[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
War, War, War See other War, War, War Articles Title: Color Revolutions From the Description section: The aim is regime change through non-violent strikes, mass street protests, and media agitation-propaganda. http://www.ned.org/publications/05annual/toc.html [National Endowment for Democracy] http://www.iri.org [International Republican Institute - AZ Sen. John McCain, Chairman] http://www.freedomhouse.org http://www.ndi.org/ [National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - Madeline Albright, Chairman and Fmr. Sec. of State (Clinton admin.)] http://www.soros.org/about/foundations Poster Comment: Additional article ref. COLOR REVOLUTIONS AS AN ELEMENT OF NET-CENTRIC WARFARE - southfront.org 25.02.2016. Excerpts: The essence of “net-centric warfare” is that it does not have a beginning or an end, it is being conducted on a permanent basis, It’s a design for global manipulation and total control on a world scale. That is apparent from the EBO definition. Today one of the characteristic manifestations of NCW [Net-Centric Warfare] in a globalizing world are “color revolutions”. A Color Revolution (CR) is a net-centric operation whose objective is the removal of existing political regimes in another country. It is based on “non-violent struggle” methods developed by George Sharp in the 1980s (a US product, one of net-centric technologies). The CR concept implies establishing full control over a country and its territory without the use of armed force, if possible. It can be achieved by applying “soft power” which US political scientist Joseph Nye Jr. defines as a state’s (or alliance’s or coalition’s) ability achieve desired international results through persuasion and not suppression, imposition, or compellence, which is characteristic of “hard power.” Soft power achieves its effect by inducing others to adhere to certain international norms of behavior, which leads to the desired outcome without applying compellence. Color Revolution consequences. For states and political systems, CRs contain aspects of colonialism. The interests of the target society are not taken into consideration, it is expendable ... The society itself is destabilized, social foundations are undermined, the respect for government disappears, dissatisfaction increases, and economy is in anything but a normal state. These are the ideal conditions to impose Western social models. US enters the country. In the last 20 years, US and NATO transformed Ukraine into a country hostile to Russia also through the application of net-centric technologies. ... The outcome is the country’s territory passing under US control. ... Being a nuclear weapons state, Russia is considered by the US and NATO one of its main geopolitical adversaries. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
#2. To: GreyLmist (#0)
This is so primarily because George Soros is one of the movers and shakers behind the movement. ;)
This is so primarily because George Soros is one of the movers and shakers behind the movement. ;) SOROS ADMITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR COUP AND MASS MURDER IN UKRAINE Color revolution collaboration began soon after engineered fall of Soviet Union George Soros, NATO, and the Western Color Revolution apparatus
You hit the nail on the head. Sometimes we must realize that we have traitors in our midst. ;)
Yes indeed. 4um Title: Neutrality Act of 1794 [18 U.S.C. § 960] [Correction: 18 U.S.C. § 960]
There are no replies to Comment # 17. End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||