[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tucker Carlson WARNS Trump that Neo-cons are trying to END his presidency by going to war with Iran

DR. IMMANUEL FURIOUSLY CLAIMS RFK JR. IS “DANCING AROUND” THE DANGERS OF COVID-19 MRNA VACCINES

AOC (& Bernie Sanders) Back Zohran After Cuomo Debate COLLAPSE

14 FOODS that SUCK the SUGAR from Your BLOOD

Musk 'Yes' On Trump Impeachment; Will 'Immediately' Decommission SpaceX Dragon & Doubles Down On Epstein Claims

Musk drops bombshell linking Trump to Epstein files, claims Epstein docs hidden to protect Trump

Musk To 'Immediately' Decommission SpaceX Dragon After Trump Threat, Doubles Down On Epstein Claims

Eye-opening device: Self-powered AI synapse mimics human vision, achieves 82% accuracy

This Is Israel

Rogan warns quantum breakthrough could wipe out encryption overnight, digital money vulnerable

Protesters Clash With Feds During Twin Cities Drug and Money Laundering Bust [WATCH]

A Warrior's Homecoming: Trumps Push to End Veteran Homelessness

Trump Administration Rescinds Biden-Era Guidance Forcing Hospitals To Perform Abortions

Supreme Court Dismisses Mexico Lawsuit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers

YouTube has stopped working on 5 popular phones - so, is your device on the list?

POSOBIEC BOMBSHELL: U.S. INTEL HID UKRAINIAN DRONE ATTACK FROM THE PRESIDENT

Soldiers on US-Mexico border hunt drones with air defense radars typically used in combat

Pentagon Awards $5 Billion Virginia Sub Contract to Boost Production

Trump to Use Emergency Powers to Boost U.S. Critical Minerals Industry

Palestinian Red Crescent details medics account of 15 colleagues slaughter

Trump fires slew of pro-Israel officials in America First 'course correction'

British Airways cancels all flights to Israel until August

Majority of British people support arms embargo on Israel

Chaos at major airport as ground stop halts ALL planes just weeks after tech meltdown

Scott Ritter: Trump Needs to Decide Whether He Supports Russia or Terrorism

Texas moves to label popular snacks as unsafe for human consumption.

No radar can detect it. Mach 4.1 Mig-41..Jet Fighter

Russia Offers Su-57 With Source Codes to India – Full Control, No Strings

This Neutered Isle: Britain After Britain

NC High School Student Suspended for Saying "Illegal Alien" Will Receive Public Apology


Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Cavegirls were first blondes to have fun
Source: Timesonline
URL Source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2058688,00.html
Published: Mar 1, 2006
Author: Roger Dobson and Abul Taher
Post Date: 2006-03-01 07:27:58 by YertleTurtle
Keywords: Cavegirls, blondes, first
Views: 351
Comments: 17

THE modern gentleman may prefer blondes. But new research has found that it was cavemen who were the first to be lured by flaxen locks. According to the study, north European women evolved blonde hair and blue eyes at the end of the Ice Age to make them stand out from their rivals at a time of fierce competition for scarce males.

The study argues that blond hair originated in the region because of food shortages 10,000-11,000 years ago. Until then, humans had the dark brown hair and dark eyes that still dominate in the rest of the world. Almost the only sustenance in northern Europe came from roaming herds of mammoths, reindeer, bison and horses. Finding them required long, arduous hunting trips in which numerous males died, leading to a high ratio of surviving women to men.

Lighter hair colours, which started as rare mutations, became popular for breeding and numbers increased dramatically, according to the research, published under the aegis of the University of St Andrews.

“Human hair and eye colour are unusually diverse in northern and eastern Europe (and their) origin over a short span of evolutionary time indicates some kind of selection,” says the study by Peter Frost, a Canadian anthropologist. Frost adds that the high death rate among male hunters “increased the pressures of sexual selection on early European women, one possible outcome being an unusual complex of colour traits.”

