See other 9/11 Articles
Title: New York court orders Iran to pay 10 billion dollars to victims families of 9/11
Source:
Pravda Main Forum
URL Source: http://engforum.pravda.ru/index.php ... 11-you-cant-make-this-shit-up/
Published: Mar 11, 2016
Author: Mario Milano
Post Date: 2016-03-12 00:24:26 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 346
Comments: 7
New York court ordered Iran to pay $10.5 billion to the relatives of the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks Iran was ordered by a New York City judge to pay more than $10.5 billion in damages to the families of those killed in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Bloomberg reported. US District Judge George Daniels ruled on Wednesday that Tehran must pay $7.5 billion to the families of people who died at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Daniels also awarded $3 billion to a group of insurers that paid property damage, business interruption and other claims.The judge said that Iran had provided active support to the terrorists who killed almost 3,000 people in three terrorist attacks in New York, Washington and in Pennsylvania. He also found that Iran had failed to defend claims that it aided the September 11 hijackers and was therefore liable for damages tied to the attacks. But how about the “innocent until proven guilty” principle? Moreover, Iran never participated in any court hearings regarding the tragic events of that fateful day in September 2001. Hossein Sheikholeslam, a senior aide to Iran’s parliamentary speaker outlined Tehran’s position on the issue in an interview with Sputnik Persian. “I never heard about this ruling and I’m very much surprised because the judge had no reason whatsoever to issue such a ruling… Iran never took part in any court hearings related to the events of September 11, 2001. Even if such an absurd and ridiculous decision has been made, the charges simply hold no water because Iran has never been mentioned at any stage of the investigation and the trials that followed,” Hossein Sheikholeslam said. The investigation was partly secret but, judging by what was made public, the main suspect was Saudi Arabia, not Iran since all the masterminds were either Saudi nationals or lived and studied in Saudi Arabia, he added. “All this looks like another evil joke by the Americans,” Hossein Sheikholeslam said in conclusion. Iran Press Editor-in-Chief Emad Abshenas, dismissed the ruling as arguably the most stupid and ludicrous in the history of US courts. “The people who committed those terrorist attacks were neither friends nor allies of Iran. They were our sworn enemies, members of al-Qaeda, which considers Iran as their enemy. Fifteen out of the 19 terrorists were Saudi citizens, which happens to be America’s best friend. The remaining four terrorists lived in Saudi Arabia and enjoyed Saudi support. Therefore the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks had nothing to do with Iran,” Emad Abshenas emphasized. Poster Comment: Ghostwriter, Shura, said: "911 was engineered and executed by Israel and CIA. That is who is responsible for damages." 911 was facilitated by every news agency in the world controlled by jews. Not a single country in the world broke ranks and called down the US for invading countries based on those shameless lies. Jews mobilized major global assets and armies of propagandists to keep the lid on that one. 911 was essentially a police matter that was artificially made to appear like war against the US. To me 911 is a beautiful showcase exposing the depth and scope of global judaic infiltration and corruption. 911 showed me how many countries are infected with jews at the leadership levels. 911 proved to me conclusively that insurance companies are under total judaic control as are police and the military and cannot be trusted to serve us faithfully. Even Russia plays along like an obedient little slave. China pretends to go to the moon while it drives it's human cattle like slaves. The whole thing can only self-destruct under the weight of it's own filth. .#17 Ghostwriter Ivan88, , said: "What if Iran was not lawfully served?" They don't need anything more to publish widely in their newspapers what really happened at 911. This headline showpiece is pure hoax maintenance. The fact that Iran fails to blow the whistle on the 911 lies is because they are under the control of the tribal affiliates of the 911 liars. Do you not find it interesting that not a single country on earth dares even insinuate the truth in this matter, not even disguised as fiction? I consider that very tellling. Shura: I bet you 7,000 NY jews would appear in Court to testify that they personally saw Ahmadinejad place nuclear bombs in WTC.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
(Edited)
Zharkov Iran never took part in any court hearings It looks nuts from the outside world perspective, and it is even from a lawyer's perspective, but it is the result of our court procedure and nothing more. If a lawsuit is filed against Iran, and Iran does not answer the complaint in court, the court is required to enter judgement for the plaintiff or complaining parties. A failure to answer is presumed to be an admission that the complaint is true. Now some people think we are presumed innocent until PROVEN guilty, but a default judgement where the defendant never appears in court will allow minimal proof to support the judgement. All it takes is one witness or an affidavit under oath, and the case is over if the defendant never appears in court. Very few other nations have this crazy presumption of guilt by silence, but it is our law in a civil case. It is not the same in a criminal case. In a criminal case, there is the right to remain silent and no inference of guilt may arise from silence. In a criminal