[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ethereum ETFs In 'Window-Dressing' Stage, Approval Within Weeks; Galaxy

Americans Are More Likely To Go To War With The Government Than Submit To The Draft

Rudy Giuliani has just been disbarred in New York

Israeli Generals Want Truce in Gaza,

Joe Biden's felon son Hunter is joining White House meetings

The only Democrat who could beat Trump

Ukraine is too CORRUPT to join NATO, US says, in major blow to Zelensky and boost for Putin

CNN Erin Burnett Admits Joe Biden knew the Debate questions..

Affirmative Action Suit Details How Law School Blackballed Accomplished White Men, Opted For Unqualified Black Women

Russia warns Israel over Ukraine missiles

Yemeni Houthis Vow USS Theodore Roosevelt 'Primary Target' Once it Enters Red Sea

3 Minutes Ago: Jim Rickards Shared Horrible WARNING

Horse is back at library

Crossdressing Luggage Snatcher and Ex-Biden Official Sam Brinton Gets Sweetheart Plea Deal

Music

The Ones That Didn't Make It Back Home [featuring Pacman @ 0:49 - 0:57 in his natural habitat]

Let’s Talk About Grief | Death Anniversary

Democrats Suddenly Change Slogan To 'Orange Man Good'

America in SHOCK as New Footage of Jill Biden's 'ELDER ABUSE' Emerges | Dems FURIOUS: 'Jill is EVIL'

Executions, reprisals and counter-executions - SS Polizei Regiment 19 versus the French Resistance

Paratrooper kills german soldier and returns wedding photos to his family after 68 years

AMeRiKaN GULaG...

'Christian Warrior Training' explodes as churches put faith in guns

Major insurer gives brutal ultimatum to entire state: Let us put up prices by 50 percent or we will leave

Biden Admin Issues Order Blocking Haitian Illegal Immigrants From Deportation

Murder Rate in Socialist Venezuela Falls to 22-Year Low

ISRAEL IS DESTROYING GAZA TO CONTROL THE WORLD'S MOST IMPORTANT SHIPPING LANE

Denmark to tax livestock farts and burps starting in 2030

Woman to serve longer prison time for offending migrant men who gang-raped a minor

IDF says murder is okay after statistics show that Israel killed 75% of all journalists who died in 2023


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: The Parties of Jefferson, Lincoln and FDR Are Dead
Source: by author
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 10, 2016
Author: Stephen Lendman
Post Date: 2016-06-10 08:42:40 by Stephen Lendman
Keywords: None
Views: 581
Comments: 48

The Parties of Jefferson, Lincoln and FDR Are Dead

by Stephen Lendman

America was never beautiful. Today it’s unfit and unsafe to live in, a monster threatening humanity’s survival.

US duopoly power replaced the eras of Jefferson, Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt. No JFKs exist, a peacemaker assassinated for opposing war, urging nuclear disarmament and rapprochement with Soviet Russia.

New Deal, Fair Deal and Great Society programs are heading for history’s dust bin. Bipartisan neocons infesting Washington want social justice ended, neoliberal enslavement replacing it, fascist police state harshness enforcing it.

America is a gangster state, criminals running it - beginning in the 1990s under Bill Clinton, hardened under George W. Bush, institutionalized under Obama, certain to worsen no matter who succeeds him.

US voters in November get to choose between deplorable, unacceptable choices - Clinton the most recklessly dangerous presidential aspirant in US history, Trump a billionaire, racist demagogue, both self-serving, mindless of popular needs and concerns.

Four more years of endless imperial wars are certain. America will resemble Guatemala before they end, its people impoverished, terrorized by police state harshness, constitutional rights replaced by full-blown tyranny.

Most disturbing is how uninformed and indifferent most Americans are about a ruthless system destroying their lives, welfare and futures.

Elections accomplish nothing, rigged to sustain continuity, benefitting wealth, privilege and power exclusively over progressive governance of, by and for everyone equitably.

The nation I grew up in from the 1930s through the 60s no longer exists, unfit and unsafe to live in since neocons usurped power - Hillary Clinton their current standard bearer.

Will November’s election (sic) be rigged to install her? Corporate controlled electronic voting machines make it simple. So does disenfranchising millions of unwanted voters.

