4um: Contract with America

Title: Contract with America
Source: The Populist Party
URL Source: http://www.populistamerica.com/commentary
Published: Feb 26, 2006
Author: Steve Osborn
Post Date: 2006-02-26 15:26:57 by Zipporah
Keywords: Contract, America, with
Views: 34
Comments: 3

February 22, 2006
by Steve Osborn

The American People signed a contract. An agreement between the Governed and the Government. It is called the Constitution of the United States. The first ten amendments to that Constitution is known as the Bill of Rights. As Justice Hugo Black stated, "It is my belief that there are absolutes in our Bill of Rights, and that they were put there on purpose by men who knew what words meant and meant their prohibitions to be 'absolutes.'"

Think about it:

Without the First Amendment, newspapers could only print the "party line" or be suppressed. Books and plays would be censored or banned. We might have to attend the State Authorized Religion, or be forbidden to attend any other form of worship, or any worship at all. We could even have a church telling us how to live, backed up with government force! We would have no right of public assembly or protest, nor could we petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Without the Second Amendment, we would be a completely disarmed populace, at the mercy of government troops or security forces.
Without the Third Amendment, the government could quarter troops in your home without your consent.
Without the Fourth Amendment, the government's security force or military could search your home at will, without a warrant, confiscate your papers and property, monitor your communications and phone conversations without your ever knowing about it.
Without the Fifth Amendment, you could be picked up, your property confiscated, you could be held incommunicado for an indefinite time without legal counsel and could be forced to testify against yourself.
Without the Sixth Amendment, your could be held for an indefinite period, without charge, and without being told why you're being held. Your trial, if any, could be held in secret without your being able to confront your accusers or examining any evidence, nor would you have the right to legal counsel.
Without the Seventh Amendment, in civil suits, you would not have the right of trial by jury.
Without the Eighth Amendment, there would be no limit on the amount of bail set or fines imposed, and any cruel punishment could be meted out, even death by torture.
Without the Ninth Amendment, any rights not spelled out would be forfeit to the government.
Without the Tenth Amendment, the People of the United States would have no powers reserved to themselves, it would all lie with the State.

Isn't it tragic that the Congress gave to the Executive, through misguided PATRIOTism, an ACT that would unconstitutionally repeal those rights guaranteed by the Constitution and turn it all over to Homeland Security?

Read your Constitution and Bill of Rights, then read the text of the PATRIOT ACT and the proposed amended PATRIOT ACT, then think about it.

Stephen M. Osborn [send him email] is a freelance writer living on Camano Island in the Pacific Northwest. He is an "Atomic Vet." (Operation Redwing, Bikini Atoll 1956, ) who has been very active working and writing for nuclear disarmament and world peace. He is a retired Fire Battalion Chief, lifelong sailor, writer, poet, philosopher, historian and former newspaper columnist.

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." ~Plato

"Prior to the fourteenth amendment, "No private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of Constitution. The constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The states are party to it." 1"

1 Supreme Court of Georgia, Padelford, Fay &mp;mp; Co. vs Mayor and Alderman, City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438,520 (1854)

The non-ratified fourteenth amendment did away with the PREAMBLE to the Bill of Rights, [the most important part], the original 13th amendment, and the first 10. I guess you could say the only difference now is that they are removing all pretences.

The so-called founding fathers [minus Patrick Henry and a couple others] were complicit with the "crown" to enslave us. Most we've been taught about George Washington is propaganda, a lot of it started by old George himself. He constantly was revising his writings, even long after the fact. The Judeo- Freemasons have taken care of the rest. I learned that a few years ago when I picked up a copy of The Papers of the Presidents, containing some of the papers of GW. I have not been able to think of him since without getting my dander up.

I am pretty sure what we have now is just what they envisioned. People had to bow to old George. After all, he was related to the British Monarchy, as is GWB, and most of our presidents. He probably would have liked to be king for life, but from what I've read, after the Whiskey Rebellion, the people didn't want him, and not just in Pennsylvania. Thomas Paine had a few choice things to say about him as well. See if you can find Thomas Paine's letter to George Washington. Paine had nothing good to say about his old buddy.

If we could enforce the original 13th Amendment, make the current 13th the 14th, and do away with everything after, this government would crash and burn. [Phoenix crashing, yeah!!!]

See barefootsworld.net for the original 13th Amendment. It does away with lawyers and judges as we know them.