[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Taxpayer Funded Censorship: How Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars To Silence Your Voice

"Terminator" Robot Dog Now Equipped With Amphibious Capabilities

Trump Plans To Use Impoundment To Cut Spending - What Is It?

Mass job losses as major factory owner moves business overseas

Israel kills IDF soldiers in Lebanon to prevent their kidnap

46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days

In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law

MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!!

Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits

Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon

FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate...

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt.

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Can Christ Followers Save The World From Christians
Source: We Hold These Truths
URL Source: http://www.whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=709
Published: Feb 6, 2006
Author: Charles E. Carlson
Post Date: 2006-02-15 00:09:52 by Red Jones
Keywords: Christians, Followers, Christ
Views: 4960
Comments: 491

Can Christ Followers save the world from Christians

Charles E. Carlson Feb 06, 2006

Why all the bad news?

The news stories in the world press, from South Africa to Norway, are incredibly negative about the USA. It was not always that way. Once, not long ago, most press was good to the USA. Our generations of military and tourists have been treated like liberators in Germany and Japan, countries we helped to destroy and then rebuilt. But no more, “America” is mud.

This letter is not for everyone. Some already recognize the answer, but many still deny that the USA has become both the awful predator, and the world’s engine of monetary dilution. Less anyone thinks this writer is causing America’s image problem we add these words from a pretty good President, Theodore Roosevelt, who was also a decorated military officer:

"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President or any other public official, save to the extent in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country.”

"In either event, it is unpatriotic not to tell the truth - whether about the president or anyone else - save in the rare case where this would make known to the enemy information of military value which would otherwise be unknown to him." -Theodore Roosevelt

Jesus gave us parables to help us understand his lessons. We follow his example with a parable about a man and the pet he loves and think he controls, which we liken to our government.

This man discovers, to his horror and dismay, that his family dog has become a nighttime marauder, a predator, slipping out of the yard and pillaging the community, killing other pets and threatening pedestrians, and then jumping back into the backyard to sleep it off. What should the man do: 1) Feed the dog more and hope he will stay home? 2) Build a higher fence, cement-in the yard and put double locks on every access? (3) Ignore the problem? (4) Put the dog to sleep before someone is hurt?

The pet owner could try the second choice (2), if he has the patience and money, but chances are he will not sleep well at night. It is his responsibility to stop the crimes, even if it means he has to destroy his own dog. It is not up to the police to solve the crime, nor is it up to the neighbors to correct it. In truth, he should do it himself because he is responsible, not the taxpayers who pay for the animal shelter.

Similarly, it is up to the most responsible Americans to correct criminal acts against its world neighbors, and if we do not then the blood of the USA’s every crime is on our hands. It is not good enough to say, "Oh, this is a great place to live...our standard of living is the envy of the world...even if we do make some mistakes."

It is not our place to recite all the wrongs of our government, we would never finish, nor do we defend any other government for it murderous faults. All are corrupt to some degree. We do defend the right to life of our neighbors, as described in our own Declaration of Independence. Life itself is a gift from God...this is not (for followers of Christ) a subjective, take it or leave it observation, it is an absolute.

A friend and supporter recently called to ask me if I might tone down what he considered my obvious favoritism toward the Palestinian people, whom we have come to call the Philistines. He told me I sound so biased that someone who did not know me might think "they are paying me." In fact, it is people like my caller who is supporting We Hold These Truths, so we listen.

My reply was: Thanks, but I cannot help what I say or the passion that shows through. I have been to the land of the Philistines and seen. Now I am their champion as long as they are suppressed by our own government.

Our government is the marauding dog. I told my friend I would try to do a better job of explaining my bias, but I must not stop defending the innocent blood that is being shed. This is not to say the Philistines, or their current leaders, Hamas, are perfect, nor to deny they have their criminal element, which they do have. I told a beleaguered Univerisity class the same thing when I stood among them in Gaza City, but it is our government. not theirs, that is the problem.

I have but one point to make. God does not “Will” that this great land become the predator of the world. He expects us to be the good stewards of what we are given. We can stop the marauding animal in our back yards if we will allow God to help us. And, if God does not help us, we need not worry about it, for it should now be obvious to most that we cannot overcome the mass of evil power loosed on the world by our own strength alone.