Green party presidential aspirant Jill Stein blasted the Democrat party, calling it “a disgrace… blatantly rigging the system” for Clinton, the corrupted media establishment supporting her, an unindicted racketeer, war criminal, major threat to world peace.

Late in my life, I can’t shake a deep foreboding for what I fear coming, dangers threatening everyone, youths with no futures, endless wars on a slippery slope toward possible mass annihilation.

Poet TS Eliot once mused about the world one day ending “not with a bang but a whimper.” Thermonuclear weapons in the hands of neocons like Hillary Clinton risk otherwise.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#1. To: Stephen Lendman (#0)

America was never beautiful.

I beg to differ. There are parts of America that are very beautiful indeed. The author of this piece needs to get out more. A

No JFKs exist, a peacemaker assassinated for opposing war, urging nuclear disarmament and rapprochement with Soviet Russia.<<

Ok,so he is just confused. JFK wasn't a peacemaker. He was a coward. They are different things.

New Deal, Fair Deal and Great Society programs are heading for history’s dust bin.<<

He is also delusional. America would be safe and secure today if they had been tossed in the dustbin the instant WW-2 ended.

as Bipartisan neocons infesting Washington want social justice ended, neoliberal enslavement replacing it, fascist police state harshness enforcing it. <<

Blah,blah,blan. He is so clueless he is confusing conservationism with globalism. He obviously grew up as a leftist,and was trained to be a kneejerk leftist in school. Nothing could be further from the truth. The so-called "neo-cons" are nothing but fascists,and Fascism is a left-wing political movement. A Fascist is what a Communist turns into when/if they grow up.

America is a gangster state, criminals running it - beginning in the 1990s under Bill Clinton, hardened under George W. Bush, institutionalized under Obama, certain to worsen no matter who succeeds him. <<

Proof that even a dim bulb can have an instant of brilliance. Absolutely SPOT ON!

US voters in November get to choose between deplorable, unacceptable choices - Clinton the most recklessly dangerous presidential aspirant in US history, Trump a billionaire, racist demagogue, both self-serving, mindless of popular needs and concerns. <<

And his train leaves the tracks once again. Presidents are NOT elected to bow to popular needs and concerns. Presidents are elected to GOVERN,and to govern in such a matter they do what is best for the NATION,not any one group of individuals whiners.

More proof he was raised and programmed as a leftist.

Most disturbing is how uninformed and indifferent most Americans are about a ruthless system destroying their lives, welfare and futures. <<

Uhhhhh,uhhhh,uhhhhh........

The dummy has recognized the problem,and is still clueless about the cause,which is one he has most likely promoted his entire life.

Elections accomplish nothing, rigged to sustain continuity, benefitting wealth, privilege and power exclusively over progressive governance of, by and for everyone equitably. <<

See? Have you ever seen bullshit piled higher? "Progressive" is a leftist code word for "Fascist".

Some people will never learn because they are incapable of looking at anything with a open mind and open eyes. They prefer their dogma over any reality they will ever be presented.

The nation I grew up in from the 1930s through the 60s no longer exists,<<

Only because fools like you worked hard your whole life to destroy it.

... unfit and unsafe to live in since neocons usurped power - Hillary Clinton their current standard bearer. <<

Once again,you fool,there is NOTHING the tiniest bit conservative about Fascism,and Bubbette! is nothing more than a modern day Mussolini,but without all the polished charm.

Late in my life, I can’t shake a deep foreboding for what I fear coming, dangers threatening everyone, youths with no futures, endless wars on a slippery slope toward possible mass annihilation. <<

You should fear it because you and your comrades were the ones that created the present and the near future. Just because late in life you woke up and discovered you were not to be a part of the ruling classes changes nothing.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-06-10   10:06:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: sneakypete (#1)

Ok,so he is just confused. JFK wasn't a peacemaker. He was a coward. They are different things.

Hi Pete, nice to see you here.

However, I must strongly disagree with your quoted statement.

JFK was assassinated because he threatened the global war machine. He was about to end US involvement in Vietnam, was about to dissolve the CIA due to its criminal and immoral activities, and demanded that Israel agree to allow US inspectors inside of their Dimona nuclear research facility to ensure they weren't developing nuclear weapons.

So I don't understand how you could view him as a coward.

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-06-10   11:51:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: FormerLurker (#4)

JFK was assassinated because he threatened the global war machine.<<

No,he wasn't. He LOVED the global war machine. It made him feel macho,and all punks love feeling macho.

