Title: Julian Assange is FREE! Trump and May arranged dropping of all charges. Source:
www.discussionist.com URL Source:https://www.discussionist.com/1014399981 Published:Jan 29, 2018 Author:Da Mann Post Date:2018-01-29 15:27:50 by randge Keywords:Assange, Liberation, Trump Views:116 Comments:4
Julian Assange is FREE! Trump and May arranged dropping of all charges.
WARNING! much of what is said here is speculation Synopsis: According to researcher Dr. Jerome Corsi, a British tribunal on Feb. will formally set Julian Assange free.
The new direction was apparently the result of President Trump’s meeting on Thursday with British Prime Minister Teresa May. The Tribunal meets on Feb. 6 and thereafter, Assange will be free to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London without fear of arrest.
Reuters reports that a spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) affirmed that a successful ruling on Feb. 6 by Chief Magistrate Emma Arbuthnot would allow Assange to walk free.
Ecuador announced on Jan. 11 that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had naturalized Assange as a citizen of that nation, and given him diplomatic status as well. That would give Assange a passport and the right to leave the UK under diplomatic immunity.
Ecuador’s Foreign Minister, Maria Fernanda Espinosa, in a 20-minute press conference announced that:
“Julian Assange was granted naturalization on Dec. 12, 2017.” The Bitcoin world recently circulated a rumor that either WikiLeaks or Assange has been given a gift of 4,000 Bitcoin – nearly 48 million dollars at today’s price.
However, this reporter has believed since Christmas Day that Assange had escaped with the help of President Trump on that day or the day before. I had been made aware of a rumor that US Special operators secreted Assange out of the Embassy and across the English Channel by boat. That day, a mysterious picture appeared on the Wikileaks site believed to be taken by Assange from deck of a 30-40-foot boat of a sunrise over the English Channel.
As for Trump helping Assange escape, even if Trump made the offer somehow, is it reasonable that Assange would trust him, or whomever Trump would send, enough to accept it? This is Assange who has zero trust of the CIA and is very cognizant of the tricks they play, especially since the two women who accused him so many years ago were reputed to be CIA agents. Assange has every reason not to trust any American president or asset that if he comes out of the Ecuador embassy, and got onto their boat or plane, he'd not be taken into captivity.
And if he is so close to being formally cleared of everything in just a few weeks, why would he risk making an escape now?
Note that it is reported that Trump's lawyers have argued in favor of Assange' right to publish classified material. This suggests that Assange won't be pursued by US justice - leaving him free rein to travel.
You can put any construction upon that news that you wish to.
"Your News Wire Reports: Trump’s attorneys argue Assange’s First Amendment right to publish In a motion filed with the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Dec. 29, 2017, in the case Roy Cockrum vs Donald J Trump for President, attorneys for President Trump argued that Julian Assange had a right under the First Amendment to publish the DNC and John Podesta emails, even if the emails were stolen The case was orchestrated by Project Democracy, a group run by former attorneys from the Obama administration, arguing that then former Trump campaign adviser Roger Stone had conspired with the Russians to publish the DNC and Podesta emails."
"In a 32-page motion defending the Trump Campaign, Michael A Carvin of the Jones Day law firm and the attorney of record representing President Trump, argued that the Trump campaign – and by inference Julian Assange at WikiLeaks – could not be held liable under the First Amendment for a disclosure of stolen information if the information published deals with “a matter of public interest” and the speaker was not “involved” in the theft In making the argument, Trump’s attorneys relied upon Bartnicki v Vopper 532 US."
To my knowledge, the only formal "charges" against JA were those of two Swedish skanks, which were later dropped.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Michael A Carvin of the Jones Day law firm and the attorney of record representing President Trump, argued that the Trump campaign – and by inference Julian Assange at WikiLeaks – could not be held liable under the First Amendment for a disclosure of stolen information if the information published deals with “a matter of public interest” and the speaker was not “involved” in the theft
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case relieving a media defendant of liability for broadcasting a taped conversation of a labor official talking to other union people about a teachers' strike. At trial, the parties stipulated that the taped conversation had been illegally recorded in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Nevertheless, the Court held the broadcast was not unlawful.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke