[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

mRNA Vaccines Have Destroyed Immune Systems of Millions. Renowned Toxicologist

Insane MASSACRE in NIKOLAEV: RUSSIA Attacked 'OCEAN' Shipyard full of FRENCH Soldiers and Officers

“It’s Demonic” - Candace Goes All In on Epstein and Israel

The Secret Payments That Keep Global Ransomware Attacks Going

The Whopping Lie Behind Huge, New Pension Liability Imposed By Springfield On Chicago

Families Are Fascist

"Operation Gladio is Alive and Well" NATO"s secret terrorist army EXPOSED

White Swan Collapse Underway: Ed Dowd Warns 50% Stock Crash

To Kill An Operation Mockingbird: Tulsi Goes To War With The CIA's Propaganda Yobbos

Huge Drug And Weapons Haul In French Polynesia Echoes Kash Patel's Warnings

⚠️ALERT: TRUMP HAS ACTIVATED 11.3 – Law Of War Manual

IDF Soldier: “We Were ORDERED To Stand Down On October 7th!”

Michael Snyder: The New York Declaration” Could Potentially Change Everything

Hillary Clinton calls for the repeal of Section 230 so that platforms can moderate Americans' speech.

Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans - Outrage AI Parody Song

Alarming Seismic Instability Along The East Coast, The New Madrid Fault Zone And The West Coast

Whitney Webb: "What's Happening Is Deeper Than Blackmail"

Matt Taibbi: The New York Times Can't Stop Sucking

Canada is now an Anti-Christian Country? When did this happen?

Dr Horse Predicts Food Prices Might Double in 2026

Krasheninnikov Volcano Erupts for the First Time in 600 Years — and It May Be Linkd to a Massive Earthquake

Shocking Chart Exposes America's "Civilizational Crisis"; A Nation In Freefall Without Immediate Course Correction

Watch: Sydney Sweeney Goes 'John Wick-Style' With Handgun

Sen. Blackburn To Introduce Bills To Root Out 'Embedded' Foreign Interest

China Builds a Gold-Based Alternative to the Dollar System, Modeled on Dollar Architecture

Why the U.S. Buys So Much Nuclear Fuel From Russia | WSJ

Orbán Says Hungary, Poland, Slovakia & Czechs Can Block EU Budget With United Front

What if you drink Water at Night?

Since 2/2021 we have added 5.89 million to this survey which is 19.6% growth. Disaster!

Trump Admin Saves Jobs, Kicks 1500 Non-English-Speaking Truckers Off the Road


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: South Korea’s defense minister suggests return of tactical U.S. nuclear weapons to South Korea (permanent positioning)
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl ... 7-b9bc-b2f7903bab0d_story.html
Published: Sep 4, 2017
Author: aa
Post Date: 2017-09-04 16:37:09 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 223
Comments: 3

By Anna Fifield
September 4 at 2:38 PM

 SEOUL — South Korea’s defense minister on Monday said it was worth reviewing the redeployment of American tactical nuclear weapons to the Korean Peninsula to guard against the North, a step that analysts warn would sharply increase the risk of an accidental conflict.

As concern over Korea deepened following North Korea’s huge nuclear test Sunday, Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the regime of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was “begging for war.”

Here in Seoul, the defense ministry warned that Pyongyang might be preparing to launch another missile into the Pacific Ocean, perhaps an intercontinental ballistic missile theoretically capable of reaching the mainland United States.

 Earlier Monday, South Korean Defense Minister Song Young-moo said that he asked his American counterpart, Jim Mattis, during talks at the Pentagon last week for strategic assets like U.S. aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines and B-52 bombers to be sent to South Korea more regularly.

“I told him that it would be good for strategic assets to be sent regularly to the Korean Peninsula and that some South Korean lawmakers and media are strongly pushing for tactical nuclear weapons [to be redeployed],” Song told a parliamentary hearing on North Korea’s nuclear test, without disclosing Mattis’s response.

A poll that YTN, a cable news channel, commissioned in August found that 68 percent of respondents said they supported bringing tactical nuclear weapons back to South Korea.

“The redeployment of tactical nuclear weapons is an alternative worth a full review,” Song said, echoing a position closely associated with conservatives in South Korea, not progressives like Moon, who was elected president in May after vowing to engage with North Korea.

But a growing number of policymakers in Seoul say that Guam is too far away and that, if it comes under attack from North Korea, South Korea can’t wait the two-plus hours it would take American bombers to arrive from their base in the Pacific.

We need these strategic or tactical assets that can destroy North Korea’s nuclear-capable missiles before they can inflict harm on us,” said Chun Yung-woo, a former South Korean national security adviser.

“Right now they can retaliate but by that time, tens of thousands of people might have been killed,” Chun said. “We need a first layer of offensive weapons stationed closer to North Korea’s nuclear and missile sites.”

Jon Wolfsthal, a nuclear expert who served on President Barack Obama’s national security council, said that in the South Korean context, “strategic assets” were all about giving “a tangible sense of reassurance” to the government in Seoul.

South Korean officials have been asking for fighter jets and ballistic missile-equipped submarines to be based on the peninsula, and have long wanted B-1Bs and B-52s to land rather than just fly over — all to give a sense of greater sense of commitment to South Korea.

But there are good logistical reasons why that can’t happen, said Wolfsthal. For one, South Korea doesn’t have airstrips long enough for big, heavy B-52s, and second, the U.S. does not want its high-tech fighter jets sitting within North Korean artillery range.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/south-koreas-defense-minister-raises-the-idea-of-bringing-back-tactical-us-nuclear-weapons/2017/09/04/7a468314-9155-11e7-b9bc-b2f7903bab0d_story.html

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

S. Korea is capable. They should stop relying on the USA and, in fact, they should kick the USA out. Instead they should develop their own defense system including nuclear weapons.

DWornock  posted on  2017-09-04   16:55:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: DWornock (#1)

S. Korea is capable. They should stop relying on the USA and, in fact, they should kick the USA out. Instead they should develop their own defense system including nuclear weapons.

================================================

I agree 100%.

In fact, early in Trump's campaign, he gained many votes by saying he would do exactly just that - PULL OUT OF SOUTH KOREA.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2017-09-04   16:56:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#2)

North Korea's core goal is the destruction of the South Korean state

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2017-09-18   8:51:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]