See other Religion Articles
Title: Can Christ Followers Save The World From Christians
Source:
We Hold These Truths
URL Source: http://www.whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=709
Published: Feb 6, 2006
Author: Charles E. Carlson
Post Date: 2006-02-15 00:09:52 by Red Jones
Keywords: Christians, Followers, Christ
Views: 4997
Comments: 491
Can Christ Followers save the world from Christians Charles E. Carlson Feb 06, 2006 Why all the bad news? The news stories in the world press, from South Africa to Norway, are incredibly negative about the USA. It was not always that way. Once, not long ago, most press was good to the USA. Our generations of military and tourists have been treated like liberators in Germany and Japan, countries we helped to destroy and then rebuilt. But no more, “America” is mud. This letter is not for everyone. Some already recognize the answer, but many still deny that the USA has become both the awful predator, and the world’s engine of monetary dilution. Less anyone thinks this writer is causing America’s image problem we add these words from a pretty good President, Theodore Roosevelt, who was also a decorated military officer: "Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President or any other public official, save to the extent in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country.” "In either event, it is unpatriotic not to tell the truth - whether about the president or anyone else - save in the rare case where this would make known to the enemy information of military value which would otherwise be unknown to him." -Theodore Roosevelt Jesus gave us parables to help us understand his lessons. We follow his example with a parable about a man and the pet he loves and think he controls, which we liken to our government. This man discovers, to his horror and dismay, that his family dog has become a nighttime marauder, a predator, slipping out of the yard and pillaging the community, killing other pets and threatening pedestrians, and then jumping back into the backyard to sleep it off. What should the man do: 1) Feed the dog more and hope he will stay home? 2) Build a higher fence, cement-in the yard and put double locks on every access? (3) Ignore the problem? (4) Put the dog to sleep before someone is hurt? The pet owner could try the second choice (2), if he has the patience and money, but chances are he will not sleep well at night. It is his responsibility to stop the crimes, even if it means he has to destroy his own dog. It is not up to the police to solve the crime, nor is it up to the neighbors to correct it. In truth, he should do it himself because he is responsible, not the taxpayers who pay for the animal shelter. Similarly, it is up to the most responsible Americans to correct criminal acts against its world neighbors, and if we do not then the blood of the USA’s every crime is on our hands. It is not good enough to say, "Oh, this is a great place to live...our standard of living is the envy of the world...even if we do make some mistakes." It is not our place to recite all the wrongs of our government, we would never finish, nor do we defend any other government for it murderous faults. All are corrupt to some degree. We do defend the right to life of our neighbors, as described in our own Declaration of Independence. Life itself is a gift from God...this is not (for followers of Christ) a subjective, take it or leave it observation, it is an absolute. A friend and supporter recently called to ask me if I might tone down what he considered my obvious favoritism toward the Palestinian people, whom we have come to call the Philistines. He told me I sound so biased that someone who did not know me might think "they are paying me." In fact, it is people like my caller who is supporting We Hold These Truths, so we listen. My reply was: Thanks, but I cannot help what I say or the passion that shows through. I have been to the land of the Philistines and seen. Now I am their champion as long as they are suppressed by our own government. Our government is the marauding dog. I told my friend I would try to do a better job of explaining my bias, but I must not stop defending the innocent blood that is being shed. This is not to say the Philistines, or their current leaders, Hamas, are perfect, nor to deny they have their criminal element, which they do have. I told a beleaguered Univerisity class the same thing when I stood among them in Gaza City, but it is our government. not theirs, that is the problem. I have but one point to make. God does not “Will” that this great land become the predator of the world. He expects us to be the good stewards of what we are given. We can stop the marauding animal in our back yards if we will allow God to help us. And, if God does not help us, we need not worry about it, for it should now be obvious to most that we cannot overcome the mass of evil power loosed on the world by our own strength alone. Our “predator” inside our gates has become a "King Kong behemoth. We can succeed only if we do it God’s way, else we will fail. Abraham Lincoln may have later broken his own rules, but he was dead right when he stated in 1848: “Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one