[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

‘Knucklehead’: Tim Walz returns to Minnesota ‘defeated'

Study Confirms the Awesome Destructive Power of Sugar in Utero Originally published via Armageddon Prose:

Ukraine mobilizing mentally challenged and deaf people lawmaker

COL. Douglas Macgregor : Trump and Netanyahu At Crossroads

.': Parisians Revolt Against Israeli Minister's Visit As Riots Grip Amsterdam

US Confirms Israel Will Face No Consequences for Not Improving Aid Situation in Gaza

Judge rules AstraZeneca, other COVID jab makers NOT immune from injury claims for breach of contract

Israel knew October 7th was going to happen

One of the World’s Richest Men is Moving to America After Trump’s Landslide Victory

Taiwan has a better voting system than America

Donald Trump on Tuesday nominated veteran, author, and Fox News host Pete Hegseth as the Secretary of Defense

"Warrior For Truth & Honesty" - Trump Names John Ratcliffe As CIA Director

"The Manhattan Project" Of Our Time: Musk And Vivek Ramaswamy To Head Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

Trump, Rogan and French Fries at MsDonalds

President Trump wants a 10% cap on all credit card interest rates

Senator Ted Cruz STUNS the Entire Congress With This POWERFUL Speech (On the Border)

Kash Patel, Trump’s top choice for CIA Director, wants to immediately release classified

The £4 supplement that could slash blood pressure - reducing stroke, dementia and heart attack risk

RFK Jr. to be involved in oversight of health and agriculture departments under second Trump admin

​​​​​​​"Keep Grinding": Elon Musk's America PAC Will Continue Anti-Soros Push Ahead Of Special Elections & Midterms

Johnny B Goode

Russian Hypersonic Advances Remain Beyond Western Reach

US Preps for War vs China, Dusts-Off Deserted WWII Air Bases

Spain on high alert as deadly storms loom: new flood risks in Barcelona, Majorca, Ibiza.

U.S. Publication Foreign Policy Says NATO Knows Ukraine Is Losing The War

Red Lobster and TGI Fridays are closing. Heres whats moving in

The United Nations is again warning of imminent famine in northern Gaza.

Israeli Drone Attack Targets Aid Distribution Center in Syria

Trump's new Cabinet picks, a Homan tribute, and Lizzo's giant toddler hand [Livestream in progress]

Russia and Iran Officially Link Their National Banking Systems


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: George W. Bush: The conservative's worst nightmare - Bruce Bartlett
Source: http://fredericksburg.com
URL Source: http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/032006/03052006/171752
Published: Mar 5, 2006
Author: By Bruce Bartlett
Post Date: 2006-03-06 03:45:47 by Uncle Bill
Keywords: conservatives, nightmare, Bartlett
Views: 153
Comments: 8

George W. Bush: The conservative's worst nightmare?

Bush has let down true conservatives in the GOP

The Free Lance-Star
By Bruce Bartlett
March 5, 2006

Last week I published a new book, "Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy." A lot of my friends are not happy with me for writing it, and I have been embraced by a number of people on the left whom I would ordinarily consider my political enemies. Both are mistaken about why I wrote the book and what I hope to accomplish with it.

Some of my former friends on the right have attacked me as an opportunist who sold out his party and his president to get a best-seller. They would not think so if they knew that I started this project knowing that I would probably lose my job with a think tank closely allied with the White House, which I did. My advance on the book was less than the salary I was making, so if I am an opportunist, I'm a pretty poor one.

My new friends on the left are, of course, delighted to find someone on the right who is articulating a critique of George W. Bush. But if they read the book, they will find that my criticism bears nothing in common with theirs.

Just because I find fault with a president from my party doesn't mean I've switched sides. On the contrary, I wrote the book in order to help my side win.

My basic argument is that Bush has enacted policies contrary to conservative principles on too many occasions. Some of those that disturb me the most are these:

No Child Left Behind Act: Republicans used to campaign on the idea of abolishing the Department of Education. Bush greatly increased its budget, despite a paucity of evidence showing that educational outcomes are correlated with educational spending.

No wonder Sen. Ted Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts and Congress's leading liberal, loved it. The "reforms" Bush got in return were far too modest to justify his support for this legislation--and it hasn't even helped him politically. All we ever hear from the education lobby are demands for even more spending.

Campaign finance reform: I don't know a single conservative who doesn't think that this legislation is a fundamental violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution, the Supreme Court's ruling to the contrary notwithstanding.

Personally, I consider that Bush violated his oath to defend the Constitution by signing this monstrosity, especially since he said during the 2000 campaign that he would veto such a bill.

