[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cancer Starves When You Eat These Surprising Foods | Dr. William Li

Megyn Kelly Gets Fiery About Trump's Choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General

Over 100 leftist groups organize coalition to rebuild morale and resist MAGA after Trump win

Mainstream Media Cries Foul Over Musk Meeting With Iran Ambassador...On Peace

Vaccine Stocks Slide Further After Trump Taps RFK Jr. To Lead HHS; CNN Outraged

Do Trump’s picks Rubio, Huckabee signal his approval of West Bank annexation?

Pac-Man

Barron Trump

Big Pharma-Sponsored Vaccinologist Finally Admits mRNA Shots Are Killing Millions

US fiscal year 2025 opens with a staggering $257 billion October deficit$3 trillion annual pace.

His brain has been damaged by American processed food.

Iran willing to resolve doubts about its atomic programme with IAEA

FBI Official Who Oversaw J6 Pipe Bomb Probe Lied About Receiving 'Corrupted' Evidence “We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers—not purposely by them, right,” former FBI official Steven D’Antuono told the House Judiciary Committee in a

Musk’s DOGE Takes To X To Crowdsource Talent: ‘80+ Hours Per Week,’

Female Bodybuilders vs. 16 Year Old Farmers

Whoopi Goldberg announces she is joining women in their sex abstinence

Musk secretly met with Iran's UN envoy NYT

D.O.G.E. To have a leaderboard of most wasteful government spending

In Most U.S. Cities, Social Security Payments Last Married Couples Just 19 Days Or Less

Another major healthcare provider files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The Ukrainians have put Tulsi Gabbard on their Myrotvorets kill list

Sen. Johnson unveils photo of Biden-appointed crossdressers after reporters rage over Gaetz nomination

sted on: Nov 15 07:56 'WE WOULD LOSE' War with Iran: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

Israeli minister says Palestinians should have no voting or land rights

The Case For Radical Changes In US National Defense: Col. Douglas Macgregor

Biden's Regulations Legacy Costs Taxpayers $1.8 Trillion, 800 Times Larger than Trumps

Israeli Soldiers are BUSTED!

Al Sharpton and MSNBC Caught in Major Journalism Ethics Fail in Accepting Kamala's Campaign Money

ABC News in panic mode to balance The View after anti-Trump panel misses voter sentiment

The Latest Biden Tax Bomb


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: University to Investigate Fusion Study
Source: Science (Journal of the AAAS) via NYTIMES
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/08/s ... ef4e348&ei=5043&partner=EXCITE
Published: Mar 8, 2006
Author: KENNETH CHANG
Post Date: 2006-03-08 12:47:03 by Brer'
Keywords: Investigate, University, Fusion
Views: 83
Comments: 10

March 8, 2006 University to Investigate Fusion Study By KENNETH CHANG Purdue University has opened an investigation into "extremely serious" concerns regarding the research of a professor who said he had produced nuclear fusion in a tabletop experiment, the university announced yesterday.

Fusion is the process the sun uses to produce heat and light, and scientists led by Rusi P. Taleyarkhan, a professor of nuclear engineering at Purdue, said they were able to achieve the same feat by blasting a container of liquid solvent with strong ultrasonic vibrations.

The vibrations, they said, collapsed tiny gas bubbles in the liquid, heating them to millions of degrees, hot enough to initiate fusion. If true, the phenomenon, often called sonofusion or bubble fusion, could have far-reaching applications, including the generation of energy.

The research first appeared in 2002 in the journal Science, but controversy had erupted even before publication. Dr. Taleyarkhan, then a senior scientist at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, reported the detection of neutrons, which are the telltale signs of fusion, but two other scientists at Oak Ridge, using their own detectors, said they saw no signs of neutrons.

Dr. Taleyarkhan, who joined the Purdue faculty in 2003, and his colleagues have published two additional papers in major physics journals, amid the continuing skepticism of other scientists. No other scientists have been able to reproduce the findings.

The university began a review of the research and the accusations last week, Sally Mason, the university provost, said in a statement. "The research claims involved are very significant," Dr. Mason said, "and the concerns expressed are extremely serious."

Dr. Mason said that the review was being conducted by Purdue's Office of the Vice President of Research and that the results would be announced publicly.

