[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change Americas National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, unverified data Data Science,Climate and satellites Consultant John J Bates, who blew the whistle to the Mail on Sunday The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the worlds leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change. A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that Americas National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015. The report claimed that the pause or slowdown in global warming in the period since 1998 revealed by UN scientists in 2013 never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the worlds media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers. But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, unverified data. It was never subjected to NOAAs rigorous internal evaluation process which Dr Bates devised. His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a blatant attempt to intensify the impact of what became known as the Pausebuster paper. His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trumps determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessors green policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal so triggering an intense political row. RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next The three theories of the APOCALYPSE: Researchers say... Trump's snub for the Green Prince: US President 'will avoid... Prince Charles dismayed the public has become overly... EXCLUSIVE: 'We must act before it is too late and we test... SHARE THIS ARTICLE Share 42k shares Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Microsoft CEO Bill Gates, US President Barack Obama, French President Francois Hollande and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the world climate change conference +8 Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Microsoft CEO Bill Gates, US President Barack Obama, French President Francois Hollande and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the world climate change conference The PM, the Prince and 'the pause': David Cameron and Prince Charles attended the historic 2015 Paris climate change conference with 150 world leaders. Cameron committed Britain to an EU-Wide emission cut as a result. And Charles, writing in this paper last month, stated there was no pause in global warming, influenced by the flawed NOAA paper that made this claim +8 The PM, the Prince and 'the pause': David Cameron and Prince Charles attended the historic 2015 Paris climate change conference with 150 world leaders. Cameron committed Britain to an EU-Wide emission cut as a result. And Charles, writing in this paper last month, stated there was no pause in global warming, influenced by the flawed NOAA paper that made this claim In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) of insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation
in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy. Dr Bates was one of two Principal Scientists at NCEI, based in Asheville, North Carolina. A blatant attempt to intensify paper's impact Official delegations from America, Britain and the EU were strongly influenced by the flawed NOAA study as they hammered out the Paris Agreement and committed advanced nations to sweeping reductions in their use of fossil fuel and to spending £80 billion every year on new, climate-related aid projects. The scandal has disturbing echoes of the Climategate affair which broke shortly before the UN climate summit in 2009, when the leak of thousands of emails between climate scientists suggested they had manipulated and hidden data. Some were British experts at the influential Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. LED TO THESE GREEN COMMITMENTS Data published by NOAA, the worlds top climate data agency, claimed global warming was worse than previously thought. The information was published to coincide with the Paris climate change conference in 2015, where world leaders agreed that... $100bn be given every year in extra climate-related aid to the developing world by rich nations 2 degrees C be set as the limit for maximum temperature rise above pre- industrial times 40% of CO2 emissions would be cut across the EU by 2030 £320bn
what the UKs pledges will cost our economy by 2030 NOAAs 2015 Pausebuster paper was based on two new temperature sets of data one containing measurements of temperatures at the planets surface on land, the other at the surface of the seas. Both datasets were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend. The land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings unstable. The paper relied on a preliminary, alpha version of the data which was never approved or verified. A final, approved version has still not been issued. None of the data on which the paper was based was properly archived a mandatory requirement meant to ensure that raw data and the software used to process it is accessible to other scientists, so they can verify NOAA results. Dr Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a 40-year career in meteorology and climate science. As recently as 2014, the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards to produce and preserve climate data records. Yet when it came to the paper timed to influence the Paris conference, Dr Bates said, these standards were flagrantly ignored. The paper was published in June 2015 by the journal Science. Entitled Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus, the document said the widely reported pause or slowdown was a myth. Less than two years earlier, a blockbuster report from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which drew on the work of hundreds of scientists around the world, had found a much smaller increasing trend over the past 15 years 1998-2012 than over the past 30 to 60 years. Explaining the pause became a key issue for climate science. It was seized on by global warming sceptics, because the level of CO2 in the atmosphere had continued to rise. WHY OBAMA'S GREEN GURU WILL MAKE TRUMP SEE RED NOAAs climate boss Thomas Karl, below left, had a hotline to the White House, through his long association with President Obamas science adviser, John Holdren. Karls Pausebuster paper was hugely influential in dictating the world agreement in Paris and sweeping US emissions cuts. President Trump, above right, has pledged to scrap both policies triggering furious claims by Democrats he is a climate denier and anti-science. Thanks to todays MoS story, NOAA is set to face an inquiry by the Republican-led House science committee. Some scientists argued that the existence of the pause meant the worlds climate is less sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought, so that future warming would be slower. One of them, Professor Judith Curry, then head of climate science at the Georgia Institute of Technology, said it suggested that computer models used to project future warming were running too hot. However, the Pausebuster paper said while the rate of global warming from 1950 to 1999 was 0.113C per decade, the rate from 2000 to 2014 was actually higher, at 0.116C per decade. The IPCCs claim about the pause, it concluded, was no longer valid. The impact was huge and lasting. On publication day, the BBC said the pause in global warming was an illusion caused by inaccurate data. One American magazine described the paper as a science bomb dropped on sceptics. Its impact could be seen in this newspaper last month when, writing to launch his Ladybird book about climate change, Prince Charles stated baldly: There isnt a pause
it is hard to reject the facts on the basis of the evidence. Data changed to make the sea appear warmer The sea dataset used by Thomas Karl and his colleagues known as Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperatures version 4, or ERSSTv4, tripled the warming trend over the sea during the years 2000 to 2014 from just 0.036C per decade as stated in version 3 to 0.099C per decade. Individual measurements in some parts of the globe had increased by about 0.1C and this resulted in the dramatic increase of the overall global trend published by the Pausebuster paper. But Dr Bates said this increase in temperatures was achieved by dubious means. Its key error was an upwards adjustment of readings from fixed and floating buoys, which are generally reliable, to bring them into line with readings from a much more doubtful source water taken in by ships. This, Dr Bates explained, has long been known to be questionable: ships are themselves sources of heat, readings will vary from ship to ship, and the depth of water intake will vary according to how heavily a ship is laden so affecting temperature readings. Dr Bates said: They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and corrected it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but thats what they did so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer. ERSSTv4 adjusted buoy readings up by 0.12C. It also ignored data from satellites that measure the temperature of the lower atmosphere, which are also considered reliable. Dr Bates said he gave the papers co-authors a hard time about this, and they never really justified what they were doing. Now, some of those same authors have produced the pending, revised new version of the sea dataset ERSSTv5. A draft of a document that explains the methods used to generate version 5, and which has been seen by this newspaper, indicates the new version will reverse the flaws in version 4, changing the buoy adjustments and including some satellite data and measurements from a special high-tech floating buoy network known as Argo. As a result, it is certain to show reductions in both absolute temperatures and recent global warming. The second dataset used by the Pausebuster paper was a new version of NOAAs land records, known as the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN), an analysis over time of temperature readings from about 4,000 weather stations spread across the globe. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World- leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4XulaVth0 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|