[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
History See other History Articles Title: Liberalism, "Neo-Con" Conservatism, Randian Objectivism, Anarchism and Illuminism, Why They Are So Much Alike. Liberalism, "Neo-Con" Conservatism, Randian Objectivism, Anarchism and Illuminism, Why They Are So Much Alike. by Coral Snake In this 00-Hotherp report we will be looking at the political philosophies of today and asking the question, Why are they so much alike despite their appearant differences. First let's look at these philosophies. 1. Liberalism --> This is actually a stolen name applied to British style Fabian Socialism. The basic theory behind modern Liberalism as proposed by people like Bill and Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Joseph Biden and Edward Kennedy is to build up a state based on old Marxist Leninist principles GRADUALLY through a process of introducing graduated taxation, gun control, socialized medicine, state property ownership and other aspects of Socialism/Communism in small gradual pieces. 2. "Neo-Con" Conservatism --> Basically another form of socialism based on the ideas of Communist Leon Trotsky and Itialian Fascist Leader Benito Mussalini. Neo-Cons basically seek Socialism Mussalini style by merging the state with the most powerful business Corporations to form a Socialist entitiy where the state itself handles "security" (Torture, Prisons, Concentration Camps, etc) but Corporate executives rather than being eliminated continue to serve as managers of the general economy. Because they believe in the permanent state of war ideas of both Trotsky and Mussalini Neo-Cons are highly likely to engage in militarty adeventures to spread their version of "democracy" ("Elected" Fascist socialism). 3. Randian Objectivism --> The third political player is the philosophy of unhindered Capitalism proposed by Ayn Rand in her many novels. It was also the original guiding philosophy of the Libertarian Party when it first began. While it looks good on paper in the real world there is nothing in the Randian form of Libertarianism to act as a counterbalance to huge monopoly corporations becoming mini totalitarian states in their own right with the power of life and death over their "customers" and "employees" without national borders. 4. Anarchism --> This is actually an oxymoron, essentially an attempt to run a socialist state without a state. In the real world however any Anarchist Socialist "voluntary association" will eventually take on the roll of a genuine state and make participation therein life or death MANDATORY. As you can see all four of the basic offerings on today's American political tree are in fact very much alike in that all of them promise a restoration of freedom but in fact are totalitarian at a root level. Why is this. To look at this we must go back in history to the American and French Revolutions and there we will find the father of ALL of the modern political philosophies. The American Revolution, Deists and Christians Basically there ware two Religious philosophies behind the American Revolution, Protestent Christianity and Deism. While Deism was much more liberal in its doctrine than Christianity BOTH of these philosophys began with the idea of a Creator God and a fixed moral law dirived from that God that applied equally to the state, buisiness organizations and individuals. The basic difference between the two was that Christianity saw the WHOLE Holy Bible as being the basis of that fixed moral law while Deists generally saw human reason acting within the 10 Commandments alone as its basis. However both philosophies developed the idea that humans were endowed with individual rights and responsibilities that could not be taken away by the state or buisness organizations because doing so would violate the basic moral law dirived from GOD. It is from the basic philosophy of BOTH Christianity and Deism that we get the first ten amendments to the Constitution, the Constitutional requirement that legal money be gold and silver coin, and the strict limititation of copyright and patent terms that says that ideas that were still seen as basically given to their authors and inventors by God had to be given over to the public domain after a reasonable profit generating period but still within the lifetimes of their authors/discoverers. The French Revolution and Illuminism Like the American Revolution the French Revolution of 1789 began is a basically Deistic movement based on fixed moral law and human reason acting within it. However there was another force that was recently kicked out of Germany involved in the French Revolution. Illuminism. Illuminism was Neither Deistic or Christian in its form but was ATHEISTIC publically and SATANIC in many of its closed rituals. In keeping with its public Atheism Illuminsism which came to be known in France and America as Jacobinism has always tried to promote an origin story of gradual totally materialistic development of the universe. It was left to Jacobin "scientist" Jean Jaques Lamark to try to first introduce this theory of "Evolution" to scientific credibility so that could replace the GOD based creation story held by both Deists and Christians. There were three basic reasons why "Evolution" had to replace any notion of Creation in the Jacoban scheme of things. 1. By saying man was nothing more than a glorified animal it excused man acting as an animal towards his fellow man thereby excusing free sex and state theft upheld by force and torture and other animal like behaviors in the part of the citizenry. 2. It promoted the idea that there was no afterlife and therefore allowed the Jacoban state to enhance the fear of death and control it for their own purposes. 