[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Did Iranian ballistic missiles hit the Dimona nuclear reactor.

Rep. Green Letter to DoD IG Demands Answers On K2 Base Toxins

“Israel is DESTROYING itself by attacking IRAN and millions could die” Col. Douglas Macgregor

How Boeing 787 Whistleblower's Disaster Warning Was Ignored |

Israel Says Another Missile Barrage Launched From Iran Overnight, Casualties Rise

2025 Annotated Bilderberg Members List

Major Iranian Missile Impacts On Israel; IAEA Warns Radioactive Contamination Observed At Natanz

Israeli Strikes On Iran Ongoing Through Friday As Death Toll Surpasses 100

From Torah to trauma: A Satanic child abuse scandal blows up in Israel

MAGA Influencer Calls to Deploy Palantir on LA Streets

Egypt detains nearly 200 foreigners who flew in to join Gaza march

FLASHBACK - How Mayor Daley dealt with looters!

Scammers Use AI Bots to Impersonate Students, Stealing Millions in Financial Aid

Bilderberg 2025 begins. Global elites gather in Stockholm. AI, migration, and national security dominate

I Wish We All Could Leave California (Beach Boys Parody)

Exclusive: US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences

Brilliant & Critical Insight!

Legal Immigrants Shift to GOP on Immigration, Shows 40-Point Swing from Democrats

American fuel tankers were spotted REFUELING ISRAELI JETS over Syria.

Does Western Civilization Have Enough Belief to Continue to Exist?

Trump CLEARLY KNEW of Israel's Plan To STRIKE IRAN

Trump Warns 'Even More Brutal' Attacks Coming Without Nuclear Deal

10 Supplements That Fight Inflammation

CNN Security Analyst Defends Agents Who Removed Senator Padilla From Kristi Noem Presser

Florida sheriff warns rioters: 'We will kill you graveyard dead'

DEMOCRATS' NIGHTMARE: Viral Video Shows Why They LOST The Election!

Israeli strikes on Iran. Five Waves. Might last 2 weeks?

Images Emerge Of Tehran Destruction After Major Israeli 'Preemptive Attack'

This Is What Happens Next After Israel Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Facilities…

Smartmatic accused of deleting evidence in 27 Billion Fox News Defamation Case Court Docs


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Bill O'Reilly: 'High-Powered Weaponry Is Too Easy to Get' in US
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.newsmax.com/US/bill-orei ... br=czanlhau#comment-2732963952
Published: Jun 15, 2016
Author: Joe Crowe
Post Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:54 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 626
Comments: 33

Bill O'Reilly: 'High-Powered Weaponry Is Too Easy to Get' in US

Image: Bill O'Reilly: 'High-Powered Weaponry Is Too Easy to Get' in US Bill O'Reilly (Getty Images)

By Joe Crowe | Wednesday, 15 Jun 2016 03:31 PM

Host Bill O'Reilly addressed gun crime during an episode of his Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor."

During the "Talking Points Memo" segment, he said, "There is too much gun crime in the USA and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get. That's the fact. So let's deal with it."

O'Reilly said he believes the Second Amendment does not cover high-powered weapons.

"We all have the right to bear arms, but we don't have the right to buy and maintain mortars even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a new world order," he said, adding, "No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades."

The Fox News host noted that the Second Amendment says the government's role is to regulate militias "in the name of public safety" and laid out his idea for how federal and state governments should handle gun laws.

"Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale and the states should decide what kind of carry laws are good for their people," O'Reilly said. The FBI and other federal agencies need to have the authority to keep weapons out of the hands of "evil-doers like Mateen," referring to Omar Mateen, the killer in the Orlando gay nightclub massacre.

O'Reilly said he believes that gun dealers should be required to report to the FBI when they sell "heavy weapons." Congress' job would be to outline what is considered to be a heavy weapon, but handguns would not be included.

Such laws and rules "would make it a lot tougher for the Omar Mateens of the world to kill," but he pointed out that ending gun crime is impossible, especially in the U.S. in which "hundreds of millions" of guns are already circulating.

Breaking News at http://Newsmax.com www.newsmax.com/US/bill-oreilly- gun- crime-US/2016/06/15/id/734057/#ixzz4BiKTVub2


Poster Comment:

Great comments at the source. Most have O-Reilly's number. He is a pinhead.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

#2. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

The second amendment covered cannons. Cannons. Then one day goberment decided we couldnt be trusted with cannons no more..... the second amendment was infringed a long time ago.

titorite  posted on  2016-06-16   4:11:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: titorite (#2)

The second amendment covered cannons.

NOo,it didn't. Cannons were "community property". No infantry soldier ever carried a cannon.

Individuals COULD legally possess and own cannons if they wanted,but they needed a permit. That's how pirates were legally allowed to arm their ships with cannons so they could fight against the war ships of Spain and England. The Captains were given a "Letter of Marquis" to make them legal.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-06-16   14:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 9.

#15. To: sneakypete (#9)

Cannons were "community property". No infantry soldier ever carried a cannon.

So what you are trying to tell me is that it takes a village to own a cannon?

Lol.

No, the right of a well regulated milita to keep and bare arms included cannons. What forbade the common man from cannon ownership was expense.... everything about them was expensive , the barrels, the shot, the powder it took to fire a single time... one could buy load of guns and powder for the same amount of money ...but no private individual was ever brought to court over illigal cannon ownership in the 1700s to late 1800s in fact the majority of the fucked up laws on arms were made after the 1880s

titorite  posted on  2016-06-16 20:45:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]