[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

"Gestapo" Müller - Hunting Hitler's Secret Police Chief

How Michelle Obama Could Become Democrats' Nominee after Biden's Terrible Debate, with Steve Bannon

Was This Lethal Spitfire Ace Killed by His Own Tactics?

Welsh Police Pay Home Visit To Man For Displaying Reform UK Political Sign

Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen

Trudeau govt to make all bathrooms in Parliament buildings GENDER NEUTRAL

French official admits censorship is needed for government to control public opinion

Bill Maher Predicts Trump Victory: The Left Is Aggressively Anti-Common Sense

Google is suppressing Blaze Media. Heres how you can help.

Large-scale prisons being secretly erected in all 50 states will they be used to house illegals or force Americans into concentration camps?

Hezbollah is ready to confront Israels military, with Jon Elmer

Balloons Land in Southern Lebanon, Warning Locals the Land Belongs to Jews

German Politician Hit With Hate Crime Investigation For Demanding Migrant Criminals Be Deported

DNC Caught Funneling Millions to Law Firms Involved in Unprecedented Lawfare Campaign Against Trump

Here Are The 20 Biggest Whoppers Biden Told During His Debate With Trump

NYC to ban cellphones in public schools.

New York Times Columnists Turn On Biden After Disastrous Debate Performance

8 Armed Men With Venezuelan Accents Violently Rob Denver Jewelry Store

Uvalde Police School Chief Indicted, Arrested Over Response To 2022 Shooting

Greetings from the Horse

Tonight confirmed every Democrats worst fear.

Five Women Soon To Die In 1928

How Trump Can Lose The Debate

Tucker Carlson Savagely Dismantles ‘Dumb’ and ‘Stupid’ Far-Left Reporter at Australian Freedom Conference

James Clapper, Mr. October Surprise: How Obama's Intel Czar Rigged 2016 And 2020 Debates Against Trump

Biden Campaign Balks Wont Commit to Drug Test

S-500 Prometheus: Designed To Kill Stealth Jets, ICBMs

The US military chases shiny new things and the ranks suffer

USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Now in the Med, USS Theodore Roosevelt Heads to the Middle East

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi mocks Democrat judge acting like a ‘confused simpleton’


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Dick Morris: Obama Ordered Wiretaps on Trump Before Election
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.westernjournal.com/dick ... ng&utm_content=western-journal
Published: Apr 19, 2018
Author: Dick Morris
Post Date: 2018-04-20 16:29:22 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 859
Comments: 3

Dick Morris: Obama Ordered Wiretaps on Trump Before Election

By Dick Morris

April 19, 2018 at 1:51pm

According to GOP Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, a member of the House Oversight Committee, “The text messages that I’ve had the privilege of reviewing and some of the other correlating information” suggest that the Obama administration — and the president himself — were “involved in the whole narrative of investigating Donald Trump” during the election.

He also said the Obama administration was involved in “drafting some of the action of the Department of Justice and the FBI” during the election to surveil Trump.

Moreover, Meadows said, not only was former President Barack Obama aware of the surveillance of Trump during the election, but he was personally involved in ordering it.

So when Trump said during his transition that Obama was wiretapping him, he was, in effect, quite right.

Meadows stressed that the justification for the surveillance was rooted in the Fusion GPS fake dossier, filled as it was with lies and false leads.

The progress of events is becoming clear:

The dossier, funded by a $12 million contract with the Clinton campaign, developed dirt — notional and fictitious as it was — that became the basis for surveillance of Trump and his staff.

This information was used to justify FISA warrants for further surveillance and to unmask the the names of Americans whose calls the NSA had intercepted.

Then, the resulting information was leaked to the media and came to dominate the headlines throughout the first half of 2017.

(My wife, Eileen, and I laid all this out in our book “Rogue Spooks: The Intelligence War on Donald Trump.”)

Each day, more of the story we unfolded and exposed is proving to be true and, if anything, somewhat understated.

As we discover that there was no collusion between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump, the key revelation that comes from this entire post-election investigation is that Obama and his intelligence agencies used government spying to try to defeat Trump during the election and discredit him afterward.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe is like an artifact of that effort, now searching for a new crime to prosecute, after failing to prove any of the previous allegations against Trump.


Poster Comment:

Obama screwed up big time. Granting wiretaps is the purview of the Courts, not the Executive branch. Now since Obama is no longer POTUS he has no immunity from prosecution.

But does the FISA Act allow for these ambitious spying programs on political opponents? I believe that is outside the bounds of that Act. ;)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Dick Morris getting this good? What's come over that neocon jewfool?

Yes, it stinks to high heaven. It's enuff to sink the entire SS Dummacrat -- let's hope it does some good.

