[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Fury in Memphis after attempted murder suspect who ambushed FedEx employee walks free without bail

Tehran preparing for attack against Israel: Ayatollah Khamenei's aide

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: CHENEY CLAIMS NOBODY WAS DRINKING -- BUT HE HAD A BEER
Source: nolu chan
URL Source: http://none
Published: Feb 16, 2006
Author: nolu chan
Post Date: 2006-02-16 18:29:39 by nolu_chan
Keywords: DRINKING, CHENEY, CLAIMS
Views: 2125
Comments: 172

CHENEY CLAIMS NOBODY WAS DRINKING -- BUT HE HAD A BEER

CHENEY INTERVIEW WITH BRIT HUME

Q Was anybody drinking in this party?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: No. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. We had --

Q So he wasn't, and you weren't?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Correct. We'd taken a break at lunch -- go down under an old -- ancient oak tree there on the place, and have a barbecue. I had a beer at lunch. After lunch we take a break, go back to ranch headquarters. Then we took about an hour-long tour of ranch, with a ranch hand driving the vehicle, looking at game. We didn't go back into the field to hunt quail until about, oh, sometime after 3:00 p.m.

The five of us who were in that party were together all afternoon. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence.

Nobody was drinking. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. We took a BBQ lunch break in the field under a tree and he had a beer. Then they went back to ranch headquarters. They went back out hunting quail at about 3:00 p.m.. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence.

Uh huh.

Notice that they had lunch in the field and then went back to the ranch headquarters. The beer was in the field with them. Presumably that was just ONE (1) beer and Cheney drank it while everyone else drank their Dr. Pepper and watched him drink his ONE (1) beer.

Uh huh.

When did they eat lunch? When did they finish lunch? Had the beer passed through his system by 3:00 p.m.?

Wait a minute. What beer? Nobody was drinking. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence.

Wait a minute. Maybe he was parsing. If it is not Wild Turkey or the equivalent, it is not considered drinking.

Whatever. Brit Hume let it slide.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

#1. To: nolu_chan (#0)

You missed it completely!

I know people who consider two or three drinks of ANYTHING to be in the category of NOT DRINKING.

(I also don't let them drive me anywhere)

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   18:34:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Feynman Lives! (#1)

Stop being argumentative, Richard. You're becoming a PITA again.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-02-16   18:43:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

Jethro Tull,

First off, the name is Monty, not Richard. I am a fan of the good Doctor Feynman, but we do not share the same name.

Second off, I was not being argumentative. If you want argumentative, perhaps you should go back to your own board where you seem to take no end of delight in calling people dumbfucks, assholes and peodphiles.

I was making fun of Dick Cheney, you nimwit.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   18:45:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Feynman Lives! (#3)

First off, the name is Monty

Monty my balls. You're Richard. It's as evident as the beating young Michelle took at the hands of your heroes. BTW, I just pm'd ruthie. If there is anything I can do for Michelle or her legal team, my services are theirs. I'll be happy to fly down to Dallas just to sink this rogue cop. If I do come down, I'll let you know. Lunch is on me. OK?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-02-16   18:56:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

Jethro,

I really don't know what you are talking about, but you sure do like to talk about it. I kinda do wish I fit neatly into your paranoid conspiracies, but it just ain't the case.

I don't know what you mean when you say that you pm'd ruthie, nor do I know who ruthie is, so... I guess.. good for you?

As for that chick in Deep Ellum, all I know about her is what I read in the papers, and so far as I know, nothing has been decided yet. He was not discplined and she hasn't filed a complaint as far as I know. I don't have a feeling on it one way or the other, she might be guilty, he might be wrong. I honestly don't care.

I don't know why you are so bent on this story, do you live in Dallas? Were you beaten by the cops? What is your deal?

So, while you are pm'ing ruthie, why not PITA Michelle and eat my BM, and then call yourself a cop and have us all arrested. You are making NO sense to me at all. To me, you are just an ass.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   19:04:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Feynman Lives! (#5)

Richard's posts on 4um

How about that! Your posting style and syntax is identical to Richard's. Maybe you're his twin separated at birth?

christine  posted on  2006-02-16   19:17:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: christine (#11)

Christine,

I can show you 200 people who use the same argumentative style as I do. They would all also be lawyers, 9 times out of 10. So, what?

Think about it, Richard was OBSESSED with that incident in Deep Ellum, he swears up and down the yard that he was there and he posted a couple hundred times on that one thread. (problematically so, in my opinion) I, on the other hand, wasn't even IN Dallas that weekend, and more importantly, I really don't give a tinker's toot about what happened down there and will wait to see what shakes out before passing my judgement on the event.

It seems HIGHLY unlikely that Richard could "sneak" back into this group and NOT post ad nauseum to that thread.

You are an intelligent creature, Christine, think it thru.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   19:29:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Feynman Lives! (#14)

I can show you 200 people who use the same argumentative style as I do.

Yep, contrarians blow.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-02-16   19:32:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#18)

To: Feynman Lives!

I can show you 200 people who use the same argumentative style as I do. Yep, contrarians blow.

DAMMIT JETHRO, you LIED to me!

You said you were done.

You PROMISED!!!

Now, go away, little one.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   19:34:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Feynman Lives! (#21)

Sorry Dick. You pissed me off. I'm in for the long haul :)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-02-16   19:36:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Jethro Tull (#22)

You pissed me off. I'm in for the long haul

What did I do that pissed you off?

You thought I was someone else and now you are venting your uncontrolled rage on me.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   19:40:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Feynman Lives! (#24)

What did I do that pissed you off?

You're a liar.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-02-16   19:44:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 26.

#32. To: Jethro Tull (#26)

You're a liar.

I am a liar? Well, I guess on some level, we have all lied at one point or another in our lives.

YOU call me a liar, yet you do not know me, so what is your factual proof of this allegation?

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16 19:47:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Jethro Tull (#26)

Dick Cheney was just exercising his Second Amendment Rights. Its not like he is a terrorist or anything ... just because the rest of us, are.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-02-16 19:48:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]