See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: CHENEY CLAIMS NOBODY WAS DRINKING -- BUT HE HAD A BEER
Source:
nolu chan
URL Source: http://none
Published: Feb 16, 2006
Author: nolu chan
Post Date: 2006-02-16 18:29:39 by nolu_chan
Keywords: DRINKING, CHENEY, CLAIMS
Views: 1942
Comments: 172
CHENEY CLAIMS NOBODY WAS DRINKING -- BUT HE HAD A BEER CHENEY INTERVIEW WITH BRIT HUME THE VICE PRESIDENT: No. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. We had -- Q So he wasn't, and you weren't? THE VICE PRESIDENT: Correct. We'd taken a break at lunch -- go down under an old -- ancient oak tree there on the place, and have a barbecue. I had a beer at lunch. After lunch we take a break, go back to ranch headquarters. Then we took about an hour-long tour of ranch, with a ranch hand driving the vehicle, looking at game. We didn't go back into the field to hunt quail until about, oh, sometime after 3:00 p.m. The five of us who were in that party were together all afternoon. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence. Nobody was drinking. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. We took a BBQ lunch break in the field under a tree and he had a beer. Then they went back to ranch headquarters. They went back out hunting quail at about 3:00 p.m.. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence. Uh huh. Notice that they had lunch in the field and then went back to the ranch headquarters. The beer was in the field with them. Presumably that was just ONE (1) beer and Cheney drank it while everyone else drank their Dr. Pepper and watched him drink his ONE (1) beer. Uh huh. When did they eat lunch? When did they finish lunch? Had the beer passed through his system by 3:00 p.m.? Wait a minute. What beer? Nobody was drinking. You don't hunt with people who drink. That's not a good idea. Nobody was drinking, nobody was under the influence. Wait a minute. Maybe he was parsing. If it is not Wild Turkey or the equivalent, it is not considered drinking. Whatever. Brit Hume let it slide.
Q Was anybody drinking in this party?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-53) not displayed.
.
.
.
#54. To: Feynman Lives! (#52)
I am a lover. God will tell you that. And, our deliverer, GWBush is our anointed one telling everyone how I should finance their freedoms. Democracy is serious stuff.
I bought some sort of Jap rifle from WW2. I think it's a 7.7 or something along those lines.
ANOTHER 'Feynman Lives!' thread...I'm going to go clean the cat box. Good night.
no! come back here and post something else! ;)
YOU call me a liar, yet you do not know me, so what is your factual proof of this allegation? Dakmar's post #6 at 19:09:55 You seem capable of understanding internet links, yet you have ostensibly failed to do any research on a former poster named Richard, although you have been accused of being that person many times by many posters. Do you just have damaged areas in your brain or something, some sort of mental blind spot? Your response post #12 at 19:24:01 ... well, my original thought was that he was naturally calling me Richard because of my screen name FEYNMAN LIVES! which is an homage to the good Dr Richard Feynman. Why would I naturally presume he was talking about an old poster if the name he is using has significance to MY screen name? After reading your post I have gone back and read some of the stuff from the guy he was talking about. He seemed bent on that incident in Deep Ellum last month. So what? He says he was there, maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. I am far too busy not giving a damn to care either way. It looks like he was fixated on that one thing. And in between those two posts: #9. To: Dakmar at 19:13:50 #10. To: Jethro Tull at 19:14:56 So between Dakmar's post #6 and your #12, exactly 14 mins and 6 seconds elapsed (24:01 - 09:55) during which time you also read three posts to you and made three reponses for which I estimate 1 min each to refresh and read the post and 1 minute to compose and write the repsonses or at least 6 minutes minimum for responses #9, #10 & #12, leaving about 8 mins to find Richard's posts and read enough of them to be knowledgable enough of Richard's posting history at that point to claim in your post #12: After reading your post I have gone back and read some of the stuff from the guy he was talking about. He seemed bent on that incident in Deep Ellum last month. So what? He says he was there, maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. I am far too busy not giving a damn to care either way. It looks like he was fixated on that one thing. Further, here in your post #14. To: christine at 19:29:01 Think about it, Richard was OBSESSED with that incident in Deep Ellum, he swears up and down the yard that he was there and he posted a couple hundred times on that one thread. And