[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report $200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030 Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis Fooling Us Badly With Psyops The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why) Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them America Is Reaching A Boiling Point The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani Man puts down ABC's The View on air Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But.. Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’ Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics, BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk, Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up! Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Stock Gumshoe i-ds $5 medical diagnostics company touted to make big bucks with its non-invasive urine test,
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.stockgumshoe.com/reviews ... de-teased-by-private-briefing/
Published: Jun 6, 2016
Author: Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
Post Date: 2016-06-07 00:01:55 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 206
Comments: 3

Stock promoter says this one company has already demonstrated in clinical studies the ability to identify and track melanoma, lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers using this advanced proprietary technology.

...“Insiders are buying shares in huge bunches recently – including a top director (10,000 shares), the Chief Financial Officer (who grabbed 15,000 shares), even the CEO (who grabbed 20,000 shares).

... the stock Patalon is teasing here is, once again, Trovagene (TROV), which he also pitched eight or nine months ago. Trovagene is one of many “liquid biopsy” stocks trying to get approval for and market their tests, with cancer being generally the most sought-after diagnostics market for most of them. Their differentiating factor is that they use urine, not blood, so they claim better results partly because it’s easier to repeatedly test larger volumes.

P.S. If you’re curious about some of the other “liquid biopsy” stocks that have been teased by newsletters, the most recent big push I saw was over the winter when a couple newsletters touted OCX and FMI — though there are certainly several other contenders in the “new and aspiring diagnostics” space, and I expect we’ll continue to see at least several diagnostics and testing companies, from new-age breathalyzers to advanced blood tests, pitched each year.

Comments: CuriousJoe says:

TROV went above $10 some time during 2015, cratered to $3 early 2016, recovered to almost $7 and then cratered once more because of the firing/forced departure of the CEO and CFO. It has since “recovered”: Barely holding above $5. Shah Gilani’s tout FMI is even worse than a broken clock: Has been bottom scraping since Travis’s brilliant sleuthing exposed it as FMI. At least with TROV one could swing trade. Not to mention TRXC touted by yet another Money Map Press guy.

Michael Jorrin (aka Doc Gumshoe) says:

I can’t comment on the merits of the stock, but I have doubts that the acceptance of a quick & easy cancer screening method by the clinic & the general public will be wildly enthusiastic. Detecting cancer DNA in the urine (or blood for that matter) is not tantamount to a diagnosis. It might point to what type of cancer & where it might be, but further testing will be necessary – imaging, biopsy, perhaps exploratory surgery. It would only lead directly to a specific treatment if a targeted therapy existed for cancer with that precise genetic fingerprint. The issue with any screening test is, what’s the next step if the test is positive? I personally would refuse to have such a test, as I would refuse to undergo a full body scan. Something is apt to show up, with no clear indication as to a course of action, except more and more testing. This is not to say that eager investors with faith in cutting-edge technology won’t bid up the stock.

alanh says:

Sounds like something some unscrupulous MD’s might routinely recco to drum up some ‘more tests’ business.

Mark E. says:

I am predicting that OPKO’s new PSA test (4Kscore) will soon become standard of care and covered by insurance. This is a superior test to current PSA tests and has been shown to be highly predictive for clinically significant prostate cancer. I am switching to this test as current PSA test is not predictive and highly variable in my case.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

non-invasive urine test

Is there a urine test that IS invasive?

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-06-07   1:18:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Is there a urine test that IS invasive?

Well I suppose if you're going to be picky, would be invasive if you had to collect the urine via a catheter. But non-invasive used here to differentiate technique from current, mostly used, blood, biopsy, etc., tests. Even ultrasound, CAT scans could be considered invasive.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2016-06-07   23:48:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

But non-invasive used here to differentiate technique from current, mostly used, blood, biopsy, etc., tests.

I figured that, but the title struck me as odd when I first saw it.

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-06-08   0:18:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]