See other Resistance Articles
Title: Good Ole Boy On The Dallas Shooting
Source:
https://youtu.be/0thN0oGHnkY
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 11, 2016
Author: not sure
Post Date: 2016-07-11 16:33:53 by wakeup
Keywords: None
Views: 237
Comments: 9
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#3. To: wakeup (#0)
"The Dallas Police Departmentvand FBI will not confirm that the photographs being circulated are from the crime scene in downtown Dallas." - getoffthebs.com/police-story-about-dallas-shooting/ The above pictures were published late Sunday evening on several websites. They are definitely bullshit. What lead me to writing this article is that I have a hard time believing that a robot that can travel a maximum of one to maybe 5 miles an hour, is going to cruise on to Johnson and blow him up. However for argument sakes, please consider two different scenarios. One, if Johnson was in an entrance way between the garage and building, (the only way to explain the dry wall in pictures) they sure did not need a bomb to get at him. They could of shot through the wall, breached the door, dropped through the ceiling, etc. etc. etc. For the police to have allegedly used a bomb, please be assured that it would of had to be a last resort. Two, if the police could not get at Johnson and positioned their robot on the floor directly above Johnson the first thing you would notice in the pictures is big chunks of concrete debris over the gun and body. What is shown in the pictures came down from a remodeling or demolition crew. No explosive expert would of put the robot on the floor above him and set it off. Primarily because the majority of the blast would of traveled up not down. Additionally, if that had happened you would be seeing evidence of flooring material mixed with the dry wall – maybe even carpet and most definitely rebar and large chunks of cement from the floor above him. If the bomb was set off on the other side of the wall, the debris would show a blown out pattern, not all bunched up in a heap as shown in the picture. Additionally the wall struts that are perfectly intact in the picture above would be bent so bad that they would stand out like a sore thumb. The dry wall would be charred and you would see signs extreme heat damage to the building materials around and on top of Johnson. As for the picture of the gun laying a pile of rubble with a shot of a persons feet who allegedly took the picture. No police officer wanting to be employed the next day would be that close to the gun contaminating the crime scene. Additionally, unless the person who took the picture would have to be one of the shooters. The poor lighting and flash overexposure tell you that the persson who took the photo is no crime scene photographer. In my former job as as prosecutor for the county of Las Angeles, I have been to 1,000’s of crime scenes. There is nothing about the scene I am seeing in the above pictures that come close to looking like a real crime scene.
In my former job as as prosecutor for the county of Las Angeles, I have been to 1,000’s of crime scenes. WTF kind of person from l.a. would mis-spell "las angeles"? or is that a dead giveaway that the article is from some hoax news site?
You're right, Artisan. This was a rip off retitled from WFAA Channel 8 article by Marjorie Owens originally entitled "How the downtown Dallas shooting developed." The last six paragraph are unattributed and appear tacked on - with obvious grammatical errors. No explosive expert would of (sic) put the robot on the floor above him Should have been "No explosive expert would have put the robot on the floor above him." There's a glaring colloquialism that you wouldn't expect of a prosecutor that had been to "1,000’s of crime scenes." My bad.
Lots of smart folks make those grammatical mistakes. The punch line is that folks will be ok now with drones or robots taking out bad guys.
There are no replies to Comment # 9. End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: randge (#3)
#8. To: Artisan (#6)
#9. To: randge (#8)
Replies to Comment # 9.