I am GUESSING he was killed because his father stole the election from the people who really won it,and they were steamed anad went out and found a patsy to rectify the "injustice".

Just a guess,though.

>>He was about to end US involvement in Vietnam, was about to dissolve the CIA due to its criminal and immoral activities, and demanded that Israel agree to allow US inspectors inside of their Dimona nuclear research facility to ensure they weren't developing nuclear weapons.<<

All Kennedy Klan propaganda. After he was killed the Kennedy Klan were out of business politically on the right,so they took a hard left turn,and that shithead Robert suddenly became the darling of the left,after being chief consul for the House Un-American Activities Committee. He went from investigating them to being one of their leaders in the blink of an eye.

So I don't understand how you could view him as a coward.<<

He was a coward because instead of doing his duty in the Pacific and laying off the strait the Japanese were moving supplies through so he could attack and sink Japanese troop and cargo ships,he threw out a sea anchor and let his PT boat drift while he and the whole crew took a nap. Men under his command died because of this,and it seriously pisses me off that the Kennedy Klan were allowed to turn his cowardice into heroism. The Navy wanted to court-martial him for dereliction of duty,and old man Joe Kennedy was pushing Roosevelt to give him a Medal of Honor. The compromise was neither happpened.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-06-10   16:35:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: sneakypete (#7)

All Kennedy Klan propaganda. After he was killed the Kennedy Klan were out of business politically on the right,so they took a hard left turn,and that shithead Robert suddenly became the darling of the left,after being chief consul for the House Un-American Activities Committee. He went from investigating them to being one of their leaders in the blink of an eye.

Nope. Apparently you have an axe to grind, I'm just reporting facts.

  1. He was about to end US involvement in Vietnam
  2. was about to dissolve the CIA due to its criminal and immoral activities
  3. demanded that Israel agree to allow US inspectors inside of their Dimona nuclear research facility

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-06-10   17:21:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: FormerLurker (#8)

Nope. Apparently you have an axe to grind, I'm just reporting facts.

He was about to end US involvement in Vietnam Exit Strategy: In 1963, JFK ordered a complete withdrawal from Vietnam

You do know you are talking to someone who was in the US Army Special Forces in 1964,right?

I personally knew US Army soldiers that were sent to Cambodia,Laos,and South VN in the 1959-1963 time period,and was at Bragg when the 5th SFG was pulling warm breathing bodies from other groups in preparation for deploying the whole group to VN.

Those things don't happen overnight. Since JFK LOVED Special Forces and used a Presidential Order to authorize SF to wear a beret in spite of the wishes of the regular army Establishment,you can bet he was the one that set that in motion.

The 10th SFG was located in Bad Tolz Germany 1953 from Bragg in order to run "stay behind" guerilla operations against the Soviets if they finally decided to take over West Germany. They had a awful lot of Lodge Act Europeans in the 10th back then,and some of them barely spoke English. Hell,some barely spoke German.

JFK not only didn't pull them back,he sent reinforcements after expanding the size of SF.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-06-10   22:42:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: sneakypete (#12)

I personally knew US Army soldiers that were sent to Cambodia,Laos,and South VN in the 1959-1963 time period,and was at Bragg when the 5th SFG was pulling warm breathing bodies from other groups in preparation for deploying the whole group to VN.

And you're trying to tell me those WERE NOT CIA operations?

Hate to tell you this, but Kennedy wasn't president back in 1959..

Those things don't happen overnight. Since JFK LOVED Special Forces and used a Presidential Order to authorize SF to wear a beret in spite of the wishes of the regular army Establishment,you can bet he was the one that set that in motion.

From History of the Green Beret

The Green Beret was originally designed in 1953 by SF Major Herbert Brucker, a veteran of the OSS. Later that year, First Lieutenant Roger Pezelle adopted it as the unofficial headgear for his A-team, Operational Detachment FA32. They wore it whenever they went to the field for prolonged exercises. Soon it spread throughout all of SF, although the Army refused to authorize its official use. Finally, in 1961, President John F. Kennedy planned to visit Fort Bragg. He sent word to the Special Warfare Center commander, Brigadier General William P. Yarborough, for all SF Soldiers to wear their berets for the event. President Kennedy felt that since they had a special mission, SF should have something to set them apart from the rest. Even before the presidential request, however, the Department of the Army had acquiesced and teletyped a message to the center authorizing the beret as a part of the SF uniform.

