[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Niger Villagers: US Soldier Was Bound and Executed
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://news.antiwar.com/2017/11/10/ ... oldier-was-bound-and-executed/
Published: Nov 11, 2017
Author: Jason Ditz
Post Date: 2017-11-11 06:28:52 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 635
Comments: 33

Slain Soldier Shot in the Back of His Head

Pentagon claims that no US troops were left behind, let alone survivors, in the October 4 Niger ambush, are falling apart with growing comments from both Nigerien officials and villagers from the area, who reported finding the body of Sgt. La David Johnson. Sgt. La David Johnson

After coming under ambush, the US lost contact with four soldiers, and evacuated without them when France sent helicopters. Three of the four were found dead not long thereafter when they returned. Sgt. Johnson was found days later.

And locals say Sgt. Johnson was almost certainly alive when the US left, as the body they found had his arms tied up and was shot in the back of the head, suggesting he was caught by militants and ultimately executed.

Secretary of Defense James Mattis had previously insisted that this was not possible because the US military never leaves people behind. Questions continue to grow about the Pentagon’s story, but the Pentagon says their own investigation is still ongoing, and is urging patience until they finalize it, suggesting that for now everything they’ve said so far is little more than a bunch of trial balloons to see what the public will buy.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#2. To: Ada (#0)

Will someone tell me why the US military is there and in 1,000 other overseas countries??????

Darkwing  posted on  2017-11-11   9:29:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Darkwing (#2)

Will someone tell me why the US military is there and in 1,000 other overseas countries??????

Doing what we have been doing since 1945, maintaining some semblance of law and order world wide.

Cynicom  posted on  2017-11-11   9:35:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Cynicom (#3)

Doing what we have been doing since 1945, maintaining some semblance of law and order world wide.

We sow chaos, discord, lawlessnes, and disorder wherever we send our unfortunate troops.

We are the friends of degenerate monarchies, head choppers and dope dealers everywhere.

randge  posted on  2017-11-11   20:34:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: randge (#15)

I'd add jew-bankers to your most-favored list.

Lod  posted on  2017-11-11   20:47:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Lod, randge, Phant2000, All (#16)

History lesson for those interested.

WWI...

WWI shooting stopped in 1918, Treaty of Versailles signed in June 1919...The world was at peace, Johnny went marching home and the world was at peace...FOR EVER AFTER??????

Right????

Wrong...

Before the Treaty was signed...The German General Staff had drawn up the next invasion route into France via the Ardennes Forest. That route would be taken as planned by a man named Hitler that was in 1918 a Corporal in the German Army.

In 1919 our ally Japan, drew up the design for the worlds first aircraft carrier, an offensive weapon. Carriers could go only one way from Japan that was SOUTH. So, Congress and military started process of arming Corregidore Island.

In 1919, Britain starts building aircraft carrier.

And in 1919 world jewry is in Paris looking for a future Communist leader of their choce, among Chinese students. They found Mao.

Note everyone in this arena is in it for the long haul, except Johnny who went marching home.

The rest is relatively recent history.

Cynicom  posted on  2017-11-11   22:03:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Cynicom (#21)

Whatever.

If we are going toe to toe with the Russians aand the Chinese, we not playing the game in our interest but in that of another party.

We are playing bad hand after bad hand, and it scarcely bears watching much longer.

randge  posted on  2017-11-11   22:13:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: randge (#22)

Whatever.

Such is not par with your normal reasoned observations.

A cancer has been eating away at this country since the Civil War.Senator Tillman put the name on it a hundred years ago. His words to the Senate were, that in the future this country would regret ever having allowed entry to two races of people, namely blacks and jews.

Take a look at our current state of the Union, happenstance that jews and blacks are doing their best to bring down this country?

First, Russia was taken down, largest country in the world, Germany was next but effort was foiled by Hitler. Next China was taken down, also from within, like Russia. Now is our turn to go down and go down we will, from within is the current scenario. Like Russia, like China, all happenstance?

We are broke living on borrowed money and time.

One of three ways down, financial collapse, civil war number two or World War III.

Cynicom  posted on  2017-11-12   4:41:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Cynicom (#24)

financial collapse, civil war number two or World War III

Financial collapse seems more imminent, especially since Obummer gave our spendthrift CONgress everything they asked for. Not once did he use line item veto or amendatory veto powers.

Briefly this morning, I was watching Al Sharpton on Faux News while he railed away at gun owners and highlighted the recent shooting at a church in Texas. He did have a guest from Liberty University who tried his best to deflect what Sharpton was proposing, and that was the disarming of Americans.

Of course we know that Obummer wanted the U.N. to control our guns. I was talking with an old boy out here at Wal Mart. I told him, "Obama wants the U.N. to control our guns." He said, "We'll never give up our guns. That's the way we are." There are a lot of them just like that out there.

If law abiding Americans give up their guns, only the outlaws will still have them. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-11-12   8:51:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

#26. To: BTP Holdings (#25)

Financial collapse seems more imminent,

Alabama told their people that if they had no children and were able to work, they would no longer receive food stamps, UNLESS THEY WORKED. In Trumps first year a million and a half freeloaders stopped taking food stamps.

Cynicom  posted on  2017-11-12 09:06:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: BTP Holdings (#25) (Edited)

Obummer gave our spendthrift CONgress everything they asked for. Not once did he use line item veto or amendatory veto powers.


Wikipedia excerpts:


Veto | U.S. states, veto powers, and override authority

many states [44] allow the governor [of their Executive branch] to exercise specialty veto authority to strike or revise portions of a bill without striking the whole bill. [2 examples below]

Amendatory veto: Allows a governor to amend bills that have been passed by the [State] legislature. Revisions are subject to confirmation or rejection by the [State] legislature.

Line item veto: Allows a governor to remove specific sections of a bill (usually only spending bills) that has been passed by the [State] legislature. Deletions can be overridden by the [State] legislature.


Line-item veto in the United States || State Governors [+ Mayor of D.C.] || U.S. Line-Item Veto Act of 1996 || Subsequent developments [2006] || U.S. Line Item Veto Re-Enactment Activity of 2009 || Debate - Wikipedia

Synopsis: According to Louis Fisher in The Politics of Shared Power, Ronald Reagan said to Congress in his 1986 State of the Union address, "Tonight I ask you to give me what forty-three governors have: Give me a line-item veto this year. Give me the authority to veto waste, and I'll take the responsibility, I'll make the cuts, I'll take the heat." Bill Clinton echoed the request in his State of the Union address in 1995. Congress attempted to grant this power to [him] by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 to control "pork barrel spending", but in 1998 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Line-Item Veto Act of 1996 by the federal legislature to be unconstitutional, in violation of the Presentment Clause. As a result, it appears that a federal line-item veto would only be possible through amendment of the US Constitution. Prior to that ruling, President Clinton applied the line-item veto to the federal budget 82 times. Some argue that it could even give the President de facto legislative authority in altering the law which could violate the principles, and perhaps even the letter, of the Constitution.

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-11-13 17:29:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]