Our “predator” inside our gates has become a "King Kong behemoth. We can succeed only if we do it God’s way, else we will fail. Abraham Lincoln may have later broken his own rules, but he was dead right when he stated in 1848:

“Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one that suits them better.”

It seem logical thta God's way is to correct His followers

As we have said over and over again and say now, the self-styled Christian Zionist churches, with some 70 million under their influence, are the logical answer.

We call them Scofieldized churches, others call them Dispensational, or lately Christian Zionists, whatever name you call them, they are the enablers of the monster on the loose in the world. It is Scofieldized churches that feed it; it is they who left the gate ajar at night, and they taught the marauder to vault the highest fence. They hatched a logic and theology that enables ethnic cleansing in the Mideast. Only the Scofieldized church, among all the major religions in the world, believes the acts of the nighttime marauder are Godly, and therefore, encourages it.

In America the members of the Scofieldized churchs are the salt of the earth, the good neighbors we all want, the famliy poeple who care, but they are horrible and criminaly misled and they must be salvaged from God professors to Jesus Christ's followers.

Scofildized Christian Zionists simply refuse to see the blood and torn bodies of victims. One of the Ten Commandments that God is said to have given to Moses is:

"You shall not [no, never] take the name of the Lord your God in vain."

This is exactly what the Scofieldized churches do today by supporting in God’s name that which God abhors, the spilling of innocent blood. Each one allows the abuses that Jesus denied and decried. He said to the Pharisees,

"you will not enter into heaven, and you block the way of anyone who would enter."

Jesus could have been speaking to the pastors today.

What is needed is men who will use any tactic that is legal, moral and Godly to reach into the evangelical church and paint the blood of the victims on its doorways where they cannot overlook it. This is the mission of Pharisee Watch and Project Strait Gate. And how do we achieve such a feat?

God’s churches, if they are of God, should be the salt of the earth, but these millions have lost their savor, and therefore, are:

"fit only to be trodden under the feet of men."

But they can change…most of We Hold These Truth's advisors did. Each Christian Zionist at some point lost his senses in the shouting crowd; they will regain their senses slowly, one by one, church by church…with our/your help. This is our agenda.

Start by watching our one hour presentation, with your friends, right on your computer, or you may buy it for your TV: Our best tool to help you teach, view it free: Why Christian-Zionist cannot work for peace, Interactive fully guided free audio/video.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-442) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#443. To: Feynman Lives! (#377)

"basically" the same is not "The Same." This is the problem with saying that there are universal moral imperatives.

Could you explain that a little further?

I'm not sure what the same is not the same means, and how it relates to universal moral imperatives or lack thereof.

Diana  posted on  2006-02-17   4:23:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#444. To: Diana (#442)

Whole of something specified, I'd say the earth fits that

Diana,

The earth is NOT the whole of the universe.

I see where you were going with this, and I understand your point of view, but the earth is just one planet, in a solar system, in a galaxy of 100 BILLION stars and hundreds of TRILLIONS of planets, which is one of 80 BILLION galaxies in the known universe.

To say that the earth is the whole of something specified is like saying that one of the peas on your plate is the UNIVERSAL pea on your plate. If it is true for that pea, then it should be true for ALL the peas on your plate.

This does not work for the earth.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   4:24:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#445. To: Feynman Lives! (#444)

The earth is NOT the whole of the universe.

I never said it was!

I said it fits the definition of "universal" from the Webster's dictionary.

Diana  posted on  2006-02-17   4:28:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#446. To: Diana (#443)

basically" the same is not "The Same." This is the problem with saying that there are universal moral imperatives. Could you explain that a little further?

I'm not sure what the same is not the same means, and how it relates to universal moral imperatives or lack thereof.

Diana,

Not a problem.

"basically the same" is not the same as "the same"

2 + 1 = 3

2 + 2 = 4

We can see that they are similar, but not the same.

However, if we look at

2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 + 1 = 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,001

2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 + 2 = 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000000,000,000,000,002

We can see that these two numbers are "Basically the same" but not "THE SAME"

Does that help?

