[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
World News See other World News Articles Title: Foreign Agents Registration Act Marked by History of Politicization, Selective Enforcement The singling out of RT for treatment as a foreign agent while entities such as Al Jazeera and AIPAC are ignored reflects a history of selective enforcement and the politicization of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Though it garnered renewed interest thanks to Robert Muellers investigation of the Trump administration and the rise of Russiagate hysteria, the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) of 1938 has been irregularly enforced over the course of its 79-year history. Despite nearly eight decades on the books, the law has resulted in only a handful of prosecutions and a single conviction, suggesting that the governments enforcement of the law has been lax to say the least. Originally intended to counter pro-Nazi lobbyists active in the United States in the lead-up to World War II, FARA requires that all agents operating domestically on behalf of a foreign principal that is, a non- U.S. entity operating abroad must register with the U.S. Department of Justice. Those who register must disclose all of their activities and finances to the federal government, including confidential data and the personal information of employees. There are, however, many exceptions to those who must register, such as diplomats, artists, priests, and any news or press service organized under the laws of the United States. In other words, a law firm lobbying for a foreign government or company must register while news services funded by foreign governments like Al Jazeera, France24, BBC or Deutsche Welle are generally off the hook. This last exception is why the U.S. Department of Justices announcement on Thursday that the TV news channel Russia Today (RT), which receives its funding from the Russian government and a consortium of Russian banks, must register as a foreign agent came as a surprise to many. RT, which has been active in the U.S. since 2005, is suddenly being asked to register as a foreign agent under FARA, only after political pressure against Russian entities and perceived state actors reached a boiling point. To be sure, the U.S. government has toyed with the idea of shutting down RT in recent years. In 2015, the then-chief of the U.S. Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), Andrew Lack, responsible for overseeing U.S.-funded news agencies such as Voice of America and Radio Liberty equated RTs news coverage to terrorist groups such as Daesh (Islamic State) and Boko Haram. A week later, then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland discussed curbing the channels operations in response to its coverage of the U.S.- backed coup in Ukraine. FARA enforcement selective and inconsistent Al-Jazeera America editorial newsroom staff preparing for their first broadcast in New York. (AP/Bebeto Matthews) Al-Jazeera America editorial newsroom staff preparing for their first broadcast in New York. (AP/Bebeto Matthews) Upon RTs imminent registration as a foreign agent, it would be one of the few media outlets to do so in FARAs history, joining a few state-funded outlets such as Japans NHK and the China Daily newspaper. However, many other state-funded outlets with operations similar to RT continue to operate within the United States without the designation and accompanying scrutiny, of acting as a foreign agent. This has held true even in cases where use of the news outlet by a foreign government to exert influence is well-documented. For instance, the international news channel Al Jazeera funded entirely by the government of Qatar has never been forced to register as a foreign agent, despite operating a U.S.-focused branch and even though leaked State Department cables from 2009 noted that the U.S. government has long viewed Al Jazeera to be an instrument of Qatari influence. The cable also notes that the government of Qatar regularly uses Al Jazeera as a bargaining tool to repair relationships with other countries, particularly those soured by Al Jazeeras broadcasts, including the United States. In addition to Al Jazeera, numerous other state-funded news outlets function within the United States but are not required to register as foreign agents, even when they mirror the bias of their own governments. For example, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is funded by the U.K. Foreign Office. In its coverage of the Syrian conflict, the BBC has consistently supported the foreign-funded Syrian opposition in its reporting, including fawning coverage of the White Helmets group, which like the BBC is largely funded by the U.K. Foreign Office. However, BBCs Syria coverage fit with the U.S. narrative at the time, unlike RTs Syria coverage. Further illustrating the inconsistencies in the governments application of FARA to foreign entities is the fact that some individuals and organizations that specifically lobby the government on behalf of foreign governments have successfully eluded registering under FARA despite past government attempts to make them do so. For example, the Podesta Group, the lobbying firm founded by Hillary Clintons former campaign chair John Podesta and his brother Tony, failed to register under FARA while lobbying on behalf of the Russian government-owned company Uranium One, despite having collected $180,000 in lobbying fees in 2012, 2014 and 2015. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu waves to members of the audience before speaking at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference in Washington, Monday, March 2, 2015. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu waves to members of the audience before speaking at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference in Washington, Monday, March 2, 2015. (AP/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) Another relevant example of an unregistered group lobbying on behalf of a foreign government is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which describes itself as Americas Pro-Israel Lobby essentially acknowledging that it lobbies the U.S. government on behalf of the Israeli government. According to its website, AIPAC urges all members of Congress to support Israel through foreign aid, government partnerships, [and] joint anti-terrorism efforts. Despite this, AIPAC has avoided registering as a foreign agent for 55 years with the last attempt to compel it to register as such taking place in 1962-63, when the Kennedy administration sought to force its predecessor, the American Zionist Council, to register and open its finances to federal scrutiny. Since then, AIPAC has been instrumental in ensuring the continuation of billions of dollars in U.S. aid to Israel annually despite Israels strong economy. It has also engaged in espionage. For instance, after receiving classified presidential directives and other documents pertaining to Americas Iran policy from a U.S. colonel in 2005, AIPAC then forwarded that highly sensitive information to Israeli government officials as well as to select members of the U.S. media. Given the inconsistencies of treatment, as well as the milieu of anti-Russia hysteria that has become rapidly normalized in U.S. politics over the last year, the DOJs decision to force RT to register as a foreign agent seems to be the latest indication that the Trump administration is bowing to political pressure to punish Russian entities and businesses over the governments alleged meddling in last years election an allegation that has yet to be proven. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
AIPAC is an unregistered foreign agent of the Israeli government. But they will never be held to account since the Joos control Congress and defacto the entire government. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|