Comment # 15.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]