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   4:29:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#447. To: Wrench (#440)

IMO conceptual absolutes logically must exist in the mind of an absolute God because they cannot merely reside in the properties of matter in a purely naturalistic universe. And since the logical absolutes are true everywhere all the time and they are conceptual, it would seem logical that they exist within a transcendent, omnipresent, being. If there is an absolute God with an absolute mind then he is the standard of all things – as well as morals. Therefore, there would be moral absolutes.

Oh... and after you give me an example, please show me PROOF to support your OPINION that "conceptual absolutes logically must exist in the mind of an absolute God because they cannot merely reside in the properties of matter in a purely naturalistic universe"

Why can they not merely reside in the properties of matter in a purely naturalistic universe? There is no obvious contradiction that would prevent it.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   4:30:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#448. To: Feynman Lives! (#444)

Here are a few more definitions of universal from Webster's dictionary:

4 broad in knowledge, interests, abilitites, etc.

5 that can be used for a great many or all kinds, forms, sizes, etc.; highly adaptable [a iniversal voltage regulator]

6 used, intended to be used, or understood by all

Diana  posted on  2006-02-17   4:42:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#449. To: Feynman Lives! (#437)

See... the problem is this... truths are irrefutable, morality is an opinion.

Both are equally important for a society to survive.

Diana  posted on  2006-02-17   4:46:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#450. To: Diana (#448)

Diana,

Yes, those are all different definitions for the word. However, you need to look at the term in the situation in which it is being employed to know which definition to use.

Universal morality certainly is not referring to "broad in knowledge, interest or ability." It is not sufficient to say that a UNIVERSAL morality is one "that can be used by a great many" or that is "highly adaptable." And to say that a UNIVERSAL morality is one which is "intended to be used or understood by all" does not apply as it is to ambiguous a definition. "Intended to be used" does not imply that it MUST be used, it is essentially stating an opinion.

Thanks.

:)

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   4:49:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#451. To: Diana (#449)

Both are equally important for a society to survive.

Agreed, but they are VERY different things and are not synonomous.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   4:50:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#452. To: Feynman Lives! (#446)

2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 + 2 = 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000000,000,000,000,002

We can see that these two numbers are "Basically the same" but not "THE SAME"

Does that help?

Okey.

That problem with words again.

Diana  posted on  2006-02-17   4:50:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#453. To: Diana (#452)

That problem with words again.

Diana,

Our entire existence is contained inside of words, it is how we communicate. There is a huge and insigificant difference between something being BASICALLY the same and THE SAME.

If you got married, and your husband was replaced one day with a guy who looked and acted BASICALLY the same as your husband, you would notice and it would more than likely be an issue of great concern to you. The your husband and his impostor are BASICALLY THE SAME, but not THE SAME, and that is an issue of major importance to you.

If you order coffee and they don't have cream, but they do have skim milk, then it probably would NOT be a big deal that cream and skim milk are BASICALLY the same. They are BASICALLY THE SAME, but not THE SAME, yet you are not concerned.

Does THAT help?

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   4:56:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#454. To: Feynman Lives!, Scooter (#450)

Yes, those are all different definitions for the word. However, you need to look at the term in the situation in which it is being employed to know which definition to use.

That is an assumption on your part that I don't understand the differece between the definitions and their usage. I was letting you know of some more definitions that were in my dictionary under "universal", that's all.

My brain is too tired to think at this point, I need to go to bed.

Scooter thankyou for that text, I read it but I think it will be better to read it again tomorrow.

FL you have A LOT of energy.

Diana  posted on  2006-02-17   5:39:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#455. To: Feynman Lives! (#453)

Are you a defense lawyer?

Diana  posted on  2006-02-17   5:42:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#456. To: Diana (#455)

Are you a defense lawyer?

He's a troll, Diana. Best to ignore him. Everyone should Bozo Filter him; sooner or later he will give up and leave, when no one is responding to his posts.

"I am to misbehave" -- Mal Reynolds, Firefly

YertleTurtle  posted on  2006-02-17   7:16:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#457. To: YertleTurtle, Diana (#456)

Everyone should Bozo Filter him

I've never used the bozo filter, but I think this is a time for it.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-02-17   7:21:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#458. To: Feynman Lives! (#408)

Killing your father, screwing your mother and eating your kids. Most folks would agree about that

Most, but not all.