that suits them better.” It seem logical thta God's way is to correct His followers As we have said over and over again and say now, the self-styled Christian Zionist churches, with some 70 million under their influence, are the logical answer. We call them Scofieldized churches, others call them Dispensational, or lately Christian Zionists, whatever name you call them, they are the enablers of the monster on the loose in the world. It is Scofieldized churches that feed it; it is they who left the gate ajar at night, and they taught the marauder to vault the highest fence. They hatched a logic and theology that enables ethnic cleansing in the Mideast. Only the Scofieldized church, among all the major religions in the world, believes the acts of the nighttime marauder are Godly, and therefore, encourages it. In America the members of the Scofieldized churchs are the salt of the earth, the good neighbors we all want, the famliy poeple who care, but they are horrible and criminaly misled and they must be salvaged from God professors to Jesus Christ's followers. Scofildized Christian Zionists simply refuse to see the blood and torn bodies of victims. One of the Ten Commandments that God is said to have given to Moses is: "You shall not [no, never] take the name of the Lord your God in vain." This is exactly what the Scofieldized churches do today by supporting in God’s name that which God abhors, the spilling of innocent blood. Each one allows the abuses that Jesus denied and decried. He said to the Pharisees, "you will not enter into heaven, and you block the way of anyone who would enter." Jesus could have been speaking to the pastors today. What is needed is men who will use any tactic that is legal, moral and Godly to reach into the evangelical church and paint the blood of the victims on its doorways where they cannot overlook it. This is the mission of Pharisee Watch and Project Strait Gate. And how do we achieve such a feat? God’s churches, if they are of God, should be the salt of the earth, but these millions have lost their savor, and therefore, are: "fit only to be trodden under the feet of men." But they can change…most of We Hold These Truth's advisors did. Each Christian Zionist at some point lost his senses in the shouting crowd; they will regain their senses slowly, one by one, church by church…with our/your help. This is our agenda. Start by watching our one hour presentation, with your friends, right on your computer, or you may buy it for your TV: Our best tool to help you teach, view it free: Why Christian-Zionist cannot work for peace, Interactive fully guided free audio/video.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-281) not displayed.
.
.
.
#282. To: Feynman Lives! (#278)
The conduct on that forum makes the stuff here look like kiddie time... I didn't find evidence of what you purported about that pontius fella, but I DID see surprisingly vile conduct from many of the members of THIS site. Most illuminating.. Most illuminating? Vile conduct? Now it seems youre being a tad judgemental .. a moral higher ground? Based on what?
Christine, Now, you may not have been aware that though I am a fan of Richard Feynman, my name is Monty. I thought I told you this earlier, but hey, now ya know. :)
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman We are all judgemental, humans are meaning making machines, it is what we do. Based upon what? Well, one of the first things I saw was a thread about Jethro Tull Violating Mod Ethics.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Jethro Tull OWNS that site.. it was nonsense.
Then I saw one where Jethro Tull started a thread that DELIBERATELY made fun of another member and suggested that that member had not had sex in the last 10 years. That is pretty vile and inappropriate conduct. Taking a potshot at someone is one thing, but to post a WHOLE thread attacking them, that is another. I could go on....
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman And I shouldve asked though as well.. if we all are judgemental there must be some measurement..something to judge conduct .. so if there is no God..then how can one judge one way or another as to what is 'good' and what is not?
Full Monty Undercover :)
That is pretty vile and inappropriate conduct. Taking a potshot at someone is one thing, but to post a WHOLE thread attacking them, that is another. I could go on.... People dont have to stay there.. they enjoy the banter etc.. just as some enjoy arguing ..just on a different level.
And apparently he feels free to call people all sorts of vile things like dumbfuck, prick, asshole, etc... Wow, for a guy who pretends to be a christian, he SURE is ain't ACTING like one.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman all involved over there enjoy the give and take. it's a parody site. now ya know. ;)
So that somehow justifies the conduct? How does it make the conduct less vile? Just because you and your buddies think talking about raping nuns is enjoyable banter... just on a different level... does that make it now perfectly fine for all to view? YOU directed me to that vile site, and I saw the true colors of some of the SUPPOSED christians on this site. Interesting...
