[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped. Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound) Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH... ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES Trump to send troops to Memphis Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out) Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter? What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!) Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas, Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World - Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon Newmont Pulls Out of Canada, Delists TSX Eva Vlaardingerbroek's Warning: Elites Plan to Make Humans Immortal in the Cloud The $7.9 Trillion Company You've Never Heard Of CCP's motivation for (the Korean) war was to grow its military: US-China-Russia relations Here is What REALLY Happened on 9/11 US Deficit Explodes In August Despite Rising Tariff Revenues As Government Spending Soars Adolf Hitler had 'some good ideas', a fifth of Gen Z Americans believe according to Daily Mail poll New 4um Site Software Ready For Review "Calling Me Names Is NOT Gonna Stop Me!" Tucker Carlson on Ted Cruz, Trump, Israel & 9/11 Vietnam Erases 86 Million Bank Accounts – (NWO) Great Reset in Motion Vietnam Erases 86 Million Bank Accounts – (NWO) Great Reset in Motion Rifle Ammo In Kirk Assassination Engraved With 'Transtifa' Ideology: Law Enforcement Memo Time for MASSIVE change in America (Black Crime and the Media)) How Much Are Teachers Paid Around The World?

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Stealing US Election
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201 ... nia-from-stealing-us-election/
Published: Nov 29, 2016
Author: Jim Hoft Nov 29th, 2016 6:55 am
Post Date: 2016-11-29 09:13:11 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 1404
Comments: 7

 Jim Hoft Nov 29th, 2016 6:55 am

Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Stealing US Election

The problem with Pennsylvania’s recount process though for Stein and Clinton is that according to state law three voters in each precinct or election district in Pennsylvania must submit a notarized affidavit to the clerk in their individual election districts in order to initiate a recount.  There are 9,163 precincts in Pennsylvania.  As of noon Monday,

   "the Philadelphia city Board of Elections had received petitions for 35 of the 1,686 voting divisions in Philadelphia, according to City Commissioner Al Schmidt. By 5:30 p.m., that number was 74— about 4 percent of the city’s total divisions."

    Stein needed more than 5,000 people in Philadelphia alone to sign petitions to file for a recount and would have had to mobilize about 30,000 people statewide to get a full recount going in Pennsylvania.

The laws in Pennsylvania are so stringent that it makes it nearly impossible to have a recount in the state.  Unfortunately for Republicans there have been numerous mentions of fraud over the years in the city of Philadelphia alone.  For example in 2012, in 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote.

The Pennsylvania laws prevent a recount in areas like Philadelphia where there is good reason to suspect Democrat fraud. This year these same stringent laws may prevent Hillary from stealing the US election.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/stringent-laws-may-prevent-hillary-recount-in-pennsylvania-from-stealing-us-election/

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

She's not going to steal the election, recount or no recount, barring something so egregious it would start a civil war.

Hillary would need all 3 of the states of PA, WI, & MI to take the win. Even if she got any 2 of these 3, without the third, Trump still wins, and the number of vote gains in a recount has never resulted in a change big enough to change any of these states, much less PA where Trump got 70,000 more votes than Hillary.

Certainly voter fraud exists, but I'd sooner believe (as I'm sure about all 4um'ers would), that Trump won in spite of vote fraud, not because of it.

I do think Stein, just like all US citizens, has a right to petition for a recount if she wants. Elections are not about the candidates, but about the voters. But her motives and objectives here are not clear. Why only these 3 states that Trump won and not Minnesota & Maine that Hillary won but which were also close?

Is she trying to win respect from democrat voters or publicity to aid the green party for the next election? Is/was she secretly advocating for Hillary the whole election? Is she looking to enrich herself fraudulently?

Stein did seem relatively neutral between Hillary and Trump during the campaign. She was critical of both.

But Trump has won the election and no recount effort will change that. That PA's laws are what they are -- whether they should be or not -- are simply a lock on an otherwise unopenable door.

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-11-29   10:25:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Is she trying to win respect from democrat voters or publicity to aid the green party for the next election? Is/was she secretly advocating for Hillary the whole election? Is she looking to enrich herself fraudulently?

=================================================

Did you see the liberal/socialist 'YoungTurks' coverage of the election night?

I think those bastards unintentionally answer most of your questions in how bad Hillary lost, how bad she really, really sucks, and how completely irrelevant she is and will forever be - even for socialist liberal racists like the YTurds.

FF to 21:15. These socialists are calling the bitch 'the worst candidate in history.'

What do you think?

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-11-29   13:17:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Do you have a link to the video?

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-11-29   13:34:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

that Trump won in spite of vote fraud, not because of it.

Exactly.

"Have Brain, Will Travel

Turtle  posted on  2016-11-29   15:09:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Is she trying to win respect from democrat voters or publicity to aid the green party for the next election? Is/was she secretly advocating for Hillary the whole election? Is she looking to enrich herself fraudulently?

Seems that Greens are asking some of the same questions.

Green Party Rebels Against Jill Stein: "We Do Not Support The Recount"

Tyler Durden's picture
by Tyler Durden
Nov 29, 2016 2:22 PM

In a letter penned by Green Party Senate Candidate Margaret Flowers, and signed by dozens of prominent GPUS members, the Greens have rebelled against the farcical "recount effort" conducted by Jill Stein, saying "while we support electoral reforms, including how the vote is counted, we do not support the current recount being undertaken by Jill Stein."

The reason for this is that as the author notes, "as a candidate, Dr. Stein has the right to call for a recount. However, we urge the GPUS to distance itself from any appearance of support for either Democrats or Republicans. We are well aware of the undemocratic actions taken during the primaries by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Greens cannot be perceived to be allied with such a party."

www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-29/green-party-rebels-against- jill- stein-we-do-not-support-recount

evahthang go' be aw-rite

randge  posted on  2016-11-29   15:39:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Do you have a link to the video?

FF to 21:15

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-11-29   17:32:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Seems they were mad at Hillary for losing, hence the name calling. But prez candidates have lost far worse than Hillary. Mondale in 84 and Carter in 80 both being lopsided for Reagan.

But who cares what others think.

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-11-29   23:21:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]