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2018-04-20   17:06:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BTP Holdings (#0) (Edited)

Granting wiretaps is the purview of the Courts, not the Executive branch. ... But does the FISA Act allow for these ambitious spying programs on political opponents? I believe that is outside the bounds of that Act. ;)

Regardless of who won the 2016 Presidential election, the Anti-Russia narrative was under construction as far back as Putin's September 2013 intervention at the UN to avert a wider war against Syria. Soon after, a Color Revolution was launched in the Ukraine on Russia's border. When Crimea voted in March 2014 to return to Russia, Anti-Russia legislations were constructed retaliatively, some of which became part of the 2017 NDAA signed into law by Obama near the end of Dec. 2016 -- one of which was the Global Engagement Center legislation (Keyword: Global) that is now a State Department umbrella organization for much of the social media censorship of Conservatives (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and so on -- NATO/Atlantic Council connected GMF/German Marshall Fund financing; Soros/Alliance for Securing Democracy; etc.). A routine Intelligence Authorization bill was to be included in that NDAA, as well, but didn't pass. It had been under construction since Jan. 2016 and much of it was about Russia. In June of that year, it was ordered out of committee for a report on the day that a possibly staged incident occured at the US Embassy in Moscow between a Russian security guard outside and someone who had arrived to enter the building but may not have followed ID procedures. Democrat accusations of Russian interference in the election served to distance their party in the media from the ongoing investigations of HRC, the Uranium One campaign issue and to deflect scrutiny of some other Democrat leadership connections with Russians. The HRC commissioned Anti-Trump dossier served the same purposes, in addition to maybe being a retaliative counter-strike escalation re: the debate issue that she had raised about his alleged wrongful treatment of a woman who had violated a pageant contract and the issue he raised in response about her harsh treatment of President Clinton's female accusers. If HRC had won the election, the legislative groundwork for conflict with Russia was in place and would have proceeded in that direction, as it is now, but probably more stealthily and more aggressively.

For some months before the 2016 election, DHS was advocating that State election systems be added to our Critical Infrastructure categories and put under DHS administration. During that time, there was much political "chatter" in the media about the alleged Russia interference being an act of war. On Jan. 5, 2017, there was the high-level meeting that Susan Rice wrote about 15 days later on Inauguration Day, Jan 20. She noted that Obama had said something should be "done by the book" (Standard Operating Procedure?). The day after that meeting, Jan. 6, DHS Sec. Jeh Johnson declared our State voting systems to be Critical Infrastructure. An attack on any of our Critical Infrastructure categories would be considered an act of war. Even though whatever Russian interference they alleged was prior to Johnson's unilateral and Congressionally unauthorized decree (i.e. was not ex post facto/retroactively applicable as an act of war against US Critical Infrastructure), it wouldn't be the only time that Democrats have moved against the Constitution's prohibition of ex post facto retribution actions (or anything else about the Constitution that they don't agree with). If they expected that America would be in a state of war "officially enough" with Russia being designated an "election terrorist" nation or whatnot by the DHS officated declaration of our State election systems as Critical Infrastructure, then a President could (with "negligible" or no opposition to that pretense) order any surveillance they want without a court order for 15 days. The Rice letter about the Jan. 5 meeting was exactly 15 days after it on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20. The next day, Jan. 21, would have been 15 days after the DHS Critical Infrastructure announcement so, theoretically, President Trump and any number of others might have been under surveillance through his first day in office or longer without a court order (up to 15 days from the timeframe of his Inauguration oath), depending on when such warrantless surveillance might have been started. Also, the Attorney General might have authorized electronic surveillance without a court order to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2018-04-21   3:24:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GreyLmist (#2)

If HRC had won the election, the legislative groundwork for conflict with Russia was in place and would have proceeded in that direction, as it is now, but probably more stealthily and more aggressively.

If they expected that America would be in a state of war "officially enough" with Russia being designated an "election terrorist" nation or whatnot by the DHS officiated declaration of our State election systems as Critical Infrastructure, then a President could order any surveillance they want without a court order for 15 days. The Rice letter about the Jan. 5 meeting was exactly 15 days after it on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20. The next day, Jan. 21, would have been 15 days after the DHS Critical Infrastructure announcement so, theoretically, President Trump and any number of others might have been under surveillance through his first day in office or longer without a court order (up to 15 days from the timeframe of his Inauguration oath), depending on when such warrantless surveillance might have been started.

We sure are glad the sickly and corrupt Hildabeast went down in flames. What she did during the primary to knock Bernie Sanders out of the running was despicable enough.

As it is, the War Party is the ruling party in this country. We currently fly nuclear armed B-52s over the north pole and they are poised to attack targets in Russia if given the order. And NATO has extended its operations into Ukraine, which is on the western border of Russia.

So it the Russians feel threatened they certainly have the right to that opinion. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2018-04-21   5:28:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]