Most does not make it UNIVERSAL.

So tell me what cultures allow killing your father, screwing your mother and eating your kids?

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   10:32:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#459. To: mehitable (#458)

So tell me what cultures allow killing your father, screwing your mother and eating your kids?

HEY ..what's the problem?? Maybe he's a member of the Church of Satan?? :P

Zipporah  posted on  2006-02-17   10:53:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#460. To: Diana (#455)

Are you a defense lawyer?

Probably.. he's defending the indefensible LOL

Zipporah  posted on  2006-02-17   10:54:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#461. To: Zipporah (#459)

True, or he could be an Illuminati, in which case he gets a promotion with each of those.

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   11:06:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#462. To: mehitable (#458)

So tell me what cultures allow killing your father, screwing your mother and eating your kids?

Mehitable,

It is not about CULTURES. Universal Morality fails if ONE person feels contrary to you about any given action.

This is the inherent problem with universal qualifiers.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   11:55:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#463. To: Zipporah (#460)

Probably.. he's defending the indefensible LOL

Zip,

What am I defending that is indefensible?

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   12:01:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#464. To: Feynman Lives! (#462)

Mehitable,

It is not about CULTURES. Universal Morality fails if ONE person feels contrary to you about any given action.

This is the inherent problem with universal qualifiers.

So why does it matter if one crazy person thinks it's okay to kill your father, screw your mother and eat your children? WHat is the possible significance of that to the larger society? Or do you think that the opinion of one person that it is okay to kill your father, screw your mother and eat your children morally equates to the opinion of all the rest of the people who don't agree with that?

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   12:09:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#465. To: Feynman Lives! (#463)

You are obviously supportive of and promoting moral relativism, which is precisely as you have outlined - that if ONE person disagrees with the moral principles of an entire society and rejects them and breaks them, that position is morally equivalent to the position of the greater society.

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   12:11:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#466. To: mehitable (#464)

So why does it matter if one crazy person thinks it's okay to kill your father, screw your mother and eat your children? WHat is the possible significance of that to the larger society? Or do you think that the opinion of one person that it is okay to kill your father, screw your mother and eat your children morally equates to the opinion of all the rest of the people who don't agree with that?

Mehitable,

Why it matters is that it disproves the theory of Universal Morality. You can EASILY make a case for a SOCIAL Morality, that is based upon the OPINIONS of any given society, but you can't make a case for a UNIVERSAL morality, in which EVERYONE agrees that "X is Y in all situations." Morality is established a posteriori, not a priori. A new born baby does not care one way or the other whether or not you kill your father, screw your mother or eat your children. It does not understand the concepts and has not formed AN OPINION on the matter.

The opinion of one person that it is okay to kill your father, screw your mother and eat your children ABSOLUTELY morally equates to the opinion of all the rest of the people who don't agree with that. Because they are JUST OPINIONS, not facts. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. This is another reason why Universal Morality fails, because Morality is BASED upon opinion, not fact.

YOU calling someone who disagrees with you "Crazy" is just your OPINION of that person's state of mind, it is not a factual statement. There are many examples in society where people called those who disagreed with society "CRAZY" in order to discount what they had to say. Many of them were scientists who were "CRAZY" enough to think things like "The earth is NOT the center of the universe," or "The sun does NOT revolve around the earth."

There is no such thing as a Universal Morality, sorry.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   12:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#467. To: mehitable (#465)

You are obviously supportive of and promoting moral relativism, which is precisely as you have outlined - that if ONE person disagrees with the moral principles of an entire society and rejects them and breaks them, that position is morally equivalent to the position of the greater society.

Mehitable,

Once again you are incorrect. I am not supportive of, nor am I promoting moral relativism, I simply understand that the position is tennable.

What I am stating is plain - that a UNIVERSAL morality does not exist. By contrast, I am a large supporter of SOCIETAL morality, even though I understand that the underlying principle is fluid.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   12:30:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#468. To: Feynman Lives!, all (#467)

What I am stating is plain - that a UNIVERSAL morality does not exist. By contrast, I am a large supporter of SOCIETAL morality, even though I understand that the underlying principle is fluid.

