See other Immigration Articles
Title: EU migrants will STAY in UK as Home Office cuts mean it will take 140 YEARS to deport them
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/69 ... a-May-Centre-European-Research
Published: Aug 12, 2016
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2016-08-12 11:49:38 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 156
Comments: 2
THERESA May will be unable to deport any EU migrants who arrive in Britain before the official Brexit date because of swingeing cuts to the Home Office, a pro- Brussels think-tank has said. The new Prime Minister oversaw such savage cutbacks to her former department it is incapable of keeping track of the number of European migrants entering the country and organising their return, according to the Centre for European Reform (CER). And at current rates, it would take Britain 140 YEARS to trace and deport all EU migrants, a separate study by the Migration Observatory revealed. The CER said trying to send EU workers back to the continent is “politically attractive” but “impractical, of dubious legality and against British interests”. CER researchers Camino Mortera-Martinez and John Springford said the “sheer bureaucratic effort required to identify and expel EU migrants” would make such a policy unenforceable. European citizens arriving in the UK are currently not required to sign up to any sort of database, so the Government does not even know how long they have been in the country. The report also states that the Home Office is now woefully understaffed following six years of savage budget cuts, and has neither the personnel nor the money to create one. And trying to use National Insurance numbers would prove no more fruitful, according to the researchers, because millions of EU workers who have since returned home still hold them, whilst any Europeans in Britain who do not work do not. They wrote: “By removing rights retroactively, the UK would make many EU workers either return home or continue to work illegally. Most would probably move to their home country or another EU member-state. “But others would move into the black economy. They would not pay taxes, and they would be more likely to be exploited by employers.” Citing research by the independent Migration Observatory they argued that, because Britain does not have a database of EU nationals living in the country, the process of deportations would take around 140 years to complete. Mrs May has come under fire from political opponents, including leading Brexiteers, for refusing to guarantee the rights of European citizens to continue living and working in Britain after the country leaves the EU. The PM insists she will not make a formal pledge on EU citizens’ rights in the UK until she secures a similar guarantee from European leaders, saying that doing so would weaken her negotiating hand. Meanwhile her new Brexit minister, David Davis, has suggested the Government may set a “cut-off date” before which arrivals from the EU have to arrive in Britain to be guaranteed the right to stay. The researchers say the bureaucratic nightmare involved in tracking down EU migrants after decades of free movement will provide a serious headache for Mrs May, who has promised to respect the Brexit vote by getting tough on migration. During a recent visit to Germany the PM said that “sustainable levels” of immigration are in the tens of thousands and pledged to scrap the principle of free movement under which all EU migrants have moved to Britain. She said: “The overwhelming message from the Brexit vote was the importance of bringing some control into free movement of people from the EU into the UK, so that’s another factor we will be looking at in relation to net migration for the foreseeable future.” A number of leading politicians and commentators have warned that it would be suicide for the new Prime Minister to attempt to backslide on the issue of EU immigration. But the CER exerts believe that, as the challenges of Brexit become clearer, the practicalities of trying to retrospectively track down the approximately three million EU citizens living in the UK. They said: “For practical and political reasons, the UK may have to respect the rights of all people who move to the UK before the date of Brexit. “This will obviously cause domestic political problems for Theresa May. The absence of a pre-Brexit cut-off date would strengthen incentives for EU citizens to migrate before Britain formally withdraws.” However, they added that there are other developing circumstances which could make Britain a less attractive proposition for EU citizens, who may decide to head to Germany and Scandinavia instead. They wrote: “EU migration to the UK is likely to fall in any case, partly because the British economy is weakening, partly because the eurozone economy is improving, and partly because people will not want to move to a country with an atmosphere of hostility towards migrants.” Poster Comment: So a 20 year-old thug might not be deported until he is 160 years-old?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Horse (#0)
Same stuff, different day -- these govts have EVERYTHING THEY NEED for what they WANT to do! Remember when the Vietnam War was going bust? We were told the govt just had no idea how to get all those troops home, but they INSTANTLY threw six figures worth of them into Afghanistan as the War Of Terror began AND started up the Department of Home Insecurity -- current staff 240k, current budget 41b. These govts exist for one reason -- to make war on those that can't win against them and cause every kind of hell they can think of at home. (But kittycats and apes are fair game.) _____________________________________________________________ “We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true.” - Tesla per FP
Beyond insanity. FUBAR and BOHICA brits.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#2. To: Horse (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest