See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: WhoRU
Source:
rbnlive
URL Source: http://www.rbnlive.com/programs.html
Published: Feb 18, 2006
Author: Eric Williams
Post Date: 2006-02-18 13:25:06 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: WhoRU
Views: 1647
Comments: 66
http://www.rbnlive.com/programs.html WhoRU: What is Right WhoRU?? Eric is tired of listening to the same old, "Go no where - eat meet and retreat, ARCHIVED SHOWS 13th. Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. The "right to contract" is specified in the Constitution also but EVERY TIME you sign your name you are making a "contract" which violate the above 13th amendment. BUT it is not a "violation" because you "volenteered". Poster Comment: These shows you'll have to listen to a number of times before it sinks in, at least for me it was. I suggest you start with the first show in January 7, 2006
vs. What Will Work?
Host: Eric Williams
Website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whoru
Call-in Number: 800-313-9443
Time: Saturday, 5:00 pm - 7:00 pm CST
" tripe continually regurgitated by those aggravated by the Unconstitutional acts of the
government who advise everyone to re-educate their neighbors - it hasn't happened in forty
years and, lets face it, it ain't ever going to happen. It is time to take a hard look at what
does not work and why, discard the proven unworkable and employ the realistic. Eric fairly
well agrees with the basic philosophy of most free thinking libertarians
(Eric is a Lysander Spooner Anarchist with a strong pragmatic survival inclination); however
Eric differs from the average patriot in that Eric presents a viable, workable "no cost" solution
that can easily be applied by any and all individuals serious about exercising their individual
personal sovereignty, without the necessity of converting the entire population before personally
reaping the benefits of freedom. Eric has gone back to the beginning, July 4, 1776, located a thread
of immunity and followed that thread through the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. Eric has
determined obtaining immunity is as simple as acknowledging that no one knows when they were born.
We cannot get to where we want to be from where we ought to be until we first get to where we ought
to be and we cannot get to where we ought to be until we first admit we are where we are. Eric takes
calls from listeners without a screener. Once you get in you are free to challenge or, perhaps, even
agree with Eric's analysis
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Williams06.html
Sat., February 11, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
Sat., February 4, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
Sat., January 28, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
Guest: Lindsey Williams discussing the oil crisis (To order Lindsey's videos and books: call 800-321-2900 or 360-458-6778)
Sat., January 21, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
Sat., January 14, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
Sat., January 7, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
Eric Williams establishes himself in his first show with RBN. You can find more information at his Yahoo Group: http://www.DavidONeill.com.
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-25) not displayed.
.
.
.
#26. To: Feynman Lives! (#24)
Read the article Google is buckling under the pressure of China. They are NOT doing on their own, They are being FORCED by the Communist Gov't You tell me where is says they are doing it of their own volition.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Just how are they being FORCED? What could China do to them if they refused? Not much. Do tell...
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman I repeat You tell me where is says they are doing it of their own volition.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Do this or don't operate in our country.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Block them from operating in China.. plain and simple.
GOP using churches for recruiting http://www.washingtonpost.c om/wp- dyn/content/article/2006/02/17/AR2006021701978.html By Alan Cooperman The North Carolina Republican Party asked its members this week to send their church directories to the party, drawing furious protests from local and national religious leaders. "Such a request is completely beyond the pale of what is acceptable," said the Rev. Richard Land, head of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention. During the 2004 presidential race, the Bush-Cheney campaign sent a similar request to Republican activists across the country. It asked churchgoers not only to furnish church directories to the campaign, but also to use their churches as a base for political organizing. The tactic was roundly condemned by religious leaders across the political spectrum, including conservative evangelical Christians. Ten professors of ethics at major seminaries and universities wrote a letter to President Bush in August 2004 asking him to "repudiate the actions of your re-election campaign," and calling on both parties to "respect the integrity of all houses of worship." Officials of the Republican National Committee maintained that the tactic did not violate federal tax laws that prohibit churches from endorsing or opposing candidates for office, and they never formally renounced it. But Land said he thought the GOP had backed down. "I heard nothing further about it, so my assumption was that it stopped, at least at the national level," he said. Yesterday, the Greensboro News & Record reported that the North Carolina Republican Party was collecting church directories, and it quoted two local pastors as objecting to the practice. The Rev. Richard Byrd Jr. of Cornerstone Baptist Church in Greensboro said anyone who sent in a directory "would be betraying the trust of the membership," and the Rev. Ken Massey of the city's First Baptist Church said the request was "encroaching on sacred territory." Chris Mears, the state party's political director, made the request in a Feb. 15 memo titled "The pew and the ballot box" that was sent by e-mail to "Registered Republicans in North Carolina." Mears said the "Republican National Committee has completed a study on grass- roots activity that reveals that people who regularly attend church usually vote Republican when they vote." "In light of this study's findings, it is imperative that we register, educate and get these potential voters from the pew to the ballot box. To do this we must know who these people are," the memo continued. "I am requesting that you collect as many church directories as you can and send them to me in an effort to fully register, educate and energize North Carolina's congregations to vote in the 2006 elections," it said. It added that the "North Carolina Republican Party holds your church's directory in strict confidence" and will not use it "to solicit church members for any other reason."
