[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
World News See other World News Articles Title: How the East Can Save the West Europe: My honor is solidarity! That tells you all you need to know about the difference between modern Britain and the government of Vladimir Putin. They make Novichok, we make light sabers. One a hideous weapon that is specifically intended for assassination. The other an implausible theatrical prop with a mysterious buzz. But which of those two weapons is really more effective in the world of today?. (Boris Johnson) Lets begin this discussion with a few, basic questions. Question one: does anybody sincerely believe that Putin (the collective name for the Russian Mordor) really attempted to kill a man which Putin himself had released in the past, who presented no interest for Russia whatsoever who, like Berezovsky, wanted to return back to Russia, and that to do the deed Putin used a binary nerve agent? Question two: does anybody sincerely believe that the British have presented their allies (I will be polite here and use that euphemism) with incontrovertible or, at least, very strong evidence that Putin indeed did such a thing? Question three: does anybody sincerely believe that the mass expulsion of Russian diplomats will somehow make Russia more compliant to western demands (for our purposes, it does not matter what demands we are talking about)? Question four: does anybody sincerely believe that after this latest episode, the tensions will somehow abate or even diminish and that things will get better? Question five: does anybody sincerely believe that the current sharp rise in tensions between the AngloZionist Empire (aka the West) does not place the Empire and Russia on collision course which could result in war, probably/possibly nuclear war, maybe not deliberately, but as the result of an escalation of incidents? If in the zombified world of the ideological drones who actually remain in the dull trance induced by the corporate media there are most definitely those who answer yes to some or even all of the questions above, I submit that not a single major western decision maker sincerely believes any of that nonsense. In reality, everybody who matters knows that the Russians had nothing to do with the Skripal incident, that the Brits have shown no evidence, that the expulsion of Russian diplomats will only harden the Russian resolve, that all this anti-Russian hysteria will only get worse and that this all puts at least Europe and the USA, if not the entire planet, in great danger. And yet what just happened is absolutely amazing: instead of using fundamental principles of western law (innocent until proven guilty by at least a preponderance of evidence or even beyond reasonable doubt), basic rules of civilized behavior (do not attack somebody you know is innocent), universally accepted ethical norms (the truth of the matter is more important than political expediency) or even primordial self-preservation instincts (I dont want to die for your cause), the vast majority of western leaders chose a new decision-making paradigm which can be summarized in two words: highly likely solidarity This is truly absolutely crucial and marks a fundamental change in the way the AngloZionist Empire will act from now on. Lets look at the assumptions and implications of these two concepts. First, highly likely. While highly likely does sound like a simplified version of preponderance of evidence what it really means is something very different and circular: Putin is bad, poisoning is bad, therefore it is highly likely that Putin did it. How do we know that the premise Putin is bad is true? Well he does poison people, does he not? You think I am joking? Check out this wonderful chart presented to the public by Her Majestys government entitled A long pattern of Russian malign activity: Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|