[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Did Iranian ballistic missiles hit the Dimona nuclear reactor. Rep. Green Letter to DoD IG Demands Answers On K2 Base Toxins “Israel is DESTROYING itself by attacking IRAN and millions could die” Col. Douglas Macgregor How Boeing 787 Whistleblower's Disaster Warning Was Ignored | Israel Says Another Missile Barrage Launched From Iran Overnight, Casualties Rise 2025 Annotated Bilderberg Members List Major Iranian Missile Impacts On Israel; IAEA Warns Radioactive Contamination Observed At Natanz Israeli Strikes On Iran Ongoing Through Friday As Death Toll Surpasses 100 From Torah to trauma: A Satanic child abuse scandal blows up in Israel MAGA Influencer Calls to Deploy Palantir on LA Streets Egypt detains nearly 200 foreigners who flew in to join Gaza march FLASHBACK - How Mayor Daley dealt with looters! Scammers Use AI Bots to Impersonate Students, Stealing Millions in Financial Aid Bilderberg 2025 begins. Global elites gather in Stockholm. AI, migration, and national security dominate I Wish We All Could Leave California (Beach Boys Parody) Exclusive: US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences Brilliant & Critical Insight! Legal Immigrants Shift to GOP on Immigration, Shows 40-Point Swing from Democrats American fuel tankers were spotted REFUELING ISRAELI JETS over Syria. Does Western Civilization Have Enough Belief to Continue to Exist? Trump CLEARLY KNEW of Israel's Plan To STRIKE IRAN Trump Warns 'Even More Brutal' Attacks Coming Without Nuclear Deal 10 Supplements That Fight Inflammation CNN Security Analyst Defends Agents Who Removed Senator Padilla From Kristi Noem Presser Florida sheriff warns rioters: 'We will kill you graveyard dead' DEMOCRATS' NIGHTMARE: Viral Video Shows Why They LOST The Election! Israeli strikes on Iran. Five Waves. Might last 2 weeks? Images Emerge Of Tehran Destruction After Major Israeli 'Preemptive Attack' This Is What Happens Next After Israel Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Facilities… Smartmatic accused of deleting evidence in 27 Billion Fox News Defamation Case Court Docs

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Bill O'Reilly: 'High-Powered Weaponry Is Too Easy to Get' in US
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.newsmax.com/US/bill-orei ... br=czanlhau#comment-2732963952
Published: Jun 15, 2016
Author: Joe Crowe
Post Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:54 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 648
Comments: 33

Bill O'Reilly: 'High-Powered Weaponry Is Too Easy to Get' in US

Image: Bill O'Reilly: 'High-Powered Weaponry Is Too Easy to Get' in US Bill O'Reilly (Getty Images)

By Joe Crowe | Wednesday, 15 Jun 2016 03:31 PM

Host Bill O'Reilly addressed gun crime during an episode of his Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor."

During the "Talking Points Memo" segment, he said, "There is too much gun crime in the USA and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get. That's the fact. So let's deal with it."

O'Reilly said he believes the Second Amendment does not cover high-powered weapons.

"We all have the right to bear arms, but we don't have the right to buy and maintain mortars even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a new world order," he said, adding, "No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades."

The Fox News host noted that the Second Amendment says the government's role is to regulate militias "in the name of public safety" and laid out his idea for how federal and state governments should handle gun laws.

"Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale and the states should decide what kind of carry laws are good for their people," O'Reilly said. The FBI and other federal agencies need to have the authority to keep weapons out of the hands of "evil-doers like Mateen," referring to Omar Mateen, the killer in the Orlando gay nightclub massacre.

O'Reilly said he believes that gun dealers should be required to report to the FBI when they sell "heavy weapons." Congress' job would be to outline what is considered to be a heavy weapon, but handguns would not be included.

Such laws and rules "would make it a lot tougher for the Omar Mateens of the world to kill," but he pointed out that ending gun crime is impossible, especially in the U.S. in which "hundreds of millions" of guns are already circulating.

Breaking News at http://Newsmax.com www.newsmax.com/US/bill-oreilly- gun- crime-US/2016/06/15/id/734057/#ixzz4BiKTVub2

Poster Comment:

Great comments at the source. Most have O-Reilly's number. He is a pinhead.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#2. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

The second amendment covered cannons. Cannons. Then one day goberment decided we couldnt be trusted with cannons no more..... the second amendment was infringed a long time ago.

titorite  posted on  2016-06-16   4:11:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The second amendment covered cannons.

NOo,it didn't. Cannons were "community property". No infantry soldier ever carried a cannon.

Individuals COULD legally possess and own cannons if they wanted,but they needed a permit. That's how pirates were legally allowed to arm their ships with cannons so they could fight against the war ships of Spain and England. The Captains were given a "Letter of Marquis" to make them legal.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-06-16   14:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Cannons were "community property". No infantry soldier ever carried a cannon.

So what you are trying to tell me is that it takes a village to own a cannon?

Lol.

No, the right of a well regulated milita to keep and bare arms included cannons. What forbade the common man from cannon ownership was expense.... everything about them was expensive , the barrels, the shot, the powder it took to fire a single time... one could buy load of guns and powder for the same amount of money ...but no private individual was ever brought to court over illigal cannon ownership in the 1700s to late 1800s in fact the majority of the fucked up laws on arms were made after the 1880s

titorite  posted on  2016-06-16   20:45:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So what you are trying to tell me is that it takes a village to own a cannon?

Yup,but the real reason for this was economic and local security,not any form of gun control. Cannons,cannon balls, and powder by the keg were very expensive and almost no one had or could justify spending the money to buy and maintain his own personal cannon and powder and shot house.

In order to make sure locals in all states had the ability to fight off state and federal militias and attempt to secure that power remained at the local level,the Founding Father's put in place a system where every free man was armed with his own individual weapons,and in time of emergency could form up on the village square to be issued powder and shot,and to be form gun crews to man the cannons.

The power-seekers later on formed the National Guard and federalized them in order to take over control of what HAD been the local militias as well as their armories.

Then,thanks to the "Creatures from Jekyll Island" the Feral Reserve Band was created,and our feral government sold themselves AND us into slavery by borrowing the money from private bankers to buy control over local politicians via spending bills passed in Congress.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-06-17   13:20:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Yaup... isreali banks print the money and the crown (UK) takes its cut when we pay our taxes and hardly anybody is bothered by the fact that we dont have any control over our money. It is slavery and woodrow wilson is a son of a bitch.

titorite  posted on  2016-06-17   14:39:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#21. To: titorite (#19)

Yaup... isreali banks print the money

Don't allow yourself to be backed into the "Hit bees de Jews!" corner. They are no more Israeli banks and their owners are no more Jewish than they are Martians.

What they all are,is Corporate Internationalists. They don't believe in nations because nations tax them and tell them what they can and can't do. They are One World Government people,and believe in a Corporate Board controlling the world.

Deep down and only whispered to themselves in the darkness you can bet your bippy each and every one of them believe that THEY as individuals should be the world leader,but they have no choice but to play the corporate game because each and every one of them understands that any individual that tries to take over will be killed.

As for "Jews","Americans",etc,etc,etc,such titles are only legal and political conveniences and used as tools at this time. The instant they take over those titles will be meaningless. After all,THEY are too important to be limited to such small titles. Titles like "Director of the Northern European Economic Zone",or "Director of the North American Economic Zone" will be how they will be identified.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-06-18 13:27:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]