[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Federal Judge Upholds Firearm Ban: ‘Not Within the Scope of…2nd Amendment’
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.westernjournal.com/fede ... pm&utm_content=western-journal
Published: Apr 6, 2018
Author: Rebekah Baker
Post Date: 2018-04-07 08:37:54 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 218
Comments: 2

Federal Judge Upholds Firearm Ban: ‘Not Within the Scope of…2nd Amendment’

By Rebekah Baker

April 6, 2018 at 11:59am

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that challenged Massachusetts’ ban on so-called assault weapons and large capacity magazines, the Boston Globe reported.

In a ruling on Friday, U.S. District Judge William Young stated that the ban doesn’t violate the Second Amendment, claiming that such weapons are “military firearms” and are thus not protected by the constitutional right to “bear arms.” “(T)he AR-15’s present day popularity is not constitutionally material,” he said.

Young also argued that the regulation of firearms is a policy issue, not a courts’ issue.

“Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens,” Young said. “These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment. Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous and robust debate about these matters. We call it democracy.” The “assault weapons” ban was enacted in Massachusetts in 1998.

In January of last year, a lawsuit against the ban was filed by the Massachusetts-based gun organization Gun Owners Action League after Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey told gun dealers and manufacturers that her office would begin enforcing the state’s 1998 law.

The pro-Second Amendment group’s lawsuit argued the ban is unlawful, and said it prevents law-abiding citizens from buying and possessing some of the most popular rifles in the country.

“The level of hostility to the gun-owning public in the state of Massachusetts has grown to be intolerable,” said lawyer Jay Porter. “At this point, it had grown to the level where litigation had become necessary. At some point, if you have a fundamental right, you have to protect it.”

“Our position is that the state doesn’t have the authority under the Second Amendment to ban firearms that are commonly kept by responsible law abiding citizens for lawful purposes … The Supreme Court has told us emphatically that the government cannot ban popular firearms which are commonly kept for lawful purposes.”

Attorney General Healey, who was a defendent in the case, applauded the judge’s decision.

“Today’s decision upholding the Assault Weapons Ban vindicates the right of the people of Massachusetts to protect themselves from these weapons of war and my office’s efforts to enforce the law,” she said in a statement.

“Strong gun laws save lives, and we will not be intimidated by the gun lobby in our efforts to end the sale of assault weapons and protect our communities and schools. Families across the country should take heart in this victory.”

The state’s Republican governor, Charlie Baker, also said he would support a federal ban on so-called assault weapons after the Feb. 14 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

The executive director of the Gun Owners Action League said he hasn’t yet seen the ruling and can’t make a comment, according to Chicago Tribune.


Poster Comment:

Video at source.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

I wonder why the term "arms" is used for the 2nd Amendment and the term firearms is used in statutes.

Ephesians 5:11King James Version (KJV)

11 "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. "

It's not terrorism when Amerika does it.

noone222  posted on  2018-04-07   9:00:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: noone222 (#1) (Edited)

I wonder why the term "arms" is used for the 2nd Amendment and the term firearms is used in statutes.

All we need to understand is the common usage of words at the time the 2nd Amendment was written and ratified.

Since muskets were the common arms of the day, swords and knives were also common arms. So these would be included.

Center fire cartridges were not invented until around 1870.

firearmshistory.blogspot.com/2010/05/cartridges-centerfire- cartridge.html

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2018-04-07   10:15:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]