[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Activism See other Activism Articles Title: Moscow invades Mexico, citing Yucatan’s terrorism threat Moscow invades Mexico, citing Yucatan’s terrorism threat Consider the following scenario: It’s 1966 -- the height of the Cold War -- and the Soviet Union sends the Red Army 7,000 miles across the globe to gratuitously invade Mexico, entirely without provocation or credible cause. The illegal, immoral aggression is predicated on a preposterous lie about the Mexicans supposedly being an imminent, awful threat to Mother Russia. Moscow overthrows the Mexican government, uses controlled elections to install a puppet regime, and then proceeds to appropriate the hapless country’s oil wealth. In the course of the initial attack and the Mexican patriots’ resistance during the ensuing, hated occupation, tens of thousands of people are killed. All over the planet, huge protest demonstrations take place. A common placard at those angry gatherings is one that reads, “Leonid Brezhnev: The World’s Number One Terrorist.” In the neighboring United States, everyone is outraged. American conservatives, especially, are justifiably livid. They condemn the Soviet travesty, correctly comparing what’s occurred to Hitler’s fascist expansionism. Now, flash forward from an imaginary outrage too crazy to ever have possibly happened. We’re in 2006, and it’s the United States under George Bush that’s occupying Iraq, after a shock-and-awe aggression that blew to pieces not just vastly outgunned Iraqi defenders, but elderly men, terrified women, and small children as well. More than 100,000 of them died. The fabricated rationale for needlessly going to war has been thoroughly exposed as ridiculous. Documents exist showing exactly how Iraqi oil wealth is to be diverted into U.S. corporate coffers by duplicitous means. Collaborators and opportunists comprise the Quisling regime that Washington has installed, while those devoted to true Iraqi freedom and self-determination are gunned down by Marines, or tortured at Abu Ghraib. Angry protests sweep the world. Placards emblazoned with “George Bush: The World’s Number One Terrorist” crop up everywhere. In the United States, however, conservatives lavishly praise Bush’s wretched war. They drive SUVs and own oil company stock. While emitting hypocrisy like a volcano spews clouds of billowing ash. The Oppressed Become Oppressors Eight hundred Oglala Sioux from the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota are serving in Iraq. Unemployment at Pine Ridge exceeds 80 percent. Alcohol and drug abuse are epidemic. The general health and education status lags behind many Third World countries. I’ll often get panhandled on the streets by destitute souls without homes or food. They sleep under the freeway, and eat at a mission. Most are “Indians,” some of whom left Pine Ridge to try for better lives in the white man’s city. Meanwhile, others from the reservation are risking improvised explosive devices in Iraq to facilitate the same theft of someone else’s land and resources that made Native American existence a trail of tears to begin with. There are no tumbleweeds or coyotes in the badlands north of Baghdad, but otherwise it’s an old, familiar, sad story. When Will They Ever Learn? A young couple has their first, precious baby. With boundless love in their hearts, they watch as it grows, becoming a toddler, then a pre-schooler. It’s a treasured time of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and alphabet sing-a-longs on Sesame Street. Kindergarten follows, then later grades and real learning. Soon the child brings home books, reads stories, does math. Gold stars reward good performance. Mom and Dad are so proud. Middle school comes next, along with team sports. How great it is to be a kid having fun in America! In high school, first love and a first job bring new excitement to everyone. The child is doing well scholastically. College is on the horizon. Moisture streams down both parents’ faces as they watch a diploma being presented to the light of their lives at graduation. The child has grown into a young adult with great promise. Acting on a sincere sense of service, the graduate joins the National Guard. It’s only part-time duty, and it will bring the reward of helping the community during emergencies such as hurricanes or floods. But when the natural disasters arrive, an unnatural disaster keeps Guard members from being there to assist. A dishonest, malicious president has launched a dreadful war of choice in the Middle East. National Guard units are sent abroad for a lie about weapons of mass destruction that never existed. One by one, and increasingly in groups, young American Guardsmen and women start dying, the victims of people with guns and bombs who simply want foreign soldiers out of their sacred land. One day the front doorbell rings at the home of the youngster who was happily playing backyard games not that many years ago. Two men in uniforms tell the mother, who is trembling and weeping even before a single word is uttered, “We regret to inform you . . ." She screams. On the television in the living room, a smug, smirking man at a podium talks about “honoring those who’ve fallen” by “staying the course” until “complete victory” is achieved. But that can’t happen, for there is no honor in pursuing a misrepresented endeavor that’s destined to fail. In a few days, Mom and Dad will have their child’s entire life flash before their flowing eyes in the few moments it takes to lower a coffin six feet beneath a cemetery‘s manicured lawn. Meanwhile, across town, another young person prepares to leave for the battlefield. And at the local hospital, new parents beam as they marvel over their just-born infant. A muted radio on the bedside table plays an oldie from decades past: “When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn?Dennis Rahkonen of Superior, Wisconsin, urges everyone to help guarantee a decisive turnout for street protests marking the third anniversary of the Iraq war, on March 19. He can be reached at dennisr@cp.duluth.mn.us.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 77.
#4. To: robin (#0)
No, but Red China has Panama, Venezuela and Nicaragua. Do you think this is a laughing matter too?
nobody suggested that this is a laughing matter. and yet you accused someone of it. Why did you do that? do you support this war against Iraq? Are you glad that so many American soldiers and others are being destroyed through depleted uranium? Do you support our troops? Do you want to bring our troops home? Do you support national sovereignty? Shouldn't a democratically electred government make the laws and the policies of the American nation? And isn't it true that the same is true for Iraq?
As long as there is a single US soldier, sailor or airman in Iraq I support doing whatever is necessary for them to complete whatever missions are assigned them. Anything to the contrary including your persistent bitching just kills Americans. Let them do their job and stay out of their way. After it is over you can rant, demonstrate naked, move to Medina or change things as you see fit. I did not notice the rabid stance of any of you left wing protesters when Christians were being slaughtered in Yugoslavia. Your boy Klintoonia was at it and you loved it. The hypocrisy reeks. Besides Yugoslavia saved lives, islam MURDERED 3000 people burned to death slowly, torches jumping from a quarter mile high to go splat or ground up between girders. Whine about the poor poor muslims all you want...and go join them if you like....after our troops have finished what they signed on, proudly swore, and were trained to do.
dear god, you really believe the government's fairy tale of who's responsible for 911? it sure as hell wasn't iraq.
No, it was Islamo-fascists from other muslim countries. I hope you have not bought the fairytale that the buildings were demolished and planes did not fly into them resulting in 3000 people dying too slowly and horribly
Oh, it was fascists
alright. The ones who run the US Government and if "islamo-fascists" were
involved it's because they were paid and/or in collusion with same. As far as
the buildings being "demolished" (with explosives) and planes hitting them,
they're not mutually
exclusive. In fact, I believe that's exactly what happened to WTC 1 and 2.
However, you and I both know that no plane hit Bldg 7. A fact
that should make you go hmmmmm. ;) Btw, have you seen Loose Change 2nd Edition?
Islamo-fascists ought to be defined as people of the muslim faith who subscribe to the ideology of fascism (government control of business -- corporate "capitalism"), as exemplified by Mussolini and Francisco Franco (and Bush of course ["christo-fascist"?]). Any other application of the term is just meaningless gobbledygook, a convoluting of the language for propaganda purposes. Can I safely assume that "Brer" is the same "Brer Rabbit" from LP?
agree and your assumption is correct.
There are no replies to Comment # 77. End Trace Mode for Comment # 77.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||