here in your post #20. To: Dakmar at 19:33:25 From reading his posts he does sound like a lawyer, and he certainly does seem know the Deep Ellum area. However, I don't know enough about the incident to comment one way or the other as to whether or not he was there. As for the conflicting reports... So between your post #12 and your post #20 is another 9 mins and 26 secs (33: 25 - 24:01) elapsed but assuming again 4 minutes to read and respond in posts #14 and #20 yields another 5 mins and 26 secs for additional 'research' of Richard's posting history, for a total of 13 minutes and 26 seconds for you to read a 784 post thread, find Richard's posts, read them and assess Richard's posting history. So in the first 8 minutes of 'research' of an 784 post thread you determined that Richard: and in the next 5 minutes and 26 secs of 'research' you determined that Richard: You want us to believe that you just this evening between 19:09:55 and 19:33: 25 (an interval of 23 and a half minutes total) you researched Richard's posts from a 784 post thread and also read and responded to 5 posts on this very thread. No one believes that, Richard. You know Richard's posting history not because you figured it out in 13 minutes, but because you are the poster previously known as "Richard". You've fooled no one. Your M.O. was pegged within a day of you're being here but many people were patient and tolerant, which you returned with derision and lies. You might have had a little credibility but when you post blatant falsehoods like: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=19442&Disp=14#C14 I can show you 200 people who use the same argumentative style as I do. They would all also be lawyers, 9 times out of 10. You don't know 200 laywers, and the few you might know wouldn't argue like you do (not in court, well, not twice anyway) and "all" does not equate to "9 times out of 10". But you didn't even think about the facts when you posted, no, your keyboard just runs mindlessly out of control. http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19372&Disp=14#C14 A shotgun is commonly also referred to as a rifle in modern parlance, Duck, but thanks. Ignoring the fact you're posting to a "duck hunter" (duh!) who would know, a "rifle" is a firearm with a rifled bore, and "rifling" means to cut spiral grooves within a gun barrel, the purpose of which is to spin the bullet upon exit at the muzzle for better ballistics, whereas "shot" guns expel shot pellets (encased in a shot cup) through a smooth bore barrel with no rifling because the shot cup is not supposed to rotate or spin down the barrel. You pretend to know what you're talking about when it is blatantly obvious to all of us you're lying. You not only demonstrate a total disregard for truth but also a childlike naivete in what you think you can get away with.
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
what you said.
"says he was there" "bent" and "fixated" and in the next 5 minutes and 26 secs of 'research' you determined that Richard: "posted a couple hundred times", "swears up and down the yeard that he was there" "certainly does seem to know the Deep Ellum area" "conflicting reports" Starwind, Wow, not sure who you are, but you are sure jumping on Jethro's bandwagon pretty hard. ROFL Yes, this was my initial assessment after a cursory view of the thread. I have to read and digest enormous volumes of written material every day for a living. I know how to read for comprehension, not content, so I read much faster than you do. It does not take much reading to learn the things that you said there. Any psychologist or psychiatrist could give you the same base level assessment in the same time. Had I taken another 10 minutes I could have told you much more about the situation, but, as I said earlier, I just don't care that much about the case. The rest of it just appears to be you going WELL out of your way to try to pick a fight with me over small matters that really don't concern you, so I will just ignore them. Oh, and I am not gonna bother bickering with you about what name you wanna give me. I will tell you one time, and quite politely, that my name is not Richard, but in fact, Monty. I don't know who you are or why you have reacted in such an odd fashion, but once again, I will add this to the list of things about which I just do not care. From there, you are free to go off on whatever rant you see fit. You are too filled with hate to do anyone any good.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman I'll rent him out to you... cheap?
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
Yeah. We see you 'reading and digesting' huge volumes of bandwidth here daily. But none of that digestion included the difference between shotguns and rifles, though, or the difference between "All" and "9 out of 10", now did it.