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
And just HOW could they BLOCK them from operating in China? Do tell... They can't STOP them from being on the internet, and China can't control all the internet access in their country. China bluffed and Google flinched, and then willingly engaged in censorship.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman THEY CAN'T STOP THEM FROM BEING ON THE INTERNET.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman I repeat (AGAIN) You tell me where is says they are doing it of their own volition.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
The OPENING sentence. "Google to censor itself in China " Google to censor ITSELF, that is a volitional act. Nice try, thanks for playing...
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Why do you take always take things to the ridiculous?... #1 HOW does Google make $$?? ADVERTISING for one thing.. DUH.. #2 http://www.stanford.edu/~mdelgado/cs201/golden_shield.htm
SINCE IT WRITES THE CODE IT ONLY "LOOKS" LIKE THEIR VOLITION BUT WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO DO THAT? THEY SAID TO MEET THE GOV'T REQUIREMENTS. Yes they do it under orders from the gov't.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Zip, This does not in any way take away from the fact that GOOGLE engaged in SELF CENSORSHIP, China simply made a request. China can not force Google to censor themselves, NOR can they stop Google from getting into their country. My initial assertion was that China could not BAN Google from their country. Which is correct, they can't.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman How, exactly would China KEEP THEM OUT? The Chinese Government can't stop them from operating in China.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Then you contact them and tell them not to censor the sites that the Dictatorship is telling them to. And get back to us when you succeed, following your orders and NOT of the orders from the China Gov't. I'll even bet you money you don't succeed.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
WHY? To make more MONEY because they are a greedy corporation. Google CHOSE willingly to engage in CENSORSHIP because they wanted to make even MORE money. That is the ONLY reason that they acted, they did not fear being banned by the Chinese government, because China CAN'T stop them. They just did what would make them the most money because they don't care about censorship, they care about PROFITS. Google willingly engaged in censorship.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Oh really? And as I said, how does Google operate?? Advertising dollars.. they can't "operate" in China if they dont comply.. they can't get advertising.. most importantly. Get real.
And get back to us when you succeed, following your orders and NOT of the orders from the China Gov't. I'll even bet you money you don't succeed. Why would I care what Google chooses to do? They are free to act as they see fit. I am simply stating the fact that they willingly engaged in censorship.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman The Great Firewall And as I said, how does Google operate?? Advertising dollars.. they can't "operate" in China if they dont comply.. they can't get advertising.. most importantly. Get real That only stops landline access. What about satellite and cell phone access? Their "great wall" does not stop them. China CAN'T stop Google from getting inside their country. At BEST, they can only limit their access. Google WILLINGLY engaged in censorship.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman I've come to a conclusion .. about you:
ROFLMAO!!! SAME thought .. SAME PIC !!!!!!! LOL!
from your link Rules and regulations Ever since the Internet was allowed into China in 1995, all service has been funneled through government servers whose administrators capriciously block access to Western news sites, Chinese dissident sites, Taiwanese newspapers, and other material deemed objectionable. A powerful Ministry of Information Industry has been created to regulate Chinese access to the Internet, while the Ministry of State Security has been assigned to monitor local use of the Internet. somebody has the mentality of BeAChooser
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
ROFLMAO!
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Exactly!.. IF I can remember correctly, They've been looking into utilizing something similar in the US.. and I believe there were western corporations involved in it's development.