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Information that would have been MUCH more useful BEFORE directing me to the site. Thanks, Christine, for letting me know. :)
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Huh? I don't get it. I never saw The Full Monty.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman How does it make the conduct less vile? Just because you and your buddies think talking about raping nuns is enjoyable banter... just on a different level... does that make it now perfectly fine for all to view? YOU directed me to that vile site, and I saw the true colors of some of the SUPPOSED christians on this site. Interesting... Raping nuns?? what? I have no clue what you're talking about.. It's an open forum.. If you dont want to view it, then don't simple as that.
I think what you are looking for is for someone to say the Bible is the word for word infallible, final authority on all matters of the Christian faith and practice. The problem with that thought is that Sacred Scripture does not make that claim about itself. Folks will/have/do contort St Paul's message to St Timothy to mean the above when St Paul is actually reminding St Timothy to keep and remember the Traditions he was taught as a child and to know the Scriptures (he was taught as a child- The Old Testament) are God Breathed and profitable for teaching, etc. When St Paul wrote that to St Timothy, I doubt most of the New Testament had been written yet. The idea of a cannon of New Testament Scripture more than likely would have been very foreign to St Paul. If the Bible as we know it today is the final, literal, word for word final infallbile authority on all matters of faith and practice then Christians from 33AD to about 500AD are finding things a little warm and toasty because they did not have access to the Bible as a whole. The Old Testament, a couple Gospels and letters, the rest was based on the Tradition, teaching (written and oral) and practices from the Apostles and their disciples themselves. We know the New Testament is valid, is real, is true because the Church confirms it. The Bible is the product of the Church, not the other way around. Keep things within the context of Tradition (and I speak of the Eastern Orthodox Tradition- what little I know of). We could find out tomorrow that Al Gore wrote the Book of Romans. Free Republic would probably sponser a book burning. To the Eastern Church, it would not matter, the Church has already confirmed and validated the book and its content as a whole. Or, if one reads Proverbs quite literally, one can draw the conclusion the Wisdom is the Mother of God and that we worship a Quadrinity rather than a Trinity. We know that's not the case! Or, the Gospels record two temple cleanings- two entirely different versions of the same account. On their face, obvious discrepencies. Remember what I said, the Gospels are not purely historical journalistic, blow-by-blow accounts of events. They were written years after retrospectively in consideration of the Cross. A theology was already in place in light from people who were clueless about events "then" who are "now" retracing those steps in the full light and rememberence of Christ. They are written from an already shared and common Tradition and experience. The Gospels share a remarkable harmony in all actuality- as they should. You have another question about the Trinity. You cited Christ's words, "I and that Father are one," and then go to "The Father is greater than I". I am not as well versed on the mysteries of the Trinity as others are, so this is my best attempt to answer your question in my own words. I am "Scooter". I am a person. I am a man. I am a son. All three share the same essence and none of these three can be separated. If I describe myself in the sense of a person, a human being, there is more of a significant qualifier there rather than me describing myself as someone's son. If I walk into an interview and my resume simply says "son of..." and I introduce myself soley as "son of...", I won't get very far. If on that resume I describe myself as the person and talk about myself as the person, I just might get that job. This is how the essence of me as a person is greater than the essence of me as someone's son. Yet both are still of the same essence.