Medicare Drug Benefit: This was really the final straw for me. The Medicare system was already $50 trillion in debt in 2003, and we should have been looking for ways to cut its spending, not increase it. The unfunded liability of just the drug benefit added another $18 trillion to that debt, an increase of 40 percent.

Sooner or later, this legislation is going to cause a massive tax increase, in my opinion and that of many budget experts.

The book details many other areas where I feel that Bush's policies are totally contrary to Ronald Reagan's. Readers can judge for themselves whether my indictment holds water.

The reaction I have received thus far suggests that a lot of conservatives share my concerns and believe that Bush has done deep damage to the conservative movement and the Republican Party.

The last time a Republican president--Richard Nixon--sold out his party's core beliefs, it led to huge losses for his party, in 1974 and 1976. I think Republicans are deluding themselves if they believe that gerrymandering of the House of Representatives and millions of lobbyist dollars will protect them from big losses this November.

It's worth remembering that Republicans took control of Congress in 1994 not because more Republicans voted, but because fewer Democrats did. They, like many Republicans today, were dispirited by a president of their party who took their loyalty for granted.

I think Republicans are also wrong to assume that Democrats will always behave as stupidly as they have lately. One of these days, they are going to get their act together and stop nominating lousy candidates who run awful campaigns. Once Republicans lose the votes of those who are only voting against the Democrats, not for them, they will be in serious political trouble.

I wrote my book so that Republicans and conservatives can start a debate about the future of the party and the movement. If we wait until 2008, it will be much too late.

It is important for potential Republican presidential nominees to start thinking about and articulating a vision for the future now. And Republican voters need to ask themselves whether they are satisfied with the direction George W. Bush has led them, or whether they would really prefer to get back to the policies and philosophy of Ronald Reagan.



“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it’s just a goddamned piece of paper!” - George W. Bush

To: beyond the sea

Bartlett better make his fortune off this book, because he's finished in the GOP.

3 posted on 03/04/2006 7:30:03 PM PST by sinkspur
Source (2 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Uncle Bill (#0)

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-03-06   5:21:33 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Uncle Bill (#0)

I totally agree with Bartlett's premise and have stated the same with no knowledge of Bartlett on other threads and on LP against the (grin). BTW, you may notice I loathe NeoCons and profiteering (grin)s.

Republican insiders, the base, conservatives, sat out the Virginia gubernatorial elections because the Republican candidate would not publicly state his opposition to illegal aliens, while assuring insiders in personal written correspondence. Not good enough. The Republican vote was 'allowed' to stay at home as an object lesson. Was anyone listening?

Conservatives who are the base in the Republican Party abhor NeoCon treachery, greed, leftist alliegence and disloyalty the The United States.

Bartlett has simply re-stated a premise that has been in the forefront of Republican actions and planning for over a year now.

Brer'  posted on  2006-03-06   8:00:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Uncle Bill (#0)

It is important for potential Republican presidential nominees to start thinking about and articulating a vision for the future now.

There is simply no way a PUB can win if she or he campaigns on the issue of smaller govt and/or cutting perks for those on the dole.

The largest bloc of voters are greedy seniors who simply don't care if America collapses, as long as they receive their treasury checks. Whoever promises the most to them will win.

I pity those "real conservatives" who insist on making love to the corpse of the GOP. You may as well go to www.lewrockwell.com and visit the museum of conservatism, because you'll never see the values that you cherish embraced by the voters.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-03-06   8:35:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Uncle Bill (#0)

What a tangled web we weave, when we first begin to apologize for born-agin' Zionazi mafia dons.


John 7:13

Tauzero  posted on  2006-03-06   8:47:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#1)

BTTT

Uncle Bill  posted on  2006-03-13   20:22:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Uncle Bill, BeAChooser (#5)

9/11 Information Center

http://www.wanttoknow.info/911i nformation

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-03-13   20:29:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#6)

I wish Americans would watch this from your link. Thanks, and God bless!

Uncle Bill  posted on  2006-03-13   20:42:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, christine, robin, OKCSubmariner (#6)

You know, paybacks are hell.

Bruce Bartlett - "Just because there will be no change in party control does not offer protection. I know this from personal experience in the Reagan-to- Bush transition in 1988. The Bush people were just as brutal about firing the Reagan people as Michael Dukakis would have been had he won. Indeed, in many cases, Reagan appointees were fired even when there was no Bush person available to fill the slot immediately. I believe that President Bush badly mishandled his transition. Every Reagan appointee -- among which I was one -- knew they would likely be replaced eventually, but no one imagined the blood bath that occurred almost instantly after Jan. 20, 1989. It left very bad feelings that not only contributed to Bush's loss in 1992"

Uncle Bill  posted on  2006-03-13   21:58:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]