When President Kennedy came to Fort Bragg Oct. 12, 1961, General Yarborough wore his Green Beret to greet the commander-in-chief. The president remarked, “Those are nice. How do you like the Green Beret?” General Yarborough replied, “They’re fine, Sir. We’ve wanted them a long time.”

A message from President Kennedy to General Yarborough later that day stated, “My congratulations to you personally for your part in the presentation today … The challenge of this old but new form of operations is a real one, and I know that you and the members of your command will carry on for us and the free world in a manner which is both worthy and inspiring. I am sure that the Green Beret will be a mark of distinction in the trying times ahead.”

In an April 1962 White House memorandum for the U.S. Army, President Kennedy showed his continued support for SF, calling the Green Beret “a symbol of excellence, a badge of courage, a mark of distinction in the fight for freedom.”

Regardless of all that, you are not refuting the statement of fact that I posted earlier, in that JFK had started the process of withdrawing US troops from Vietnam.

From U.S. Exit Strategy: In 1963, JFK ordered a complete withdrawal from Vietnam

As McNamara’s 1986 oral history, on deposit at the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, makes clear (but his book does not), he was himself in the second group, who favored withdrawal without victory—not necessarily admitting or even predicting defeat, but accepting uncertainty as to what would follow. The denouement came shortly thereafter:

After much debate, the president endorsed our recommendation to withdraw 1,000 men by December 31, 1963. He did so, I recall, without indicating his reasoning. In any event, because objections had been so intense and because I suspected others might try to get him to reverse the decision, I urged him to announce it publicly. That would set it in concrete. . . . The president finally agreed, and the announcement was released by Pierre Salinger after the meeting.

Before a large audience at the LBJ Library on May 1, 1995, McNamara restated his account of this meeting and stressed its importance. He confirmed that President Kennedy’s action had three elements: (1) complete withdrawal “by December 31, 1965,” (2) the first 1,000 out by the end of 1963, and (3) a public announcement, to set these decisions “in concrete,” which was made. McNamara also added the critical information that there exists a tape of this meeting, in the John F. Kennedy Library in Boston, to which he had access and on which his account is based.

The existence of a taping system in JFK’s oval office had become known over the years, particularly through the release of partial transcripts of the historic meeting of the “ExComm” during the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962. But the full extent of Kennedy’s taping was not known. And, according to McNamara, access to particular tapes was tightly controlled by representatives of the Kennedy family. When McNamara spoke in Austin, only he and his coauthor, Brian VanDeMark, had been granted the privilege of listening to the actual tape recordings of Kennedy’s White House meetings on Vietnam.

In 1997, however, this situation changed. The Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), an independent civilian body established under the 1992 JFK Records Act that has already been responsible for the release of millions of pages of official records deemed relevant to Kennedy’s assassination, ruled that his tapes relating to Vietnam decision-making should be released. In July the JFK Library began releasing key tapes, including those of the withdrawal meetings on October 2 and 5, 1963.7

A careful review of the October 2 meeting makes clear that McNamara’s account is essentially accurate and even to some degree understated. One can hear McNamara—the voice is unmistakable—arguing for a firm timetable to withdraw all U.S. forces from Vietnam, whether the war can be won in 1964, which he doubts, or not. McNamara is emphatic: “We need a way to get out of Vietnam, and this is a way of doing it.”

In Retrospect’s discussion of Kennedy’s decision to withdraw ends at this point. McNamara makes no mention of NSAM 263. However, on the tape of the meeting of October 5, 1963, one can clearly hear a voice—it may be Robert McNamara or McGeorge Bundy—asking President John F. Kennedy for “formal approval” of “items one, two, and three” on a paper evidently in front of them. It is clear that one of these items is the recommendation to withdraw 1,000 men by the end of 1963, the rationale being that they are no longer needed. This short exchange is thus unmistakably a request for a formal presidential decision concerning the McNamara-Taylor recommendations. After a short discussion of the possible political effect in Vietnam of announcing this decision, the voice of JFK can be clearly heard: “Let’s go on ahead and do it,” followed by a few words deciphered by historian George Eliades as “without making a public statement about it.”

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-06-14   15:32:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

        There are no replies to Comment # 16.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]