WOW.. .now you have opened a HUGE can of worms... We can judge one another REGARDLESS of whether or not there is a god, Zip. The existence, or lack thereof, of one or many gods does not preclude our ability to make our own assessments of situations. When people get together in groups, they form societies. Those societies try to keep the most people happy by making 'laws' that SAY what is to be considered Good and Bad in that society. Now, that said, what ONE society say is good is OFTEN considered bad by another society. There are no universally good or bad things, just perceptions of a moment in time. Look at the bible, at one point it was accepted that if your kid talked back to you, you could KILL them for doing so, and if you touched the skin of a dead pig, you were also put to death. Luckily, perceptions can change.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman If you dont want to view it, then don't simple as that. You asked me what I thought was vile conduct, and then you told me I was wrong for having my own opinion of what I felt was vile. I gave you an example of how that PREMISE does not hold. (remember premises from earlier?) It is as simple as that.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman We can judge one another REGARDLESS of whether or not there is a god, Zip. The existence, or lack thereof, of one or many gods does not preclude our ability to make our own assessments of situations. When people get together in groups, they form societies. Those societies try to keep the most people happy by making 'laws' that SAY what is to be considered Good and Bad in that society. Now, that said, what ONE society say is good is OFTEN considered bad by another society. There are no universally good or bad things, just perceptions of a moment in time. Look at the bible, at one point it was accepted that if your kid talked back to you, you could KILL them for doing so, and if you touched the skin of a dead pig, you were also put to death. Luckily, perceptions can change. Judge based on what? Your idea of what is right and wrong? Where do you think our laws came from?
(2)You cited Christ's words, "I and that Father are one," and then go to "The Father is greater than I". I am not as well versed on the mysteries of the Trinity as others are, so this is my best attempt to answer your question in my own words. I am "Scooter". I am a person. I am a man. I am a son. All three share the same essence and none of these three can be separated..... (1)That is circular reasoning. The bible is true because the organization that GIVES us the bible SAYS it is true. It is akin to saying 'I can prove to you my imagniary friend is real by simply telling you that he is because I say he is." (2)Your analogy does not hold water. Jesus says he is god, and he also says that god is more powerful than he is. That is a CONTRADICTION, not a restatement of the same point from differing viewpoints. Scooter, I appreciate your trying to address the topic, but your response does not lend any resolution to the matter. You yourself say that the bible is flawed. Thank you for your contribution, however.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman I gave you an example of how that PREMISE does not hold. (remember premises from earlier?) It is as simple as that. Excuse me?? That was NOT what you were doing .. this is what you said: " Just because you and your buddies think talking about raping nuns is enjoyable banter.." So yet again.. where's the honesty?.. Now thats what I see as vile.. dishonesty.
Zip, my sweet, I am CRYSTAL clear on where our laws came from. What Law IS. Laws are rules which govern how everybody - you, your family and friends - live and behave. If there were no laws, there would be a danger that many arguments or disputes would be settled by force. We would live in a society where the strongest and most powerful people could do what they wanted. So that you don't think I am pulling this out of my butt (next to the sandwich I hid there for a snack later), I will give you the definition of "LAW" straight out of Black's Law Dictionary. The entire definition takes up a little more than one full page and I won't bore you with the whole thing. However, there IS one paragraph that stands out for this discussion: "Law. [... 6th Edition, 4th paragraph:] In old English jurisprudence, "law" is used to signify an oath, or the privilege of being sworn; as in the phrases "to wage one's law," "to lose one's law." And it is this phrase that brings me to my main point, which is this: All law is voluntary, and most laws don't apply to most people. While that may sound silly, think about it… After all, we live in the United States of America, and this country has a long history of laws going back for more than two centuries. Not to mention that those laws are mostly based on English jurisprudence, going back much further. There are those that go back even further still. The court system of China originated from the Xia Dynasty (2100-1600 B.C.). With the formation of the Xia kingdom, China evolved from a society of prehistoric tribe into a feudal system of social classes. From approximately the 2100 B.C., the ancient law system began to take its form and began the long journey of evolution. Through more than a thousand years from Xia, Shang, Xi Zhou and Chun Qiu, the law of China evolved from a system which based heavily on common practices to a well defined court system. The ancient laws of common practices include the laws of fate, accusation and testimony. So, clearly ALL law does not come from the same source. Society dictates the law for a given people at a given time. Now, does this bold statement mean that mean we can just go around, willy nilly, ignoring every law on the books? Of course not. Nor would we want to. Society has developed a lot of those laws for our mutual protection. Some of them are important. So how do we know which ones to follow, and which to ignore? What Law is Not Before we explore further into what law is, let's clear up what it is not. There are lots of definitions, and we need to be speaking the same language. Blackstone's Commentaries has this to say: "Meaning of law.