[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Joe Rogan expressed deep concern that Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Zelensky will start World War III

Fury in Memphis after attempted murder suspect who ambushed FedEx employee walks free without bail

Tehran preparing for attack against Israel: Ayatollah Khamenei's aide

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Media Ignores Cheney 'Smoking Gun'
Source: Prison Planet
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_bohemian_grove.html
Published: Feb 15, 2006
Author: Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Post Date: 2006-02-15 14:37:00 by Zoroaster
Keywords: Smoking, Ignores, Cheney
Views: 379
Comments: 52

Media Ignores Cheney 'Smoking Gun' A 28-gauge shotgun fired at 30 yards is too weak to cause Whittington's injuries

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison http://Planet.com | February 15 2006

Amidst the swirl of outrage, obfuscation and wisecracking, one fundamental flaw in the White House's Cheney shooting story remains. How can a 28-gauge shotgun fired from supposedly 30 yards away cause pellets to become lodged in someone's heart?

How can a weapon that has little more power than a kids BB gun fire projectiles that in most cases don't penetrate further than an inch into a bird's breast and yet in this instance tore through a hunting vest, clothes underneath, the chest cavity and into the muscle of Whittington's heart?

Alex Jones has been bird hunting on countless occasions and considers himself an expert. Alex says that it is simply impossible for such a weak shotgun to cause such damage from 30 yards . Alex has used shotguns that are more powerful than the 28-gauge and seen pellets literally bounce off birds and only stun them. It is common practice for birds to be stunned as a result of the pellets not penetrating and it is usually necessary to have to snap the neck to finish them off.

The only explanation that fits the nature of Whittington's injuries is that Cheney's gun discharged at extremely close range.

The most fundamental basics of gun safety are that you don't point loaded weapons at people, you point them down at the ground and keep them very carefully under control.

As others have speculated it is likely that Cheney was drunk and he dropped the weapon, causing it to discharge and pepper Whittington at close range. Cheney refused to talk to local police until the next day and the Secret Service made sure the authorities had no access to him. This tells us that Cheney considers himself to be above the law.

If any other US citizen shot someone in the face would the police be happy to wait 14 hours before talking to them?

The media seems to be focusing on the delay in reporting the original incident and the White House cover-up of the fact that Whittington had a heart attack. These are important issues but why are no questions being asked about the incompatibility between the official story and the injuries sustained by Whittington?

Related: Secret Service stalls and delays for Cheney


Poster Comment:

Cheney regards violence as inherently legitmate. Poor Whittington provides a unique example. Will Cheney pepper Iran with nukes? His interview on Fox News tonight may provide clues.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

#3. To: Zoroaster (#0)

As others have speculated it is likely that Cheney was drunk and he dropped the weapon, causing it to discharge and pepper Whittington at close range.

If someone as foul-tempered as Cheney shot Whittington at close range, isn't it as likely to have been deliberate as accidental?

aristeides  posted on  2006-02-15   14:42:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: aristeides (#3)

I've read that Whittington has 200 pieces of bird shot in him. I'm not an expert, but that sounds like it was close range to me.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2006-02-15   14:47:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Fred Mertz (#5)

I've read that Whittington has 200 pieces of bird shot in him. I'm not an expert, but that sounds like it was close range to me

Fred,

That is not possible from ONE shot of a rifle of that caliber.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-15   14:49:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Feynman Lives! (#6)

Harry Whittington has a buckshot pellet in his heart and up to 200 pellets in the rest of his body after being accidentally shot by Mr Cheney during a weekend hunting trip.

Read it and weep.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2006-02-15   14:56:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Fred Mertz (#10)

Harry Whittington has a buckshot pellet in his heart and up to 200 pellets in the rest of his body after being accidentally shot by Mr Cheney during a weekend hunting trip.

There was no buckshot involved.

duckhunter  posted on  2006-02-15   14:57:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: duckhunter (#13)

I think one of the doctors in Corpus Christi reported the approximate size of the pellet in Whittington's heart (I read this on Daily Kos -- I think it was .55 mm,) and, unless he got the size very wrong, that particular pellet was too big to be shot used to hunt quail.

aristeides  posted on  2006-02-15   15:00:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: aristeides (#18)

I think it was .55 mm

Don't know the exact size of the shot, but that sure seems reasonable for 7 1/2 shot.

duckhunter  posted on  2006-02-15   15:02:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: duckhunter (#20)

7 1/2 shot

Well... a 7 1/2 shell will have only 262 pellets in it.

SO.. you are saying that 80% of the pellets hit Whittington from that distance?

LOL

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-15   15:03:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Feynman Lives! (#23)

SO.. you are saying that 80% of the pellets hit Whittington from that distance?

I didn't say that. I will say that if that many pellets hit him from a 28 gauge loaded w/ 7.5 shot then he was much closer than we've been told.

duckhunter  posted on  2006-02-15   15:47:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: duckhunter (#35)

didn't say that. I will say that if that many pellets hit him from a 28 gauge loaded w/ 7.5 shot then he was much closer than we've been told.

I would agree with you if he was MUCH closer...

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-15   15:48:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Feynman Lives! (#36)

How much would 200 7.5 pellets weight, anybody know?

aristeides  posted on  2006-02-15   15:53:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 38.

#40. To: aristeides (#38)

not much

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-15 15:54:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: aristeides (#38)

How much would 200 7.5 pellets weight, anybody know?

I'm guessing the entire payload weighed either 3/4 or 1 oz. 200 pellets would be very near to a full load.

duckhunter  posted on  2006-02-15 15:55:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]