[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Waking up in Hillary Clinton's America As this endless election limps toward its last days, while spiraling into a bizarre duel over vote-rigging accusations, a deep sigh is undoubtedly in order. The entire process has been an emotionally draining, frustration-inducing, rage-inflaming spectacle of repellent form over shallow substance. For many, the third debate evoked fatigue. More worrying, there was again no discussion of how to prevent another financial crisis, an ominous possibility in the next presidency, whether Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton enters the Oval Office given that nothing fundamental has been altered when it comes to Wall Streets practices and predation. At the heart of American political consciousness right now lies a soul-crushing reality for millions of distraught Americans: the choices for president couldnt be feebler or more disappointing. On the one hand, we have a petulant, vocabulary-challenged man-boar of a billionaire, who hasnt paid his taxes, has regularly left those supporting him holding the bag, and seems like a ludicrous composite of every bad trait in every bad date any woman has ever had. On the other hand, were offered a walking photo-op for and well-paid speechmaker to Wall-Street CEOs, a one-woman money-raising machine from the 1% of the 1%, who, despite a folksiness that couldnt look more rehearsed, has methodically outplayed her opponent. With less than two weeks to go before E-day despite the Trumptilian upheaval of the last year the high probability of a Clinton win means the establishment remains intact. When we awaken on November 9th, it will undoubtedly be dawn in Hillary Clintons America and that potentially means four years of an economic dystopia that will (as would Donald Trumps version of the same) leave many Americans rightfully anxious about their economic futures. None of the three presidential debates suggested that either candidate would have the ability (or desire) to confront Wall Street from the Oval Office. In the second and thirddebates, in case you missed them, Hillary didnt even mention the Glass-Steagall Act, too big to fail, or Wall Street. While in the first debate, the subject of Wall Street only came up after she disparaged the tax policies of Trumped-up, trickle down economics (or, as I like to call it, the Trumpledown economics of giving tax and financial benefits to the rich and to corporations). In this election, Hillary has crafted her talking points regarding the causes of the last financial crisis as weapons against Trump, but they hardly begin to tell the real story of what happened to the American economy. The meltdown of 2007-2008 was not mainly due to tax policies that slashed taxes on the wealthy or a failure to invest in the middle class, two subjects she has repeatedly highlighted to slam the Republicans and their candidate. It was a byproduct of the destruction of the regulations that opened the way for a too-big-to-fail framework to thrive. Under the presidency of Bill Clinton, Glass-Steagall, the Depression-era act that once separated peoples bank deposits and loans from any kind of risky bets or other similar actions in which banks might engage, was repealed under the Financial Modernization Act of 1999. In addition, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act was passed, which allowed Wall Street to concoct devastating unregulated side bets on what became the subprime crisis. Given that the people involved with those choices are still around and some are still advising (or in the case of one former president living with) Hillary Clinton, its reasonable to imagine that, in January 2017, shell launch the third term of Bill Clinton when it comes to financial policy, banks, and the economy. Only now, the stakes are even higher, the banks larger, and their impunity still remarkably unchallenged. Consider President Obamas current treasury secretary, Jack Lew. It was Hillary who hit the Clinton Rolodex to bring him back to Washington. Lew first entered Bill Clintons White House in 1993 as special assistant to the president. Between his stints working for Clinton and Obama, he made his way into the private sector and eventually to Wall Street as so many of his predecessors had done and successors would do. He scored a leadership role with Citigroup during the time that Bill Clintons former Treasury Secretary (and former Goldman Sachs co-Chairman) Robert Rubin was on its board of directors. In 2009, Hillary selected him to be her deputy secretary of state. Lew is hardly the only example of the busy revolving door to power that led from the Clinton administration to the Obama administration via Wall Street (or activities connected to it). Bill Clintons Treasury Under Secretary for International Affairs, Timothy Geithner worked with Robert Rubin, later championed Wall Street as president and CEO of the New York Federal Reserve while Hillary was senator from New York (representing Wall Street), and then became Obamas first treasury secretary while Hillary was secretary of state. One possible contender for treasury secretary in a new Clinton administration would be Bill Clintons Under Secretary of Domestic Finance and Obamas Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman, Gary Gensler (who was -- Im sure you wont be shocked -- a Goldman Sachs partner before entering public service). These, then, are typical inhabitants of the Clinton inner circle and of the political-financial corridors of power. Their thinking, like Hillarys, meshes well with support for the status quo in the banking system, even if, like her, they are willing on occasion to admonish it for its mistakes. This thru-line of personnel in and out of Clinton World is dangerous for most of the rest of us, because behind all the talking heads and genuinely amusing Saturday Night Live skits about this bizarre election lie certain crucial issues that will have to be dealt with: decisions about climate change, foreign wars, student-loan unaffordability, rising income inequality, declining social mobility, and, yes, the threat of another financial crisis. And keep in mind that such a future economic meltdown isnt an absurdly long-shot possibility. Earlier this year, the Federal Reserve, the nations main bank regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the government entity that insures our bank deposits, collectively noted that seven of our biggest eight banks -- Citigroup was the exception -- still have inadequate emergency plans in the event of another financial crisis. Exploring a Two-Faced World Politicians regularly act one way publicly and another privately, as Hillary was outed for doing by WikiLeaks via its document dump from Clinton campaign manager John Podestas hacked email account. Such realities should be treated as neither shockers nor smoking guns. Everybody postures. Everybody lies. Everybodys two-faced in certain aspects of their lives. Politicians just make a career out of it. Whats problematic about Hillarys public and private positions in the economic sphere, at least, isnt their two-facedness but how of a piece they are. Yes, she warned the bankers to cut it out! Quit foreclosing on homes! Quit engaging in these kinds of speculative behaviors! -- but that was no demonstration of strength in relation to the big banks. Her comments revealed no real understanding of their precise role in exacerbating a fixable subprime loan calamity and global financial crisis, nor did her finger-wagging mean anything to Wall Street. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: X-15 (#0)
Horseshit...
Yes, horseshit indeed. The globalistas are shittin' kittens that Trump will thump Hillary and that he will toss a wrench into the revolving door corporation/finance/government apparatus that these bastards have become accustomed to. The message here is "Like it or not, it's Hillary. Get used to it." I am not buying that crap. Its All About The Supreme Court
How do they explain the huge crowds that Trump gathers. Talked with family in FL. voted today, said voting was heavy.
How do they explain the huge crowds that Trump gathers. They don't. They just do what they do best. They lie. Its All About The Supreme Court
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803) "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Thomas Jefferson
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|