[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Why Silver is Lagging Gold

Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver verbally and physically assaulted federal agents in New Jersey

Diana Ross & The Supremes - Reflections [Spain TV] [1967]

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Introduces Bill to REPEAL the USA PATRIOT Act Declares War on Surveillance State

Car Followed Home. Quick Thinking Driver Saved Himself

Woody Harrelson Couldn't Hold Back

Burkina Faso leaders visit to Moscow for Victory Day carries HUGE strategic significance: heres why

Pope Francis Donated Funds for Drones for the Armed Forces of Ukraine - Historian Zinchenko

President Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National Center for Homeless Veterans

Report:: Trump plans to announce US recognition of Palestinian state at upcoming Middle East conference

With US mediation, POTUS DJT announces that India and Pakistan have agreed to a ceasefire

Expert's urgent warning over sweetener in thousands of food linked to BRAIN DAMAGE

Here's What The World's Paying For Eggs

Richard Gage 9-11-2001 and Otober 7, 2024

"America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great"

Warsaw Ghetto Uprising compared to Gaza

Mainstream Media Blacks Out ICJ Hearings on Israeli Genocide

Pakistani air victory raises alarms for Taiwan’s defense strategy

NIH and CMS To Study Autism Using Medicare And Medicaid Data

Dr Rhonda Patrick: Recommended Breakfast

$373M In DEI Funding At US Universities In Four Years

To Judea’s Rage, Trump orders humanitarian aid to be brought into Gaza ‘as soon as possible’

Democrats Join with GOP to Overturn Gov Newsoms Ban on Gas Powered Cars

US Trade War With China

ICE Cockfighting Bust Reveals the Dark Underbelly of Bidens Border Crisis

Air Traffic Control Overhaul Announced By Trump Administration Here's What We Know

Huge win for Trump as world's second biggest carmaker relocates manufacturing to US

Rep Anna Paulina Luna Proposes to Strip Deep State Surveillance Tools by Repealing PATRIOT Act

125 Jets Clash in One of Largest Dogfights in Recent History | India Vs Pakistan

Pakistan's Chinese-made J-10 jet brought down two Indian fighter aircraft: US officials


Business/Finance
See other Business/Finance Articles

Title: Supreme Court throws out Apple’s $399M win in Samsung patent fight
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/12/ ... m-win-in-samsung-patent-fight/
Published: Dec 8, 2016
Author: UPDATED: December 7, 2016 at 3:21 am
Post Date: 2016-12-08 16:01:50 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 56

mercurynews.com
UPDATED: December 7, 2016 at 3:21 am

CUPERTINO — In a unanimous decision Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out a lower court’s $399 million judgment against Samsung for violating patents involving Apple’s iPhone.

The decision overturns a victory that Apple had won in the Washington, D.C.-based U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. The case will now go back to that court for any further proceedings, including determining what, if any, lower penalties Samsung may have to pay Apple.

Tech giants such as Google, Facebook and Hewlett Packard Enterprise had urged the Supreme Court to take up Samsung’s appeal of its patent loss to Apple, warning that the outcome against Samsung “will lead to absurd results and have a devastating impact on companies” because of the implications of how patent law is applied to technology products such as smartphones.

It was the first time the Supreme Court made a ruling on a product design since 1885, when it heard a case involving carpet designs. Case Collard, an intellectual property lawyer in Denver with the law firm Dorsey & Whitney, said the 8-0 court opinion, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, may end up being historical in its reach.

“The Supreme Court’s decision brings damages law for design patents into accord with the damages law for utility patents,” Collard said. “No longer can a patent holder get all of the profits from the sales of a product infringing a design patent. Instead, they may recover the profits attributable to the infringing feature.”

http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/12/06/supreme-court-throws-out-apples-399m-win-in-samsung-patent-fight/

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  



[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]