3. It promoted the idea that State leaders were the "Evolutionary Superiors" of their subjects and had the inherant right to of life and death over them "granted" by that "superiority. Therefore once Illuminism/Jacobinism replaced Deism as the basis of the French Revolution the Reign of Terror spacifically against Royalty and Aristocrats became one against the citizenry in general that the Jacobins came to call Depopulation where mass drownings and skull crusings wutn hoes, clubs and other implements accompanied the gillotine in the ever increasing orgy of mass murder that spent itself completely ONLY with the Napoleonic Wars and in fact took many of the Jacobin Illuminists including their leader Maxamilian Robespere with it. In fact so concerned were the Iluminist Jacobins with eliminating anything religious in their Illuminist State of "Republican" France that they even tried to eliminate the sabbaths of the various religions with a new "Revolutionary" calender based on "naturalistic" names for the months with four 10 day weeks in each month with an end of the year festival of 5 days in an normal year and 6 in a leap year replacing Christmas. The thing other than Napoleon that probably killed off Jacobin Illuminism and drove it underground until the 19th century was probably the falsification of Lamark's theory of "Evolution". Like most of the early evolutionists Lamark was not a genuine scientist and made a very serious mistake in his theory by ascribing "Evolution" to accidents that happened to animals like a loss of a tial or a stretching of the neck in ADULTHOOD. (In Lamark's theory a hamster was simply a descendent of a mouse that lost its tail and got fatter than a normal mouse as a forinstance.) Experements by genuine scientists in cutting the tails of mice and fattening them up basically showed that their offspring REMAINED fully tailed normal weight mice without any of the artificial "hamster" features and thereby falsified the Lamarkian theory that changes in adulthood led to "Evolution" in offspring. Without Lamarkism people who wanted a "non dogmatic" philosophy of origins had to go back to the creation story as defined by Desim as the Atheism of the Jacoban Illuminists was denied its "scientific" cover. However Illuminism was far from dead. One of the many wealthy families to take it up was the Rothschild family, the masters of the Central Banking systems of England and Napoleonic France. At this time their predominint non banking power base was the British East India company which functiond much like the TriLateral Commission, The Bilderburgs and the Council On Foreign Relations does today. It would be the British East India Company that would finally bring about a version of "Evolution" that could not be falsified at the time through a "Scientist" whose ONLY degree was for the Ministry in the Christian Religion he Rejected, Charles Darwin and would bring back Political Jacobin Illuminism under tha name "Communism" through its own member Fredric Engels and his "outside" paid off political ho Karl Marx. Basically Darwin's theory differed from Lamark's mainly in the stage of development where "Evolution" was perceived to occur. Rather than saying it occured in the adulthood of an organism Darwin made changes in the embryo of an organism that he called "gemules" but today are called mutations the basis of Evolution. Darwin also added another aspect to "Evolution" that has its origins in the revised Illuminism of the British East India Company. This was the "dialectical" or "Ordo ab Chao" interpretation of philosophy and scientific theory. Basically the dialect of Darwinism is organisms (thesis) interact with the envoronment (antithesis) and produce organisms fit to survive the environment (synthesis). While this idea of "Dialectical Materialism" would be made more famous by British East India Company member Fredric Engels and his paid political ho Karl Marx as the basis of the revival of political Illuminaism under the names of "Communism" and "Socialism" it was actually Darwin that made "dialectical materialism" the basis of a second rejection of God as father of individual rights and responsibilities through a Godless origin story sold as "scientific fact". It was this that allowed the revival of the Illuminist philosophy by EngelsMarx. Now enough of history for now we should have found out why today's political philosophies are so much alike in promising freedom but delivering TOTALITARIANISM in one form or another, Either through Corporations, the state or through psudo "voluntary" organizations. ALL MODERN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES ARE ESSENTIALLY JACOBIN/ILLUMINIST and reject GOD as the source of individual rights and responsibilities within a fixed moral framework. ALL of them are to one degree or another based on the Atheist "dialectical materiialism" theory first made public by Charles Darwin as part of his theory of "Evolution" and brought into politics and economics by Engels, Marx, Mussalini, Hitler and others to be eventually refined into the Liberals, Neo-Cons, Randians, and Leftist Anarchists of today.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#2. To: Coral Snake (#0)
To: Coral Snake I'm not a philosopher, and what I know about history you could put in a thimble, but I will agree with you on this: modern political philosophy is most definitely a rejection of God. Re: Illuminism. Doesn't it have something to do with Lucifer as the "light- bearer"? I find it interesting, and maybe significant, that the word "Ur", a city near BABYLON [ Gen 15:7 And he said unto him, I [am] the LORD that brought thee out of ** Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it. ], in Strong's Concordance, goes like this: Ur = "flame" 1) city in southern Babylonia, city of the Chaldeans, centre of moon worship, home of Abraham's father, Terah, and departure point for the Abraham's migration to Mesopotamia and Canaan from the root word 217: 1) flame, light of fire from the root word 215: 1) to be or become light, shine a) (Qal) 1) to become light (day) 2) to shine (of the sun) 3) to become bright b) (Niphal) 1) to be illuminated 2) to become lighted up c) (Hiphil) 1) to give light, shine (of sun, moon, and stars) 2) to illumine, light up, cause to shine, shine 3) to kindle, light (candle, wood) 4) lighten (of the eyes, his law, etc) 5) to make shine (of the face) See what I mean? God took Abraham out of Ur [Babylon], to be a father of a nation holy to the Lord, and the Devil [Illuminati, CorpUSA, or whatever name they choose to go by] has been trying to drag us back to Babylon ever since. The founding of America was by God: Ezekiel 34:13; Micah 4; Psalm 2. The founding of the "United States" was by the Devil. Ezekiel 17, eagles; Matthew 15:13. It was kind of on the order of the first Israel. The true temple worship was planted in the Southern Kingdom [Judah], and a cross was planted in Virginia in 1606, by a rag-tag group of Christians, by order of The First Charter of Virginia. The second colony sounds [by the long on demands, short on praise for Jesus Christ Charter] like it was intent on setting up the golden calf. And it's been a battle for the Kingdom of God [Psalm 2] ever since. The American Revolution was a contrived war, the first of many for us, given us by the same people who contrived the French Revolution, all for the purpose we are seeing now, slavery under a one world government. Some more insight here: http://www.hisholyc hurch.net/news/4dconstitution.html The Unseen System: A solution for our times. http://www.hisholychurc h.net/news/1beginning.html [We will live under God, or we will live under tyrants.]
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||