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
LOL!
If he's been shown to be less than honest with the forum, he should be banished to PL until he can demonstrate that he's ready to come back to 4um.
Seconded. Thanks for the legwork, Star.
hmmmm..interesting, yet just like Richard, not far too busy to spend nearly all day posting on this forum! have you even taken a potty break?
Who said your name was Richard? You simply chose that screen name in your
previous 4um life. WhoTF do you think we are? Many of us have been posting on
forums long before your parents let you near the family Tandy. Now scat.
Give him a second chance. Let him prove himself on PL. Give the clowns a chance to work with him.
That's where his act belongs.
Careful .. 'someone' may say 'that's what beer cans are for'..:P
Wow, Jethro, Who said my name was Richard? YOU did, my dulcet darling. So did Starwind. I don't know who you two are, but you two are really quite deeply steeped in your delusion. It is sad, but hey, it is also funny to watch, like a drunk who dropped his car keys in a puddle. I would really like to be able to say "aw, ya got me" so you can have a good feeling in your tummy, but it just ain't so. I have never used this site before, and I don't go around using the name Richard. However, I know that this will bring you little solace and your fury will go unabated... so... hey, if you are gonna nut out on me, why not have fun with it. You have yet to call me a dumbfuck or an asshole, as it is clear from your other thread that you LOVE to call people names.(a board that I read for an even SHORTER amount of time than I read the one on that Starwind mentioned.) You really need to take whatever medication that the state psychiatrist gave to you, Jethro, and make sure to share some with Starwind. Enjoy your paranoia. Remember, just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean that people AREN'T out to get you. ROFL
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Christine, I was at my desk all day, now I am home, now I am eating dinner, doing laundry, and am now playing in a poker tourney on my computer. What a fabulous Thursday!
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Uh... EEEWWWW! I drink scotch, and that is NOT what scotch bottles are for. Scotch bottles are for pouring scotch!
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman I suggested that Richard was your previous 4um persona, not your Christian name. SO sorry if that offends. Now, I’m coming to Dallas. 4 mail me your contact. Lunch is on me.
Give me a SECOND chance? Jethro is not willing to give me a FIRST CHANCE. I have reviewed Jethro's site, by the way, and have no interest in joining his group. Jethro feels that because it is his group, he can call people pedophiles, dumbfucks, and assholes if he wants to. Well, that is fine with me, he can keep it.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Jethro, I have been on this site less than a week. In that time you have been the most abusive, ignorant, irrational asshole I have seen in quite some time. Why on earth would I want to share the same ZIP CODE with you, much less a table for lunch? You are the embodiment of all things ignorant and offensive.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Lunch? My treat?
Under the handle of Feynman Lives! Off to PL with you. You're a fraud.
Are you aware that JethroTull saved the world from mass destruction because of his incredible foresight about Y2K phenomena? Not many know this little point of fact. He is a great man that saved all of us. But one thing that has always bugged me is his insipid SPAM. I hate SPAM.
Off to PL with you. You're a fraud. I categorically deny your allegations. I have never been on this site before in my life and the only name I have used on this site is Feynman Lives! Please provide me with PROOF of said fraud. Otherwise. Just go have another beer and listen to your arteries harden.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Uh... in your own words... "Shut up, dumbfuck"
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman No, I think you would find JT to be very gracious. You will be able to post with PPSHOW and TLBSHOW. You could be something like FLSHOW or FeynmanSHOW. You could civilize the place - or at least try.
Do you realize that you have RAILROADED this thread away from the original topic due to your delusion? You basically took it over with your ass-like behavior. I saw you doing the same thing on your own board. Do you ever do ANYTHING productive?
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Buck, from you this is a compliment. Yes I crawled into my Spam-laden bunker on 12/31/99 only to emerge disappointed that this cesspool of a world didn’t end. But all isn’t lost. Some six years later, talking anuses from the dept of Homeland Security Dept are suggesting that we duct tape our windows. Well fuck them. I still have my Spam stash and dozens of Israeli gas masks. I’m prepared for anything from crazed Muslims to the bird flu. Bring it on :)
Personally I can't post there because they don't like gays. Of course, I'm not gay, but a lot of people think I am. Bang a thousand women and no one calls you Trace the Hetero. Blow a couple of guys for fun however and you're Trace the fag for life.
