[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: How a 25-Year-Old Raised $1 Million Running a Fake Donald Trump Site How a 25-Year-Old Raised $1 Million Running a Fake Donald Trump Site The kicker? His scheme is not even illegal. Getty Isaac Brekken By Jack Holmes Aug 29, 2016 Normally the grifters at least pretend to work for the betterment of the campaign. But not Ian Hawes, the 25-year-old Maryland man who set up a website, dinnerwithtrump.org. At first glance, Hawes' website has all the trappings of an official Trump campaign website. Under closer inspection, you'll see that the site is in no way formally affiliated with Trump. A report from Politico found Hawes has raked in more than $1 million from the scheme, which involved forming a political action committee to accept donations and funneling many of the dollars raised to CartSoft LLC—a company owned by Hawes. The phony site is remarkably similar to its counterpart at donaldjtrump.com, and more than 20,000 donors have been deceived. In the first three weeks of operation, Politico reports, Hawes spent $108,000 on Facebook ads and took in $350,000 in donations. Those numbers have only increased since, and the proceeds have gone to CartSoft, which is listed as "media" and "media purchasing" on federal forms but has not spent a dime in service of the Trump campaign. In an email to Esquire, Hawes claimed that "less than 10 percent" of the gross donations have gone to his company. Top: The real thing. Bottom: The imposter. via Politico Politico reached out to dozens of donors listed on federal filings, all of whom said they thought they were actually donating to Trump. "I feel ripped off and taken advantage of. This is horrible. That was not my intent," said Mary Pat Kulina, who gave $265. "This is robbery. I want my money back and I want them to add up what they stole from people and give it to Donald Trump." With the kind of campaign Trump has run, you might think "siphoning money" from him, as Politico put it, isn't such a bad idea. But in real terms, Hawes is siphoning money from ordinary people, who have every right to support their candidate, monetarily or otherwise, even if that candidate is an apricot demagogue. Also, there's Hawes himself. The man who describes himself on Twitter as a "registered genius, board certified hacker, and grape soda connoisseur" may well avoid any kind of fraud or malfeasance charges because he technically is offering visitors a chance at dinner with Trump. It's just that offer is two tickets to a fundraising event with who-knows-how-many other attendees, as it says "in gray, size 8.5-font on a black background at the bottom of the website." You can win the tickets without donating, but putting money in "double[s] your chances," and plenty have been interested in that. When one user claimed donations don't actually increase your chances of winning, Hawes' reply was telling: "Monetary contributions don't increase your chance of winning, but we do multiply your entries. We're also a political action committee, so it's our job to collect contributions. So you can eat your own shit." (To be clear, the user had first told him to eat shit.) Poster Comment: Computer whiz kid? Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#2. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Reminds me of the scam a guy in Australia ran. He set up a web page and advertised that for $50.00 a person could get passwords, keys etc to virtually all the porn sites on the internet. Over the next week or two he received a couple of million dollars from people all over the world. At the end of the two weeks he informed everybody via his web site that the contract fell through and that he would not be able to provide the info as stated. He offered to refund everybody's money. He sent back hundreds of thousands of dollars in refunds but virtually none of the refund checks were cashed and he ended up with over a million bucks. Why didn't people take the refunds? The refunds were issues via check and on the upper part of the check it had in big bold letters "Customer Refund - the site name and included something similar to - CUSTOMER REFUND - NORTH AUSTRALIA PORNOGRAPHY AND CHILD PEDOPHILIA COMPANY.
ROTF!!!!!!! Now there's a worthwhile scam -- a public service, really! Please write more often, bush_is_a_moonie.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||