Frost’s theory, to be published this week in Evolution and Human Behavior, the academic journal, was supported by Professor John Manning, a specialist in evolutionary psychology at the University of Central Lancashire. “Hair and eye colour tend to be uniform in many parts of the world, but in Europe there is a welter of variants,” he said. “The mate choice explanation now being put forward is, in my mind, close to being correct.”

Frost’s theory is also backed up by a separate scientific analysis of north European genes carried out at three Japanese universities, which has isolated the date of the genetic mutation that resulted in blond hair to about 11,000 years ago.

The hair colour gene MC1R has at least seven variants in Europe and the continent has an unusually wide range of hair and eye shades. In the rest of the world, dark hair and eyes are overwhelmingly dominant.

Just how such variety emerged over such a short period of time in one part of the world has long been a mystery. According to the new research, if the changes had occurred by the usual processes of evolution, they would have taken about 850,000 years. But modern humans, emigrating from Africa, reached Europe only 35,000-40,000 years ago.

Instead, Frost attributes the rapid evolution to how they gathered food. In Africa there was less dependence on animals and women were able to collect fruit for themselves. In Europe, by contrast, food gathering was almost exclusively a male hunter’s preserve. The retreating ice sheets left behind a landscape of fertile soil with plenty of grass and moss for herbivorous animals to eat, but few plants edible for humans. Women therefore took on jobs such as building shelters and making clothes while the men went on hunting trips, where the death rate was high.

The increase in competition for males led to rapid change as women struggled to evolve the most alluring qualities. Frost believes his theory is supported by studies which show blonde hair is an indicator for high oestrogen levels in women.

Jilly Cooper, 69, the author, described how in her blonde youth she had “certainly got more glances. I remember when I went to Majorca when I was 20, my bum was sore from getting pinched”.

However, Jodie Kidd, 27, the blonde model, disagrees with the theory: “I don’t think being blonde makes you more ripe for sexual activity. It’s much more to do with personality than what you look like. Beauty is much deeper than the colour of your hair.”

Film star blondes such as Marilyn Monroe, Brigitte Bardot, Sharon Stone and Scarlett Johansson are held up as ideals of feminine allure. However, the future of the blonde is uncertain.

A study by the World Health Organisation found that natural blonds are likely to be extinct within 200 years because there are too few people carrying the blond gene. According to the WHO study, the last natural blond is likely to be born in Finland during 2202.


If this is the best evolutionists can do, no wonder so few people take them seriously. As for blonds dying out, on the contrary we'll take over the world because of our exceptional intelligence and beauty.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

If this is the best evolutionists can do, no wonder so few people take them seriously. As for blonds dying out, on the contrary we'll take over the world because of our exceptional intelligence and beauty.

laughing, YT. btw, go to your setup page and check the box for 'poster comment'. hey, i started out a blonde but evolved to brown with gold highlights.

christine  posted on  2006-03-01   10:13:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: christine (#1)

hey, i started out a blonde but evolved to brown with gold highlights.

Both my parents were blond/blue so I had no choice. I doubt I carry the genes for anything else. In a way that's a shame, because I like red/green, too.

"I aim to misbehave" -- Mal Reynolds, Firefly

YertleTurtle  posted on  2006-03-01   19:58:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

“Human hair and eye colour are unusually diverse in northern and eastern Europe (and their) origin over a short span of evolutionary time indicates some kind of selection,” says the study by Peter Frost, a Canadian anthropologist. Frost adds that the high death rate among male hunters “increased the pressures of sexual selection on early European women, one possible outcome being an unusual complex of colour traits.”

Turns out they were just biding their time until they could find some black men to date. [/sarcasm]

Cor mundum crea in me, Deus, et spiritum rectum innova in visceribus meis.

Peetie Wheatstraw  posted on  2006-03-01   20:01:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: YertleTurtle, siagiah, Zipporah (#0)

The war against blondes

blondes may soon be an endangered species, if they are not already.

A study by the World Health Organisation found that natural blonds are likely to be extinct within 200 years because there are too few people carrying the blond gene. According to the WHO study, the last natural blond is likely to be born in Finland during 2202.

And with Dubai Dubya the new Dictator I feel twice as endangered anyway.