China can't stop ALL access to the internet in their country, just landline access. Google made a business decision to willingly engage in censorship.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman What does this: IF I can remember correctly, They've been looking into utilizing something similar in the US.. and I believe there were western corporations involved in it's development. Have to do with this: China can't stop ALL access to the internet in their country, just landline access. Google made a business decision to willingly engage in censorship.
Just goes to show what a numb nuts this guy is that he cannot grasp the simple fact of how easily the internet can be censored. The Chinese were tired of having their techs do the blocking. So, when Google decided they wanted to put up an actual Chinese language version, Google.cn, it was no biggie for the technocratic Chicoms to demand Goodgle conform to Chinese laws which restrict the flow of information, in effect controlling what you think.
The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
The Chinese were tired of having their techs do the blocking. So, when Google decided they wanted to put up an actual Chinese language version, Google.cn, it was no biggie for the technocratic Chicoms to demand Goodgle conform to Chinese laws which restrict the flow of information, in effect controlling what you think. BTP, They can block LANDLINE access only. There are MANY ways to access the internet without using landlines.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman Fynnman Lives!: More like just a plain
Hey Kids! It's the Feynman Lies! collection!: "A shotgun is commonly also referred to as a rifle in modern parlance, Duck, but thanks." "China can't stop ALL access to the internet in their country, just landline access." Add others you know of! Be the first on your forum to collect 'em all! Trade'm with your friends!
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
But he's not Richard, LOL. See my post just now on DMHO thread.
After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military. - William S Burroughs
Star... Please show me how this statement is a lie. Thank you.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman You've admitted they can block landlines. Cell phones require cell phone towers, construction and operation of which towers are under Chinese control. Satellites require dishes, construction and operation of which dishes are ground-based which again puts them under Chinese control. Google can't build a business on the few illicit accesses that might be pirated, China can effectively block/filter anything within their borders, so Gogle cooperates, just every other company doing business in China does it largely on China's terms. But, being a digestor of large volumes of information daily, you already knew all that, didn't you, but that didn't stop your specious arguments, did it.
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
The operative question is why the jerk retains his posting privileges. He'd be gone if I were in charge (but glad I'm not).
Satellite phones do NOT require ground based access to China, Star. They can't control all internet access to China. Unless they control all the satellites. My statement stands unrefuted. Nice try, and thanks so much for playing.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman LOL, satellite phones are even easier to track. They broadcast a wider dispersion at higher power levels and they're easier to hunt down. Why do you think Osama and Co., stopped using them? Their power consumption also prevents them from being used very long. People might risk their lives to smuggle Bibles into China. But do you seriously think significant numbers will risk illicit Google searchs for porn using a satellite phone and laptop from some bamboo hut in Tibet? Only in your childish ignorance.
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
Just because they can track down satellite phones does NOT mean that you can't get access to the internet inside of China if you want to. The issue was not the number of people who will employ a given method, it was whether or not China could BAN Google from being received uncensored inside of their borders. They can't. Google willingly chose to engage in censorship. Again, my point stands unrefuted. Nice try... but again, not good enough. You will get a lovely home version of our game, young man.
"There are 10 the 11th power stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers." ----Richard Feynman They have. Get over it. If you're going to rest your argument (like those 200 lawyers you know) on a few guys with battery operated satellite phones and laptops who keep scurrying from hut to hut to avoid the Chinese police confiscating their gear and putting them in prison, then you've admitted Google had little business alternative, did they.
(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
I have a story to tell you about a friend and his wife. This is perfect example of what Erik Williams is talking about. They were on a main throughfare stoping at a light. The state trouper,next to them, noticed the driver had no seat belt on (actually no schoulder harness). As they turned the Trouper followed them and pulled them over. Trooper: "Do you know why I stopped you?" Joyce: "No" Trooper: "I noticed you didn't have your seat belt on." Joyce: "Yes I do." (she put it on as soon as she saw him.) Trooper: "You didn't when I first saw you." Joyce: "Can you prove it?" He asked for her drivers license and she said she didn't have one. Trooper: "What is your name?" Joyce: "I don't have one, but if you give me your pad I'll write down who I am." Trooper: (mumbles something) goes to his car(automobile) and call headquarters. Comes back and asks: "Who's your passenger?" (commercial term) Joyce: "He not a passenger, he's my traveling companion." Trooper:"Who owns the automobile?" Don: "The State." Troopers goes back to his auto and talks with headquarters He returns and says "You can get along now."
