See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Op-Ed Robots are coming for your job
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-e ... ata-mining-20160328-story.html
Published: Mar 29, 2016
Author: Bryan Dean Wright
Post Date: 2016-03-29 08:58:59 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 183
Comments: 8
A viral video released in February showed Boston Dynamics' new bipedal robot, Atlas, performing human-like tasks: opening doors, tromping about in the snow, lifting and stacking boxes. Tech geeks cheered and Silicon Valley investors salivated at the potential end to human manual labor. Shortly thereafter, White House economists released a forecast that calculated more precisely whom Atlas and other forms of automation are going to put out of work. Most occupations that pay less than $20 an hour are likely to be, in the words of the report, “automated into obsolescence.” The so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution has found its first victims: blue- collar workers and the poor. In other words, the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution has found its first victims: blue-collar workers and the poor. The general response in working America is disbelief or outright denial. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 80% of Americans think their job will still exist in 50 years, and only 11% of today's workers were worried about losing their job to automation. Some — like my former colleagues at the CIA – insist that their specialized skills and knowledge can't be replaced by artificial intelligence. That is, until they see plans for autonomous drones that don't require a human hand and automated imagery analysis that outperforms human eyes. Human workers of all stripes pound the table claiming desperately that they're irreplaceable. Bus drivers. Bartenders. Financial advisors. Speechwriters. Firefighters. Umpires. Even doctors and surgeons. Meanwhile, corporations and investors are spending billions — at least $8.5 billion last year on AI, and $1.8 billion on robots — toward making all those jobs replaceable. Why? Simply put, robots and computers don't need healthcare, pensions, vacation days or even salaries. The job-killing-robot myth The job-killing-robot myth Powerhouse consultancies like McKinsey & Co. forecast that 45% of today's workplace activities could be done by robots, AI or some other already demonstrated technology. Some professors argue that we could see 50% unemployment in 30 years. Deniers of the scope and scale of this looming economic upheaval point hopefully to retraining programs, and insist that there always will be a need for people to build and service these machines (even as engineers are focused on developing robots that fix themselves or each other). They believe that such shifts are many decades away, even as noted futurist Ray Kurzweil, who is also Google's director of engineering, says AI will equal human intelligence by 2029. Deniers also talk about all the new jobs they assume will be created during this Fourth Industrial Revolution. Alas, a report from the 2016 World Economic Forum calculated that the technological changes underway likely will destroy 7.1 million jobs around the world by 2020, with only 2.1 million replaced. With the future value of human labor (read: our incomes) in doubt, what do we do? One way to cushion the economic blow is to reclaim something from the technology realm that we've been giving away for free: our personal data. Get your free weekly take on the most pertinent, discussed topics of the day >> Get your free weekly take on the most pertinent, discussed topics of the day >> Companies that sell personal data should pay a percentage of the resulting revenue into a Data Mining Royalty Fund that would provide annual payments to U.S. citizens, much as the Alaska Permanent Fund distributes oil revenues to Alaskans. This payment scheme would start with traditional data — customer, financial and social media information sold to advertisers — but would also extend to future forms of data like our facial expressions and other biometrics. If Google, Facebook or others were profiting from harvesting timber, oil, gold or any other public resource, it would be illegal and immoral for them not to pay for it. The same logic should apply to our data. Profound changes lie ahead with implications beyond our paychecks, to be sure. Ethicists and philosophers already are debating what a world without work might look like. It's clear that no one will escape the outcomes — negative and positive — of this economic and technological revolution. A Data Mining Royalty Fund isn't about helping just the unemployed factory worker who used to earn $20 an hour, the truck driver replaced by self-driving vehicles or the minimum-wage barista. It's about taking steps to guarantee some minimum income to your family, or the one down the block, before any of us are automated into obsolescence. Bryan Dean Wright is a former CIA covert operator who resides in Oregon. @BryanDeanWright
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#1. To: Ada (#0)
In my area they told us 20 years ago we all had to get the same city-issued garbage can on wheels because the dumping operation could be standardized and save garbagemen a lot of injuries. Now the driver just tools along and tells the big arm to grab and shake each can -- no more team of the brethren traveling with it. Does this mean 5 or 10 more guys out of work in every town across the fruited plain before this next "wave" of automation begins? Speaking of the brethren, much as I love the personal touch in stores, I won't miss having to deal with certain types of people across counters anymore if that is our fate -- apparently 'tis so with fast food and already happening. (Pure coincidence -- as the record will show!)
No garbage cans where I live. Garbage is transmitted under the street by a vacuum system. Sooooo quiet.
You are kidding us!! How does it get under there, how long has it been doing so?
The AVAC system was installed when the island was developed in erly 1970s. I dump my garbage down a chute and then magic happens as follows: An automated vacuum waste collection system, also known as pneumatic refuse collection, or automated vacuum collection (AVAC), transports waste at high speed through underground pneumatic tubes to a collection station where it is compacted and sealed in containers. When the container is full, it is transported away and emptied. The system helps facilitate separation and recycling of waste. The process begins with the deposit of trash into intake hatches, called portholes, which may be specialized for waste, recycling, or compost. Portholes are located in public areas and on private property where the owner has opted in. The waste is then pulled through an underground pipeline by air pressure difference created by large industrial fans, in response to porthole sensors that indicate when the trash needs to be emptied and help ensure that only one kind of waste material is travelling through the pipe at a time. The pipelines converge on a central processing facility that uses automated software to direct the waste to the proper container, from there to be trucked to its final location, such as a landfill or composting plant. < Every so often something gets stuck but its quickly cleared out.
All this and automated separation too?? Way cool! I feel really bad about the lack of trash separation predominating across the land -- but not bad enough to change or recycle. I figure as long as industry and government are blithely committing trillions of times the solid waste I am with the full support of the sheeple, my time is better spent elsewhere eg here :-7
#8. To: NeoconsNailed (#6)
We have to recycle. Paper in one bin and plastic/metal in another.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: NeoconsNailed (#1)
#3. To: Ada (#2)
#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#3)
How does it get under there, how long has it been doing so?
#6. To: Ada (#4)
Replies to Comment # 6.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.