-- Law, in its most general and comprehensive sense, signifies a rule of action; whether animate or inanimate, rational or irrational. Thus we say, the laws of motion, of gravitation, of optics, or mechanics, as well as the laws of nature and of nations. And it is that rule of action, which is prescribed by some superior, and which the inferior is bound to obey." (Jones' Blackstone, Bancroft-Whitney Co., 1915) Laws of nature have long been lumped in with laws of man, and termed collectively "The Law." I believe this is done to intentionally confuse the masses. A deep-seated subconscious belief is created in a man's mind, that the whole body of man's law is as unbending and absolute as the law of gravity. As surely as the sun rises and sets every day, all of a king's subjects must follow the king's laws. Violating one of the king's laws is therefore subconsciously compared with the planets suddenly spinning out of alignment. "Help! The universe must be put back into balance!" LOL It is this confusion that me absolutely MUST erase, before we can understand the nature of law. We must separate in our minds the "facts" of nature, which are absolute, from laws made by man. Otherwise we'll never understand be able to have a substantive discussion about that which is the truth about law. Look at the second part of Blackstone's definition. It presupposes the existence of a "superior" who has the authority to tell people what to do, and what not to do. Where did such a superior get his authority? Sir William Blackstone was a British subject, so he recognized the British Crown as his superior. What about Americans? Who are our superiors? The American Declaration of Independence declares: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. . ." I didn't see any part in there about an earthly superior. Society has the final say at any given time as to what is good and what is evil. "There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Zip, come on now, this was an analogy, not a factual statement.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman No it wasnt a factual statement in any way shape or form.
Of course it wasn't...
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman I told you my thoughts on the topic... what are yours?
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Now on to the facts.. where do our laws come from?
Zip, you didn't read my post. I just explianed to you where our laws came from. You were going to tell me YOUR version.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman My version?? The structure of our government as well as our laws were founded in biblical law.. btw I missed your post if you in fact did give your version.
I want to put a SOHC 427 into a 71 pinto, make it mid-engined. Will I need the cloth or plastic headliner to make the package work right?
After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military. - William S Burroughs
Chum means shark bait in all the movies I watch. After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military. - William S Burroughs
Zip, sorry to disappoint, but no, they were not. While there is significant influence of biblical law in the current law, it was NOT the foundation. This is a COMMON misconception. There is a tendency on the part of many theists to assume that the burden of proof is on the nontheist when it comes to the issue of law and morality. Thus, the individual who operates without a theological base is asked to justify his so doing — the assumption of the theist being that no morality is possible in the absence of some form of "higher" law. However, I am most curious to sit back and try to see you make your case.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman “It seems like Flynt's trying to stick it to Congress,” Weiss said. “I don't know what I'd call it. Childish, perhaps.” Expecting Congress to represent Americans is un-American? How did we get here?
After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military. - William S Burroughs
LOL Dakmar, "Chum" means pal if you lived in England for any amount of time. I was not referring to her as my old pile of fishblood and bits... LOL
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman How did we get here? Heck if I know.. it's the FR effect..
HEY I'm offended.. prove that isnt what you meant...
For those Hardy enough to rest on their Laurels? Stan, is that you?
After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military. - William S Burroughs
Who or what is an FR?
After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military. - William S Burroughs
ROFL! Good one!
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Good.. good.. you've gone thru deprogramming and came out with flying colors..
Comments (322 - 491) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI checked out that thread... yikes!
#283. To: christine (#281)
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#284. To: Zipporah (#282)
Most illuminating? Vile conduct? Now it seems youre being a tad judgemental ..