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." ~Plato

robin  posted on  2006-03-01   20:07:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: YertleTurtle (#0)

According to the study, north European women evolved blonde hair and blue eyes at the end of the Ice Age to make them stand out from their rivals at a time of fierce competition for scarce males.

I guess the disproportionate ratios never gave cavemen the idea of having more than one babe in the hut. Their morals are impressive for 10,000 BC. Does this study consider that angle?

I'd always thought the higher lattitude gave lighter hair people more of an advantage with sunlight absorbtion, while at lower equatorial lattitudes, darker hair is more advantageous for the same reason.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-03-01   20:15:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin (#4)

I read this article about blonds dying out when it first came out, and even then I knew it was garbage. Later I found out study was fraudulent; it never happened.

Last Friday, several British newspapers reported that the World Health Organization had found in a study that blonds would become extinct within 200 years, because blondness was caused by a recessive gene that was dying out. The reports were repeated on Friday by anchors for the ABC News program "Good Morning America," and on Saturday by CNN.

There was only one problem, the health organization said in a statement yesterday that it never reported that blonds would become extinct, and it had never done a study on the subject.

"W.H.O. has no knowledge of how these news reports originated," said the organization, an agency of the United Nations based in Geneva, "but would like to stress that we have no opinion of the future existence of blonds."

All the news reports, in Britain and the United States, cited a study from the World Health Organization - "a blonde-shell study," as The Daily Star of London put it. But none reported any scientific details from the study or the names of the scientists who conducted it.

On "Good Morning America," Charles Gibson began a conversation with his co-anchor, Diane Sawyer, by saying: "There's a study from the World Health Organization, this is for real, that blonds are an endangered species. Women and men with blond hair, eyebrows and blue eyes, natural blonds, they say will vanish from the face of the earth within 200 years, because it is not as strong a gene as brunets."

Ms. Sawyer said she was "somewhat of a natural blonde."

Jeffrey Schneider, a spokesman for ABC News, said the anchors got the information from an ABC producer in London who said he had read it in a British newspaper.

In London, The Sun and The Express both reported that unnamed scientists said blonds would survive longest in Scandinavia, where they are most concentrated, and expected the last true blond to hail from Finland.

The British accounts were replete with the views of bleached blonds who said hairdressers would never allow blondness to become extinct, and doctors who said that rare genes would pop up to keep natural blonds from becoming an endangered species.

Journalists in London said last night that the source of the reports was probably one of several European news agencies that are used by the British press, but it remained unclear which one.

Tim Hall, a night news editor at The Daily Mail, said the report was probably distributed by The Press Association, Britain's domestic news agency. "Several papers picked it up," he said.

But Charlotte Gapper, night editor at The Press Association, said that although it had considered running the report on Sept. 27, it had decided not to after talking to the World Health Organization.

"We didn't do that story because we made an inquiry to the World Health Organization first," she said. "They told us that report was two years old, and had been covered at the time. They said it had been picked up again that day by a German news agency."

She added that she did not know which agency the organization was referring to.

Dr. Ray White, a geneticist at the University of California at San Francisco, said that the disappearance of a gene for blond hair "sounds patently incorrect."

"I aim to misbehave" -- Mal Reynolds, Firefly

YertleTurtle  posted on  2006-03-01   20:18:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Neil McIver (#5)

I guess the disproportionate ratios never gave cavemen the idea of having more than one babe in the hut. Their morals are impressive for 10,000 BC. Does this study consider that angle?

I'd always thought the higher lattitude gave lighter hair people more of an advantage with sunlight absorbtion, while at lower equatorial lattitudes, darker hair is more advantageous for the same reason.

Flaxen haired, fair-skinned people hide better in the snow too! With all the tribal fighting, I think being able to blend in with the snow had its advantages. I seriously doubt if there was even one child-bearing aged woman who wasn't pregant back in the caveman days, brunette, blonde, red-haired or bald.

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." ~Plato

robin  posted on  2006-03-01   20:19:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Neil McIver (#5)

I'd always thought the higher lattitude gave lighter hair people more of an advantage with sunlight absorbtion, while at lower equatorial lattitudes, darker hair is more advantageous for the same reason.

