Title: every once in a while, the lion has to show the jackals who he is. Source:
[None] URL Source:https://youtu.be/y-Yszp3SmxE Published:Dec 26, 2016 Author:Staff Post Date:2016-12-26 04:14:46 by Horse Keywords:None Views:453 Comments:27
You post a video showing Hitler to be a Lion that is going to save white people?
Seriously?
Look at the wonderful job he and his leftist Nazi drones did saving white Germans. The reality is he bled Germany dry of German blood,and most of the children born there since 1945 have had non-German fathers because all their fathers and grandfathers were killed during WW-2,leaving no one but non-German occupation troops and immigrants to impregnate their mothers and grandmothers.
The Germans would have been killed even if there had been no Hitler. The Jews of the Soviet Union had 20,000 tanks, 20,000 artillery pieces and 20,000 planes when WW II began. But Hitler had only 1,000 tanks and 43 submarines.The German problem was that they stood in the way of Jewish Power.
The Germans would have been killed even if there had been no Hitler. The Jews of the Soviet Union had 20,000 tanks, 20,000 artillery pieces and 20,000 planes when WW II began. But Hitler had only 1,000 tanks and 43 submarines.The German problem was that they stood in the way of Jewish Power.
ROFLMAO! In what alternate universe did you "learn" that nonsense?
Most of the political Jews in Russia had to run for their lives after the communist took over. That is how and why the west got stuck with providing a safe place for Jewish communists fleeing from Stalin. Western Jews like Jacob Schiff,whose family Goober Gore's eldest daughter married into, used their wealth and power to grease the skids to bring them to the US and set them up and protect them.
The few Jews left in Stalinist Russia that didn't go to the labor camps or the special cities were psychos like Beria with no political ambition. He was happy to spend his days executing people and raping minor girls.
The typical Russian Jew went off to the labor camps. The ones with scientific/engineering degrees went off to the deluxe labor camps. The Soviets had no more love of Jews than you do because they considered them,just like faithful followers of every OTHER religious cult to be threats to their rule.
BS. Brezhnev and Khrushchev both had Jewish wives and Jewish children. Yelstin was Jewish as is Putin's mother. How was that possible if Stalin was an anti-Semite chasing Jews out of the country?
If there were no Jews, would there have been a Communism that was so vicious and so long lasting?
Yes. The Jews didn't even invent communism. I believe that was the Irish who came the closest in modern times,but the truth is it was the first tribe of cavemen that invented communism. They all had to live together,share,and sacrifice for the common good or they wouldn't have survived.
I guess it would be more correct to say that the stated ideas/goals of communism were created by the first family unit,whoever they were.
the truth is it was the first tribe of cavemen that invented communism. They all had to live together,share,and sacrifice for the common good or they wouldn't have survived.
That's called family, Pete. We do it because we want to. Entirely different than being dragged off to re-education camps for hoarding ball-point pens.
Which is the theoretical root of communism and it's baby brudder,democracy.
We de peep-pulls.
And it happened because it was necessary in order to survive. None of us are an island,and none of us can ever hope to live independently from others.
THESE days we are MUCH freer to pick and choose who our "families" are,but that doesn't alter the historical facts that the future of mankind relied on it.
Or that this is the rock upon which communist philosophy is based. The FACT that the reality once you get beyond the tribal/survival mode it becomes as much of a rock tied to your neck in deep water as often as it does a rock you can stand on is irrelevant.
Like many other things,the reality never fails to match the promise. Still,the weak-minded or ignorant masses that hear this tend to hear/understand the promise to be "That man is my brother and my keeper. He is responsible for MY welfare" instead of the "WE are OUR brother's keepers" promise that is the message being sold. The end result is ALWAYS a dictatorship because the people willingly surrender their control over their own individual lives with the hope that someone else will accept this responsibility and manage it for them. In this,they are correct even though they are almost never happy with the reality they end up having to live with once they surrender control over their lives to "the borg". Yeah,they no longer have to or are even expected to make decisions so they can never be faulted for making bad ones,but that is no step forward because someone else is making your bad decisions for you and you have to live with them. In effect they are also YOUR bad decisions because you made the decision to accept this.
EVERY one of these same points can be made about any organized religion you care to name.
In a western liberal democracy we are compelled to support our loved ones not by legal force, but by sense of obligation. In a communist society, one is compelled to support all (usually meaning The Party) by very real threat of imprisonment or death.
You would be surprised at how rarely that happens!
Well,maybe not.
In a western liberal democracy we are compelled to support our loved ones not by legal force, but by sense of obligation. In a communist society, one is compelled to support all (usually meaning The Party) by very real threat of imprisonment or death.
Very good points AND very true,BUT......,what you are describing is the end result of establishing a communist government,not the PROMISE that sucks in the selfish and morally weak.