Yes, my mission is to expose BS artists. You've been busted. Sorry.
Suck it up and come on over....bring Dick....
"Shut up, dumbfuck" So wrong. I never said that. (I guess you won't meet me?)
posting alll day on company time on their computer??
I'm trying to exlain to the Dick that he should go over. On top of everything else, I think the clowns would have fun meeting him.
Some of us carry the burden of our personal history. Thank God, I have terabytes of memory.
My initial assessment proven correct.
Comments (95 - 172) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhat about shooting road signs?
#55. To: buckeroo (#53)
#56. To: christine (#43)
#57. To: Fred Mertz (#55)
May God Bless all.
#58. To: who knows what evil (#56)
#59. To: Feynman Lives!, Jethro Tull, christine, Zipporah, Dakmar, duckhunter, All (#32)
#60. To: Starwind (#59)
You not only demonstrate a total disregard for truth but also a childlike naivete in what you think you can get away with.
#61. To: Starwind, Feynman Lives! (#59)
#62. To: Starwind (#59)
So in the first 8 minutes of 'research' of an 784 post thread you determined that Richard:
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#63. To: Zipporah, Jethro Tull (#61)
#64. To: Feynman Lives! (#62)
I have to read and digest enormous volumes of written material every day for a living.
#65. To: Starwind (#64)
Yeah. We see you 'reading and digesting' huge volumes of bandwidth here daily.
#66. To: Starwind (#63)
#67. To: Starwind (#59)
but also a childlike naivete in what you think you can get away with.
#68. To: Feynman Lives! (#62)
I am far too busy not giving a damn to care either way.
#69. To: Feynman Lives! (#62)
#70. To: Jethro Tull (#69)
Now scat.
#71. To: Trace21231 (#70)
#72. To: christine (#68)
have you even taken a potty break?
#73. To: Jethro Tull (#69)
Who said your name was Richard? You simply chose that screen name in your previous 4um life. WhoTF do you think we are? Many of us have been posting on forums long before you parents let you near the family Tandy. Now scat.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#74. To: christine (#68)
a potty break
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#75. To: Zipporah (#72)
Careful .. 'someone' may say 'that's what beer cans are for'..:P
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#76. To: Feynman Lives! (#73)
Who said my name was Richard? YOU did, my dulcet darling. So did Starwind.
#77. To: Trace21231 (#70)
Give him a second chance. Let him prove himself on PL. Give the clowns a chance to work with him.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#78. To: Jethro Tull (#76)
I suggested that Richard was your previous 4um persona, not your Christian name. SO sorry if that offends. Now, I’m coming to Dallas. 4 mail me your contact. Lunch is on me.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#79. To: Feynman Lives! (#78)
Jethro is not willing to give me a FIRST CHANCE.
#80. To: Feynman Lives! (#78)
I have been on this site less than a week.
#81. To: Feynman Lives! (#77)
#82. To: Jethro Tull (#80)
have been on this site less than a week. Under the handle of Feynman Lives!
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#83. To: Jethro Tull (#79)
Lunch? My treat?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#84. To: Feynman Lives! (#77)
#85. To: JETHRO (#83)
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#86. To: buckeroo (#81)
#87. To: Feynman Lives! (#83)
#88. To: Feynman Lives! (#85)
Do you ever do ANYTHING productive?
#89. To: Trace21231 (#87)
Blow a couple of guys for fun however and you're Trace the fag for life.
#90. To: Feynman Lives! (#83)
Uh... in your own words...
#91. To: Feynman Lives! (#74)
I was at my desk all day
#92. To: Jethro Tull (#89)
#93. To: Jethro Tull (#86)
#94. To: Feynman Lives!, starwind (#62)
so I read much faster than you do.
.
.
.