Probably Vitamin D, which is more of a hormone that a vitamin. Lack of it is associated with about 16 different cancers, high blood pressure, strokes, diabetes and kidney failure. All of which blacks suffer far more than whites.

I've seen a thousand people in dialysis centers, and every one of them was black.

"I aim to misbehave" -- Mal Reynolds, Firefly

YertleTurtle  posted on  2006-03-01   20:20:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: YertleTurtle (#6)

Dr. Ray White, a geneticist at the University of California at San Francisco, said that the disappearance of a gene for blond hair "sounds patently incorrect."

What a relief! Thanks.

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." ~Plato

robin  posted on  2006-03-01   20:21:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: robin (#7)

Flaxen haired, fair-skinned people hide better in the snow too! With all the tribal fighting, I think being able to blend in with the snow had its advantages.

I would question the idea that there was lots of tribal fighting. With low populations, there would be only so many weekly skirmishes that the population counts could afford. I can see fighting for food on occasion but the numbers just wouldn't allow for much death from that. There's economy in working with others to get a job done, which is a reason not to kill unnecessarily.

Sure hiding in snow is advantageous for fair skinned blonds. (I guess we're assuming they wear either white fur or a birthday suit). Hunting would be a small advantage there. I heard polar bears are smart enough to cover their black noses when hunting.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-03-01   20:31:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: YertleTurtle (#8)

Yes, vitamin D is created with exposure to sunlight. Little known fact, I think.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-03-01   20:32:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Neil McIver (#10)

I would question the idea that there was lots of tribal fighting.

Same here. Little known are the number of Nobel Prize winners from Northern Europe. Why would such smart people fight? It isn't Africa, which is full of submorons with mean average IQs of 60.

That's what I meant when I said being blond is associated with intelligence. Exactly why, I don't know, but I have met very few "dumb blondes," as compared to other ethnic groups.

"I aim to misbehave" -- Mal Reynolds, Firefly

YertleTurtle  posted on  2006-03-01   20:39:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Neil McIver (#10)

I heard polar bears are smart enough to cover their black noses when hunting.

Ha!

Like rats, we do tend to fight more when crowded, so perhaps for awhile that was not a problem. Later though there must have been some turf wars, they hopped on boats and migrated so much, or was that for some other reason. Climate/environment was their biggest enemy.

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." ~Plato

robin  posted on  2006-03-01   20:53:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: robin, Zipporah, Yertle Turtle (#4)

The war against blondes

blondes may soon be an endangered species, if they are not already.

Hey, us naturally blonde gals MUST stick together~!! We have the "delicate" genes for "flaxen good looks" and that makes us extra special... Being brilliant is just gravy...

Now, how to PRESERVE our heritage? Our daughters must mate with each other's SONS... gawd, that COULD complicate our friendships, eh? LOL

I don't know about you, but the present STATE OF THE UNION scares the crap outa me...

siagiah  posted on  2006-03-01   21:13:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: robin (#13)

I heard polar bears are smart enough to cover their black noses when hunting.

Actually I should have said "stalking".

Like rats, we do tend to fight more when crowded,

I think fights have a tendency to break out whenever some needed resource is scarce. Space and food are good examples.

Climate/environment was their biggest enemy.

Not if it's the only climate you've ever known.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-03-01   21:17:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Neil McIver (#15)

Not if it's the only climate you've ever known.

I remember a geology teacher telling us that he read the Eskimos' favorite television show was Hawaii-Five-O.

From his perspective WWII had a lot to do with Japan's and Germany's 2% natural resource problem.

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." ~Plato

robin  posted on  2006-03-01   21:21:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: robin (#16)

From his perspective WWII had a lot to do with Japan's and Germany's 2% natural resource problem.

For Germany, I wouldn't say the bulk of the influence was the monetary fiasco brought on by WW I combined with the advent of central banking. Germany's economy was destroyed by the terms of surrender in 1918, and they came back with a vengence a generation later.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-03-01   21:41:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]