We know that what you are saying is untrue just by canvassing various societies throughout history - none have supported the behaviour I referred to. The only individuals who would engage in such behavior have been denounced and treated as criminals in every single society on earth - and you cannot find an exception. If you are (and you ARE) equating the moral positions of criminals with those of the vast majority of society, you are a moral relativist, whether you admit or acknowledge that or not.

Stop lying by cutting hairs. You're gonna end up bald.

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   12:36:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#469. To: mehitable (#468)

The only individuals who would engage in such behavior have been denounced and treated as criminals in every single society on earth - and you cannot find an exception. If you are (and you ARE) equating the moral positions of criminals with those of the vast majority of society, you are a moral relativist, whether you admit or acknowledge that or not.

Stop lying by cutting hairs. You're gonna end up bald.

ROFL...

Mehitable, you just ignored my entire post, and then you PROVED it correct.

Wow. Most impressive.

You keep proving it... you fall back to the morality of the "VAST MAJORITY OF SOCIETY," which, as we all know is NOT Universal.

Like I said, I agree with and believe in SOCIETAL MORALITY, because it exists. You just proved AGAIN that there is no UNIVERSAL MORALITY.

I am not a moral relativist at all, Mehitable, I am just smart enough to see that Universal Morality is a myth.

I am not lying at all, I am showing you The Truth.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   12:45:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#470. To: Feynman Lives!, (#469)

I am not a moral relativist at all, Mehitable, I am just smart enough to see that Universal Morality is a myth.

Realistically there are things, such as injunctions against killing your father, screwing your mother and eating your children, that are universally true or moral among all sane people and the only people who violate those things are people who are INSANE or CRIMINALS. So ultimately what you are doing is saying that the moral positions taken by insane people or criminals are equal to the moral positionsof the rest of society. Just to say that there are people whose moral positions differ from the rest of society is...MEANINGLESS...as you are referring to criminals.

So what is your point in debating these things? What are you trying to prove? You seem to argue for the sake of arguing - I don't see any ultimate point in what you have been saying. What is the point of your stating that there is no Universal Morality?

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   13:05:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#471. To: mehitable (#458)

So tell me what cultures allow killing your father, screwing your mother and eating your kids?

Mehitable,

For the record, many cultures, for example, the Aztecs allowed killing your father - incest is COMMONPLACE in many cultures, for example, one of the socioligists who worked on the Kinsey report showed in his extensive study that the childhood in much of India begins with the young child being regularly masturbated by the mother, and it virtually all non-Western cultures, the child sleeps in the family bed for several years and regularly observes sexual intercourse between the parents. Boys as well as girls are reported as being masturbated and raped by the men in the family, including fathers, older brothers, uncles and cousins. He found that by the time children are four or five, they are usually taken to bed at night by others in the extended household - and MANY cultures have been shown to condone cannabilism.

So... even though we are talking about UNIVERSAL morality, I thought I would share that with you.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   13:08:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#472. To: mehitable (#470)

universally true or moral among all sane people and the only people who violate those things are people who are INSANE or CRIMINALS.

This is an unsubstantiated judgement.

Define "All Sane People."

As I said, society has a habit of calling those who disagree "criminals."

Gallileo would have been considered one of these "CRIMINALS" in your view.

And there are people who take moral positions that differ from the rest of society, Mehitable. Most of the people on this board take moral positions that differ from the rest of society. You have people here who think hemp should be legalized, that the current government are crooks and should be overthrown, that all guns should be legal, etc. Does that mean that they are ALL CRIMINALS and therefore MEANINGLESS?

You might want to be careful... YOU are one of those Meaningless Criminals...

Sorry, but there simply is no Universal Morality. Societal Morality, sure, but not Universal.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   13:15:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#473. To: mehitable (#470)

So what is your point in debating these things? What are you trying to prove? You seem to argue for the sake of arguing - I don't see any ultimate point in what you have been saying. What is the point of your stating that there is no Universal Morality?

