[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Don't Eat Food In These 6 Restaurants (Applebees, Taco Bell, Olive Garden)

Nashville's Democrat Mayor Doxxes ICE Agents

"Billion-Dollar Ghost Town" Surrounds Under Armor Headquarters (Baltimore)

Pepe Escobar: Putin Drops Kursk BOMBSHELL, Russia-North Korea Alliance STUNS Trump

On That Big Beautiful Bill

Special Government Employees only serve 130 Days

Colorado is funding kink workshops spanking, whipping, and dungeons.

“You became aware that 329 children were being sent to the same fucking address. Who else knew about that?”

A company was paid almost $1.5 MILLION PER LOT just to cleanup each lot after Lahaina, Maui fires

Dumbing Down Students So Everyone is Equally Stupid.

UK to Build $1 Billion Kill Web to Unleash Cyber Attacks

10 U.S. States on the Brink of Collapse - Is Yours on the List? (Liberl Hohwash)

US Research Into Bioweapons Targeting Slavs Underway Since at Least the 1990s: Expert

Supreme Court Rules 8-0 to Limit Judicial Authority Over Environmental Cases

Nancy Pelosi Says Rahm Emanuel Will Probably Run for President in 2028

Israeli Mossad named as funder of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

Proof Kier Starmer Is As EVIL As You Think - Ricky Gervais Has Had Enough

DC Mayor Bowser Flip-Flops on Immigration, Moves To Repeal Sanctuary City Law: Report

A Palestinian Just Won the Pulitzer Prize. The Media is MAD.

The Al-gocracy Agenda: How AI and the Deep State Are Digitizing Tyranny

The Collapse Of China: $50 Trillion Debt Is Crashing China’s Entire Economy As Protests Erupt

Bird Flu Panic EXPOSED: Are They Planning Another Gain-of-Function Covid Disaster?

Seattle's Woke Problem: You Don't Hate Antifa Or Leftist Politicians Enough

FDIC: US Banks have $413 Billion in Unrealized Losses

Mexican Cartels Have Gone to War

Senate Ag Chair Balks At "Controversial" Mystery Meat Country-Of-Origin Labeling

Sen. Ron Johnson: What’s Really in the “Big Beautiful Bill,” and Uncovering the Truth About 9-11

CONTROVERSY at CALIFORNIA SCHOOL

A storm in the West: The liberal intellectual paradigm is broken

Twin Babies Die a Week After Receiving 3 Vaccines, Police Interrogate Parents


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Katie Pavlich: Schumer Only Wants To Protect Mueller for One Reason
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.westernjournal.com/kati ... pm&utm_content=western-journal
Published: Apr 18, 2018
Author: Randy DeSoto
Post Date: 2018-04-20 06:59:56 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 117
Comments: 2

Katie Pavlich: Schumer Only Wants To Protect Mueller for One Reason

By Randy DeSoto

April 18, 2018 at 4:35pm

Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich dismissed Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the Democrats’ stated reason for avoiding a “constitutional crisis” by wanting to pass legislation to protect special counsel Robert Mueller.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto the previous day he saw “no indication that Mueller’s going to be fired,” and therefore has no plans to take up such legislation on the Senate floor.

“I don’t think the president’s going to do that, and just as a practical matter, even if we passed (the bill), why would he sign it?” McConnell said.

Schumer responded to the GOP leader’s comments stating, “It’s a mistake not to pass legislation to protect the investigation. We ought to head off a constitutional crisis at the pass, rather than waiting until it’s too late.” Pavlich was not buying Schumer’s alarmist language.

“Democrats aren’t interested in preventing a constitutional crisis, they’re interested in protecting their political talking point of Russia because that is really all they have at this point,” she said.

Meanwhile, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said his committee will take up a bill designed to protect special counsels.

The legislation, drafted by both Republican and Democrat members on the committee, would codify regulations stipulating that only a senior Justice Department official can fire a special counsel.

Further, it would require an “expedited judicial review” within 10 days of the firing to determine if there had been “good cause.” If the review determines there was none, the special counsel would be reinstated.

“They got together, so I feel an obligation to keep my word and move forward,” Grassley said when asked if he would still give the bill a vote, The Hill reported.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

The legislation, drafted by both Republican and Democrat members on the committee, would codify regulations stipulating that only a senior Justice Department official can fire a special counsel.

That dog will never hunt.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2018-04-20   12:07:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Lod (#1)

That dog will never hunt.

The special counsel is an employee of the Executive branch. POTUS is in charge of that part of government and he has authority to hire and fire anyone in any department of it. And you are right, that dog will never hunt. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2018-04-20   16:08:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]