[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: A World Without Western Civ At the Republican National Convention last week in Cleveland, none of the speakers used the phrase “white people.” Anti-racists, however, need to make EVERYTHING about race, so they made it about white people anyway. Appearing on a panel helmed by MSNBC’s lesbian-faced Chris Hayes, an old white man named Charles Pierce of Esquire magazine racially taunted fellow old white man Steve King, a Republican congressman from Iowa: If you’re really optimistic, you can say that this is the last time that old white people will command the Republican Party’s attention, its platform, its public face. That hall is wired by loud, unhappy, dissatisfied white people. King tossed the bomb back in Pierce’s lap: This “old white people” business does get a little tired, Charlie. I’d ask you to go back through history and figure out, where are these contributions that have been made by these other categories of people that you’re talking about, where did any other subgroup of people contribute more to civilization? A fat black female panelist began hootin’ and hollerin’ and acting as if she caught the vapors, whereupon Hayes scolded King that white people were responsible for Hitler and Stalin. MSNBC would later describe King’s comments as “jaw-dropping.” The Washington Post called his comments “weird.” The website Quartz referred to his utterly rational and dispassionate question as “an awkward, racist rant.” And Esquire deemed his question to be “batshit” crazy. I suppose that when you don’t want to answer a question, it’s best to gaslight the person who asked it. Asked later about his now-infamous question, a remorse-free King noted that none of the apopleptic co-panelists had bothered to answer it: You go back and Google “old white people,” “old white men,” [and] you’ll find that that comes out of the mouth of leftists constantly. They have decided it’s open season on white people in America from an ideological standpoint. And I hope it stops there, but somebody needs to stand up for the contributions that have been made by Western Civilization. And if we disparage our roots, if we disparage what makes this a great nation, then we’ll lose the formula for being an even greater nation. So I stood up for our foundation, for our history, for our culture, of Western Civilization, and I said so. And if you’ll notice, Chris Hayes didn’t want to go down that path after that. Of course, this didn’t stop others from attempting to go down that path. The oniony-looking Rebecca Onion of Slate asserted that it made “no sense” to judge groups by their historical inventions, despite the fact that a given racial group’s level of technological innovation is tightly correlated with its relative success and prosperity. Writing for Salon, a certain Sarah Watts didn’t appear to be joking when she credited Africans for inventing “humanity.” (I suppose other inventions were hard to come by.) She also typed with a straight face that non-American and non-European “subgroups” like Asia, Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East are almost solely responsible for what we consider modern society.” There are reams of evidence of technological innovations by the ancient Chinese, the ancient Indians, and the ancient Semites—emphasis on the “ancient.” For example, the Chinese invented gunpowder. But for some reason these perennial warriors and kung-fu fighters weren’t savvy enough to use their invention as a weapon of war. The ancient Indians are widely credited with inventing the numerical system we currently use. But they certainly didn’t invent calculus like Newton and Leibniz did. Most uncomfortable for egalitarians and their ilk is that there are vast landmasses—sometimes entire continents—where the indigenous inhabitants have invented virtually nothing. Sub-Saharan Africans are not known for contributing much to rocket science, and black Americans are so underrepresented as inventors that everyone has heard a gazillion times about the mulatto who improved blood-storage methods and George Washington Carver’s wondrous dalliances with the magical peanut. The so-called “Native Americans” are credited with inventing the spinning top, which somehow proved incapable of defending them against the white man and his guns. And Australia’s aborigines? Well, let’s not talk about them, because they’d be embarrassed. Peruvians can take pride in developing the art of potato cultivation. And I’ve already covered the Mexicans and their nachos. If you were to note every manmade item within your field of vision, chances are that nearly every last gadget and trinket was invented by a white man. According to Charles Murray’s book Human Accomplishment, whites have historically dominated the fields of physics, math, chemistry, medicine, biology, and technology. What’s grossly ironic is the specter of people using white computers hooked up to white electricity sent across white power grids to criticize the very white people who made their whining possible. Even worse is the ubiquity of white people pejoratively using the word “white people” as if it somehow doesn’t apply to them. That right there is a collective mental illness for the ages. White technology has doubled lifespans across the globe and yanked several human subgroups out of the Stone Age. This makes certain white people feel guilty. It also apparently makes lots of nonwhite people resentful. Those who wish to downplay or outright deny the vastness of white contributions to the world’s technological and civilizational development claim that to even dare giving credit where it’s due will immediately lead to millions of slaughtered nonwhites. That’s an insane leap of logic, but they keep on a-leapin’. When all else fails, press the Holocaust Button. As noted, Chris Hayes mentioned Hitler rather than answer Steve King’s question. Many others who dodged King’s question immediately brought up the Holocaust and slavery and colonialism as Western Civilization’s true “inventions.” The Washington Post quoted an Indian female historian who felt the need to bring up concentration camps, atomic bombs, the Crusades, slavery, and witch hunts as distinctly white contributions to the world. Apparently it’s a virtue to be so dumb that you decapitate people like the Aztecs or eat them like the African cannibals rather than being brainy enough to develop an atomic bomb. Slate’s Rebecca Onion warns that “the idea of white technological superiority has often served as justification for oppressing or displacing nonwhite people.” But flip that around—denying white technological contributions and distilling all of white history into one massive blood libel of torture and enslavement of nonwhites can serve as justification for displacing white people. Remember, this whole controversy started when an old white male progressive could barely contain his righteously masochistic glee at the idea of “old white people” dying out. Much—if not most, or even all—of political guilt-tripping is rooted in psychological projection. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#8. To: X-15. Lod (#0)
(Edited)
Thing is, if you want to attribute the RACES which contributed to "modern society" it'd be CAUCASIAN and MONGOLOID. Whereas Caucasian civilizations across Europe, Middle Eastern and African civilizations such as the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Persians, along with Mongoloid Asian civilizations such as the Chinese, all contributed immensely to math, science, architecture, engineering, etc., native African Negroes never got past mud huts. They never knew about wheels, boats, metals, or even written language until other races brought those things to them. They never figured out how to make arrows. Sure there are VERY ancient stone arrowheads located at archeological sites in Africa, but apparently the civilizations which produced those moved elsewhere, since no native African tribe in modern times use arrows, they use wooden spears instead. As far as I know they never even figured out how to grow vegetables, fruit, or any other crop such as rice or wheat. That could be why they resorted to cannibalism by attacking other tribes for their meals.
====================================== True statement.
There are no replies to Comment # 9. End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||