Mehitable,

I am simply being the advocate of truth in this matter.

You state, incorrectly, that there IS such a thing as a Universal Morality.

I, as the advocate of truth, am here to show you the error of your ways.

It is as simple as that.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   13:16:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#474. To: Feynman Lives!, Zipporah, all (#471)

Why do I get the impression that you would love to introduce some of those practices in our culture?

While I would have to do some investigation into your allegations about the Aztecs as I have never heard or read that they allowed killing your father, your other assertions are not what I said at all. Masturbating children does not equate to screwing your mother. As your own sexual practices are probably...deviant...you may not understand the difference, but the rest of us do. Moreover, I don't know of any cannibal society in which eating your own children was encouraged, but perhaps you can find some obscure psychotic stone age tribe in Borneo that does.

You are a moral relativist. I wish you would just be honest about your own positions. You lie by splitting hairs and trying to cover up what you actually believe about various issues. You are a deceiver, and I think you're probably a pretty evil person, now that I've been observing you and your thinking. You come across all chuckles and feyness, but so did some of the jolliest Nazis. I do hope you are not in any aspect of education. You are not someone I would trust with the minds of the young as I sense you are deeply perverted in your thinking. I don't mean just sexually - I mean intellectually/psychologically.

Frankly I'm getting sick of you so I'm going to stop answering your posts. There appears to be no point to your arguments other than the sake of arguing itself. I can do that for a while, but like your posts, it becomes...meaningless.

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   13:17:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#475. To: mehitable (#474)

It's nonsense.. and circular reasoning..There is no winning or convincing .. it's not about honest discussion obviously.

Zipporah  posted on  2006-02-17   13:18:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#476. To: mehitable (#474)

1>Masturbating children does not equate to screwing your mother 2>I don't know of any cannibal society in which eating your own children was encouraged, 3>You are a moral relativist.

1>WOW... that is skating on a VERY thin thread... condoned incest is condoned incest. If you want to shut your eyes to it that is fine, I wont press the point further if you are so adamant on denying it. You have been shown.

2> It is clear that there are volumes of things that "you don't know" but your ignorance of the world is no defense against the truth. You never said that eating children had to be "encouraged," just accepted.

3>I am not a moral relativist by any means. I believe in the morality of the society.

You are free to stop answering my posts, as you have clearly been shown that your position is untennable and your points have been refuted.

Have a good day.

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   13:24:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#477. To: Zipporah (#475)

It's nonsense.. and circular reasoning..

Zip,

What is circular about the reasoning? Do tell...

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   13:24:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#478. To: Zipporah (#475)

The moral of this story is: "Don't feed the trolls". And now I will go update my Bozo list.

Phaedrus  posted on  2006-02-17   13:24:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#479. To: Feynman Lives!, Zipporah, all (#476)

I think you are a very evil person who knows far too much about masturbating children. And yes, this is the end of our communication. I think I've revealed you for what you are.

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   14:05:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#480. To: Zipporah (#475)

Yes, I know. SOme of what I was doing was playing with the fool, but I also wanted to get to point where he would make statements that clearly reveal his mindset and beliefs, which I think he has. I think people like FL are important to be aware of and understand as I think they are a significant source of the moral evil that has been poisoning our society for a generation at least.

Now that I feel I've "outed" him, I'm done with him. Throw him on the wagon.

mehitable  posted on  2006-02-17   14:07:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#481. To: mehitable (#480)

What Richard "shared" with us in #471 is his attempt to compare the primitive ways of third world tree monkeys, with those our society Yep, you outet this Deep Ellum friend of Abe Foxman.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-02-17   14:15:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#482. To: mehitable (#480)

Now that I feel I've "outed" him, I'm done with him. Throw him on the wagon.

You have "outed" me?

How so? I proved your point to be flat out wrong.

You have a very limited understanding of my mindset and my beliefs, Mehitable.

But you are free to flee on your wagon if you choose. It is typical for those who have been roundly bested, as you have been, to then say while they retreat into the darkness that they are NOT actually retreating, but that they are excecuting a strategic withdrawl... LOL

Whatever you need to believe, sweetie...

"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-17   14:16:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (483 - 491) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]