case, one's liberty is at stake so the rules are tougher on the prosecution than in a civil case where only money is at stake. One interesting thing about the US Constitution is the right not to testify against yourself has been interpreted to exist only in criminal cases where the testimony is potentially incriminating for the witness. If the testimony is not incriminating, the courts can force a witness to testify, such as if they were granted immunity or the testimony is harmless to the witness. The 5th Amendment says that no person shall be compelled in a criminal case to be a witness against himself. So Iran is stuck with the judgement, but judgements have expiration dates. In some states they are only valid for 10 or 20 years and then become unenforceable. In many states, a default judgement can be set aside by the court if the defendant asks within 30 days after it is entered into court records. One interesting question might be whether Iran could rely on the 4th Amendment in not appearing in court, because it would expose them to interrogation of their officials. The 4th Amendment supposedly protects the "persons, papers, and effects" of the individual person while they are in the United States. Zharkov: T-Koga, said: "A failure to answer is presumed to be an admission that the complaint is true. But if Iran did answer, it would mean Iran accepted the courts jurisdiction." Correct. That is the lawyer's dilemma. If he appears on behalf of a client, the court has jurisdiction, if he doesn't appear, then the court may proceed anyway because nobody challenged jurisdiction. Every case is different on that point. In some cases, the best advice is to ignore the court because the judgement will not be enforced, such as with North Korea being sued for whatever reason. Nobody is going to collect from them. In other cases, financial exposure is so great that it pays to fight the case. In Iran's situation, they could easily win this case because everyone knows Iran had nothing to do with 9/11. So they probably should have appeared by attorney and fought the case. But if nobody can enforce the judgement against Iran because Obama just sent all of Iran's money back to Iran, then they made the right decision to ignore the lawsuit. It is an easier decision to make if the country is not on good treaty terms with the US, but the really hard decision involves lawsuits filed in one state against someone domiciled in a different state of the USA. Because judgements of one state can be entered into the court records of another state and enforced, so the decision can be much more difficult on whether to challenge jurisdiction or not. Shura: Ghostwriter said: "911 was facilitated by every news agency in the world controlled by jews. Not a single country in the world broke ranks and called down the US for invading countries based on those shameless lies. Jews mobilized major global assets and armies of propagandists to keep the lid on that one. 911 was essentially a police matter that was artificially made to appear like war against the US. To me 911 is a beautiful showcase exposing the depth and scope of global judaic infiltration and corruption. 911 showed me how many countries are infected with jews at the leadership levels. 911 proved to me conclusively that insurance companies are under total judaic control as are police and the military and cannot be trusted to serve us faithfully. Even Russia plays along like an obedient little slave. China pretends to go to the moon while it drives it's human cattle like slaves. The whole thing can only self-destruct under the weight of it's own filth". What you are saying may be true, but here we are dealing with the crime of the century, 911, which was of Israel's making nobody else's
And if you believe that Iran had anything to do with Sept 11, I have a bridge in NY for sale, make an offer.
“The people who committed those terrorist attacks were neither friends nor allies of Iran. They were our sworn enemies, members of al-Qaeda, which considers Iran as their enemy. Fifteen out of the 19 terrorists were Saudi citizens, which happens to be America’s best friend. The remaining four terrorists lived in Saudi Arabia and enjoyed Saudi support. Therefore the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks had nothing to do with Iran,” Emad Abshenas emphasized. Emad Abshenas is correct. Recall the "dancing Israelis" as proof of foreknowledge of the event. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
Nevertheless this well illustrates what can happen when you allow Sayanim to get control of a nation's politics and judicial system. Shura's comment: "I bet you 7,000 NY jews would appear in Court to testify that they personally saw Ahmadinejad place nuclear bombs in WTC." was a great punchline in the posting.
What utter bogus bullshit. I went back, twice, to be sure that this wasn't from The Onion. Iran had as much to do with it as did Iraq, or Afghanistan for that matter.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Just Sayanim doing their duty to detract from Mossad's and Silvrstein's orchestration of 9/11.
Better they should order New Yauk to pay Iran $10 bil for all the hate and defamation that's been heaped on that poor country by the Jueish war and lie machine here, egregiously via the painfully-misnamed Freedom Tower.
This sequence preceds above comments. (Dropped from my original edit in Wordpad)
#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
#3. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
Iran Press Editor-in-Chief Emad Abshenas, dismissed the ruling as arguably the most stupid and ludicrous in the history of US courts.
#4. To: Darkwing (#2)
#5. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
#6. To: Lod (#5)
#7. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest