[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Feature Column: Did Hillary Cheat? Feature Column: Did Hillary Cheat? In the swing of the second presidential debate of the 2016 election season, conspiracy theories are cropping up all over the place. But while I call them that, I have to wonder if that's an accurate description. More and more, it's looking like the things that people are talking about might not be a foregone conclusion. Hillary Clinton is fighting tooth and claw for the presidency, as any presidential candidate would. But the difference in this election and the difference in this candidate, is that there's a definite sense of entitlement associated with her presidential bid. She feels that it's "her turn," that she's "entitled to be president," and that "it's time for a female president and she's the most qualified." While I could dispute those three statements, I'm not going to waste my time. Whether or not it's time for a female president is immaterial as far as I'm concerned. I have no doubt that when the right, qualified female candidate comes along, she'll win the election. I'm equally sure that Hillary isn't it. She's neither right for the country or qualified. Be that as it may, it seems that there's no depth she won't sink to, in order to win the presidency, and there are many people who are more than glad to help her stoop. Part of that is just plain party politics and another is the genuine fear of a Trump presidency. But there's another whole group of people who are sold out to the Clintons, and they're the ones who are really doing most of the stooping for the queen and her ride to the throne. We saw this in the primaries, with the now proven voter fraud that was going on. Considering that they had already gotten the word out to the superdelegates that they were to vote for Hillary, I don't know why she bothered. Personally, if I was Bernie Sanders, I'd be suing the Democrat Party and Hillary Clinton too. But that's for him to decide, not me. Word came out, after the Commander in Chief Forum, that Hillary was using an earpiece to receive help from her staff. While the earpiece was tiny, the camera still managed to catch it. With that trick exposed, she couldn't do it again. So, her staff had to come up with another way to communicate with her; and they did. One of Hillary's requirements for the debate was a custom-built podium. The stated reason for it was to help make her look taller than she is. But as any car buff knows, once you start customizing things, it's hard to find a place to stop. And that's what seems to have happened to Hillary's podium. Video has surfaced, showing Hillary's podium from behind, at the end of the debate. The two candidates meet in the middle and shake hands, pretending to actually like each other. While this is happening, a narrow white line, hidden just above the desk surface of Hillary's podium, turns black, like a light being turned off. Some are speculating that this is a teleprompter, which was used to send Hillary information she could use in answering the questions. Such a possibility is highly likely. Hillary has already shown her willingness to break the rules, so it wouldn't bother her conscience at all. She seemed to have an amazing grasp on the facts, as she spoke, which indicates either an amazing memory for the facts, something hard to believe from someone who can't remember a thing when she's under oath, or someone feeding her information. I actually think that our expectation that presidents know everything about everything is a bit unrealistic. Nobody can know every detail about everything that's going on in the government, let alone the nation. Adding the world into that equation just makes it worse. They need assistants who can provide them with data and details. But to do so in secret, pretending that she is pulling all those facts out of her head, is dishonest at best. But then, we've already seen Hillary's penchant for lying, so that's not a surprise. In and of itself, that lie is enough. But that's not the only lie that she showed us debate night. Remember all the coughing that Hillary was doing? Well somehow she managed to make it all the way though the 90 minute debate without a single cough. Nor did she take even the smallest sip of water. She's either superwoman, has had a remarkable recovery, or something else is going on. You guessed it, the camera showed something else going on. Apparently she was wearing something on her back, under her jacket. While we don't know what that was, speculation has been made that it was some sort of device to suppress coughing. If that's the case, then it's just one more piece of evidence that her health problems are much worse than she's letting on. Speaking of her health, as she was leaving the stage, going down the tunnel to her van, one of her handlers was leading her with a light. Once again, this was caught on camera. This time, it was a security camera. Apparently using a light like that is something that is common with patients who have Parkinson's Disease, for which speculation has been running wild. So, thanks to the wonders of modern technology, Hillary was caught in the act, once again. It seems extremely clear that the debate was rigged and she was being her dishonest self. Sadly, the people who need to see that video footage and who need to hear the truth about her won't. They'll dismiss it as right-wing propaganda or perhaps a conspiracy theory and go on their merry way, drinking their cool-aid and heading towards the cliff. This woman has no place in the Oval Office. She would be worse for the country than Obama has been. But she still has millions of followers, and millions more who will vote for her, just to try to keep Trump out of office. Perhaps it's time to do something about them too... like make them pass an intelligence test before they can vote. Poster Comment: TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT! "like make them pass an intelligence test before they can vote." That would keep the ghost voters from coming out to vote in Chicago. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#2. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Well Jews already control all of Congress by "sponsoring" Israel-supporting candidates. With one of their own in the White House it would be much easier for Sayanim to accommodate Israel's security needs (without getting into trouble with the law).
With all due respect, Trump would still fund Israel to the tune of Billions. I'm not for Billary, she is sick and is just wrong for the white house, under oath she can't recall shit or she is lying, either way, she is just imho pure evil the likes many have never seen before.
#4. To: SilverStorm (#3)
More evil than anyone can imagine. And besides, Bill is HIV positive. This comes from all his philandering and whore mongering. ;)
There's no way around that. The Israeli lobby would require Congress to to kybosh any presidential attempt to end this foreign aid, 'else Congress critters would lose Sayanim support at election time.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||