[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: CHENEY CLAIMS NOBODY WAS DRINKING -- BUT HE HAD A BEER
Source: nolu chan
URL Source: http://none
Published: Feb 16, 2006
Author: nolu chan
Post Date: 2006-02-16 18:29:39 by nolu_chan
Keywords: DRINKING, CHENEY, CLAIMS
Views: 2049
Comments: 172

CHENEY CLAIMS NOBODY WAS DRINKING -- BUT HE HAD A BEER

CHENEY INTERVIEW WITH BRIT HUME

Q Was anybody drinking in this party?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: No. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. We had --

Q So he wasn't, and you weren't?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Correct. We'd taken a break at lunch -- go down under an old -- ancient oak tree there on the place, and have a barbecue. I had a beer at lunch. After lunch we take a break, go back to ranch headquarters. Then we took about an hour-long tour of ranch, with a ranch hand driving the vehicle, looking at game. We didn't go back into the field to hunt quail until about, oh, sometime after 3:00 p.m.

The five of us who were in that party were together all afternoon. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence.

Nobody was drinking. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. We took a BBQ lunch break in the field under a tree and he had a beer. Then they went back to ranch headquarters. They went back out hunting quail at about 3:00 p.m.. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence.

Uh huh.

Notice that they had lunch in the field and then went back to the ranch headquarters. The beer was in the field with them. Presumably that was just ONE (1) beer and Cheney drank it while everyone else drank their Dr. Pepper and watched him drink his ONE (1) beer.

Uh huh.

When did they eat lunch? When did they finish lunch? Had the beer passed through his system by 3:00 p.m.?

Wait a minute. What beer? Nobody was drinking. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence.

Wait a minute. Maybe he was parsing. If it is not Wild Turkey or the equivalent, it is not considered drinking.

Whatever. Brit Hume let it slide.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: nolu_chan (#0)

You missed it completely!

I know people who consider two or three drinks of ANYTHING to be in the category of NOT DRINKING.

(I also don't let them drive me anywhere)

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   18:34:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Feynman Lives! (#1)

Stop being argumentative, Richard. You're becoming a PITA again.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-02-16   18:43:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

Jethro Tull,

First off, the name is Monty, not Richard. I am a fan of the good Doctor Feynman, but we do not share the same name.

Second off, I was not being argumentative. If you want argumentative, perhaps you should go back to your own board where you seem to take no end of delight in calling people dumbfucks, assholes and peodphiles.

I was making fun of Dick Cheney, you nimwit.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16   18:45:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Feynman Lives! (#3)

It's funny you know JT is the owner of another board, yet you feign ignorance when sites such as FR or LP (aka TOS1 & 2) are mentioned. Judging from the sheer number of cliche arguments you put forth I must say I find that quite improbable.

You seem quite capable of using HTML, why would a pro like you need to ask how to create a tagline?

You seem capable of understanding internet links, yet you have ostensibly failed to do any research on a former poster named Richard, although you have been accused of being that person many times by many posters. Do you just have damaged areas in your brain or something, some sort of mental blind spot?

I regret being nice to you at first on that evolution thread, even though I really am an athiest. You are full of nastiness, and that will hurt you more than anyone else could even dream of.

Dakmar  posted on  2006-02-16   19:09:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#12. To: Dakmar (#6)

It's funny you know JT is the owner of another board, yet you feign ignorance when sites such as FR or LP (aka TOS1 & 2) are mentioned. Judging from the sheer number of cliche arguments you put forth I must say I find that quite improbable.

I was POINTED to that site today by Zip. She felt I would find it INTERESTING. After I viewed it, I found it VERY interesting. Jethro is just a bully, nothing more, nothing less.

As for HTML, everything I have done is 1st grade basic HTML. Bold, color and font sizes are NOT magnificent feats of coding.

With this idiot, Jethro (quite a fitting name for such an inbred freak)... well, my original thought was that he was naturally calling me Richard because of my screen name FEYNMAN LIVES! which is an homage to the good Dr Richard Feynman. Why would I naturally presume he was talking about an old poster if the name he is using has significance to MY screen name?

After reading your post I have gone back and read some of the stuff from the guy he was talking about. He seemed bent on that incident in Deep Ellum last month. So what? He says he was there, maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. I am far too busy not giving a damn to care either way. It looks like he was fixated on that one thing. So, what do I care about him? My concern is why this moron Jethro was deliberately mistaking me for him. Jethro seems seriously unbalanced.

Dakmar, you are FAR too simple minded if you are willing to make such snap judgements without learning the facts of the matter before hand. However, if you wish to withdraw your kindness to me, go for it. Whatever floats your boat. Ask Zip, SHE was the one who told me about the site and TOLD me to check it out, just today.

Feynman Lives!  posted on  2006-02-16 19:24:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]