War, War, War See other War, War, War ArticlesTitle: South Korea’s defense minister suggests return of tactical U.S. nuclear weapons to South Korea (permanent positioning)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl ... 7-b9bc-b2f7903bab0d_story.html
Published: Sep 4, 2017
Author: aa
Post Date: 2017-09-04 16:37:09 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None Views: 212
Comments: 3
By Anna Fifield September 4 at 2:38 PM
SEOUL South Koreas defense minister on Monday said it was worth reviewing the redeployment of American tactical nuclear weapons to the Korean Peninsula to guard against the North, a step that analysts warn would sharply increase the risk of an accidental conflict.
As concern over Korea deepened following North Koreas huge nuclear test Sunday, Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the regime of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was begging for war.
Here in Seoul, the defense ministry warned that Pyongyang might be preparing to launch another missile into the Pacific Ocean, perhaps an intercontinental ballistic missile theoretically capable of reaching the mainland United States.
Earlier Monday, South Korean Defense Minister Song Young-moo said that he asked his American counterpart, Jim Mattis, during talks at the Pentagon last week for strategic assets like U.S. aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines and B-52 bombers to be sent to South Korea more regularly.
I told him that it would be good for strategic assets to be sent regularly to the Korean Peninsula and that some South Korean lawmakers and media are strongly pushing for tactical nuclear weapons [to be redeployed], Song told a parliamentary hearing on North Koreas nuclear test, without disclosing Mattiss response.
A poll that YTN, a cable news channel, commissioned in August found that 68 percent of respondents said they supported bringing tactical nuclear weapons back to South Korea.
The redeployment of tactical nuclear weapons is an alternative worth a full review, Song said, echoing a position closely associated with conservatives in South Korea, not progressives like Moon, who was elected president in May after vowing to engage with North Korea.
But a growing number of policymakers in Seoul say that Guam is too far away and that, if it comes under attack from North Korea, South Korea cant wait the two-plus hours it would take American bombers to arrive from their base in the Pacific.
We need these strategic or tactical assets that can destroy North Koreas nuclear-capable missiles before they can inflict harm on us, said Chun Yung-woo, a former South Korean national security adviser.
Right now they can retaliate but by that time, tens of thousands of people might have been killed, Chun said. We need a first layer of offensive weapons stationed closer to North Koreas nuclear and missile sites.
Jon Wolfsthal, a nuclear expert who served on President Barack Obamas national security council, said that in the South Korean context, strategic assets were all about giving a tangible sense of reassurance to the government in Seoul.
South Korean officials have been asking for fighter jets and ballistic missile-equipped submarines to be based on the peninsula, and have long wanted B-1Bs and B-52s to land rather than just fly over all to give a sense of greater sense of commitment to South Korea.
But there are good logistical reasons why that cant happen, said Wolfsthal. For one, South Korea doesnt have airstrips long enough for big, heavy B-52s, and second, the U.S. does not want its high-tech fighter jets sitting within North Korean artillery range.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/south-koreas-defense-minister-raises-the-idea-of-bringing-back-tactical-us-nuclear-weapons/2017/09/04/7a468314-9155-11e7-b9bc-b2f7903bab0d_story.html Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
|