[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
War, War, War See other War, War, War Articles Title: Korean Peninsula Tensions Risk Boiling Over Korean Peninsula Tensions Risk Boiling Over by Stephen Lendman On Wednesday, addressing State Department staff, Rex Tillerson stressed leaning hard on China to pressure Pyongyang on denuclearizing the Korean peninsula backed up by very strong (US) resolve
So its a pressure campaign
to lean into people to go along with Washingtons agenda. Weve told them were watching what youre doing. Punishment will be administered to non-compliers by sanctions and other means, he said. His message was meant mainly for Beijing - on North Korea, trade and South China Sea issues. Friendly bilateral relations depend on playing ball with America was his message. If Beijing doesnt come down hard on Pyongyang, Washington could sanction its banks, commerce and industry dealing with the DPRK, he warned, adding: (W)eve got a lot of work left to do to keep that pressure on. Major Sino/US differences remain unresolved - notably on North Korea, trade and Beijings South China Sea activities. During his confirmation hearing as Trumps ambassador to China, former Iowa Governor Terry Branstad said he intends raising tough issues with Beijing. Asked if he considers China an ally or enemy, he said its a tough question, stressing its governments obligation to play by the rules - US ones, he failed to explain. On Monday, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said Chinas help on North Korea trumps trade. On Monday, he infamously called Trumps April 7 aggression on Syria after-dinner entertainment, adding it didnt cost the president anything - other than mostly civilian lives lost and flagrantly breaching international law, he didnt explain. Separately on Wednesday, Pyongyangs Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) published a commentary titled Refrain from making reckless remarks undermining the DPRK-China relations, criticizing Beijing for what it called a wanton violation of (the DPRKs) independent and legitimate rights, dignity and supreme interests. It defended the nations nuclear program as its right to self-defense. It criticized ignorant (Chinese) politicians and media persons for their views on this issue. (T)he DPRK(s) strategic interests have been repeatedly violated due to insincerity and betrayal on the part of its partner, Beijing, it said. Uncharacteristic tough talk about its most important ally! It said China should acknowledge in an honest manner that the DPRK has just contributed to protecting peace and security of China, foiling the US scheme for aggression by waging a hard fight in the frontline of the showdown with the US for more than seven decades, and thank the DPRK for it, adding: China had better ponder over the grave consequences to be entailed by its reckless act of chopping down the pillar of the DPRK-China relations. Pyongyang justifiably feels threatened by possible US aggression. It relies heavily on China as its most important strategic, political and economic partner. For its part, Beijing wants war on the Korean peninsula avoided. It wants normal relations with all nations. Its treading a delicate balance in dealings with Washington, Pyongyang and other regional countries - a major test for its diplomatic skills. Can war on the Korean peninsula be avoided? Trumps rage for belligerent confrontations isnt reassuring. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III." http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|