Dr. Taleyarkhan did not return phone calls or respond to an e-mail message seeking comment.

Meanwhile, Brian Naranjo, a graduate student at the University of California, Los Angeles, said his analysis of data from the last scientific paper that was published by Dr. Taleyarkhan's group showed a chance of less than one in 10 million that the emission pattern could have been generated by fusion.

Instead, Mr. Naranjo said that the pattern of particles seen in the experiment much more closely matched that given off by californium, a radioactive element that is used in Dr. Taleyarkhan's laboratory. With $350,000 from the Defense Department, Seth J. Putterman, a professor of physics at U.C.L.A. and the thesis adviser to Mr. Naranjo, has tried to build a replica of Dr. Taleyarkhan's apparatus and has not seen any signs of fusion.

Dr. Putterman said he told Dr. Taleyarkhan of the calculations last week on a visit to Purdue. "He didn't have any clear answers," Dr. Putterman said. "From my perspective, his answers were not satisfactory."

Californium is present in Dr. Taleyarkhan's laboratory, stored in a closet about 15 feet from the experiment — close enough to generate the results reported in Dr. Taleyarkhan's paper if it had been stored improperly.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Purdue University has opened an investigation into "extremely serious" concerns regarding the research of a professor who said he had produced nuclear fusion in a tabletop experiment, the university announced yesterday.

LMAO....how soon they forget!! Try ANY schtick for a $$buck$$.

Junk Science is reported far more than real science.

This is Junk Science and has been for 30 years. It pops up whenever someone like Science ( Korean Stem Cell scandals, japanese scandals ) or the New York Times needs a yellow press tactic to suck in tyhe gullible.

Brer'  posted on  2006-03-08   12:50:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brer' (#1)

Junk Science is reported far more than real science.

Link?

Or is this from a post you read over on FR.

Wingnuts don't do very well with objective investigation. This does give rise to a bias against science and non-controlled media.

Of course, you can go to FR and the will explain to you that it is all actually due to a looney conspiracy within a looney conspiracy within a looney conspiracy within a looney conspiracy. That is really what is causing the wingnut victimhood.

If that doesn't work, your info sources will tell you it's all Clinton's fault. Without any rational support of course.

I note that's what Rush just did today. He just told the goobers that Clinton was really responsible for the ports deal. Of course, he offered no facts in support, but the goobs don't like facts anyway. Hate rhetoric and boogeymen are enough.

...  posted on  2006-03-08   12:59:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brer' (#1)

Junk Science is reported far more than real science.

Extraordinary -- and silly appearing --- claims require exraordinary proof.

...  posted on  2006-03-08   13:00:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: ... (#2)

LOL are you as stupid as you seem?? or just want to try and pull my chain?

Brer'  posted on  2006-03-08   13:01:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Brer' (#4)

LOL are you as stupid as you seem?? or just want to try and pull my chain?

When Badeye is caught bullshitting without any way to back up his claims he says "whatever" and hides.

Why don't you try that?

...  posted on  2006-03-08   13:02:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Brer' (#4)

Junk Science is reported far more than real science.

I am assuming you can't back this up and were just shooting your mouth off.

Correct?

...  posted on  2006-03-08   13:03:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: ... (#6)

Not in the MSM....which you are probably barely literate enough to have read to you.

Brer'  posted on  2006-03-08   13:05:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Brer' (#4)

LOL are you as stupid as you seem??

You are trying wingnut debate tactic number #3 on me here and I am wise to it.

"When exposed as a bullshitter, conduct a personal attack on the person who offered up the rational argument."

Try another disinfo tactic.

Changing subjects is s good one.

That's number four on the list.

...  posted on  2006-03-08   13:08:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Brer' (#7)

Not in the MSM....which you are probably barely literate enough to have read to you.

Move on to wingnut disruption tactic number four. You already tried number three, personal insults, and it didn't work

What you are saying here is that you have nothing but wingnut propaganda publications to back up your talking point.

(Are you surprised that the shills, and only the shills, support the talking point they inserted into your head?)

Thank you.

...  posted on  2006-03-08   13:11:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Brer' (#7)

You can't support anything in your belief structure can you?

It's all based upon gut reaction and talking points you have been fed by propaganda shills.

...  posted on  2006-03-08   13:14:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]