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#285. To: Feynman Lives! (#284)
#286. To: All (#284)
Based upon what?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#287. To: Feynman Lives! (#284)
#288. To: Feynman Lives! (#283)
#289. To: Feynman Lives! (#286)
Then I saw one where Jethro Tull started a thread that DELIBERATELY made fun of another member and suggested that that member had not had sex in the last 10 years.
#290. To: Zipporah (#285)
Jethro Tull OWNS that site.. it was nonsense.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#291. To: Feynman Lives! (#286)
#292. To: Zipporah (#289)
People dont have to stay there.. they enjoy the banter etc.. just as some enjoy arguing ..just on a different level
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#293. To: christine (#291)
all involved over there enjoy the give and take. it's a parody site. now ya know. ;)
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#294. To: christine (#288)
Full Monty Undercover :)
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#295. To: Feynman Lives! (#292)
So that somehow justifies the conduct?
#296. To: Feynman Lives! (#207)
#297. To: Zipporah (#287)
if we all are judgemental there must be some measurement..something to judge conduct .. so if there is no God..then how can one judge one way or another as to what is 'good' and what is not?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#298. To: Zipporah (#295)
have no clue what you're talking about.. It's an open forum..
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#299. To: Feynman Lives! (#297)
WOW.. .now you have opened a HUGE can of worms...
#300. To: scooter (#296)
(1)We know the New Testament is valid, is real, is true because the Church confirms it. The Bible is the product of the Church, not the other way around.
Utterly ridiculous and without any merit whatsoever.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#301. To: Feynman Lives! (#298)
You asked me what I thought was vile conduct, and then you told me I was wrong for having my own opinion of what I felt was vile.
#302. To: Zipporah (#299)
Judge based on what? Your idea of what is right and wrong? Where do you think our laws came from?
Imagine what it would be like without laws - it would be like a game of football or hockey or basketball where the rules were ignored by the players. It would be chaos, and probably quite dangerous. A proper game could not go ahead without the players agreeing on basic rules.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#303. To: Zipporah (#301)
Just because you and your buddies think talking about raping nuns is enjoyable banter.."
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#304. To: Feynman Lives! (#303)
Zip, come on now, this was an analogy, not a factual statement.
#305. To: Zipporah (#304)
No it wasnt a factual statement in any way shape or form.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#306. To: Zipporah (#299)
Where do you think our laws came from?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#307. To: Feynman Lives! (#306)
I told you my thoughts on the topic... what are yours?
#308. To: Zipporah (#307)
Now on to the facts.. where do our laws come from?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#309. To: Feynman Lives! (#308)
#310. To: Rabbi Feynman Lives! (#306)
I told you my thoughts on the topic... what are yours?
#311. To: Feynman Lives!, Zipporah, christine, Jethro Tull (#280)
Zip's gender was of no concern to me, and no I did not know she was female. I referred to Zip as 'old chum' as a friendly gesture.
#312. To: Dakmar (#311)
Chum means shark bait in all the movies I watch.
#313. To: Zipporah (#309)
The structure of our government as well as our laws were founded in biblical law
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#314. To: Zipporah (#312)
Daniel Weiss, a senior analyst for media and sexuality for the conservative religious group Focus on the Family, says that members of Congress who don't want the mailings should work with the Postal Service to make them stop. And if that doesn't work, they should ask the Justice Department to investigate whether the magazine is obscene and have it blocked.
#315. To: Dakmar (#311)
Chum means shark bait in all the movies I watch.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#316. To: Dakmar (#314)
Expecting Congress to represent Americans is un-American?
#317. To: Feynman Lives! (#315)
I was not referring to her as my old pile of fishblood and bits... LOL
#318. To: Feynman Lives! (#315)
"Chum" means pal if you lived in England for any amount of time.
#319. To: Zipporah (#316)
Heck if I know.. it's the FR effect..
#320. To: Dakmar (#318)
For those Hardy enough to rest on their Laurels? Stan, is that you?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#321. To: Dakmar (#319)
Who or what is an FR?
.
.
.