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
check out the latest, The proper purpose of a Grand Jury Eric WhoRU Did you know he's on WTPRN now?
MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist."
#27. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#26)
They are being FORCED by the Communist Gov't
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#28. To: Feynman Lives! (#27)
#29. To: Zipporah (#23)
#30. To: Feynman Lives! (#25)
LOL... exactly... and just HOW were they planning on enforcing this? Send a plane to bomb Google Headquarters? Or do they have some enormous pillowcase and a big lake of chocolate pudding?
#31. To: Zipporah (#30)
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 18, 2006; Page A19
#32. To: Zipporah (#30)
LOL... exactly... and just HOW were they planning on enforcing this? Send a plane to bomb Google Headquarters? Or do they have some enormous pillowcase and a big lake of chocolate pudding? Block them from operating in China.. plain and simple.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#33. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#29)
Do this or don't operate in our country
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#34. To: Feynman Lives! (#33)
#35. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#26)
You tell me where is says they are doing it of their own volition.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#36. To: Feynman Lives! (#32)
#37. To: Feynman Lives! (#35)
#38. To: Zipporah (#36)
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#39. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#37)
SINCE IT WRITES THE CODE IT ONLY "LOOKS" LIKE THEIR VOLITION BUT WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO DO THAT? THEY SAID TO MEET THE GOV'T REQUIREMENTS.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#40. To: Feynman Lives! (#39)
#41. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#37)
SINCE IT WRITES THE CODE IT ONLY "LOOKS" LIKE THEIR VOLITION BUT WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO DO THAT?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#42. To: Feynman Lives! (#38)
#43. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#40)
Then you contact them and tell them not to censor the sites that the Dictatorship is telling them to.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#44. To: Zipporah (#42)
Oh really?
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#45. To: Feynman Lives! (#44)
#46. To: Feynman Lives! - Dick the Liar (#44)
#47. To: Jethro Tull (#46)
#48. To: Zipporah (#42)
#49. To: Zipporah (#45)
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#50. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#48)
somebody has the mentality of BeAChooser
#51. To: Zipporah (#50)
IF I can remember correctly, They've been looking into utilizing something similar in the US.. and I believe there were western corporations involved in it's development.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#52. To: Feynman Lives! (#51)
#53. To: Zipporah Itisa1mosttoolate (#30)
LOL... exactly... and just HOW were they planning on enforcing this? Send a plane to bomb Google Headquarters? Or do they have some enormous pillowcase and a big lake of chocolate pudding?
#54. To: BTP Holdings (#53)
LOL... exactly... and just HOW were they planning on enforcing this? Send a plane to bomb Google Headquarters? Or do they have some enormous pillowcase and a big lake of chocolate pudding? Just goes to show what a numb nuts this guy is that he cannot grasp the simple fact of how easily the internet can be censored.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#55. To: Zipporah (#45)
HO
for the NWO!!!
#56. To: Zipporah, Jethro Tull, Itisa1mosttoolate, mehitable (#54)
#57. To: Starwind (#56)
It's the Feynman Lies! collection!:
#58. To: Starwind (#56)
"China can't stop ALL access to the internet in their country, just landline access."
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#59. To: Feynman Lives! (#58)
Please show me how this statement is a lie.
#60. To: Starwind (#56)
#61. To: Starwind (#59)
Satellites require dishes, construction and operation of which dishes are ground-based which again puts them under Chinese control.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#62. To: Feynman Lives! (#61)
Satellite phones do NOT require ground based access to China, Star.
My statement stands unrefuted.
#63. To: Starwind (#62)
LOL, satellite phones are even easier to track. They broadcast a wider dispersion at higher power levels and they're easier to hunt down. Why do you think Osama and Co., stopped using them? Their power consumption also prevents them from being used very long.
"THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT, IN ANY SENSE, FOUNDED ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION." ----1796 Treaty of Tripoli — initiated by George Washington and signed into law by John Adams
#64. To: Feynman Lives! (#63)
The issue was not the number of people who will employ a given method, it was whether or not China could BAN Google from being received uncensored inside of their borders. They can't.
#65. To: All (#0)
#66. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest